Tao Finetune Huggingface Model
NVIDIAOfficialCreated by NVIDIA Corporation
- Skill
- Workflow
- Software development
- Apache-2.0
- Medium risk
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides a structured, six-step workflow for fine-tuning HuggingFace CV, VLM, and LLM models on local NVIDIA GPUs. It leverages NGC PyTorch containers to ensure environment consistency and reproducibility. The workflow includes automated preflight checks, live research of model-specific recipes, smoke testing on real data, and optional integration with HuggingFace Hub for model sharing. It is designed to be the fallback for models not covered by dedicated TAO skills, ensuring a rigorous, documented path from inspection to deployment.
What it does
- Inspects and qualifies models and datasets for compatibility.
- Audits local hardware and selects the appropriate NGC PyTorch container.
- Performs live research to fetch model-specific training recipes and configurations.
- Generates a complete, reproducible project structure including training and evaluation scripts.
- Executes a mandatory smoke test on real data before full-scale training.
- Pushes fine-tuned models to the HuggingFace Hub and emits a self-contained rerun skill.
When to use it
- When you need to fine-tune a HuggingFace model and no dedicated TAO skill exists for it.
- When you require a reproducible, containerized training pipeline on local NVIDIA hardware.
- When you need to smoke-test a model locally before scaling to larger infrastructure.
- When you want to automate the generation of model cards and training reports.
Advantages
- Ensures environment consistency using NVIDIA-optimized NGC containers.
- Prevents common training failures through mandatory smoke testing and preflight checks.
- Reduces manual configuration by automating script generation and recipe research.
- Provides a clear, auditable path from initial inspection to final model deployment.
Usage examples
- “Fine-tune google/vit-base-patch16-224 on my local image dataset.”
- The agent will inspect the model and dataset, verify hardware, generate the training project, run a smoke test, and initiate the fine-tuning process.
- “Train a Llama-3-8B model using LoRA on my local GPU.”
- The agent will research the appropriate LoRA configuration, set up the NGC environment, and execute the training pipeline with the specified parameters.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/nvidia/tao-finetune-huggingface-model/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip tao-finetune-huggingface-model.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by NVIDIA Corporation
<!-- Copyright (c) 2026, NVIDIA CORPORATION. All rights reserved. Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0; see http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->
tao-finetune-huggingface-model
Standalone install? If this session was not initialized by the TAO skill bank plugin, run the
tao-setupskill first (host preflight, credentials, cross-skill discovery).
Local NVIDIA GPU fine-tuning for HuggingFace models, grounded in live-fetched documentation with curated references as a fallback safety net. One NGC container, a few focused scripts, one push to HF Hub. Follow the rules in this file; don't improvise.
Dedicated-model routing gate
Before Step 1 or any probe, image selection, package install, venv creation, or
training-code generation, resolve model_id against the packaged model-owner
registry. Use the absolute skill-bank root from which this file was loaded:
python <bank-root>/scripts/resolve_tao_model.py \
--skill-bank <bank-root> \
--model "$MODEL_ID" \
--format jsonThe resolver matches model metadata, including huggingface_model_ids,
network_arch, skill names, and legacy aliases. Routing is internal: a model ID
and task are enough. Never require prompt boilerplate about skills, containers,
or checkpoint formats.
Exit
0: stop this workflow and follow the owning model skill's environment, action metadata, preflight, and checkpoint preparation.Exit
3: no packaged model skill owns the ID. This is the only result that permits Step 1 of the generic workflow.Any other nonzero exit: ownership discovery is broken or ambiguous. Stop and resolve that error; do not silently fall back to generic Hugging Face training.
Hugging Face hosting never overrides ownership. Do not use this workflow to
bypass a matched skill or ask the user to prescribe its internal preparation.
For example, nvidia/Cosmos3-Nano routes to tao-finetune-cosmos-reason.
Do not create a host training venv in this workflow. Its default execution path is the NGC container documented below; any venv-based training path requires an explicit user request.
