Generated banner for Tao Port Huggingface Model
Generated logo for Tao Port Huggingface Model

Tao Port Huggingface Model

NVIDIAOfficialCreated by NVIDIA Corporation

  • Skill
  • Workflow
  • Software development
  • Apache-2.0
  • Medium risk

From the author

Integrate a HuggingFace Computer Vision model into the NVIDIA TAO Toolkit ecosystem (tao-core config, tao-pytorch trainer, tao-deploy TensorRT pipeline). Use when the user asks to "integrate a HuggingFace model into TAO", "add an HF model to TAO Toolkit", "wire a HuggingFace ViT/DETR/ SegFormer into tao-pytorch", "build a TAO trainer + deploy pipeline for an HF CV model", or pastes a HuggingFace model URL/ID and wants it turned into a TAO model. Covers the full 7-phase loop: prerequisites check, HuggingFace inspection and validation, codebase exploration, tao-core configuration and native trainer implementation, ONNX export plus TensorRT deploy integration, packaging and L0 testing, container-based end-to-end validation, and (conditional) accuracy/latency tuning. Supports classification, object detection, semantic / instance / panoptic segmentation, zero-shot detection, and depth estimation.
— the description by NVIDIA Corporation

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

This skill provides a structured, seven-phase workflow for porting HuggingFace Computer Vision models into the NVIDIA TAO Toolkit. It guides the user through inspecting the model, configuring the TAO core, implementing the trainer, and setting up the deployment pipeline for TensorRT. The process emphasizes a local-only development loop, requiring the user to manage four independent repository clones and execute all validation, testing, and training tasks within locally prepared TAO Toolkit containers.

What it does

  • Validates HuggingFace model compatibility for computer vision tasks.
  • Configures TAO core and implements native trainers for PyTorch.
  • Integrates ONNX export and TensorRT deployment pipelines.
  • Automates packaging and L0 unit testing for model components.
  • Performs end-to-end validation within containerized environments.
  • Provides optional tuning for accuracy, latency, and model size.

When to use it

  • When you need to bring a custom HuggingFace computer vision model into the TAO Toolkit.
  • When you require a full training-to-deployment pipeline for a new model architecture.
  • When you need to verify model performance and exportability to TensorRT.
  • When you are working in a local environment with NVIDIA GPU support.

Advantages

  • Ensures consistency across training, export, and deployment stages.
  • Provides a rigorous, step-by-step debugging and testing loop.
  • Maintains environment isolation using containerized workflows.
  • Supports a wide range of computer vision tasks including detection and segmentation.

Usage examples

“Integrate a HuggingFace model into TAO.”
The agent initiates the Phase 0 prerequisite check to verify your environment and prepare the necessary TAO Toolkit container images.
“Wire a HuggingFace SegFormer into tao-pytorch.”
The agent begins the codebase exploration phase to map the model to the appropriate TAO reference architecture and prepare the configuration.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/nvidia/tao-port-huggingface-model/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip tao-port-huggingface-model.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by NVIDIA Corporation

Standalone install? If this session was not initialized by the TAO skill bank plugin, run the tao-setup skill first (host preflight, credentials, cross-skill discovery).

<!-- Copyright (c) 2026, NVIDIA CORPORATION. All rights reserved. Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. -->

TAO-HF Integration Skill

Integrate a HuggingFace (HF) Computer Vision model into the NVIDIA TAO Toolkit ecosystem. Work the phases iteratively — not purely linearly — via a build → test → debug → fix → retest loop at every step: when something fails, diagnose and fix before moving on; when it passes, move to the next step.

This SKILL.md is the workflow coordinator. Each phase has a dedicated references/phase-N-*.md with the full step-by-step content, code, docker invocations, and gates. Read the matching reference at the start of each phase — the summaries below are not sufficient.


Local-Only Rule

All work is strictly local. Do NOT push/commit/branch on any remote (GitLab, GitHub, HuggingFace), create merge/pull requests or issues, or upload/publish Docker images to any registry or artifact store. You may only read/clone from remotes — all edits, Docker builds, and test runs stay on the local machine.


