Hf Cloud Sagemaker Deployment Planner
Hugging FaceOfficialPublished by Hugging Face
- Skill
- Meta (authoring, orchestration, planning, memory)
- Cloud and DevOps
- Apache-2.0
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
The SageMaker Deployment Planner acts as the primary entry point for users looking to host models on AWS. It streamlines the deployment process by gathering essential requirements, such as model type and traffic patterns, to recommend the most efficient serving pathway. The skill coordinates with specialized sub-skills to handle context discovery, IAM configuration, image selection, and production deployment, ensuring a structured and informed path to hosting.
What it does
- Identifies the appropriate SageMaker deployment pathway based on model type and traffic needs.
- Conducts discovery to determine model requirements and operational constraints.
- Checks AWS service quotas to prevent deployment failures due to resource limits.
- Recommends optimal instance types for specific model architectures and cost profiles.
- Coordinates with downstream skills for environment setup, IAM, and infrastructure deployment.
- Provides clear, actionable recommendations while allowing user flexibility.
When to use it
- When you need to deploy, host, or serve a model on Amazon SageMaker.
- When you are unsure which SageMaker deployment option (real-time, async, serverless) fits your use case.
- When you want to ensure your model deployment is configured with reasonable production defaults.
- When you need to verify account quotas before attempting to launch infrastructure.
Advantages
- Reduces complexity by abstracting AWS infrastructure decisions.
- Prevents common deployment errors by checking service quotas upfront.
- Optimizes cost and performance by selecting the right serving stack for the specific model.
- Provides a consistent, guided workflow for various model types including LLMs and embeddings.
Usage examples
- “I need to deploy my fine-tuned Llama-3 model on AWS, can you help?”
- The agent will ask for the model artifact location and expected traffic, then recommend a real-time endpoint on an appropriate instance type.
- “I have an embedding model that I need to host on SageMaker, but I'm not sure how to start.”
- The agent will identify the model as an embedding task, suggest a CPU-based real-time endpoint, and initiate the deployment workflow.
- “I want to deploy a stable diffusion model for async inference.”
- The agent will confirm the async requirements and coordinate the deployment using the async inference pathway.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/huggingface/hf-cloud-sagemaker-deployment-planner/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip hf-cloud-sagemaker-deployment-planner.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Hugging Face
SageMaker Deployment Planner
You are helping a user deploy a model to Amazon SageMaker. Most users invoking this skill want the model deployed with reasonable defaults, in as few questions as possible. Ask only what you need, recommend a pathway honestly, and hand off to the specialized skills.
Workflow phases
Discovery — what is being deployed and what are the constraints (this skill)
Pathway selection — real-time / serverless / async / batch / Bedrock CMI (this skill)
Context preflight —
hf-cloud-aws-context-discovery, thenhf-cloud-python-env-setupIAM preflight —
hf-cloud-sagemaker-iam-preflightImage selection —
hf-cloud-serving-image-selectionDeployment —
hf-cloud-sagemaker-production-defaults
Phases 1–2 are this skill's job. The others activate when their patterns match.
Discovery: ask only what you need
You will eventually need to know:
What model: HuggingFace ID, S3 path to artifacts, or model name. If the user is vague ("the model I fine-tuned"), ask for the artifact location.
Model type: text-generation LLM, embedding/reranker, or other (classifier, NER, etc.). This determines the serving stack — usually inferable from the model name (anything ending in
-embed-*, starting withBAAI/bge-,sentence-transformers/*etc. is embeddings; chat/instruct models are LLMs). Only ask if it's genuinely ambiguous.Traffic shape: roughly how often will this be called?
Latency tolerance: interactive, near-real-time, or async?
Cost sensitivity: ask only if the user signals it or the traffic pattern is ambiguous.
Region comes from hf-cloud-aws-context-discovery — don't ask unless the user volunteers it.
Do not front-load all of these. A common minimal set is just: what model, and roughly how often will it be called? The model name usually settles the model-type question. That alone is often enough to narrow the pathway to two candidates. If the user already told you something, don't ask again.
Pathway selection
| Pathway | When it fits | When it does not |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time endpoint | Steady traffic, sub-second to few-second latency, always-on | Very spiky or very sparse traffic (wastes money on idle) |
| Real-time, scale to zero | Sparse or scheduled traffic, dev/test endpoints, and a client that tolerates a ~9 min first request after idle | Any interactive SLA: every request during the wake fails with a 400 |
| Serverless inference | Spiky/intermittent, tolerates cold starts (~10s+), simpler models | LLMs above a few B params (memory/cold-start limits), strict SLAs |
| Async inference | Long inference (>60s), large payloads, queue-friendly | Interactive synchronous calls |
| Batch transform | Offline scoring over a dataset | Anything online or interactive |
| Bedrock Custom Model Import | Wants Bedrock-compatible API, supported base family, weights only | Custom inference logic, unsupported architectures |
For LLMs, real-time endpoints are the default unless traffic is explicitly spiky/sparse or inference is long-running. Serverless looks attractive for "low traffic" cases but most LLMs exceed its memory limits.