Order of authority (highest first):
User input — explicit
model_id,dataset_id,training_method,config.yamloverrides.Live research — model card, HF repo example, author finetune script, HF task docs, paper; always fetched (Step 3 +
references/research-priorities.md).Curated references (
references/*.md) — fallback when live research is silent/ambiguous.Your training-data memory — last resort; suspect, cross-check against (2)/(3).
Conflict resolution between (2) and (3) and the source-line discrepancy note are
in references/research-priorities.md.
Inputs
Required:
model_id— HuggingFace model ID, e.g.google/vit-base-patch16-224
Conditional credentials (read from the session environment — exported before launching or sourced from a user-approved env file):
HF_TOKEN— only when the model/dataset is gated (read) orpush_to_hubis on (write); public + public +push_to_hub: falseneeds none. Value never read — presence-only via[ -n "$HF_TOKEN" ].WANDB_API_KEY,WANDB_PROJECT— only when WandB is enabled;WANDB_MODE=disabledopts out.
Dataset — exactly one:
dataset_id— HuggingFace dataset ID (source:hf)local_dataset_path— local folder or file (source:local); optionallocal_dataset_format∈ {auto, imagefolder, coco, voc, jsonl, arrow, parquet, csv} (default: auto-detect).(omit) — agent recommends popular datasets (source:
recommend)
Optional (have defaults):
task_type— auto-detected from config + model cardn_train=10000,n_eval=1000,n_epochs=3,lora_r=16output_dir=./output/<model_short_name>hf_model_repo— push target; if unset and HF_TOKEN has write access, auto-derived as<whoami>/<model_short_name>-finetuned.push_to_hub=True— set toFalseto skipskip_baseline=False— skip zero-shot baseline eval
Optional deliverables (off by default):
emit_progress_log: false # output_dir/PROGRESS.md (per-step journal)
emit_report: false # reports/report.{pdf,html} with curves & samples
emit_unit_tests: false # tests/ with fake-data heterogeneous-batch testsAll values live in output_dir/config.yaml. Never hardcode in Python.
Execution platform
This skill orchestrates what to run; the platform skills own how to run it on a GPU host — read them first.
| Concern | Authoritative skill |
|---|---|
| GPU host runtime (driver 580, CUDA Toolkit 13.0, NVIDIA Container Toolkit 1.19.0) | tao-skill-bank:tao-setup-nvidia-gpu-host |
docker run flags, NGC auth, mounts, env passthrough, local/remote Docker job preflight (daemon, GPU smoke) | tao-skill-bank:tao-run-on-docker |
Default platform: local-docker — build a one-off image (run-<short>:latest)
and run it on the local Docker daemon. Ask only when the user explicitly needs a
different backend (Brev remote GPU, SLURM/Kubernetes); then run that platform's
Preflight first and route the Steps 4–5 docker run commands through it. The
GPU-runtime and presence-only credential preflights (values never read), the
canonical docker run flag set, discovery of the execution platforms from the
installed platform skills (tao-run-on-docker / -slurm / -kubernetes / -brev, plus
any external one; on a runtime that surfaces only the core router skills, read
skills/platform/tao-run-on-*/SKILL.md frontmatter), and
the workflow-specific flags (--entrypoint /bin/bash -lc, PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF,
--name hft_train) are in references/workflow-intake-preflight.md.
References — fallback safety net
Consulted only when live research is silent, ambiguous, or unavailable; live
docs always win for the specific model and current API. Each step links the
references it needs; full catalog in references/detailed-workflow.md.
Always-on: core-rules.md, error-playbook.md, compat-workarounds.md,
model-discovery.md, dataset-recommendations.md, dataset-sources.md,
dataset-patterns.md, hardware-container.md, research-priorities.md,
cv-scripts.md, vlm-scripts.md, docker-runs.md, hub-push.md,
pipeline-skill-template.md, deliverables.md. Opt-in (when their flag/need
applies): progress-tracking.md, testing.md, reporting.md,
workflow-intake-preflight.md, workflow-generate-train.md, workflow-push-rerun.md.
