Generated banner for Shipping And Launch
Generated logo for Shipping And Launch

Shipping And Launch

Addy OsmaniCommunityCreated by Addy Osmani

  • Skill
  • Guidelines
  • Cloud and DevOps
  • MIT
  • No issues found

From the author

Prepares production launches. Use when preparing to deploy to production, or when asking what needs to be in place before shipping. Use when you need a pre-launch checklist, when setting up monitoring, when planning a staged rollout, or when you need a rollback strategy.
— the description by Addy Osmani

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

This skill provides a structured approach to production launches, emphasizing safety through incremental rollouts, monitoring, and clear rollback strategies. It includes detailed checklists for code quality, security, performance, and accessibility, alongside operational guidance on feature flags, error budgets, and post-launch verification to ensure reliable service delivery.

What it does

  • Provides a comprehensive pre-launch checklist covering code, security, performance, and infrastructure.
  • Defines a staged rollout sequence using feature flags to minimize risk.
  • Establishes objective decision thresholds for advancing or rolling back deployments.
  • Outlines monitoring and observability requirements for production environments.
  • Provides a template for creating formal rollback plans for every deployment.
  • Integrates error budget policies to govern release velocity.

When to use it

  • When preparing to deploy new features or significant changes to production.
  • When planning a migration of data or infrastructure.
  • When setting up a new beta or early access program.
  • When establishing standard operating procedures for safe, incremental releases.

Advantages

  • Reduces deployment risk through standardized verification steps.
  • Ensures observability is built-in before code reaches users.
  • Promotes a culture of safety by mandating rollback plans.
  • Decouples deployment from release using feature flags.
  • Provides objective criteria to prevent shipping broken features.

Usage examples

“Create a rollback plan for our upcoming database migration.”
The agent generates a structured rollback plan including trigger conditions, specific revert steps, and verification procedures to ensure data integrity.
“What should I check before deploying this new API endpoint to production?”
The agent provides a prioritized checklist covering security headers, input validation, rate limiting, and health check configurations.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/addyosmani/shipping-and-launch/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip shipping-and-launch.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by Addy Osmani

Shipping and Launch

Overview

Ship with confidence. The goal is not just to deploy — it's to deploy safely, with monitoring in place, a rollback plan ready, and a clear understanding of what success looks like. Every launch should be reversible, observable, and incremental.

When to Use

  • Deploying a feature to production for the first time

  • Releasing a significant change to users

  • Migrating data or infrastructure

  • Opening a beta or early access program

  • Any deployment that carries risk (all of them)

The Pre-Launch Checklist

Code Quality
  • [ ] All tests pass (unit, integration, e2e)

  • [ ] Build succeeds with no warnings

  • [ ] Lint and type checking pass

  • [ ] Code reviewed and approved

  • [ ] No TODO comments that should be resolved before launch

  • [ ] No console.log debugging statements in production code

  • [ ] Error handling covers expected failure modes

Security
  • [ ] No secrets in code or version control

  • [ ] The ecosystem's dependency audit (npm audit, pip-audit, cargo audit, ...) shows no critical or high vulnerabilities

  • [ ] Input validation on all user-facing endpoints

  • [ ] Authentication and authorization checks in place

  • [ ] Security headers configured (CSP, HSTS, etc.)

  • [ ] Rate limiting on authentication endpoints

  • [ ] CORS configured to specific origins (not wildcard)

Performance
  • [ ] Core Web Vitals within "Good" thresholds

  • [ ] No N+1 queries in critical paths

  • [ ] Images optimized (compression, responsive sizes, lazy loading)

  • [ ] Bundle size within budget

  • [ ] Database queries have appropriate indexes

  • [ ] Caching configured for static assets and repeated queries

Accessibility
  • [ ] Keyboard navigation works for all interactive elements

  • [ ] Screen reader can convey page content and structure

  • [ ] Color contrast meets WCAG 2.1 AA (4.5:1 for text)

  • [ ] Focus management correct for modals and dynamic content

  • [ ] Error messages are descriptive and associated with form fields

  • [ ] No accessibility warnings in axe-core or Lighthouse

Infrastructure
  • [ ] Environment variables set in production

  • [ ] Database migrations applied (or ready to apply)

