Interpreting Culture Index
Trail of BitsOfficialPublished by Trail of Bits
- Skill
- Role or persona
- Business and productivity
- CC-BY-SA-4.0
- Medium risk
- Has scripts
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides a structured methodology for analyzing Culture Index (CI) survey data. It emphasizes the importance of relative trait positioning over absolute scores, the distinction between hardwired survey traits and adaptive job behaviors, and the identification of burnout risks through energy utilization analysis. The skill guides users through interpreting individual profiles, assessing team composition using the Gas/Brake/Glue framework, and coaching managers based on behavioral patterns.
What it does
- Interprets individual behavioral profiles and identifies archetypes.
- Analyzes team composition to balance Gas, Brake, and Glue traits.
- Detects burnout risk by comparing survey traits against job-adaptive behaviors.
- Predicts behavioral traits from interview transcripts.
- Provides coaching recommendations for managers based on direct report profiles.
- Extracts and verifies CI data from PDF documents into structured JSON.
When to use it
- When you need to interpret an individual's Culture Index survey results.
- When assessing team dynamics or identifying gaps in team composition.
- When a team member shows signs of burnout or frustration in their role.
- When defining ideal behavioral profiles for new hiring roles.
- When mediating conflict between team members with different behavioral styles.
- When preparing for 1:1 coaching sessions with direct reports.
Advantages
- Prevents common interpretation errors like comparing absolute values.
- Provides a clear, data-driven approach to identifying burnout and flight risk.
- Standardizes the process of extracting and analyzing behavioral data.
- Offers actionable management and communication strategies for different archetypes.
- Reduces subjectivity in hiring and team development decisions.
Usage examples
- “I have a Culture Index PDF for a candidate. How do I interpret their profile?”
- The agent will guide you through the extraction process using the provided script, then analyze the resulting JSON to identify the candidate's archetype and key behavioral strengths.
- “Our team feels stuck. Can you analyze our composition?”
- The agent will request the CI profiles for the team members, assess the balance of Gas, Brake, and Glue traits, and identify potential gaps or areas of friction.
- “How do I manage a direct report who is a 'Craftsman' archetype?”
- The agent will provide specific management strategies, communication preferences, and motivational needs tailored to the Craftsman pattern.
- “Is this employee at risk of burnout?”
- The agent will compare the employee's survey traits with their job-adaptive behaviors to calculate energy utilization and identify stress signals.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/trailofbits/interpreting-culture-index/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip interpreting-culture-index.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Trail of Bits
<essential_principles>
Culture Index measures behavioral traits, not intelligence or skills. There is no "good" or "bad" profile.
<principle name="never-compare-absolutes"> **Never compare absolute trait values between people.**
The 0-10 scale is just a ruler. What matters is distance from the red arrow (population mean at 50th percentile). The arrow position varies between surveys based on EU.
Why the arrow moves: Higher EU scores cause the arrow to plot further right; lower EU causes it to plot further left. This does not affect validity—we always measure distance from wherever the arrow lands.
Wrong: "Dan has higher autonomy than Jim because his A is 8 vs 5" Right: "Dan is +3 centiles from his arrow; Jim is +1 from his arrow"
Always ask: Where is the arrow, and how far is the dot from it? </principle>
<principle name="survey-vs-job"> **Survey = who you ARE. Job = who you're TRYING TO BE.**
"You can't send a duck to Eagle school." Traits are hardwired—you can only modify behaviors temporarily, at the cost of energy.
Top graph (Survey Traits): Hardwired by age 12-16. Does not change. Writing with your dominant hand.
Bottom graph (Job Behaviors): Adaptive behavior at work. Can change. Writing with your non-dominant hand.
Large differences between graphs indicate behavior modification, which drains energy and causes burnout if sustained 3-6+ months. </principle>
<principle name="distance-interpretation"> **Distance from arrow determines trait strength.**
| Distance | Label | Percentile | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| On arrow | Normative | 50th | Flexible, situational |
| ±1 centile | Tendency | ~67th | Easier to modify |
| ±2 centiles | Pronounced | ~84th | Noticeable difference |
| ±4+ centiles | Extreme | ~98th | Hardwired, compulsive, predictable |
Key insight: Every 2 centiles of distance = 1 standard deviation.
