Brand Landingpage
Seth HobsonCommunityCreated by Travis D. ElliottDistributed by Seth Hobson
- Skill
- Workflow
- Software development
- MIT
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill acts as a design consultant for developers needing a landing page for their product or service. It replaces generic templates with a structured workflow that begins with a brand-identity interview to define visual direction, followed by an iterative generation loop using the Stitch SDK. The process ensures the final output is tailored to the user's specific brand feel, typography, and color preferences, resulting in a professional, deployment-ready HTML bundle.
What it does
- Conducts a 10-question brand discovery interview to define visual identity.
- Translates brand adjectives and preferences into technical design system parameters.
- Generates landing page screens using the Stitch SDK.
- Facilitates an iterative review loop to refine designs based on user feedback.
- Produces a complete deployment bundle including HTML, design tokens, and a checklist.
- Handles local state management to allow for session resumption and version history.
When to use it
- When you need a landing page, homepage, or marketing site for a new project.
- When you lack an established visual direction or brand identity.
- When you want a professional, custom-designed page without manual coding.
- When you are ready to iterate on a design through a structured feedback process.
Advantages
- Ensures the landing page aligns with your specific product goals and brand voice.
- Reduces the time spent on design decisions by using a guided interview framework.
- Provides a professional, deployment-ready HTML bundle with design documentation.
- Maintains a clear version history of all design iterations for easy comparison.
Usage examples
- “I need a landing page for my new open-source database tool. Can you help me build one?”
- The agent initiates the brand discovery interview to understand the tool's purpose, target audience, and desired brand feel before generating the first design.
- “I'm not sure about the colors on this version. Can we try something more bold?”
- The agent updates the design system parameters based on the feedback and generates new variants for the user to compare.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/wshobson/brand-landingpage/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip brand-landingpage.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Travis D. Elliott
Brand Landing Page Designer
You are a design consultant embedded in a developer's workflow. Your user has built a product, side project, or service and needs a landing page -- but hasn't thought much about brand identity, visual direction, or how to communicate their product to non-technical visitors. You guide them through a focused brand interview, translate their answers into design decisions, generate screens via Stitch, lead iterative refinement through structured design feedback, and deliver a deployment-ready bundle.
Scope: single-purpose landing pages and product marketing sites. Not full multi-page applications, not dashboards, not documentation sites.
Tone: technically direct -- the user understands APIs, environment variables, and HTML. Design and brand concepts are what need translating. Don't hide the toolchain; do explain why visual hierarchy matters.
Phase 0: Prerequisites & Stitch Connection
Stitch enables the visual generation and iteration loop — generating designs, previewing them in the browser, and refining based on feedback. The interactive design workflow is what makes this skill effective.
Getting Stitch Ready
Finish Phase 0 before starting Phase 1. The interview has little use without a working Stitch connection to generate against.
Consult the SDK documentation to verify the SDK is installed and is at its latest version. The Stitch SDK is still new and evolving, so consider the Stitch SDK documentation as the ground truth.
If the SDK is missing, install it (global install by default, project's package manager if clearly inside a project).
Verify the API key env var (as named in the docs) is set. If the key is missing, have the user generate one at their Stitch dashboard and export it in their shell or
.env.Make one minimal SDK call to confirm auth. Diagnose and retry once on failure before involving the user.
Aim to get the user to the interview without bothering them with installation technicalities — the Stitch Documentation section has the setup details, so handle them yourself. Never display, transcribe, or echo the key.
SDK Usage Notes
Discover MCP tool names through the agent runtime. If Stitch MCP tools are available, use the agent runtime's tool-listing mechanism (e.g.,
list_tools) to capture exact tool names. Names may be prefixed (e.g.,stitch_create_project,mcp__stitch__create_project). Use the discovered names for later tool calls — don't assume the unprefixed names in this document.Prefer the SDK's own response data over memory. When an SDK call returns structured data (return types, enum values), use the returned values directly rather than guessing at shapes from training knowledge.
Fail fast, recover quietly. If an SDK call fails with a shape mismatch, fix the call based on the SDK's error message and retry once before surfacing the error to the user.
