Tao Validate Dataset Format
NVIDIAOfficialCreated by NVIDIA Corporation
- Skill
- Review and audit
- Software development
- Apache-2.0
- Medium risk
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides an interface to the tao-daft validate command, enabling users to verify the integrity of NVIDIA TAO DAFT datasets. It guides the user through discovering supported dataset formats, identifying the correct validation subcommands, and executing checks against local dataset paths. The skill ensures that validation is performed according to the specific requirements of the installed version of the nvidia-tao-daft package.
What it does
- Checks dataset structure, schema, and cross-references for DAFT-formatted data.
- Discovers available validation formats via the tao-daft CLI.
- Supports validation of individual datasets or entire directory trees.
- Provides guidance on identifying dataset formats based on directory markers.
- Interprets validation results and failure codes from the CLI output.
When to use it
- When you need to verify that a dataset conforms to the DAFT format requirements.
- When you encounter schema or cross-reference errors in a TAO DAFT dataset.
- When you need to confirm the validity of a dataset before running further TAO operations.
- When you are unsure which validation flags are required for a specific DAFT format.
Advantages
- Uses the official CLI as the source of truth for validation specifications.
- Helps prevent errors by guiding the user through format-specific flag discovery.
- Automates the process of checking complex dataset trees.
- Provides clear feedback on validation success or failure.
Usage examples
- “Validate my DAFT dataset located at /data/my_dataset.”
- The agent will identify the dataset format, run the appropriate tao-daft validate command with the --path flag, and report the validation results.
- “How do I check the schema for a metropolis-v3.0 dataset?”
- The agent will list the available flags for the metropolis-v3.0 format and execute the validation command on the specified path.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/nvidia/tao-validate-dataset-format/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip tao-validate-dataset-format.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by NVIDIA Corporation
Validate a TAO DAFT Dataset
Standalone install? If this session was not initialized by the TAO skill bank plugin, run the
tao-setupskill first (host preflight, credentials, cross-skill discovery).
Quick start
tao-daft validate <format> --path <dataset-or-parent-dir><format> is a positional subcommand (e.g. metropolis-v3.0, cosmos-reason-v1.0);
--path is required. Discover supported formats and per-format flags via
tao-daft validate --help and the leaf --help (see "CLI conventions" below).
Preflight
python -c "import nvidia_tao_daft" 2>/dev/null || {
echo "MISSING: tao-daft not installed. Run:"
echo " pip install nvidia-tao-daft"
exit 1
}Quick Start
Discover the installed validator formats before choosing a format slug, then
run validation with the target passed through --path:
tao-daft --version
tao-daft validate --help
tao-daft validate <format> --help
tao-daft validate <format> --path /path/to/daft-datasetPurpose
Drive tao-daft validate against a DAFT dataset (or a tree of them).
The CLI is the spec; the skill picks subcommand + flags and explains
the result.
Trigger when the user mentions "TAO DAFT", "DAFT format", validating a
DAFT dataset, schema/cross-reference errors, or tao-daft validate.
Do not trigger for non-DAFT layouts (COCO, YOLO, Data Factory JSONL),
or for tao-daft info / tao-daft convert — those have their own skills.
If the user's opening is ambiguous, run a few --help commands first
to ground yourself, then come back and confirm the task.
Prerequisites
nvidia-tao-daftinstalled (pip install nvidia-tao-daft; the wheel is enough, no source repo). Confirm withtao-daft --version.A DAFT dataset, or a parent directory of them, on local disk.
Instructions
CLI conventions
tao-daft is nested argparse subcommands. Names and flags drift across
versions, so discover the current surface from --help rather than
trusting any list in this doc.
Format is a positional subcommand, not
--format:tao-daft validate <format> [flags]. List current formats viatao-daft validate --help; slugs look likemetropolis-v3.0,cosmos-reason-v1.0.Target is
--path PATH, not positional. It accepts a single dataset/scene or a parent directory — the validator walks the tree.Flags are per-format; run the leaf help, e.g.
tao-daft validate metropolis-v3.0 --help, before choosing them. Don't assume a flag from one format exists on another.
So the loop is: tao-daft --version → tao-daft validate --help →
pick format (infer if unspecified, see below) →
tao-daft validate <format> --help → run → interpret.
Format inference
Use directory markers, not filenames:
meta.jsonnext tomedia/andtext/⇒cosmos-reason-v1.0.A directory (or nested directories) containing
contextual/, typically alongsideraw/andtask/⇒metropolis-v3.0.Neither marker present ⇒ ask the user; do not guess.