Extreme traits drive extreme results but are harder to modify and less relatable to average people. </principle>
<principle name="l-and-i-exception"> **L (Logic) and I (Ingenuity) use absolute values.**
Unlike A, B, C, D, you CAN compare L and I scores directly between people:
Logic 8 means "High Logic" regardless of arrow position
Ingenuity 2 means "Low Ingenuity" for anyone
Only these two traits break the "no absolute comparison" rule. </principle>
</essential_principles>
When to Use
Interpreting Culture Index survey results (individual or team)
Analyzing CI profiles from PDF or JSON data
Assessing team composition using Gas/Brake/Glue framework
Detecting burnout risk by comparing Survey vs Job graphs
Defining hiring profiles based on CI trait patterns
Coaching managers on how to work with specific CI profiles
Predicting CI traits from interview transcripts
Mediating team conflict using CI profile data
When NOT to Use
For non-CI behavioral assessments (DISC, Myers-Briggs, StrengthsFinder, Predictive Index, Enneagram)
For clinical psychological assessments or diagnoses
As the sole basis for hiring/firing decisions — CI is one data point among many
<input_formats>
JSON (Use if available)
If JSON data is already extracted, use it directly:
import json
with open("person_name.json") as f:
profile = json.load(f)JSON format:
{
"name": "Person Name",
"archetype": "Architect",
"survey": {
"eu": 21,
"arrow": 2.3,
"a": [5, 2.7],
"b": [0, -2.3],
"c": [1, -1.3],
"d": [3, 0.7],
"logic": [5, null],
"ingenuity": [2, null]
},
"job": { "..." : "same structure as survey" },
"analysis": {
"energy_utilization": 148,
"status": "stress"
}
}Note: Trait values are [absolute, relative_to_arrow] tuples. Use the relative value for interpretation.
Check same directory as PDF for matching .json file, or ask user if they have extracted JSON.
PDF Input (MUST EXTRACT FIRST)
⚠️ NEVER use visual estimation for trait values. Visual estimation has 20-30% error rate.
When given a PDF:
Check if JSON already exists (same directory as PDF, or ask user)
If not, run extraction with verification:
uv run --no-project {baseDir}/scripts/extract_pdf.py --verify /path/to/file.pdf [output.json]Visually confirm the verification summary matches the PDF
Use the extracted JSON for interpretation
If uv is not installed: Stop and instruct user to install it (brew install uv or curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh). Do NOT fall back to vision.
PDF Vision (Reference Only)
Vision may be used ONLY to verify extracted values look reasonable, NOT to extract trait scores.
</input_formats>
<intake>
Step 0: Do you have JSON or PDF?
If JSON provided or found: Use it directly (skip extraction)
Check same directory as PDF for
.jsonfile with matching nameCheck if user provided JSON path
If only PDF: Run extraction script with
--verifyflaguv run --no-project {baseDir}/scripts/extract_pdf.py --verify /path/to/file.pdf [output.json]If extraction fails: Report error, do NOT fall back to vision
Step 1: What data do you have?
CI Survey JSON → Proceed to Step 2
CI Survey PDF → Extract first (Step 0), then proceed to Step 2
Interview transcript only → Go to option 8 (predict traits from interview)
No data yet → "Please provide Culture Index profile (PDF or JSON) or interview transcript"
Step 2: What would you like to do?
Profile Analysis:
Interpret an individual profile - Understand one person's traits, strengths, and challenges
Analyze team composition - Assess gas/brake/glue balance, identify gaps
Detect burnout signals - Compare Survey vs Job, flag stress/frustration
Compare multiple profiles - Understand compatibility, collaboration dynamics
Get motivator recommendations - Learn how to engage and retain someone
Hiring & Candidates: 6. Define hiring profile - Determine ideal CI traits for a role 7. Coach manager on direct report - Adjust management style based on both profiles 8. Predict traits from interview - Analyze interview transcript to estimate CI traits 9. Interview debrief - Assess candidate fit based on predicted traits
Team Development: 10. Plan onboarding - Design first 90 days based on new hire and team profiles 11. Mediate conflict - Understand friction between two people using their profiles
Provide the profile data (JSON or PDF) and select an option, or describe what you need.