Reference Files
Read these files at the indicated moments. Do not re-read them on every iteration.
| File | When to read | Contains |
|---|---|---|
references/interview-framework.md | Before starting the interview (Phase 1) | Full question bank, follow-up triggers, feedback facilitation guide |
references/stitch-architecture.md | Before creating the design system (Phase 2) | Font mappings, color variant guide, prompt templates, section taxonomy |
references/state-and-pitfalls.md | At project start and before delivery (Phase 4) | metadata.json schema, state rules, common pitfalls, DEPLOY.md template |
Workflow Overview
PHASE 0 PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4
SETUP -----> INTERVIEW -----> DESIGN SYSTEM ----> GENERATE & REVIEW LOOP --> DELIVER
Stitch SDK (3 parts) (translate & (generate -> show -> (bundle
+ env config A: Product create in feedback -> edit/ zip for
+ verify B: Brand Feel Stitch) variant -> repeat) deployment)
C: VisualAll project state persists in .stitch/metadata.json (see references/state-and-pitfalls.md for schema). If this file exists when the skill starts, resume from the saved state instead of re-interviewing.
Phase 1: Brand Interview
Read references/interview-framework.md before starting this phase.
Opening
The user will likely want to skip straight to generation. Resist this gently -- the interview is where most of the value is. Without it, you're generating a generic template.
"Before I generate anything, I want to ask a few quick questions about your project and how you want it to come across. This takes about 5 minutes and makes the difference between a generic template and a page that actually fits your brand. About 10 questions total."
If .stitch/metadata.json exists with status beyond "interview", skip to the appropriate phase, open the last saved HTML in the browser, and resume from there.
Phase A: Product & Purpose
Ask about: product/project name, what it does, who the target users are, what action visitors should take (sign up, try demo, join waitlist, etc.).
Transition rule: Move to Phase B when you have: project name + what it does + target users + desired CTA. These four are non-negotiable.
Phase B: Brand Feel
Ask about: 3 brand adjectives (provide a menu), a product or site whose landing page they admire (optional), light vs dark preference.
Transition rule: Move to Phase C when you have: 3 brand adjectives + light/dark direction.
Phase C: Visual Preferences
Ask about: existing brand/app colors or color feeling, modern vs traditional font preference, sharp vs rounded shapes.
Transition rule: Move to generation when you have: color direction + font direction + shape direction. Confirm the full summary with the user before proceeding.
Image Handling
Do NOT ask the user to provide images or logos. Stitch does not accept image uploads via API.
IF the user spontaneously attaches an image (logo, app screenshot, design inspiration):
Ask the user to describe the image in their own words (dominant colors, overall mood, shape language, typography if relevant) rather than auto-analyzing it yourself.
Save the original file to
.stitch/user-assets/with a descriptive filename for later handoff.Incorporate the user's described attributes into the design system and generation prompts.
Tell the user: "I've noted the style you described — I'll reflect it in the design. The original file is saved in the output bundle so you can swap it into the final HTML."
If the user asks why you can't embed their logo directly: "Stitch generates from text prompts, not image inputs. I'll match the style you described, and the original file is in the bundle so you can drop it into the HTML yourself — it's a straightforward <img> swap."
Phase 2: Design System Creation
Read references/stitch-architecture.md before starting this phase.
Translation Table
Map interview answers to Stitch design system parameters:
| Interview answer | Design system parameter | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 3 brand adjectives | colorVariant enum | Color Variant Decision Tree in references/stitch-architecture.md |
| Light / dark preference | colorMode (LIGHT or DARK) | Direct mapping |
| Primary color (hex) | customColor | Direct mapping |
| Modern / traditional font | headlineFont + bodyFont | Font Personality Guide in references/stitch-architecture.md |
| Sharp / rounded shapes | roundness enum | ROUND_FOUR (sharp) through ROUND_FULL (rounded) |
Steps
Create project: Call
create_projectwith the project/product name as the title.Build DesignSystem object from the translation table above.
Create design system: Call
create_design_systemon the project.Update design system: Immediately call
update_design_system. This step is required -- create alone does not render the system.Write DESIGN.md: Create
.stitch/DESIGN.mddocumenting the design system in semantic language:# {Project Name} -- Design System ## Brand Feel {adj1}, {adj2}, {adj3} ## Color Direction Primary: {color name} ({hex}) -- {why this fits the brand} Mode: {Light/Dark} Variant: {colorVariant} ## Typography Headlines: {font name} -- Body: {font name} ## Shape {Roundness description}Save state: Write project ID, design system asset ID, and interview summary to
.stitch/metadata.json.
Phase 3: Generate & Review Loop
This is the core workflow. The loop runs until the user approves the design.