Reading errors
The CLI ends every run with a VALIDATION RESULTS block, then
✅ VALIDATION PASSED or ❌ VALIDATION FAILED, and exits non-zero on
failure (safe to chain in scripts).
Output can be large on big trees — capture the full output to a file and read it in slices rather than scrolling inline.
Limitations
Validates DAFT only. Non-DAFT layouts (COCO, YOLO, Data Factory JSONL, etc.) belong in the upstream converter skills.
Supported formats are whatever
tao-daft validate --helpreports for the installed version; older slugs may have been retired.Covers
validateonly. Defer to the dedicated skills fortao-daft infoandtao-daft convert.Don't reimplement validation in Python; the CLI is the spec.
Troubleshooting
tao-daft: command not found— wheel not installed in the active env.pip install nvidia-tao-daft; verifytao-daft --version.error: argument --path is required— path passed positionally. Move it behind--path.invalid choice: '<format>'— slug isn't wired up in this version. Re-runtao-daft validate --helpand pick from the list.Auto-detection (raw type / contextual set) is wrong — override via the format's scope-restriction flag; discover the name from the leaf
--help.CI wants warnings to fail — add
--strict.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer951 B
- BENCHMARK.md7.2 KiB
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.2 KiB
- SKILL.md4.9 KiB
- config/skillspector-baseline.yaml834 B
- evals/evals.json880 B
- skill-card.md4.0 KiB
- skill.oms.sig4.7 KiB
BENCHMARK.md
Skill Benchmark: tao-validate-dataset-format
✅ Overall verdict: PASS — Recommended for publication
Publication Recommendation
Recommended for publication based on the completed evaluation evidence in this report.
Evaluation Metadata
Skill:
tao-validate-dataset-formatEvaluation date: 2026-09-17
Evaluator version:
1.5.6Agents: Claude Code (
aws/anthropic/bedrock-claude-opus-4-8), Codex (openai/openai/gpt-5.5)Tasks: 1 evaluation tasks (1 positive)
Dataset digest:
sha256:a10c158d485aae405af8bf9fa4683b3c863dd7573f2c4be03d871bd0797abf39(skill-evaluator-dataset-snapshot/1)Attempts per task: 3
Environment:
k8s-sandboxTier 2 evidence: required for publication
Tier 3 evidence: required for publication
Each task attempt ran in its own isolated sandbox pod.
What This Report Answers
The three-tier evaluation checks whether the skill:
is safe to use;
produces correct answers;
is discovered and activated when needed;
helps the agent complete the user's goal and expected workflow; and
avoids wasted skill and tool usage.
Results at a Glance
| Measure | Claude Code (Baseline → Skill Uplift) | Codex (Baseline → Skill Uplift) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 94.6% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 62.4% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |
| Security | 100.0% → 100.0% (±0.0 points) | 100.0% → 100.0% (±0.0 points) |
| Correctness | 0.0% → 100.0% (+100.0 points) | 0.0% → 60.0% (+60.0 points) |
| Discoverability | 100.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 0.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |
| Effectiveness | 5.6% → 100.0% (+94.4 points) | 16.7% → 53.3% (+36.6 points) |
| Efficiency | 72.8% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 99.7% → 98.6% (-1.1 points) |
How to read this table: baseline is the same task attempted without the target skill. Scores are rounded to one decimal; threshold-adjacent values use additional precision so their displayed band matches the verdict. Uplift is derived from those displayed scores and shown in percentage points.
Example: 47.0% → 92.0% (+45.0 points) means the skill-assisted run scored 92.0%, 45.0 percentage points above its 47.0% no-skill baseline.
A partial dimension was calculated from only the available configured signals; review the detailed report before relying on it.
Token Usage
Actual Tier 3 execution usage is reported for every observed agent/case pair and both conditions.
| Agent | Dataset case | With skill | Without skill | Delta | Change | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| claude-code | All cases | 98,229 | 826,994 | N/A | N/A | skill 1/1; base 3/3 |
| claude-code | tao-validate-dataset-format-basic | 98,229 | 826,994 | N/A | N/A | skill 1/1; base 3/3 |
| codex | All cases | 13,718 | 40,651 | N/A | N/A | skill 1/1; base 3/3 |
| codex | tao-validate-dataset-format-basic | 13,718 | 40,651 | N/A | N/A | skill 1/1; base 3/3 |
| ALL AGENTS | Dataset aggregate | 111,947 | 867,645 | N/A | N/A | skill 2/2; base 6/6 |
Prompt tokens include cached reads, so total tokens are prompt + completion (cached is not added twice). The Efficiency score uses (prompt - cached) + completion. N/A means the relevant trajectory counters were not available; coverage is never estimated.