Rule: before falling back, log the live source you tried and why it was
insufficient (config.yaml notes:, and PROGRESS.md if enabled). [FETCH LIVE]
markers in cv-scripts.md / vlm-scripts.md are a research checklist, not code to
inline — refetch the listed URL if a block has no Step 3 finding.
Core rules
Non-negotiable behaviors. Short version (full enumeration —
hallucinated-imports list, never-without-approval list, full error-recovery and
hardware-sizing tables — in references/core-rules.md, consult before any
training-time decision):
Your HF-library knowledge is outdated. Fetch live docs (model card, HF repo example, task doc) before writing any ML code — don't generate trainer args / collator / transforms from memory (Step 3).
Smoke-test on real data with
--max_steps 1before any full run; no batch launches without a verified smoke.Never silently substitute model_id, dataset_id, or training_method — if what the user asked for doesn't load, stop and ask.
Error recovery is minimal-change. OOM → halve batch, double grad_accum, enable gradient checkpointing (no LoRA switch without approval); NaN → reduce LR 10×; flat loss → inspect collator; same error 3× → stop and ask. Don't loop.
Dataset columns verified BEFORE the collator — rename in
prepare_data.py; restructuring needed → stop and ask.Hardware-sizing thumb (bf16): ≤3B → 24 GB, 7–13B → 80 GB, 30B+ → multi-GPU or LoRA on 1× 80 GB, 70B+ → 8× 80 GB or LoRA. Full finetune won't fit and no LoRA requested → ask before switching.
Workflow — 6 steps
Single pass, sequential; each step has a clear gate before the next begins.
Step 1 — Inspect & qualify
Goal: decide whether to proceed. Probe model + dataset, apply accept/reject,
register applicable compat fixes, write the initial config.yaml.
Prerequisites: MODEL_ID, optional DATASET_ID / local_dataset_path,
optional HF_TOKEN, OUTPUT_DIR (default ./output/<model_short_name>). Probes
run in a CPU-only python:3.12-slim Docker container (bind-mounted .probe/
scratch) so the host needs no virtualenv — Docker must exist first. Docker-presence
guard, container env, full probe invocation, and the model/dataset probe scripts
are in references/workflow-intake-preflight.md, references/model-discovery.md,
and references/dataset-sources.md.
Probe requirements:
Model: load
AutoConfig, read model-card tags, detect task fromarchitectures+ tags + card examples (fallback logging inmodel-discovery.md).Dataset: for recommended datasets, first present 3-5 choices from
dataset-recommendations.md; for local data, bind-mount read-only and usedataset-sources.mdformat detection.Reject early if the model config fails, the task is out of scope, no recipe source exists, or the dataset cannot load / match the task schema.
Evaluate
compat-workarounds.mdagainst the model/task; defer hardware-dependent rules to Step 2.
Write the initial config.yaml (model_id, task, dataset_id or
local_dataset_path, research_sources: [] filled in Step 3,
applicable_workarounds: from Step 1, notes: [] for reference fallbacks,
push_to_hub: true default — annotated template in
references/workflow-intake-preflight.md). Optionally rm -rf "$OUTPUT_DIR/.probe"
once the gate is met.
Gate: config.yaml exists with model, dataset, task, applicable_workarounds;
do not proceed if any field is missing.
Step 2 — Hardware audit & NGC image
Goal: verify Docker + GPU + disk, pick the NGC PyTorch image live, finalize hardware-dependent compat rules.
2a. Audit (hard gate) — three checks (commands in
references/workflow-intake-preflight.md):
GPU host runtime —
tao-setup-nvidia-gpu-host'ssetup-nvidia-gpu-host.sh --backend docker --check-only; on fail, ask approval then re-run with--install --yes.Free-disk soft-warn — override via
MIN_DISK_GB(default 100 GB); recommend ≥ 100 GB for NGC base (~20 GB) + HF cache + checkpoints + data.Conditional credential presence (values never read) —
HF_TOKENonly when gated orpush_to_hubis on;WANDB_*only when WandB is on.
Do not proceed to Step 4 on a hard-fail — Step 4's docker build pulls a
20+ GB NGC base, and a missing nvidia-container-toolkit only surfaces later as
could not select device driver "" with capabilities: [[gpu]]. Record gpu_count,
gpu_name, driver_major, vram_gb_per_gpu in config.yaml.
