Qdrant Search Quality Diagnosis
QdrantOfficialPublished by Qdrant
- Skill
- Guidelines
- Software development
- Apache-2.0
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides a structured methodology for diagnosing and fixing search quality regressions in Qdrant. It distinguishes between retrieval relevance issues (model or data problems) and index performance issues (approximate search configuration). It emphasizes the necessity of establishing a labeled ground truth dataset to validate improvements and avoid noise, while offering specific troubleshooting paths for embedding model selection, HNSW index tuning, quantization impacts, and pipeline optimization.
What it does
- Provides a diagnostic workflow to isolate search quality issues.
- Guides the creation of labeled query sets to measure retrieval performance.
- Offers specific tuning parameters for HNSW index optimization.
- Explains how to validate embedding model suitability for specific data domains.
- Outlines best practices for quantization and rescoring to maintain recall.
- Identifies common pitfalls in search pipeline configuration.
When to use it
- When users report irrelevant, missing, or poor search results.
- When approximate search performance is significantly worse than exact search.
- When evaluating whether to fine-tune an embedding model.
- When search quality degrades after applying quantization.
- When establishing a baseline for search relevance in a production pipeline.
Advantages
- Separates index-level issues from model-level issues.
- Promotes data-driven decision making using metrics like Recall@k and NDCG.
- Prevents common configuration errors like using binary quantization without rescore.
- Provides clear steps for validating improvements against held-out queries.
Usage examples
- “My search results are not relevant. How do I start diagnosing this?”
- The agent will guide you to establish a labeled query set and compare exact vs. approximate search to isolate whether the issue lies in the embedding model or the HNSW index configuration.
- “How do I know if my HNSW index is configured correctly for high recall?”
- The agent will explain how to test recall@k, adjust hnsw_ef, ef_construct, and m parameters, and verify if oversampling is needed for your specific quantization settings.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/qdrant/qdrant-search-quality-diagnosis/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip qdrant-search-quality-diagnosis.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Qdrant
How to Diagnose Bad Search Quality
Before diagnosing or evaluating search quality, establish two different ground truths: a labeled query set measures whether the results are the right ones; exact KNN measures whether ANN finds what brute force would (no labels needed). The first diagnoses relevance, the second diagnoses the index.
Need a Labeled Baseline to Score Quality or Validate a Gain
Use when: user has no golden set, asks "how do I know if my search is good?", or needs to gate releases on a retrieval metric. Every fix in the sections below should be validated this way.
Pick the metric by usage:
Recall@kfor RAG,MRR/Hits@1for single-answer,NDCG@kfor re-ranking Choosing the metricBuild a labeled query set (human, log-based, or LLM-synthetic) and score retrieval with
ranxMeasuring Retrieval RelevanceWhen tuning and evaluating search quality, set a minimum target gain, then make sure your labeled query set is large enough to measure it reliably. Quantify the uncertainty around a measured gain with a confidence interval (e.g. bootstrap the per-query gains, 95%): if it includes zero, the improvement is inconclusive and may be due to query-to-query variation. Adding labeled queries narrows the interval; how many you need depends on the size of the gain you are targeting and on query-to-query variation, not on collection size Before tuning a collection
If you use the labeled queries to tune or select a configuration, evaluate the final choice on held-out queries. A gain that doesn't survive the held-out evaluation isn't reliable evidence of an improvement.
For full RAG pipelines, also score generation with Ragas and use the retrieval-vs-generation 2x2 to isolate regressions Pipeline Output Quality
Gate CI on a per-metric threshold to catch regressions from embedding-model swaps, prompt changes, or index config changes
Don't Know What's Wrong Yet
Use when: results are irrelevant or missing expected matches and you need to isolate the cause.
For a no-code quick check, use the Web UI's ANN Recall tab to compare approximate vs exact
recall@kWeb UI ANN RecallFor the same comparison in code (CI gating, regression tests), run each query twice: once approximate, once with
exact=true. Computerecall@kfrom the overlap ANN recall in CITarget >95%
recall@kin production. Exact search bad = model, data, or search pipeline problem. Exact good, approximate bad = tune HNSW.Match the embedding model to your data: the context window should fit your chunk length with room for special tokens, the model must cover every language in your corpus, and its training domain should resemble yours (e.g. a code-trained model for code) How to choose an embedding model
Make sure documents are properly chunked; splitting chunks mid-sentence alone can drop quality by 30-40%
Check if quantization degrades quality (compare with and without)
Check if filters are too restrictive (then you might need to use ACORN)
If duplicate results from chunked documents, use Grouping API to deduplicate Grouping
Payload filtering and ranked text search are different things. Metadata (dates, categories, tags) goes in payload for filtering. To rank text content, on Qdrant 1.20 or newer use BM25 on a full-text index with scoring enabled (queried with a text query); on older versions, or for learned sparse models, use sparse vectors. A full-text index without scoring only filters.