</intake>
<routing>
| Response | Workflow |
|---|---|
| "extract", "parse pdf", "convert pdf", "get json from pdf" | workflows/extract-from-pdf.md |
| 1, "individual", "interpret", "understand", "analyze one", "single profile" | workflows/interpret-individual.md |
| 2, "team", "composition", "gaps", "balance", "gas brake glue" | workflows/analyze-team.md |
| 3, "burnout", "stress", "frustration", "survey vs job", "energy", "flight risk" | workflows/detect-burnout.md |
| 4, "compare", "compatibility", "collaboration", "multiple", "two profiles" | workflows/compare-profiles.md |
| 5, "motivate", "engage", "retain", "communicate" | Read references/motivators.md directly |
| 6, "hire", "hiring profile", "role profile", "recruit", "what profile for" | workflows/define-hiring-profile.md |
| 7, "manage", "coach", "1:1", "direct report", "manager" | workflows/coach-manager.md |
| 8, "transcript", "interview", "predict traits", "guess", "estimate", "recording" | workflows/predict-from-interview.md |
| 9, "debrief", "should we hire", "candidate fit", "proceed", "offer" | workflows/interview-debrief.md |
| 10, "onboard", "new hire", "integrate", "starting", "first 90 days" | workflows/plan-onboarding.md |
| 11, "conflict", "friction", "mediate", "not working together", "clash" | workflows/mediate-conflict.md |
| "conversation starters", "how to talk to", "engage with" | Read references/conversation-starters.md directly |
After reading the workflow, follow it exactly.
</routing>
<verification_loop>
After every interpretation, verify:
Did you use relative positions? Never stated "A is 8" without context
Did you reference the arrow? All trait interpretations relative to arrow
Did you compare Survey vs Job? Identified any behavior modification
Did you avoid value judgments? No traits called "good" or "bad"
Did you check EU? Energy utilization calculated if both graphs present
Report to user:
"Interpretation complete"
Key findings (2-3 bullet points)
Recommended actions
</verification_loop>
<reference_index>
Domain Knowledge (in references/):
Primary Traits:
primary-traits.md- A (Autonomy), B (Social), C (Pace), D (Conformity)
Secondary Traits:
secondary-traits.md- EU (Energy Units), L (Logic), I (Ingenuity)
Patterns:
patterns-archetypes.md- Behavioral patterns, trait combinations, archetypes
Archetype Deep Profiles (archetype-*.md):
archetype-administrator.md- The Administrator (High A, High B, Low C, Mid D)archetype-coordinator.md- The Coordinator (Low A, High B, Mid C, Low D)archetype-craftsman.md- The Craftsman (Low A, Low B, High C, High D)archetype-daredevil.md- The Daredevil (High A, Low B, Low C, Low D)archetype-debater.md- The Debater (Mid A, Mid-High B, Low C, High D)archetype-facilitator.md- The Facilitator (Low A, Mid B, Mid C, Low D)archetype-influencer.md- The Influencer (Low A, High B, Low C, Low D)archetype-operator.md- The Operator (Low A, Low B, High C, Mid-High D)archetype-persuader.md- The Persuader (High A, High B, Low C, Low D)archetype-philosopher.md- The Philosopher (Low A, Low B, High C, Low D)archetype-rainmaker.md- The Rainmaker (High A, High B, Low C, Low D)archetype-scholar.md- The Scholar (High A, Low B, Low C, High D)archetype-socializer.md- The Socializer (Low A, High B, Low C, Low D)archetype-specialist.md- The Specialist (Low A, Low B, High C, Mid D)archetype-technical-expert.md- The Technical Expert (Low A, Low B, High C, Low D)archetype-traditionalist.md- The Traditionalist (Low A, Low B, High C, High D)archetype-trailblazer.md- The Trailblazer (High A, Mid B, Mid C, Low D)
Application:
motivators.md- How to motivate each trait typeteam-composition.md- Gas, brake, glue frameworkanti-patterns.md- Common interpretation mistakesconversation-starters.md- How to engage each pattern and trait typeinterview-trait-signals.md- Signals for predicting traits from interviews
</reference_index>
<workflows_index>
Workflows (in workflows/):
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
extract-from-pdf.md | Extract profile data from Culture Index PDF to JSON format |
interpret-individual.md | Analyze single profile, identify archetype, summarize strengths/challenges |