2b. Pick NGC image (live): from the NVIDIA Deep Learning Frameworks support
matrix (https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/frameworks/support-matrix/index.html),
PyTorch NGC container section, pick the highest-versioned image where
Min driver ≤ detected driver_major and container CUDA ≤ host CUDA Toolkit
(match closely so cuDNN / TensorRT line up). Do not reject an image for an
aN/bN/rcN PyTorch tag — NGC validates the full image; pick the newest
CUDA-aligned one and let compat-workarounds.md handle per-version issues. If the
matrix is unreachable, use the fallbacks in references/hardware-container.md;
default nvcr.io/nvidia/pytorch:24.09-py3 <!-- unpinned: documented fallback --> (driver ≥ 545; SDPA+GQA bug — if
num_key_value_heads < num_attention_heads, set attn_implementation: "eager").
Record ngc_image in config.yaml.
2c. Re-evaluate hardware-dependent compat rules: re-run the
compat-workarounds.md walk for entries whose detect needs hw; update
applicable_workarounds: in place.
2d. Model-fit check: estimate param_bytes ≈ 2×param_count (bf16); if
60% of
vram_gb_per_gpu × 1e9, recommend LoRA in the user-facing summary.
Gate: config.yaml has ngc_image, gpu_count, gpu_name, driver_major,
vram_gb_per_gpu; hardware-dependent compat fixes recorded.
Step 3 — Research the recipe
Goal: fetch the live recipe — training-data knowledge of
transformers/trl/peft is suspect, so Step 3 is non-negotiable. Walk
references/research-priorities.md in priority order (Priority 1 → 6); stop once
you have, for the detected task:
AutoModel/ processor classTrain + eval transforms
Collator
compute_metricsHyperparameter hints (LR, batch size, epochs, scheduler)
Record findings in meta/recipe.md, append source URLs to
config.yaml: research_sources:. A slot with no live finding falls back to the
matching scaffold (cv-scripts.md / vlm-scripts.md), logged as "fallback to
scaffold — no live source for <slot>" under notes:. Conflict-resolution rules
are in references/research-priorities.md.
Gate: every required slot filled, with a source URL or scaffold-fallback note.
Step 4 — Generate project & smoke-test
Goal: write all scripts, build the image, prepare data, run a 1-step smoke on
real data (one docker build, two docker runs).
4a. Generate project files in output_dir/: config.yaml, Dockerfile,
requirements.txt, prepare_data.py, train.py, run_eval.py, infer.py,
optional merge_lora.py, optional tests/, .gitignore. Live Step 3 research is
authority; cv-scripts.md / vlm-scripts.md give scaffold shape only. Apply every
applicable_workarounds entry as a Dockerfile block, requirement pin, config
override, or runtime env var. Hard rules: run_eval.py keeps that exact filename
(avoids colliding with the HF evaluate package); every generated .py starts
with the NVIDIA Apache-2.0 copyright header and any emitter fails when it is
missing; emit_unit_tests: true generates and runs tests per
references/testing.md. Script bodies, Dockerfile shape, and the emitter contract
are in references/workflow-generate-train.md.
4b. Build, prepare, smoke — docker build -t run-<short>:latest ., then
prepare_data and the --smoke --max_steps 1 run (references/docker-runs.md
§1-3). Smoke pass criteria (in logs/smoke.log):
No exception
Loss is finite (not
0.0, notNaN)grad_norm > 0at step 1
If emit_unit_tests: true, also run pytest tests/ in the container. Any failure → STOP.
4c. Preflight summary — before full training, print and verify: reference URL, dataset columns, Hub target, monitoring target, NGC image, hardware, smoke loss/grad norm.
Gate: project files written, image built, smoke PASSED, preflight has no blank fields.