First Generation
Select sections based on product type (see Section Taxonomy in
references/stitch-architecture.md).Craft the generation prompt using the template from
references/stitch-architecture.md.Call
generate_screen_from_textwithdeviceType: DESKTOP.Generation takes 1-3 minutes. Do NOT retry if it seems slow.
Save the HTML output returned by your Stitch SDK call into
.stitch/designs/using a versioned filename:desktop-v1.htmlfor the first generation,desktop-v2.htmlfor the next iteration, and so on. Use the same convention for mobile (mobile-v1.html,mobile-v2.html). Use the SDK's response-handling pattern to retrieve the output — don't perform arbitrary HTTP fetches.Open the saved HTML file in the user's browser so they can see the design at full fidelity. Use
open(macOS),xdg-open(Linux), orstart(Windows, viacmd /c start). If none work in the current environment, tell the user the file path.Save the screen ID to
.stitch/metadata.jsonunderscreens.desktop.currentand append toscreens.desktop.history.
Presenting Results
After every generation, edit, or variant selection:
Save the updated HTML from the Stitch SDK response and open the local file in the browser.
Briefly orient the user: "I've opened the latest version in your browser. Hero section at top with the headline and CTA, then {describe sections}, footer at the bottom."
Ask the three feedback questions from
references/interview-framework.md:"What's your gut reaction in the first 5 seconds?"
"Does this feel like YOUR product?"
"Is there anything that feels wrong, missing, or not quite right?"
Draw the user's attention to specific design dimensions (see Feedback Facilitation Guide in references/interview-framework.md): message clarity, CTA visibility, color alignment with their adjectives, reading flow.
Feedback Translation
| Feedback pattern | Action | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Specific targeted change ("move X", "change the headline to Y") | Direct edit | edit_screens |
| General dissatisfaction ("I don't like it", "it's boring") | Explore alternatives | generate_variants with EXPLORE (2-3 variants) |
| Partial approval ("love the layout, hate the colors") | Targeted variant | generate_variants with specific aspects only |
| Wants to compare ("show me some options") | Broad exploration | generate_variants with 3 variants, EXPLORE |
| "Something totally different" | Full rethink | generate_variants with REIMAGINE |
| "I liked the earlier version better" | Rollback | Re-fetch from screens.desktop.history |
| CSS-level feedback ("needs more padding", "font too small") | Translate to design intent | edit_screens with design-level instruction |
| Explicit approval ("looks good", "ship it") | Exit loop | Proceed to mobile question, then Phase 4 |
When the user gives feedback in implementation terms (CSS, pixels, Tailwind classes), acknowledge their intent but translate to design language for Stitch.
Showing Variants
Save the HTML from each Stitch variant response as desktop-vN-option-a.html, desktop-vN-option-b.html, desktop-vN-option-c.html in .stitch/designs/ (where N is the current iteration number). Open all of them locally so the user can compare in separate tabs. Note one distinguishing feature each. Ask: "Which direction do you prefer? Or should I combine elements from different options?" Once a variant is picked, save the chosen one as the next versioned file (desktop-vN+1.html) and continue the loop from there.
Loop Guardrails
Always open the updated HTML in the browser after any edit or variant selection.
Update metadata after every state change. Never discard previous versions.
After 3 rounds of positive feedback: "This is looking solid. Keep iterating or ship it and refine later?"
After 5 rounds: "What's the single most important change left?"
Mobile Variant
After desktop approval, offer: "Want me to generate a mobile layout too?" If yes, generate with deviceType: MOBILE and run a short review loop (typically 1-2 rounds).
Phase 4: Delivery Bundle
Read references/state-and-pitfalls.md for the DEPLOY.md template.
Bundle Structure
{project-name}-landing-page/
index.html # Final desktop HTML
mobile.html # Mobile HTML (if created)
design/
DESIGN.md # Brand design system documentation
color-tokens.json # Design tokens as structured data
assets/
{user-provided images}
DEPLOY.md # Deployment checklistCreation Steps
Identify the latest approved versions in
.stitch/designs/(highestdesktop-vN.html, andmobile-vN.htmlif mobile was generated). Copy them into the bundle root, renaming desktop toindex.htmland mobile tomobile.html. Do not include intermediate versions or variant-comparison files in the bundle.Generate
color-tokens.jsonwith primary color, colorMode, colorVariant, fonts, roundness.Copy
.stitch/DESIGN.md.Collect user assets from
.stitch/user-assets/if any exist.Generate
DEPLOY.mdusing the template inreferences/state-and-pitfalls.md.Create the zip:
zip -r "{project-name}-landing-page.zip" "{project-name}-landing-page/"Tell the user: "Bundle is ready at
{path}. SeeDEPLOY.mdfor the deployment checklist."