Approximate Search Worse Than Exact
Use when: exact search returns good results but HNSW approximation misses them.
hnsw_efcontrols ANN search breadth; increase it while recall is still climbing, stop at the lowest value that hits your recall target inside your latency budget Search params Raisehnsw_efonly when recall is still climbingIncrease
ef_construct(200+ for high quality) HNSW configIncrease
m(16 default, 32 for high recall) HNSW configEnable oversampling + rescore with quantization Search with quantization
ACORN for filtered queries (v1.16+) ACORN
Binary quantization requires rescore. Without it, quality loss is severe. Use oversampling to recover recall: the docs report 0.98 recall with 2x oversampling on 4096-dimensional and 4x on 1536-dimensional embeddings, so start around 2-4x and tune on your data. Always test quantization impact on your data before production. Quantization
Wrong Embedding Model
Use when: exact search also returns bad results.
Check Qdrant team recommendations on how to choose an embedding model.
Test top 3 MTEB models on 100-1000 sample queries Hosted Qdrant inference. Score them against a labeled set to compare apples to apples Measuring Retrieval Relevance.
If your data is strongly hierarchical (taxonomies, product catalogs, part-whole relationships), consider hyperbolic (Poincaré) embeddings. They capture tree structure in far fewer dimensions than flat ones. In Qdrant, use Euclidean HNSW to pull a candidate set from the original Poincaré coordinates, then a Formula Query to rescore with the real hyperbolic distance. How to serve hyperbolic embeddings with Qdrant.
Consider fine-tuning an embedding model for your specific use case only after trying better-suited models and retrieval/pipeline tuning and confirming that the embedding model remains the bottleneck. Fine-tuning is most useful when general-purpose embeddings fail to capture important domain- or task-specific distinctions and you have good labeled query-document pairs. Fine-tuning requires re-embedding and re-indexing the collection Model migration.
Unoptimized Search Pipeline
Use when: exact search also returns bad results and model choice is confirmed by user.
Optimize search according to the advanced search-strategies skill
Check candidate depth: if your retrieval pipeline includes a first-stage retriever that feeds a reranker or fusion stage, test whether increasing the prefetch limit improves your quality metric. A downstream ranker cannot recover relevant documents that never enter its candidate set. For hybrid search, start around
limit=100-200and test larger values against your labeled queries Candidate depth
What NOT to Do
Tune Qdrant before verifying the model is right for the task (most quality issues are model issues)
Use binary quantization without rescore (severe quality loss)
Set
hnsw_eflower than results requested (guaranteed bad recall)Skip payload indexes on filtered fields then blame quality (HNSW can't traverse filtered-out nodes, and filterable HNSW is built only if payload indexes were set up prior)
Deploy without baseline recall or other search relevance metrics (no way to measure regressions)
Compare two configs on a query set too small to resolve the difference between them (the result is noise, not evidence)
Confuse payload filtering with ranked text search (different things, different config)
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer874 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.1 KiB
- SKILL.md9.3 KiB
LICENSE
Apache License
Version 2.0, January 2004
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
1. Definitions.
"License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
"Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
the copyright owner that is granting the License.
"Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
"control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
"You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
exercising permissions granted by this License.
"Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
including but not limited to software source code, documentation
source, and configuration files.
"Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
and conversions to other media types.
"Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
(an example is provided in the Appendix below).
"Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
"Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
"Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
subsequently incorporated within the Work.
2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
(except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
as of the date such litigation is filed.
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
meet the following conditions:
(a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
(b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
stating that You changed the files; and
(c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
the Derivative Works; and
(d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
as modifying the License.
You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
the conditions stated in this License.
5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing
the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.
END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
identification within third-party archives.
Copyright 2026 Qdrant Solutions GmbH
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Needs Python
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Qdrant
- Publisher
- Qdrant (Official)
- Source
- qdrant/skills · skills/qdrant-search-quality/diagnosis · commit 9f55f6a
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Qdrant or Qdrant.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download qdrant-search-quality-diagnosis.zip