analyze-team.md | Assess team balance (gas/brake/glue), identify gaps, recommend hires |
detect-burnout.md | Compare Survey vs Job, calculate EU utilization, flag risk signals |
compare-profiles.md | Compare multiple profiles, assess compatibility, collaboration dynamics |
define-hiring-profile.md | Define ideal CI traits for a role, identify acceptable patterns and red flags |
coach-manager.md | Help managers adjust their style for specific direct reports |
predict-from-interview.md | Analyze interview transcripts to predict CI traits before survey |
interview-debrief.md | Assess candidate fit using predicted traits from transcript analysis |
plan-onboarding.md | Design first 90 days based on new hire profile and team composition |
mediate-conflict.md | Understand and address friction between team members using their profiles |
</workflows_index>
<quick_reference>
Trait Colors:
| Trait | Color | Measures |
|---|---|---|
| A | Maroon | Autonomy, initiative, self-confidence |
| B | Yellow | Social ability, need for interaction |
| C | Blue | Pace/Patience, urgency level |
| D | Green | Conformity, attention to detail |
| L | Purple | Logic, emotional processing |
| I | Cyan | Ingenuity, inventiveness |
Energy Utilization Formula:
Utilization = (Job EU / Survey EU) × 100
70-130% = Healthy
>130% = STRESS (burnout risk)
<70% = FRUSTRATION (flight risk)Gas/Brake/Glue:
| Role | Trait | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Gas | High A | Growth, risk-taking, driving results |
| Brake | High D | Quality control, risk aversion, finishing |
| Glue | High B | Relationships, morale, culture |
Score Precision:
| Value | Precision | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Traits (A,B,C,D,L,I) | Integer 0-10 | 0, 1, 2, ... 10 |
| Arrow position | Tenths | 0.4, 2.2, 3.8 |
| Energy Units (EU) | Integer | 11, 31, 45 |
</quick_reference>
<success_criteria>
A well-interpreted Culture Index profile:
Uses relative positions (distance from arrow), never absolute values alone
Identifies the archetype/pattern correctly
Highlights 2-3 key strengths based on leading traits
Notes 2-3 challenges or development areas
Compares Survey vs Job if both are available
Provides actionable recommendations
Avoids value judgments ("good"/"bad")
Acknowledges Culture Index is one data point, not a complete picture
</success_criteria>
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer959 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer19.7 KiB
- SKILL.md14.0 KiB
- agents/openai.yaml246 B
- assets/trail-of-bits-mark.svg3.0 KiB
- references/anti-patterns.md8.1 KiB
- references/archetype-administrator.md3.7 KiB
- references/archetype-coordinator.md3.9 KiB
- references/archetype-craftsman.md3.6 KiB
- references/archetype-daredevil.md3.3 KiB
- references/archetype-debater.md4.1 KiB
- references/archetype-facilitator.md3.7 KiB
- references/archetype-influencer.md2.9 KiB
- references/archetype-operator.md3.6 KiB
- references/archetype-persuader.md3.4 KiB
- references/archetype-philosopher.md3.6 KiB
- references/archetype-rainmaker.md2.6 KiB
- references/archetype-scholar.md4.1 KiB
- references/archetype-socializer.md3.3 KiB
- references/archetype-specialist.md4.1 KiB
- references/archetype-technical-expert.md3.7 KiB
- references/archetype-traditionalist.md3.7 KiB
- references/archetype-trailblazer.md4.0 KiB
- references/conversation-starters.md9.6 KiB
- references/interview-trait-signals.md8.1 KiB
- references/motivators.md6.6 KiB
- references/patterns-archetypes.md6.7 KiB
- references/primary-traits.md12.5 KiB
- references/secondary-traits.md8.3 KiB
- references/team-composition.md6.2 KiB
- scripts/check_deps.pyScript2.6 KiB
- scripts/culture_index/__init__.pyScript564 B
- scripts/culture_index/constants.pyScript3.6 KiB
- scripts/culture_index/extract.pyScript5.6 KiB
- scripts/culture_index/models.pyScript371 B
- scripts/culture_index/opencv_extractor.pyScript15.6 KiB
- scripts/extract_pdf.pyScript7.0 KiB
- scripts/pyproject.toml422 B
- scripts/uv.lock66.6 KiB
- templates/burnout-report.md3.2 KiB