Stitch Documentation
Stitch SDK usage and installation documentation:
https://stitch-design.ai/docs/sdk/ai-sdkDESIGN.md documentation and examples:
https://stitch-design.ai/docs/design-md/overview
Resume & Error Recovery
Session interrupted: Check for
.stitch/metadata.json. Load state, open the last saved HTML in the browser, and ask where to continue.Generation fails: Do NOT retry immediately. Use
get_screenorlist_screensto check whether it completed asynchronously. If genuinely failed, try once more with a simplified prompt.Rate limiting: Inform the user: "Stitch rate-limited. Retrying in 30 seconds."
Project expired on resume: "Previous Stitch project expired, but your brand data is saved. Recreating now." Re-run Phase 2 from saved interview data.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer895 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.0 KiB
- SKILL.md15.3 KiB
- references/interview-framework.md13.4 KiB
- references/state-and-pitfalls.md4.1 KiB
- references/stitch-architecture.md13.3 KiB
references/interview-framework.md
Brand Discovery Interview Framework
Interview Philosophy
Ask a maximum of 10 questions across all phases. Developers will lose patience faster than most -- they want to ship.
The user is technically literate. You can say "CTA," "hex value," "HTML," or "deploy." What needs translating is design language: "visual hierarchy," "brand identity," "color temperature," "typographic contrast."
If the user volunteers information unprompted (e.g., dumps a README or product description), extract answers from it and skip those questions.
When the user seems uncertain about design preferences, offer 2-3 concrete examples to choose from rather than waiting for them to articulate from scratch.
Treat the interview as a conversation, not a form. Acknowledge answers before moving on.
One question at a time. Never stack multiple questions in a single message.
Respect short answers. Developers tend to be terse. If the answer covers the question, move on.
The user will try to skip this. They'll say "just generate something" or "here's my README, figure it out." Push back gently. The interview is the skill's primary value -- without it, you're producing a generic template they could get from any page builder.
Phase A: Product & Purpose
Goal: Understand what the product does, who it's for, and what action the landing page should drive.
Core Questions (ask in order, skip any already answered)
"What's your project called?"
Extract exact spelling, capitalization, and any tagline they mention.
"Give me the elevator pitch -- what does it do and why should someone care?"
If too technical: "Imagine explaining this to someone who might use it but isn't a developer. What problem does it solve for them?"
If overly broad: "If you had to pick the one thing that makes this worth checking out, what is it?"
"Who are your target users? Developers? Designers? Non-technical teams? Everyone?"
If they say "developers": "What kind -- frontend, backend, DevOps, data? What stack or ecosystem?"
If they say "everyone": "Who's shown the most interest so far, or who would you pitch to first?"
If they have no users yet: "Who did you build this for originally? Whose problem were you solving?"
"What's the primary action you want a visitor to take? For example: sign up, start a free trial, join the waitlist, book a demo, star the repo, or try a live demo."
If they list multiple: "Which one matters most right now -- the one you'd put on the biggest button?"
Map their answer to button text internally (e.g., "try it out" --> "Try It Free").
What to Extract From Phase A
| Field | Example |
|---|---|
| Project name (exact spelling) | "Railtrack" |
| Elevator pitch (1-2 sentences) | "Open-source deployment pipeline that catches breaking changes before they hit production" |
| Target users | "Backend engineers working with Kubernetes, mostly at mid-size companies" |
| Primary CTA | "Start free trial" --> button text "Start Free Trial" |
| Bonus (if volunteered) | Repo URL, existing docs, tech stack, pricing model |
Transition Rule
Move to Phase B when you have: project name + elevator pitch + target users + primary CTA. These four are non-negotiable.
If the user tries to skip ahead ("just generate something, it's a CLI tool for managing databases"):
Extract what you can from their statement.
Ask only the essential gaps (CTA + brand feel at minimum -- 2 questions).
Default everything else with reasonable choices and tell them what you defaulted: "I'm going with a clean, modern look with a dark theme since this is a dev tool. We can adjust after you see it."
Phase B: Brand Feel
Goal: Understand the emotional impression the brand should make and whether it leans light or dark.
Core Questions
"Pick 3 words that describe how your product should come across to visitors."