Submodule Override Strategy

The user clones the four TAO repos (tao-core, tao-pytorch, tao-deploy, tao-dataservices) independently into one working directory. The tao-core/ submodule nested inside each repo points to the original unmodified commit; modifications only exist in the top-level tao-core/. Always install from the top-level tao-core/, never <repo>/tao-core/ — the nested submodule silently ignores all modifications. Override rules: (1) mount the working directory -v $(pwd):/workspace; (2) pip install /workspace/tao-core FIRST, before tao-pytorch/tao-deploy; (3) PYTHONPATH top-level tao-core first, e.g. -e PYTHONPATH=/workspace/tao-core:/workspace/tao-pytorch. See references/cross-cutting.md for the directory tree.


Execution platform

Every test, smoke run, and end-to-end validation executes inside a locally prepared TAO Toolkit container (tao-pytorch-base:latest, tao-deploy-base:latest, optionally tao-dataservices-base:latest — all from Phase 0). The platform skills own how to run them; this skill specifies what. Default platform: local-docker. Phase 0 delegates the driver / CUDA / NCT preflight to tao-setup-nvidia-gpu-host. See references/cross-cutting.md for the authoritative-skill table, bind-mount rationale, and canonical docker-run flag set.


Phase Map

PhaseGoalReference
0Prerequisites + TAO Toolkit images + local image tagsphase-0-prereqs.md
1Inputs, HF-inspection container, validate model + datasetphase-1-inspection.md, hf-inspection.md
2Closest existing TAO reference modelphase-2-codebase.md, task-type-guide.md
3tao-core config + tao-pytorch trainer / eval / inferencephase-3-implementation.md, tao-patterns.md, repo-structure.md
4ONNX export + tao-deploy TRT engine / inference / evalphase-4-deploy.md
5Packaging (console_scripts) + L0 testsphase-5-packaging.md
6Container testing + end-to-end validationphase-6-container-tests.md, docker-patterns.md
7(conditional) Accuracy / latency / size tuningphase-7-optimization.md

Cross-cutting refs: workflow-consistency.md (CLI flow, config field paths, cross-phase dependencies); cross-cutting.md (platform, isolation, module pitfalls, debugging).

IMPORTANT — Continuous Execution Through Phase 6: do NOT stop after Phases 3–5 to wait for the user to run tests. Phase 6 is mandatory — not complete until tests pass inside the containers and the end-to-end pipeline is validated.


Development Loop

At every step: write code → test immediately (import check, unit test, or dry-run) → if it fails, read traceback → diagnose → fix → retest; if it passes, move on. Do NOT accumulate untested code — testing only at the end compounds bugs.


Debugging Playbook

When something fails, consult the symptom → likely-cause → fix table in references/cross-cutting.md before trying random fixes — it covers ModuleNotFoundError, BACKBONE_REGISTRY KeyError, shape mismatch, NaN loss, ONNX/TRT build failures, TRT-vs-PyTorch accuracy gaps, OOM, DDP hangs, checkpoint load failures, and stale-submodule config issues.


Environment Isolation Strategy

All Python work runs inside Docker containers — no host venvs, no pip installs into host Python (the host needs only Docker, from tao-setup-nvidia-gpu-host). Three contexts: A (Phase 1 HF inspection in tao-hf-inspect, python:3.12-slim fallback), B (Phase 3/4/6 smoke/L0/e2e in the prepared container, source via pip install /workspace/tao-core && python setup.py develop), C (host-bind-mount scratch). See references/cross-cutting.md for the contexts in full and the four numbered rules verbatim (--check-only host packages; Phase 1 --user $(id -u):$(id -g) vs. root; HOME=/workspace/PIP_USER=1 fallback; distro package-manager list; root:root trade-off; tao-hf-inspect cleanup).