- templates/comparison-report.md3.3 KiB
- templates/hiring-profile.md3.9 KiB
- templates/individual-report.md2.5 KiB
- templates/predicted-profile.md5.6 KiB
- templates/team-report.md3.1 KiB
- workflows/analyze-team.md5.1 KiB
- workflows/coach-manager.md8.8 KiB
- workflows/compare-profiles.md6.2 KiB
- workflows/define-hiring-profile.md7.6 KiB
- workflows/detect-burnout.md6.1 KiB
- workflows/extract-from-pdf.md3.9 KiB
- workflows/interpret-individual.md5.7 KiB
- workflows/interview-debrief.md7.5 KiB
- workflows/mediate-conflict.md9.9 KiB
- workflows/plan-onboarding.md9.2 KiB
- workflows/predict-from-interview.md8.0 KiB
references/primary-traits.md
<overview>
The four primary traits (A, B, C, D) are the main drivers of behavior. The relationship BETWEEN dots is often more important than individual positions. All interpretations are relative to the red arrow (population mean).
</overview>
<trait name="A" color="maroon" label="Autonomy">
Measures mental initiative (think and start on their own) and inner self-confidence (belief in self that they will win regardless of circumstance).
<high_a side="right">
Characteristics:
Self-confident, self-starter, self-motivated, self-driven, self-reliant
Assertive, aggressive, ruthlessly competitive
Future-focused and strategic - sees the full 360-degree lay of the land
Prioritizes time based on ROI - trades in time and money
Willing to confront - conflict is just a means to an end
"Enough equals more" - always raises the bar, never satisfied
Opinionated - typically thinks they're the smartest person in the room
Challenges:
Single hardest trait to employ - they work for "me, Inc." first
"You are only RENTING high A's" - need mutually beneficial partnership
Kryptonite is people - people will consistently disappoint them
May take matters into their own hands when others "move too slow"
Can LEAD (vision, strategy) but struggle to MANAGE (routine operations)
Best Fit Roles: Leadership, sales, entrepreneurship, strategy
Communicating with High A's:
Use bullet points focused on ROI - they won't read walls of text
"Bake me a cake" approach: Give outcomes, not step-by-step instructions
Get buy-in through questions, not statements - let them "own" the idea
Prefer variable compensation (bonus, equity, commission) over fixed salary
Who High A's Respect:
People ahead of them (mentors, more successful peers)
People with inner confidence who aren't threatened by them
NOT people who capitulate or seem "weak"
</high_a>
<low_a side="left">
Characteristics:
Helpful, supportive, service-oriented, accommodating, peaceful
Servant leadership orientation - "what do WE need to win"
Tactical and present-focused (vs high A's strategic future-focus)
Excel at execution once direction is clear
Team-oriented - finds genuine satisfaction in supporting others' success
Prefers direction before acting - doesn't initiate on their own
Challenges:
Indecisive with NEW challenges - need frameworks, precedents, or direction
Conflict averse - may agree to things they don't support to keep peace
May be put in leadership roles they didn't seek (and will burn out)
Can appear passive when waiting for direction
Best Fit Roles: Support roles, customer service, collaborative teams, execution
Managing Low A's:
Provide specific praise, not general ("Great job on the Johnson proposal")
Offer consistent, predictable compensation over variable bonuses
Give clear frameworks for novel decisions
Don't interpret conflict avoidance as agreement - probe for true concerns
</low_a>
<leadership_styles>
| Style | Trait | Mindset | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABL (Action Based Leadership) | High A | "What do I need to win?" | Self-directed, competitive, drives from front |
| WPL (Wolf Pack Leadership) | Low A | "What do WE need to win?" | Collaborative, consensus-building, servant leadership |
Neither is better - depends on context. High-growth/turnaround may need ABL. Stable/complex operations may benefit from WPL.
</leadership_styles>
</trait>
<trait name="B" color="yellow" label="Social Ability">
Measures need for social interaction and persuasion.