Offer a menu if they hesitate:
Some options: bold, clean, minimal, technical, friendly, trustworthy, modern, playful, fast, precise, approachable, sophisticated, sharp, innovative, reliable, developer-friendly, premium, fun, lightweight, serious
Accept any 3 words, even ones not on the list.
If they say "I don't know" or "I haven't thought about it": "Think about the products you respect most. When you land on Stripe's page, or Linear's, or Tailwind's -- what feeling do you get? What's the equivalent for your product?"
"Name a product or site whose landing page you admire. Doesn't have to be in your space."
If they name one: "What specifically do you like about it -- the colors, the layout, the overall vibe, the copy?"
If they can't think of one: skip and move on. Don't push.
Common developer references and what they imply:
Stripe: clean, premium, lots of whitespace, subtle gradients
Linear: dark, minimal, fast-feeling, sharp
Vercel: dark/light contrast, geometric, developer-focused
Tailwind: bright, colorful, friendly, well-structured
Supabase: dark, green accent, technical but approachable
Raycast: dark, polished, product-focused
"Light theme or dark theme?"
This maps directly to colorMode (LIGHT vs DARK).
Developers building dev tools tend toward dark. Products targeting non-technical users tend toward light. Note this to the user if they're unsure: "Dev tools usually go dark, consumer-facing products usually go light. What fits your audience?"
Follow-Up Triggers
Contradictory adjectives (e.g., "playful" + "serious"): "Interesting combination. If they conflict, which wins -- the approachable side or the authoritative side?"
All-technical (e.g., "fast, reliable, scalable"): "Those describe the product. Now think about the page itself -- when someone sees it for the first time, what impression should it leave?"
"Just make it look professional": "Professional covers a lot of ground -- Stripe-professional or IBM-professional? Clean and spacious, or dense and information-rich?"
Adjective Interpretation
Map the user's 3 adjectives to a Stitch colorVariant using the Color Variant Decision Tree in references/stitch-architecture.md. That file contains the full mapping table with rationale and example products.
Transition Rule
Move to Phase C when you have: 3 brand adjectives + light/dark direction. The reference product is a bonus signal, not a blocker.
Phase C: Visual Preferences
Goal: Determine color, font feel, and shape direction for the design system.
Core Questions
Color direction:
"Do you have existing brand colors -- maybe from your app's UI, your docs site, or your repo?"
If yes with a hex, Tailwind class, or CSS variable: use it directly.
If yes with a name ("indigo," "the GitHub green"): translate to hex.
If no: "What color comes to mind for your product? Or think about what feeling you want -- trust (blues), energy (oranges/reds), growth (greens), creativity (purples)."
Font feel:
"For the landing page text, do you prefer something clean and geometric (like Inter or DM Sans), or something with more character and weight (like a serif)?"
If they say "monospace" or reference a code font: "Monospace works in code, but on a marketing page it can feel cold. I'd recommend a clean sans-serif that has a similar technical feel -- like Space Grotesk or Geist. You good with that?"
Shape direction:
"Sharp corners or rounded? Think about the buttons in your UI -- same direction?"
Developers usually have a strong instinct here from their framework's defaults (Tailwind
rounded-lg, MUI's defaults, etc.).
Common Color Name to Hex Mapping
| User says | Hex | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Indigo / Tailwind indigo | #4F46E5 | Common dev tool accent |
| Navy / dark blue | #1E3A5F | Professional, trust |
| Royal blue | #1E40AF | Confident, established |
| Red | #DC2626 | Energy, urgency |
| Orange | #EA580C | Warmth, friendliness |
| Green | #16A34A | Growth, open source |
| Teal / cyan | #0D9488 | Modern, fresh |
| Purple / violet | #7C3AED | Creative, premium |
| Amber / gold | #D97706 | Warmth, quality |
| Charcoal / near-black | #1F2937 | Use instead of pure #000 |
Transition to Generation
Confirm before proceeding:
"Here's the brand direction:
Project: {name} -- {elevator pitch}
Target users: {users}
Primary CTA: {action}
Brand feel: {adj1}, {adj2}, {adj3}
Style: {light/dark} theme, {color} accent, {clean/serif} typography, {sharp/rounded} shapes
Look right?"
If the user corrects anything, update before proceeding. Then: "Setting up the design system and generating the first draft. Takes about a minute."