Phase 0 — Prerequisites Check

Goal: verify Python 3.10+ and git; delegate the driver / CUDA / Docker / NVIDIA Container Toolkit host check to tao-setup-nvidia-gpu-host; verify NGC docker login for nvcr.io. Then ask the user for the TAO Toolkit image references (tao-pytorch, tao-deploy, optionally tao-dataservices), pull, and prepare local tags tao-pytorch-base:latest, tao-deploy-base:latest, tao-dataservices-base:latest for later phases — preparation removes the pre-installed released TAO packages so the user's /workspace/... clones install/load via pip install /workspace/tao-core && python setup.py develop. Hard stop on any failed check. Required user inputs: the image references + credentials (NGC login, HF_TOKEN). Full commands, prompt wording, and per-image Dockerfile snippets: the Phase 0 reference.

Gate: all prerequisite checks pass; the user supplied the required image references; tao-pytorch-base:latest and tao-deploy-base:latest exist locally; tao-dataservices-base:latest exists if dataservices work is anticipated.


Phase 1 — Information Gathering & Validation

Goal: decide whether to proceed at all. Gather credentials, locate/clone the four TAO repos, create a consistent working branch, launch the tao-hf-inspect container (Context A), validate the HF model is CV with a supported pipeline_tag, extract config + state-dict schema, sanity-check ONNX export, clean up. Full steps: Phase 1 references.

Reject if: pipeline_tag is NLP / audio / LLM (non-CV); AutoConfig raises; or ONNX export fundamentally cannot work (no rewrite path).

Gate: all 4 TAO repos located/cloned with a consistent branch; pipeline_tag confirmed CV; model_type, image_size, hidden_size, num_labels extracted; state-dict keys documented + HF→TAO remapping plan drafted; ONNX export sanity check passed (or failure understood); user confirmed model_short_name + task type. (Full checklist: phase-1-inspection.md.) Present findings and get user confirmation first.


Phase 2 — Codebase Exploration

Goal: find the closest existing TAO reference model for the detected pipeline_tag, read its implementation across tao-core / tao-pytorch / tao-deploy, and decide whether the backbone exists in backbone_v2/ or is new.

The HF pipeline_tag → TAO reference model mapping (classification → classification_pyt, detection → dino/rtdetr, segmentation → segformer, instance → mask2former, panoptic → oneformer, zero-shot → grounding_dino, depth → mono_depth) drives everything downstream (config, architecture, loss, ONNX shape, TRT builder, deploy classes, metrics, dataset format). See the Phase 2 references for the full reference list (12 files per model), the backbone_v2/ and tao-dataservices coverage checks, and per-task architecture.

If a new backbone is needed, decide the strategy (timm wrap > re-implement > HF black-box wrap) before Phase 3 — it changes weight loading, ONNX export, deploy. Never dual-inherit from transformers.PreTrainedModel and BackboneBase (metaclass conflict — compose instead).

Gate: reference TAO model identified + all 12 reference locations read; task-type implications understood (architecture, loss, ONNX outputs, deploy classes, metrics, dataset); backbone coverage decided (reuse / wrap timm / new); dataservices coverage checked. (Full checklist: phase-2-codebase.md.)


Phase 3 — TAO Core Configuration & Native Implementation

Goal: write the tao-core config schema + the tao-pytorch trainer / native inference / evaluation, smoke-testing between steps. (<model_name> = snake_case short-name; <ModelName> = PascalCase.)

Steps 1–7 (each builds on the previous, smoke-test between): tao-core config (1), tao-pytorch trainer (2), multi-GPU/multi-node (3), native inference → result.csv (4), native evaluation → results.json (5), MLOps for training and eval/infer → status.json (6–7). The ExperimentConfig(CommonExperimentConfig) must contain model, dataset, train, evaluate, inference, export, gen_trt_engine, quantize. All ??? fields are MISSING (user supplies via YAML/CLI); the augmentation.mean/std, model.head.in_channels, checkpoint-name, and onnx_file matches are in the checklist below.

Full per-step bodies, code, the canonical experiment_spec.yaml, and smoke-test commands: the Phase 3 references.

Gates: Step 1 — ExperimentConfig imports cleanly in-container; Step 2 — build_model(cfg) runs + PLModel instantiates in-container; Phase 3 — all 7 steps complete, smoke tests pass, no missing __init__.py.