<high_b side="right">
Characteristics:
Dual nature: Social competence (skill to connect) + need for acceptance (drive to connect)
Verbal processors - "think out loud." First statement isn't final position.
Relational equity required - must build relationship BEFORE discussing tasks
Culture builders - create positive atmosphere, the "fun part of the zoo"
Energized by people, drained by isolation
Fear: rejection, exclusion, being disliked
Managing High B's:
Words of affirmation are primary currency - verbal praise, public recognition
Allow small talk - it's not wasted time, it's relationship investment
Include them in group activities and social events
Don't isolate them with solo work for extended periods
Note: With Low C, they become "sprayers" - lots of fast talking
Best Fit Roles: Sales, PR, public speaking, management, team building
</high_b>
<low_b side="left">
Characteristics:
"There for the work" - not for relationships. Socializing feels like a tax.
Prefer solitary or small-group work environments
Process internally before speaking - silence does not equal disengagement
Analytical, reserved, focused - ideal for deep work
Fear: being forced into social situations, public attention
Managing Low B's:
Leave them alone - minimize unnecessary check-ins
Email/async preferred over meetings - let them process in writing
Private recognition - public praise is uncomfortable
Thoughtful gifts > verbal praise (a useful book means more than "great job")
Quality time: meaningful 1:1 > group settings
Don't mistake quiet for disengagement or unhappiness
Best Fit Roles: Engineering, accounting, research, coding, analysis
</low_b>
</trait>
<trait name="C" color="blue" label="Pace/Patience">
Measures patience, urgency, and rate of motion. Force multiplier - intensifies or calms how other traits manifest.
Analogy: High C = scheduled surgeons (focused, present, deliberate). Low C = emergency room operators (spinning plates, time-sensitive, variety).
<high_c side="right">
Characteristics:
Patient, steady, calm, consistent, resists sudden change
Extended focus capability - can concentrate for long periods
28-minute recovery from interruptions - protect their focus time
Sequential, systematic processing - one thing at a time
Checklist oriented - give structured approaches, they'll follow exactly
Consistency preferred - same desk, schedule, tools
Patient with complexity - will work through problems methodically
Managing High C's:
Send meeting agendas in advance - no surprises
One meeting, one topic - multi-topic meetings are stressful
Protect them from frequent interruptions
Provide predictable schedules and environments
Give advance notice of changes
Best Fit Roles: Administrative work, long-term projects, routine tasks, operations
</high_c>
<low_c side="left">
Characteristics:
Impatient, quick, fast, restless, multifocused, intense, urgent
Zero to 60 immediately - instant attention ramp-up
Short attention span - a bit of ADD tendency
Change agents - open to change primarily because they get bored easily
Struggle staying in the moment - constantly thinking "what's next?"
If D is not high: procrastination ("if I wait to the last minute, it only takes a minute")
Overextension/over-scheduling - overestimate how much they can accomplish
Pluses:
Create urgency and drive results (GSD - get stuff done)
Good with variety and pivots - pivot faster than high C
Good under pressure/stress (even if they look animated/hair on fire)
Firefighters - when attention turns to something, they're fully engaged
Minuses:
Can spin up others unnecessarily - disruptive when situation doesn't warrant urgency
Interrupt others ("Did you get that email? Did you get back to me?")
Moving fast leads to errors (especially without high D to catch mistakes)
Get bored easily - often over-promoted because "can I help?" is misread as ambition
Low C Motivators:
Variety - keep them busy, load them up
Evolving, changing environments - thrive in consistent pivots
Movement (mental or physical) in their day
Fires to fight - creative problems to solve
DEADLINES - critical motivator. Put deadlines in email subject lines.
Best Fit Roles: Startups, emergency response, rapid-fire environments
</low_c>
<c_as_modifier>
C acts as a force multiplier for other traits:
Low C (Intensifier): Adds urgency and "violence" to other traits
High B + Low C = Proactively social, "buzzing around," many shorter conversations
High D + Low C = Mistakes get called out QUICKLY
High A + Low C = Aggressive, impatient driver who demands results NOW
High C (Sedative): Calms and steadies other traits
High B + High C = Better listener, deeper conversations
High D + High C = Notices issues but approaches steadily, might fix it themselves quietly
High A + High C = Strategic and determined, but willing to wait for the right moment
</c_as_modifier>
</trait>
<trait name="D" color="green" label="Conformity">
Measures attention to detail, rules, and structure. Third confidence trait - confidence rooted in knowledge and competency.