For embeddings, real-time is again the default — but CPU instances are usually the right choice (much cheaper, fast enough for most embedding workloads). Don't reflexively recommend GPU instances for embedding models; ask hf-cloud-serving-image-selection to consider CPU variants if the model is small (<1B params) and traffic is moderate.
For text-to-image, video generation, or other long-inference workloads (>30s per request) where traffic is also bursty: async inference is the right answer. It supports genuine scale-to-zero between batches and queues requests via S3, so you don't pay for idle GPU. hf-cloud-sagemaker-production-defaults has a dedicated deploy_async.py for this.
Real-time, real-time scale-to-zero, and async are the three scripted pathways (deploy.py, deploy_ic.py, deploy_async.py in hf-cloud-sagemaker-production-defaults). Serverless, batch transform, and Bedrock Custom Model Import are not currently scripted — for those, hand the user off with a brief explanation rather than trying to deploy them through this workflow.
Scale to zero, real-time or async? Both reach zero and both make the first request after idle slow. Pick async when one inference can exceed the 60s InvokeEndpoint limit, when payloads are large, or when the client can accept an S3 result instead of a synchronous response. Pick real-time scale-to-zero when the client needs a normal synchronous HTTP response and can retry through the wake. Real-time scale-to-zero needs inference components; the plain real-time pathway cannot go below one instance.
If two pathways are both reasonable, say so in one sentence each and pick one. Don't bury the recommendation in options.
Instance selection: check quota before recommending
Endpoint quotas are per instance type, per region, and default to 0 for GPU types in many accounts. Recommending an instance the account can't launch wastes a full deploy cycle on ResourceLimitExceeded. Check first:
aws service-quotas list-service-quotas --service-code sagemaker --region <region> \
--query "Quotas[?contains(QuotaName, 'for endpoint usage') && Value > \`0\`].[QuotaName, Value]" \
--output tableIf the type you want isn't in the result, recommend one that is — or tell the user to request an increase (hours to days) before creating anything.
If the call itself is denied, say so once and continue. The quota check is an optimization, not a gate: the deployment surfaces the real limit as ResourceLimitExceeded. Never stop the workflow, and never ask the user to change IAM, for a preflight check.
GPU family notes for the common 24 GB tier:
ml.g5.*(A10G) andml.g6.*(L4) both work with current vLLM images when the gpu-3-1 AMI is set (seehf-cloud-serving-image-selection). g6 is the newer generation and slightly cheaper per hour; g5 has roughly double the memory bandwidth, which usually means better LLM token throughput. Pick whichever has quota; when both do, either is defensible — g5 for throughput, g6 for cost.ml.g6e.*(L40S, 48 GB) when the model doesn't fit in 24 GB.
Once you have enough to recommend, state it plainly:
Based on what you've told me, I'd recommend a real-time endpoint on
ml.g5.xlarge. The model is small enough that this is cost-effective, and your traffic pattern is steady enough that you won't be paying for idle. Alternative: serverless would be cheaper if traffic dries up for hours at a time, but Qwen3-0.6B is at the edge of serverless memory limits and cold starts would be 15–30s. Want me to proceed with the real-time endpoint?
Then wait for confirmation. The user should know what they're about to spend money on before you create anything.
The plan lives in the conversation — don't generate plan.yaml or similar artifacts unless explicitly asked.
Style
Users invoking this skill are deferring to the agent because they don't want to do AWS plumbing. Match that energy: efficient, not exhaustive.
One round of clarifying questions is usually enough. Three rounds is interrogation.
When you don't know something specific (current image URI, SDK API surface, quotas), check it rather than guess. Other skills handle the "how to check" details.
If the user pushes back on a recommendation, accept it. They know their constraints better than you do.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer918 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.1 KiB
- SKILL.md8.4 KiB
LICENSE
Apache License
Version 2.0, January 2004
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
1. Definitions.
"License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
"Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
the copyright owner that is granting the License.
"Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
"control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
"You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
exercising permissions granted by this License.
"Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
including but not limited to software source code, documentation
source, and configuration files.
"Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
and conversions to other media types.
"Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
(an example is provided in the Appendix below).
"Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
"Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
"Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
subsequently incorporated within the Work.
2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
(except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
as of the date such litigation is filed.
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
meet the following conditions:
(a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
(b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
stating that You changed the files; and
(c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
the Derivative Works; and
(d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
as modifying the License.
You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
the conditions stated in this License.
5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing
the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.
END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
identification within third-party archives.
Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Needs a command-line tool, Needs Python
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Hugging Face
- Publisher
- Hugging Face (Official)
- Source
- huggingface/skills · skills/hf-cloud-sagemaker-deployment-planner · commit 25910b3
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Hugging Face or Hugging Face.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download hf-cloud-sagemaker-deployment-planner.zip