  • [ ] DNS and SSL configured

  • [ ] CDN configured for static assets

  • [ ] Logging and error reporting configured

  • [ ] Health check endpoint exists and responds

Documentation
  • [ ] README updated with any new setup requirements

  • [ ] API documentation current

  • [ ] ADRs written for any architectural decisions

  • [ ] Changelog updated

  • [ ] User-facing documentation updated (if applicable)

Feature Flag Strategy

Ship behind feature flags to decouple deployment from release:

// Feature flag check
const flags = await getFeatureFlags(userId);

if (flags.taskSharing) {
  // New feature: task sharing
  return <TaskSharingPanel task={task} />;
}

// Default: existing behavior
return null;

Feature flag lifecycle:

1. DEPLOY with flag OFF     → Code is in production but inactive
2. ENABLE for team/beta     → Internal testing in production environment
3. GRADUAL ROLLOUT          → 5% → 25% → 50% → 100% of users
4. MONITOR at each stage    → Watch error rates, performance, user feedback
5. CLEAN UP                 → Remove flag and dead code path after full rollout

Rules:

  • Every feature flag has an owner and an expiration date

  • Clean up flags within 2 weeks of full rollout

  • Don't nest feature flags (creates exponential combinations)

  • Test both flag states (on and off) in CI

Staged Rollout

The Rollout Sequence
1. DEPLOY to staging
   └── Full test suite in staging environment
   └── Manual smoke test of critical flows

2. DEPLOY to production (feature flag OFF)
   └── Verify deployment succeeded (health check)
   └── Check error monitoring (no new errors)

3. ENABLE for team (flag ON for internal users)
   └── Team uses the feature in production
   └── 24-hour monitoring window

4. CANARY rollout (flag ON for 5% of users)
   └── Monitor error rates, latency, user behavior
   └── Compare metrics: canary vs. baseline
   └── 24-48 hour monitoring window
   └── Advance only if all thresholds pass (see table below)

5. GRADUAL increase (25% -> 50% -> 100%)
   └── Same monitoring at each step
   └── Ability to roll back to previous percentage at any point

6. FULL rollout (flag ON for all users)
   └── Monitor for 1 week
   └── Clean up feature flag
Rollout Decision Thresholds

Use these thresholds to decide whether to advance, hold, or roll back at each stage:

MetricAdvance (green)Hold and investigate (yellow)Roll back (red)
Error rateWithin 10% of baseline10-100% above baseline>2x baseline
P95 latencyWithin 20% of baseline20-50% above baseline>50% above baseline
Client JS errorsNo new error typesNew errors at <0.1% of sessionsNew errors at >0.1% of sessions
Business metricsNeutral or positiveDecline <5% (may be noise)Decline >5%
When to Roll Back

Roll back immediately if:

  • Error rate increases by more than 2x baseline

  • P95 latency increases by more than 50%

  • User-reported issues spike

  • Data integrity issues detected

  • Security vulnerability discovered

Monitoring and Observability

What to Monitor
Application metrics:
├── Error rate (total and by endpoint)
├── Response time (p50, p95, p99)
├── Request volume
├── Active users
└── Key business metrics (conversion, engagement)

Infrastructure metrics:
├── CPU and memory utilization
├── Database connection pool usage
├── Disk space
├── Network latency
└── Queue depth (if applicable)

Client metrics:
├── Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS)
├── JavaScript errors
├── API error rates from client perspective
└── Page load time
Error Reporting
// Set up error boundary with reporting
class ErrorBoundary extends React.Component<React.PropsWithChildren> {
  state = { hasError: false };

  static getDerivedStateFromError() {
    return { hasError: true };
  }

  componentDidCatch(error: Error, info: React.ErrorInfo) {
    // Report to error tracking service
    reportError(error, {
      componentStack: info.componentStack,
      userId: getCurrentUser()?.id,
      page: window.location.pathname,
    });
  }

  render() {
    if (this.state.hasError) {
      return <ErrorFallback onRetry={() => this.setState({ hasError: false })} />;
    }
    return this.props.children;
  }
}

// Server-side error reporting
app.use((err: Error, req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => {
  reportError(err, {
    method: req.method,
    url: req.url,
    userId: req.user?.id,
  });