Step 5 — Train, evaluate, infer
Goal: baseline eval, full training, post-train eval, optional LoRA merge, 5
inference samples (all commands: references/docker-runs.md §4-8).
| Sub-step | docker-runs.md | Skip if |
|---|---|---|
| 5a. Baseline eval (zero-shot) | §4 | skip_baseline: true |
| 5b. Full training (detached) | §5 | — |
| 5c. LoRA merge | §6 | not VLM+LoRA |
| 5d. Post-train eval | §7 | — |
| 5e. Inference (5 samples) | §8 | — |
Multi-GPU: prepend torchrun --nproc_per_node=$gpu_count to python train.py.
While training streams, watch docker logs -f hft_train: loss should drop within
10-20 steps; flat loss (collator/label-masking bug), NaN (LR too high), and OOM
all stop the run — recovery in references/core-rules.md. If emit_report: true,
run report.py after Step 5e per references/reporting.md.
Gate: all of:
checkpoints/final/(orcheckpoints/merged/for LoRA) existsreports/eval_results.jsonhas a numeric primary metricreports/baseline_results.jsonexists (unless skipped)reports/inference_samples/has 5 sampleswandb URL shows descending loss
Step 6 — Push & emit rerun skill
Goal: publish the run and make it reproducible without re-research.
Push per references/hub-push.md (weights, model card, eval/baseline JSONs,
config.yaml, Dockerfile, requirements.txt, inference samples, reports when
emitted) unless push_to_hub: false is explicit. Emit
<output_dir>/skills/run-<short>/SKILL.md from
references/pipeline-skill-template.md — substitute every placeholder, include
full YAML metadata + the NVIDIA copyright HTML comment, and make any emitter fail
if those are missing.
Gate (Done criteria): all of:
Step 5 gate met
HF Hub repo exists at the resolved URL with weights + card +
results/(unlesspush_to_hub: false)<output_dir>/skills/run-<short>/SKILL.mdexists, no<placeholder>left, with metadata + copyright HTML comment perpipeline-skill-template.md
Final message: wandb URL, HF Hub URL, baseline -> fine-tuned primary metric,
reports/inference_samples/, and the rerun skill path.
Error playbook
On a known runtime error, consult the symptom → minimal-fix table in
references/error-playbook.md (NGC entrypoint, PyTorch/Transformers regressions,
numpy ABI, Albumentations bbox, PEFT/checkpointing, LoRA target breadth, CV
augmentation gaps, OOM at step 0) before redesigning anything. When a row there
fires twice across runs, lift it into compat-workarounds.md with a detect rule
— auto-applied in Step 1 before the error can fire.
Communication style
Terse. No filler, no restating the request; one-word answers when appropriate.
Always include direct Hub and wandb URLs when referencing artifacts.
On error: state what went wrong, why, what you changed — no menus.
Never present "Option A/B/C" for a request with a clear answer. Act.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer960 B
- BENCHMARK.md7.7 KiB
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.2 KiB
- SKILL.md19.2 KiB
- config/skillspector-baseline.yaml4.4 KiB
- eval.config2.5 KiB
- evals/evals.json3.5 KiB
- references/compat-workarounds.md11.8 KiB
- references/core-rules.md4.7 KiB
- references/cv-scripts.md33.2 KiB
- references/dataset-patterns.md10.5 KiB
- references/dataset-recommendations.md11.0 KiB
- references/dataset-sources.md17.3 KiB
- references/deliverables.md20.1 KiB
- references/detailed-workflow.md715 B
- references/docker-runs.md8.9 KiB
- references/error-playbook.md3.8 KiB
- references/hardware-container.md8.7 KiB
- references/hub-push.md5.4 KiB
- references/model-discovery.md10.5 KiB
- references/pipeline-skill-template.md8.9 KiB
- references/progress-tracking.md9.7 KiB
- references/reporting.md18.5 KiB
- references/research-priorities.md6.5 KiB
- references/testing.md20.9 KiB
- references/vlm-scripts.md27.7 KiB
- references/workflow-generate-train.md7.6 KiB
- references/workflow-intake-preflight.md22.9 KiB
- references/workflow-push-rerun.md3.0 KiB
- skill-card.md4.9 KiB
- skill.oms.sig10.2 KiB
BENCHMARK.md
Skill Benchmark: tao-finetune-huggingface-model
✅ Overall verdict: PASS — Recommended for publication
Publication Recommendation
Recommended for publication based on the completed evaluation evidence in this report.