<high_d side="right">
Characteristics:
Accurate, careful, detail-oriented, historical, specific, micro-organized
Need SOPs - must lay "railroad tracks" for them to stay on track
Won't feel comfortable doing anything until they've mastered it - "no" until "know"
Look back to see what the measurement is before acting (historical mindset)
High levels of self-discipline and self-management
Their own worst critic - take themselves "behind the woodshed" when they make mistakes
Long memories - remember nitpicky particulars, including who failed them in 2018
Currency they trade in is knowledge - all the certifications
Pluses:
Reliable, dependable, consistent quality
Executors and finishers - sustain and maintain things, circle back around
Highly accountable - will do what they say
Risk mitigation experts - defenders of what's right, defenders of the truth
Good delegation targets - when you delegate to them, certainty they'll do it well (if properly defined)
Quality control, compliance, operational excellence backbone
Minuses:
Lost without SOPs - struggle outside the box, inflexible, rigid
Uncomfortable when asked to do something beyond normal role
Don't naturally delegate - hard to trust others, becomes bottleneck
Long memories can lead to grudge-holding
Critical - find the flaw, focus on what's wrong (even when 9 of 10 things are right)
Judgmental - "I give 110%, you should too"
Thin-skinned and blame-avoidant when confronted personally
High D Motivators:
Don't make it personal - frame as process improvement, not personal failure
Training and learning opportunities - the currency is knowledge
Structured, accountable environment
Recognition for hard work - but ONLY if deserved
Fair pay based on education, experience, market rates
Trust - huge word for high Ds. Don't break it.
Best Fit Roles: Finance, compliance, quality control, legal, security, ops
</high_d>
<low_d side="left">
Characteristics:
Non-conforming, out of the box, free-spirited, conceptual, casual, flexible
Don't need historical context or proof of concept to experiment
Every day is a new day - shorter recall, don't hold on to yesterday
Really good at getting things 80% done, then need others for maintenance/finishing
Unfiltered - don't always mind their p's and q's
Rules are meant to be interpreted, bent, broken
Pluses:
Willingness to delegate (opposite of high D)
Flexible and resilient - don't see limitations
Creative brainstorming partners - look at things in non-traditional ways
Good with innovation and experimentation
Shorter recall = resiliency (get kicked in the mouth today, blank slate tomorrow)
Minuses:
Inconsistent follow-through - out of sight, out of mind
Forgetful - need systems/automation to catch things
Sloppy execution when disinterested
Don't always stay in their lane - don't see lanes as much
Won't circle back on finer details without systems
Low D Motivators:
Creative problems to solve - give them something to figure out
Room to run - freedom from too much structure and too many rules
Options - don't box them in, offer choices
Pick your battles - focus on the 3 things that financially move the needle
Best Fit Roles: Strategy, creative roles, R&D, visionary leadership
</low_d>
<key_relationship>
"The A starts, the D finishes."
A initiates and drives; D executes and completes
Building NEW processes: High A + High D = architects, scholars, technical experts
Optimizing EXISTING processes: Low A + High D = specialists
Independence Types:
High A independence: "I have a goal, I have a plan, I don't care if anyone follows me"
Low D independence: "Don't control me. Don't tell me not to do something."
Most independent people: High A + Low D
Greatest risk takers: High A + Low D
Most risk averse: Low A + High D
</key_relationship>
</trait>
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Declares allowed tools, Needs network access, Needs Python
Security
What our scanner noticed· Medium risk
- Instructions that use the network
- Downloads piped into a shell
- Scripts that your agent may run
This skill includes scripts that your agent may run. Read them before you use it.
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Trail of Bits
- Publisher
- Trail of Bits (Official)
- Source
- trailofbits/skills · plugins/culture-index/skills/interpreting-culture-index · commit e4dd0bb
- Licence
- Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Trail of Bits or Trail of Bits.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download interpreting-culture-index.zip