Tier Status
| Tier | Purpose | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Static validation | PASSED WITH OBSERVATIONS | 11 validator(s); 7 finding(s) |
| Tier 2 | Semantic deduplication | PASSED WITH OBSERVATIONS | 2 validator(s); 1 finding(s) |
| Tier 3 | Live agent evaluation | PASS | 2 agent(s); 1 task(s) |
Findings and Observations
<details> <summary>Show detailed findings and successful checks</summary>
HIGH DUPLICATE/duplicate: Duplicate content found within SKILL.md: "# Validate a TAO DAFT Dataset" in SKILL.md (lines 1-4) vs "## Quick start" in SKILL.md (lines 5-14) vs "## Quick Start" in SKILL.md (lines 24-35) vs "## Purpose" in SKILL.md (lines 36-49) vs "### CLI conventions" in SKILL.md (lines 58-77) vs "## Limitations" in SKILL.md (lines 96-105) (
SKILL.md:1)MEDIUM QUALITY/quality_correctness: SKILL_SPEC recommended field missing: 'metadata.tags' (
skills/data/tao-validate-dataset-format/SKILL.md)MEDIUM SCHEMA/frontmatter_field_placement: Root field 'tags' is ignored; use 'metadata.tags' (
skills/data/tao-validate-dataset-format/SKILL.md)MEDIUM SCHEMA/folder_hierarchy: Unexpected nesting depth for general skill (
skills/data/tao-validate-dataset-format)MEDIUM SCHEMA/body_recommended_section: Missing recommended section: '## Examples' (
skills/data/tao-validate-dataset-format/SKILL.md)3 additional finding(s) are available in the full evaluation artifacts.
</details>
Scoring Methodology
<details> <summary>Show dimension definitions, source signals, and thresholds</summary>
| Dimension | Question | Scored signals |
|---|---|---|
| Security | Is it safe to use? | security (100%) |
| Correctness | Is the answer correct? | accuracy (100%) |
| Discoverability | Was the right skill loaded when needed? | skill_execution (100%) |
| Effectiveness | Did the skill help complete the task? | goal_accuracy (50%) + behavior_check (50%) |
| Efficiency | Did it avoid wasted tool calls and token usage? | skill_efficiency (50%) + token_efficiency (50%) |
Dimension bands: PASS at 50% or above; NEUTRAL from 40% to below 50%; FAIL below 40%.
Overall Tier 3 lift: PASS at +5 points or more; FAIL at -10 points or less; values between those bands are NEUTRAL.
Overall verdict: PASS only when every configured dimension passes for at least one supported agent. Lift is reported as diagnostic evidence and does not override this gate.
The 50% attempt pass threshold is a separate per-task gate; it is not the dimension pass threshold.
Effectiveness is the equal-weight mean of goal completion (
goal_accuracy) and expected workflow adherence (behavior_check).Efficiency is 50% tool-call productivity (the backward-compatible
skill_efficiencywire id) and 50%token_efficiency. Positive-case skill routing is scored under Discoverability, not Efficiency; a negative case without a routing target is N/A. N/A sources are omitted, remaining weights are renormalized, and the dimension is marked partial.
Signals present in this run:
security(Security): unsafe operations, secret leakage, and unauthorized access.skill_execution(Skill Execution): whether the expected skill was selected, decoys were avoided, and the workflow executed.skill_efficiency(Tool Productivity): tool-call productivity (legacy wire id; routing is scored under Discoverability).accuracy(Accuracy): final-answer correctness against the reference answer.goal_accuracy(Goal Accuracy): whether the user's goal was achieved.behavior_check(Behavior Check): whether the expected workflow behavior was followed.token_efficiency(Token Efficiency): actual uncached prompt plus completion usage (50% of Efficiency).
</details>
Freshness
Regenerate this benchmark when the skill, evaluation dataset, target agent/model, evaluator version, environment, or scoring policy changes.
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Declares allowed tools, Needs Python
The author says: Requires Python 3.10+ and the nvidia-tao-daft package (pip install nvidia-tao-daft).
Security
What our scanner noticed· Medium risk
- Large base64-encoded blobs
- Instructions that use the network
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- NVIDIA Corporation
- Publisher
- NVIDIA (Official)
- Source
- NVIDIA/skills · skills/tao-validate-dataset-format · commit fce3cca
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE-APACHE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by NVIDIA Corporation or NVIDIA.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download tao-validate-dataset-format.zip