Evaluation Metadata
Skill:
tao-finetune-huggingface-modelEvaluation date: 2026-10-16
Evaluator version:
1.5.6Agents: Claude Code (
aws/anthropic/bedrock-claude-opus-4-8), Codex (openai/openai/gpt-5.5)Tasks: 4 evaluation tasks (4 positive)
Dataset digest:
sha256:1dfae0e82b4644c26c4137c7a97c06489a0136400c4aa9454daa97f9d614dacb(skill-evaluator-dataset-snapshot/1)Attempts per task: 1
Environment:
k8s-sandboxTier 2 evidence: required for publication
Tier 3 evidence: required for publication
Each task attempt ran in its own isolated sandbox pod.
What This Report Answers
The three-tier evaluation checks whether the skill:
is safe to use;
produces correct answers;
is discovered and activated when needed;
helps the agent complete the user's goal and expected workflow; and
avoids wasted skill and tool usage.
Results at a Glance
| Measure | Claude Code (Baseline → Skill Uplift) | Codex (Baseline → Skill Uplift) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 82.5% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 57.6% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |
| Security | 100.0% → 100.0% (±0.0 points) | 100.0% → 100.0% (±0.0 points) |
| Correctness | 30.0% → 100.0% (+70.0 points) | 35.0% → 70.0% (+35.0 points) |
| Discoverability | 57.5% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 0.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |
| Effectiveness | 23.5% → 87.9% (+64.4 points) | 35.0% → 60.4% (+25.4 points) |
| Efficiency | 67.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | Not available |
How to read this table: baseline is the same task attempted without the target skill. Scores are rounded to one decimal; threshold-adjacent values use additional precision so their displayed band matches the verdict. Uplift is derived from those displayed scores and shown in percentage points.
Example: 47.0% → 92.0% (+45.0 points) means the skill-assisted run scored 92.0%, 45.0 percentage points above its 47.0% no-skill baseline.
A partial dimension was calculated from only the available configured signals; review the detailed report before relying on it.
Token Usage
Actual Tier 3 execution usage is reported for every observed agent/case pair and both conditions.
| Agent | Dataset case | With skill | Without skill | Delta | Change | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| claude-code | All cases | 1,093,127 | 560,922 | N/A | N/A | skill 3/4; base 3/4 |
| claude-code | tao-finetune-huggingface-model-basic | 71,525 | 310,575 | -239,050 | -76.97% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | tao-finetune-huggingface-model-dedicated-routing | 991,593 | N/A | N/A | N/A | skill 1/1; base 0/1 |
| claude-code | tao-finetune-huggingface-model-dedicated-routing-non-cosmos | N/A | 63,711 | N/A | N/A | skill 0/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | tao-finetune-huggingface-model-unclaimed-routing | 30,009 | 186,636 | -156,627 | -83.92% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | All cases | 56,036 | 54,623 | N/A | N/A | skill 3/4; base 3/4 |
| codex | tao-finetune-huggingface-model-basic | 14,281 | 13,554 | +727 | +5.36% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | tao-finetune-huggingface-model-dedicated-routing | N/A | 27,449 | N/A | N/A | skill 0/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | tao-finetune-huggingface-model-dedicated-routing-non-cosmos | 27,952 | N/A | N/A | N/A | skill 1/1; base 0/1 |
| codex | tao-finetune-huggingface-model-unclaimed-routing | 13,803 | 13,620 | +183 | +1.34% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| ALL AGENTS | Dataset aggregate | 1,149,163 | 615,545 | N/A | N/A | skill 6/8; base 6/8 |
Prompt tokens include cached reads, so total tokens are prompt + completion (cached is not added twice). The Efficiency score uses (prompt - cached) + completion. N/A means the relevant trajectory counters were not available; coverage is never estimated.