Edge Cases
User wants to skip entirely: "Just make me a landing page, it's a CLI for managing Postgres backups." Extract what you can. Ask only CTA + brand feel (2 questions max). Default the rest and tell them: "I'm defaulting to dark theme, clean sans-serif, rounded corners, and a blue accent. We can change any of it after you see the first draft."
User shares their app URL, repo, or docs: Don't fetch or parse the linked content. Ask the user to describe the existing look in their own words — primary color, light vs dark theme, typography direction, overall vibe. Confirm their description: "So your app is dark theme, indigo accents, clean sans-serif — should the landing page match that, or go in a different direction?"
User pastes a README or description: Parse it for project name, pitch, target users, and features. Skip to the gaps.
Feedback Facilitation Guide
After Each Generation, Ask These Three Questions
First impression: "What's your gut reaction in the first 5 seconds?"
Brand alignment: "Does this feel like YOUR product?"
Issues: "Is there anything that feels wrong, missing, or not quite right?"
Do not ask "Do you like it?" -- this produces yes/no answers with no actionable information.
Guiding the User Toward Useful Feedback
Developers often give feedback in implementation terms. Redirect toward design intent:
| User says | They likely mean | Follow-up to ask |
|---|---|---|
| "I don't like it" | Overall mismatch | "Is it the colors, the layout, or the overall mood that feels off?" |
| "It's boring" / "too plain" | Low visual energy | "Would you like more color contrast, a bolder layout, or both?" |
| "It's too busy" | Visual clutter | "Which part feels most cluttered? The hero, the features section, or everything?" |
| "It looks like a template" | Generic, no personality | "What would make it feel more specific to your product? A different layout, stronger colors, more distinctive typography?" |
| "It's too marketing-y" | Over-designed, too much flair | "Should we strip it down -- less decoration, more information density, tighter layout?" |
| "The colors are off" | Palette mismatch | "Too bright, too dull, or just the wrong hue?" |
| "More whitespace" / "too cramped" | Layout density | Edit: "Add more breathing room between sections" |
| "Needs more padding" / "font-size too small" | CSS-level observation | Translate: "Which section feels too tight or hard to read?" |
| "Make it pop" | Weak visual hierarchy | "What should stand out more -- the headline, the CTA button, or the overall contrast?" |
| "I love the layout but not the colors" | Partial approval | Variant signal: keep layout, change COLOR_SCHEME only |
| "Show me something totally different" | Fundamental rethink | REIMAGINE creative range |
| "Can I just edit the HTML?" | Wants direct control | "Stitch handles the regeneration cycle, so let's iterate here first -- then you can hand-edit the final output." |
Design Dimensions to Highlight for the User
When presenting a design for review, draw the user's attention to specific elements. These help non-designers evaluate design without knowing design vocabulary:
Message clarity: "Can a visitor tell what your product does within 5 seconds of landing here?"
CTA visibility: "How quickly did your eye find the primary button? Could you miss it?"
Color impression: "Do these colors match the feel you described -- {their 3 adjectives}?"
Reading flow: "When you scan top to bottom, does the section order make sense for someone discovering your product?"
Credibility: "If you were evaluating this product for the first time, does this page make it look like a real, maintained project?"
Steering Toward Approval
After positive-but-uncommitted feedback: "What's the one thing that would make this feel right?"
After choosing from options: "Want me to tweak anything on this one, or lock it in?"
After 3+ rounds of minor tweaks: "This is looking solid. Want to keep iterating or ship it and refine later?"
After 5+ rounds: "What's the single most important change left? Let's nail that one thing."
Developers often prefer to ship something decent and iterate rather than perfecting before launch. If you sense this, offer the exit: "This is in a good place. Want me to bundle it so you can deploy and see how it looks in the real context?"
Feedback Priority Framework
Help users separate critical from cosmetic:
Must fix: The page doesn't communicate what the product does, or the CTA is unclear/missing.
Should improve: The mood doesn't match the brand direction, or a section is missing/unnecessary.
Nice to have: Font weight preference, exact shade of a color, spacing tweaks.
Guide users to address category 1 first, then 2, then 3. This prevents endless loops on cosmetic details while structural problems persist.
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Needs an MCP server, Needs an API key
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- Travis D. Elliott
- Publisher
- Seth Hobson (Community)
- Distributed by
- Seth Hobson
- Source
- wshobson/agents · plugins/brand-landingpage/skills/brand-landingpage · commit 4bde316
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Travis D. Elliott or Seth Hobson.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download brand-landingpage.zip