Phase 4 — Export, Deployment & TensorRT Integration

Goal: ONNX export from tao-pytorch, then TRT engine builder + inference + evaluation in tao-deploy reusing the tao-core ExperimentConfig.

Steps 8–11: ONNX exporter (8 — task-specific input/output names, batch_size=-1 ⇒ dynamic batch); TRT engine builder (9 — subclass EngineBuilder or reuse ClassificationEngineBuilder; write specs/{gen_trt_engine,inference,evaluate}.yaml, same ExperimentConfig schema, augmentation.mean/std MUST match training); TRT inference → result.csv (10); TRT eval → results.json (11). See the Phase 4 reference for full code and the Phase 3+4 gate (3 in-container checks: imports, model build + forward, ONNX round-trip).

Module pitfalls: tao-pytorch and tao-deploy have separate hydra_runner and monitor_status — use the deploy versions in deploy scripts. ExperimentConfig comes from nvidia_tao_core in both (same schema/field paths).

Phase 3+4 gate: all three in-container checks pass (tao-pytorch imports + model + ONNX export; tao-deploy imports).


Phase 5 — Packaging & L0 Testing

Goal: register the model as a console_script in both repos and add unit tests.

Steps 12–15: register '<model_name>=...:main' in console_scripts of tao-pytorch/setup.py (12) and tao-deploy/setup.py (13, creating the deploy entrypoint/<model_name>.py via entrypoint_hydra); deploy L0 tests (14); trainer L0 tests — Trainer(..., fast_dev_run=True) + @pytest.mark.cv_unit @pytest.mark.<model_name> (15). See the Phase 5 reference for exact entry-point strings, code, and L0 test file lists.

Gate: entrypoints registered; pytest files exist and follow the marker convention. Do NOT stop — go directly to Phase 6.


Cross-Phase Data Flow & Consistency Verification

Before Docker testing, verify the chain train → export → gen_trt_engine → inference / evaluate (the *_model_latest.pth → .onnx → .engine artifact flow + the config fields each stage reads/writes — full diagram in references/cross-cutting.md).

Consistency checklist (verify before proceeding): self.checkpoint_filename → the *_latest.pth name evaluate.checkpoint / export.checkpoint reference; augmentation.mean/std identical across training spec, inference.yaml, evaluate.yaml, engine-builder preprocess_mode; ONNX input_names=['input'] / output_names=['output'] (detection/instance-seg use task-specific names); export.input_width/input_height match dataset.img_size; model.head.in_channels matches model_params_mapping.py; classes.txt at dataset.root_dir readable by both repos; all __init__.py exist (incl. scripts/__init__.py for get_subtasks() via pkgutil). Full paths: workflow-consistency.md.


Phase 6 — Container Testing & End-to-End Validation

Mandatory — start immediately after Phase 5. All TAO models ship as Docker images; code that only works outside a container is incomplete. Testing runs directly inside the TAO Toolkit container — no image build in the loop: mount → install source (setup.py develop) → run pytest / pylint / pydocstyle / flake8 directly. Use vanilla commands, NOT the ci/run_functional_tests.py / ci/run_static_tests.py wrappers (internal-mirror-only; public github.com/NVIDIA-TAO/ mirrors have no ci/ dir).

Steps 16–25: verify local image tags exist (16); unit tests for tao-core / tao-pytorch (-m cv_unit, --shm-size=16G) / tao-deploy (17–19); lint (20); wheels (21); end-to-end — train dry-run + export in one tao-pytorch session, then gen_trt_engine + inference + evaluate in one tao-deploy session (same session critical — --rm discards installs) (22); cross-check native vs TRT (23); debug shells (24); optional release images (25).

Full commands (every docker run, per-container env-vars, exact pytest / lint invocations + full-suite variants, the train/export/gen_trt_engine/inference/evaluate one-liner with all CLI overrides, the ci/ note, the fix-and-retest loop) and build scripts / runner patterns: see the Phase 6 references.

Phase 6 gate (Done criteria): tao-core / tao-pytorch / tao-deploy unit tests pass in their containers; static tests pass (or only legacy lint warnings); wheels build; end-to-end <model_name>_model_latest.pth → model.onnx → model.engine → non-empty result.csv + results.json; native vs TRT agree within tolerance.