  // Don't expose internals to users
  res.status(500).json({
    error: { code: 'INTERNAL_ERROR', message: 'Something went wrong' },
  });
});
Post-Launch Verification

In the first hour after launch:

1. Check health endpoint returns 200
2. Check error monitoring dashboard (no new error types)
3. Check latency dashboard (no regression)
4. Test the critical user flow manually
5. Verify logs are flowing and readable
6. Confirm rollback mechanism works (dry run if possible)

Error Budget Release Gate

Your service's error budget — the fraction of requests or time your SLO allows to fail — determines whether it's safe to ship. Use it as an objective gate — not a negotiation:

Budget remaining > 20%  →  Ship normally; monitor closely
Budget remaining 0–20%  →  Slow rollouts only; no high-risk changes
Budget exhausted        →  Freeze feature work; focus entirely on reliability
Budget resets           →  Resume normal pace; bake in the fix that recovered it

A high burn rate during a canary (consuming budget faster than the baseline pace) is a hold signal in the rollout thresholds table above — treat it the same as an elevated error rate.

Rollback Strategy

Every deployment needs a rollback plan before it happens:

## Rollback Plan for [Feature/Release]

### Trigger Conditions
- Error rate > 2x baseline
- P95 latency > [X]ms
- User reports of [specific issue]

### Rollback Steps
1. Disable feature flag (if applicable)
   OR
1. Deploy previous version: `git revert <commit> && git push`
2. Verify rollback: health check, error monitoring
3. Communicate: notify team of rollback

### Database Considerations
- Migration [X] has a rollback: <verified command or runbook link>
- Data inserted by new feature: [preserved / cleaned up]

### Time to Rollback
- Feature flag: < 1 minute
- Redeploy previous version: < 5 minutes
- Database rollback: < 15 minutes

See Also

  • For the project-wide Definition of Done that every change must clear before this checklist, see ../../references/definition-of-done.md

  • For security pre-launch checks, see ../../references/security-checklist.md

  • For performance pre-launch checklist, see ../../references/performance-checklist.md

  • For accessibility verification before launch, see ../../references/accessibility-checklist.md

  • For the alerting rules and SLO-tied thresholds, see observability-and-instrumentation

Common Rationalizations

RationalizationReality
"It works in staging, it'll work in production"Production has different data, traffic patterns, and edge cases. Monitor after deploy.
"We don't need feature flags for this"Every feature benefits from a kill switch. Even "simple" changes can break things.
"Monitoring is overhead"Not having monitoring means you discover problems from user complaints instead of dashboards.
"We'll add monitoring later"Add it before launch. You can't debug what you can't see.
"Rolling back is admitting failure"Rolling back is responsible engineering. Shipping a broken feature is the failure.
"The error rate looks fine, let's keep shipping"Check the burn rate, not just the current error rate. Consuming budget faster than baseline is a hold signal even when individual thresholds are green.

Red Flags

  • Deploying without a rollback plan

  • No monitoring or error reporting in production

  • Big-bang releases (everything at once, no staging)

  • Feature flags with no expiration or owner

  • No one monitoring the deploy for the first hour

  • Production environment configuration done by memory, not code

  • "It's Friday afternoon, let's ship it"

  • Error budget exhausted but feature work continues unchanged

Verification

Before deploying:

  • [ ] Pre-launch checklist completed (all sections green)

  • [ ] Feature flag configured (if applicable)

  • [ ] Rollback plan documented

  • [ ] Monitoring dashboards set up

  • [ ] Team notified of deployment

After deploying:

  • [ ] Health check returns 200

  • [ ] Error rate is normal

  • [ ] Latency is normal

  • [ ] Critical user flow works

  • [ ] Logs are flowing

  • [ ] Rollback tested or verified ready

For every shipped service:

  • [ ] Error budget policy in place: know what action to take when budget drops below 20% and when it's exhausted

Files

Requirements and compatibility

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Security

No issues found by our static scan· No issues found

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Created by
Addy Osmani
Publisher
Addy Osmani (Community)
Source
addyosmani/agent-skills · skills/shipping-and-launch · commit 301b02b
Licence
MIT License (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Addy Osmani or Addy Osmani.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download shipping-and-launch.zip