Phase 7 — Optimization & Tuning (conditional)

Enter only if Phase 6 passes but accuracy / latency / size needs improvement. Ask the user for target metrics first.

Diagnostic categories: accuracy too low; TRT-vs-native gap; training too slow; inference too slow. Techniques: Step 27 — hyperparameter tuning; Step 28 — INT8 quantization (PTQ via torchao / modelopt, TRT INT8 + calibration); Step 29 — channel pruning + retrain; Step 30 — knowledge distillation; Step 31 — resolution tuning (TAO interpolates ViT positional embeddings automatically). See the Phase 7 reference for each category's checks, config blocks, YAML overrides, decision tree, and rationale.


Argument

$ARGUMENTS

If provided, interpret $ARGUMENTS as the HuggingFace model ID or URL to start Phase 1. If credentials or model short-name are not included, ask the user for them before proceeding.

Files

references/phase-0-prereqs.md

<!-- Copyright (c) 2026, NVIDIA CORPORATION. All rights reserved. Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License. -->

Full Phase 0 commands and content for the tao-port-huggingface-model skill — system prerequisite checks plus the one-time preparation of the published TAO Toolkit container images that the rest of the workflow runs inside. Linked from the SKILL.md Phase 0 summary.

Phase 0 — Prerequisites Check

Use this reference only when the parent SKILL.md points here for the current task. If this file conflicts with current SKILL.md, skill_info.yaml, schemas, or platform/model skills, the current authoritative source wins.

Contents

  • Phase 0 — Prerequisites Check

    • Workflow-specific checks

    • GPU host runtime — delegate to tao-setup-nvidia-gpu-host

    • NGC registry login (TAO-Toolkit-specific)

    • Ask the user for the TAO Toolkit container images

    • Pull and prepare the TAO Toolkit images

Before starting any work, verify the system has all required infrastructure. Hard stop if any check fails — resolve before proceeding.

Workflow-specific checks
# Python 3.10+
python3 --version

# git
git --version
GPU host runtime — delegate to tao-setup-nvidia-gpu-host

The NVIDIA driver (branch 580), CUDA Toolkit 13.0, and NVIDIA Container Toolkit 1.19.0 are owned by the tao-skill-bank:tao-setup-nvidia-gpu-host skill, not by this workflow. Invoke its --check-only mode; on failure, ask the user to authorize the install, then re-run.

# Resolve the skill bank root and use the GPU-host skill's bundled installer.
SB="${TAO_SKILL_BANK_PATH:-${TAO_SKILL_BANK_ROOT:-$PWD}}"
SETUP_SCRIPT="${SB}/skills/platform/tao-setup-nvidia-gpu-host/scripts/setup-nvidia-gpu-host.sh"

bash "$SETUP_SCRIPT" --backend docker --check-only || {
  echo "MISSING: TAO GPU host runtime not ready."
  echo "After user approval, run: bash \"$SETUP_SCRIPT\" --backend docker --install --yes"
  exit 1
}

This single delegation covers nvidia-smi, nvcc, the Docker daemon, the NVIDIA Container Toolkit runtime registration, and the docker run --gpus all smoke test. Do not re-implement those checks here — they live in tao-setup-nvidia-gpu-host so every TAO skill picks up version pin changes the moment that skill bumps.

NGC registry login (TAO-Toolkit-specific)
set -a; source /path/to/.env; set +a   # omit if already exported
# NGC Docker registry authentication (required to pull the TAO Toolkit container images from nvcr.io)
echo "$NGC_KEY" | docker login nvcr.io -u '$oauthtoken' --password-stdin
# Verify: should print "Login Succeeded"

NGC API Key: required to pull the TAO Toolkit container images from nvcr.io. If the user does not have one, they must generate it at https://ngc.nvidia.com/setup/api-key. The login uses $oauthtoken as the username (literal string) and NGC_KEY as the password.

Checklist:

  • [ ] Python >= 3.10 installed

  • [ ] git installed

  • [ ] tao-setup-nvidia-gpu-host --check-only passes (driver 580, CUDA 13.0, NCT 1.19.0, docker run --gpus all smoke)

  • [ ] NGC Docker registry authenticated (docker login nvcr.io succeeds)

If anything is missing, inform the user with the specific failure and what needs to be installed. Do NOT proceed until all checks pass.


Ask the user for the TAO Toolkit container images

This skill drives modifications across tao-core, tao-pytorch, tao-deploy, and tao-dataservices and runs every test inside the matching TAO Toolkit container image on nvcr.io. Tags vary per release, so the agent must ask the user for the exact image references — the same way Phase 1 asks for repository paths and HF credentials. Ask up-front so they're available for every later phase.

Prompt the user with:

Please provide the TAO Toolkit container image references you have access to on nvcr.io (or any registry mirror). Tags vary per release — paste the exact <registry>/<repo>:<tag> (or @sha256:...) string.

  1. tao-pytorch image (required) — typically nvcr.io/<org>/tao-toolkit:<version>-pyt or nvcr.io/<org>/tao-toolkit-pyt:<rc-tag>-multiarch.

  2. tao-deploy image (required) — typically nvcr.io/<org>/tao-toolkit:<version>-deploy or nvcr.io/<org>/tao-toolkit-deploy:<rc-tag>-multiarch.

  3. tao-dataservices image (optional — only required if Phase 2.4 finds annotation-converter work) — typically nvcr.io/<org>/tao-toolkit:<version>-data-services or nvcr.io/<org>/tao-toolkit-ds:<rc-tag>-multiarch.

tao-core does not require its own image — the public nvcr.io/nvidia/pytorch:24.03-py3 image is used directly for tao-core smoke tests, or the prepared tao-pytorch image is reused. <!-- unpinned: example public NGC base image -->

Capture the answers into shell variables for the rest of Phase 0:

read -r -p "tao-pytorch image      : " TAO_PT_PUB_IMAGE
read -r -p "tao-deploy image       : " TAO_DEPLOY_PUB_IMAGE
read -r -p "tao-dataservices image : " TAO_DS_PUB_IMAGE   # leave blank to skip

If the user is non-interactive, accept the references as part of $ARGUMENTS or as environment variables exported beforehand.


Pull and prepare the TAO Toolkit images

Each TAO Toolkit container image ships with the released TAO Python packages already installed (via wheels — see tao-pytorch/release/docker/Dockerfile, tao-deploy/release/docker/Dockerfile.release, and tao-dataservices/release/docker/Dockerfile.release). This skill installs the user's local clones of those packages on top via pip install /workspace/... + python setup.py develop, picking up all in-progress modifications. Pre-installed wheels would shadow the local source, so the preparation step removes them up front with pip uninstall. This leaves the CUDA + PyTorch + TensorRT + xformers + ONNX Runtime + OS layers fully intact, ready for the local source to be installed at run time.

The result is tagged with canonical local names that every later phase uses everywhere — tao-pytorch-base:latest, tao-deploy-base:latest, tao-dataservices-base:latest — so the per-release image references only ever appear here.

# Pull the TAO Toolkit container images
docker pull "$TAO_PT_PUB_IMAGE"
docker pull "$TAO_DEPLOY_PUB_IMAGE"
[ -n "$TAO_DS_PUB_IMAGE" ] && docker pull "$TAO_DS_PUB_IMAGE"

# Prepare the tao-pytorch image
#   Removes the pre-installed nvidia_tao_pytorch + nvidia_tao_core wheels (and their console_scripts).
docker build --build-arg PUB_IMAGE="$TAO_PT_PUB_IMAGE" -t tao-pytorch-base:latest - <<'EOF'
ARG PUB_IMAGE
FROM ${PUB_IMAGE}
# Remove pre-installed TAO packages so the local /workspace clones can be installed at run time.
RUN pip uninstall -y --quiet nvidia_tao_pytorch nvidia_tao_core 2>/dev/null || true
ENV PIP_DISABLE_PIP_VERSION_CHECK=1
EOF

# Prepare the tao-deploy image
docker build --build-arg PUB_IMAGE="$TAO_DEPLOY_PUB_IMAGE" -t tao-deploy-base:latest - <<'EOF'
ARG PUB_IMAGE
FROM ${PUB_IMAGE}
RUN pip uninstall -y --quiet nvidia_tao_deploy nvidia_tao_core 2>/dev/null || true
ENV PIP_DISABLE_PIP_VERSION_CHECK=1
EOF

# Prepare the tao-dataservices image (optional)
if [ -n "$TAO_DS_PUB_IMAGE" ]; then
  docker build --build-arg PUB_IMAGE="$TAO_DS_PUB_IMAGE" -t tao-dataservices-base:latest - <<'EOF'
ARG PUB_IMAGE
FROM ${PUB_IMAGE}
RUN pip uninstall -y --quiet nvidia_tao_ds nvidia_tao_pytorch nvidia_tao_core 2>/dev/null || true
ENV PIP_DISABLE_PIP_VERSION_CHECK=1
EOF
fi

Notes on the preparation step:

  • pip uninstall -y removes both the package files and the registered console_scripts (tao CLI subcommands). When python setup.py develop runs against the local source in later phases, the entry points are re-registered cleanly.

  • nvidia_tao_core is removed from every image because all three TAO Toolkit images install it; the local pip install /workspace/tao-core reinstalls the (potentially modified) version at run time.

  • The dataservices image also pre-installs nvidia_tao_pytorch; we remove it too so a local-source override still wins.

  • The 2>/dev/null || true keeps the build idempotent — packages absent from a particular image variant don't fail the preparation.

Verify the images work and the preparation succeeded:

docker run --rm --gpus all tao-pytorch-base:latest nvidia-smi
docker run --rm --gpus all tao-deploy-base:latest nvidia-smi

# These should ALL print "not installed" — confirming the pre-installed packages were removed
docker run --rm tao-pytorch-base:latest \
  bash -c "pip show nvidia_tao_pytorch nvidia_tao_core 2>&1 | grep -E '(Name|not installed)'"
docker run --rm tao-deploy-base:latest \
  bash -c "pip show nvidia_tao_deploy nvidia_tao_core 2>&1 | grep -E '(Name|not installed)'"

If any nvidia_tao_* package still shows up in pip show, the preparation step missed something — re-check the image's pip list and add any missing nvidia_tao_* package to the corresponding pip uninstall line.


Gate (Phase 0 done):

  • [ ] All system prerequisite checks pass.

  • [ ] User provided TAO Toolkit image references for tao-pytorch, tao-deploy (and optionally tao-dataservices).

  • [ ] tao-pytorch-base:latest and tao-deploy-base:latest exist locally and contain no pre-installed nvidia_tao_* packages.

  • [ ] (Optional) tao-dataservices-base:latest exists locally if dataservices work is anticipated.

All subsequent phase reference files use the local tag names (tao-pytorch-base:latest, tao-deploy-base:latest, tao-dataservices-base:latest) — they don't need to know which underlying image fed them.


Requirements and compatibility

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Needs: Declares allowed tools, Needs Python, Needs Node.js

The author says: Requires Python 3.10+, NVIDIA driver, CUDA 13.0+, docker + nvidia-container-toolkit, an NGC API key (`docker login nvcr.io`), an HF_TOKEN, and access to the TAO Toolkit container images on `nvcr.io` for `tao-pytorch`, `tao-deploy`, and (optionally) `tao-dataservices` — Phase 0 asks the user for the exact image references and prepares them locally as `tao-pytorch-base:latest`, `tao-deploy-base:latest`, `tao-dataservices-base:latest`. Local clones of `tao-core`, `tao-pytorch`, `tao-deploy`,...

Security

What our scanner noticed· Medium risk

  • Large base64-encoded blobs
  • Instructions that use the network

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Created by
NVIDIA Corporation
Publisher
NVIDIA (Official)
Source
NVIDIA/skills · skills/tao-port-huggingface-model · commit fce3cca
Licence
Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE-APACHE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by NVIDIA Corporation or NVIDIA.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download tao-port-huggingface-model.zip