Tier Status
| Tier | Purpose | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Static validation | PASSED WITH OBSERVATIONS | 11 validator(s); 63 finding(s) |
| Tier 2 | Semantic deduplication | PASSED WITH OBSERVATIONS | 2 validator(s); 1 finding(s) |
| Tier 3 | Live agent evaluation | PASS | 2 agent(s); 4 task(s) |
Findings and Observations
<details> <summary>Show detailed findings and successful checks</summary>
CRITICAL CONTENT_DEDUP/chunk_count_limit: Tier 2 produced more than 512 content chunks. (
references/workflow-intake-preflight.md)MEDIUM QUALITY/quality_correctness: SKILL_SPEC recommended field missing: 'metadata.tags' (
skills/applications/tao-finetune-huggingface-model/SKILL.md)MEDIUM QUALITY/quality_efficiency: Deeply nested references in docker-runs.md (
skills/applications/tao-finetune-huggingface-model/SKILL.md)MEDIUM SCHEMA/frontmatter_field_placement: Root field 'tags' is ignored; use 'metadata.tags' (
skills/applications/tao-finetune-huggingface-model/SKILL.md)MEDIUM SCHEMA/folder_hierarchy: Unexpected nesting depth for general skill (
skills/applications/tao-finetune-huggingface-model)59 additional finding(s) are available in the full evaluation artifacts.
</details>
Scoring Methodology
<details> <summary>Show dimension definitions, source signals, and thresholds</summary>
| Dimension | Question | Scored signals |
|---|---|---|
| Security | Is it safe to use? | security (100%) |
| Correctness | Is the answer correct? | accuracy (100%) |
| Discoverability | Was the right skill loaded when needed? | skill_execution (100%) |
| Effectiveness | Did the skill help complete the task? | goal_accuracy (50%) + behavior_check (50%) |
| Efficiency | Did it avoid wasted tool calls and token usage? | skill_efficiency (50%) + token_efficiency (50%) |
Dimension bands: PASS at 50% or above; NEUTRAL from 40% to below 50%; FAIL below 40%.
Overall Tier 3 lift: PASS at +5 points or more; FAIL at -10 points or less; values between those bands are NEUTRAL.
Overall verdict: PASS only when every configured dimension passes for at least one supported agent. Lift is reported as diagnostic evidence and does not override this gate.
The 50% attempt pass threshold is a separate per-task gate; it is not the dimension pass threshold.
Effectiveness is the equal-weight mean of goal completion (
goal_accuracy) and expected workflow adherence (behavior_check).Efficiency is 50% tool-call productivity (the backward-compatible
skill_efficiencywire id) and 50%token_efficiency. Positive-case skill routing is scored under Discoverability, not Efficiency; a negative case without a routing target is N/A. N/A sources are omitted, remaining weights are renormalized, and the dimension is marked partial.
Signals present in this run:
security(Security): unsafe operations, secret leakage, and unauthorized access.skill_execution(Skill Execution): whether the expected skill was selected, decoys were avoided, and the workflow executed.skill_efficiency(Tool Productivity): tool-call productivity (legacy wire id; routing is scored under Discoverability).accuracy(Accuracy): final-answer correctness against the reference answer.goal_accuracy(Goal Accuracy): whether the user's goal was achieved.behavior_check(Behavior Check): whether the expected workflow behavior was followed.
</details>
Freshness
Regenerate this benchmark when the skill, evaluation dataset, target agent/model, evaluator version, environment, or scoring policy changes.
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Declares allowed tools, Needs an API key, Needs Python
The author says: Requires docker + nvidia-container-toolkit, NVIDIA GPU (driver ≥ 545, ≥ 24 GB VRAM for ≤3B models), ~40 GB free disk. Optional credentials (read from the session environment) — HF_TOKEN is read only when the model/dataset is gated or `push_to_hub` is on; WANDB_API_KEY and WANDB_PROJECT only when WandB logging is enabled.
Security
What our scanner noticed· Medium risk
- Large base64-encoded blobs
- Instructions that use the network
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- NVIDIA Corporation
- Publisher
- NVIDIA (Official)
- Source
- NVIDIA/skills · skills/tao-finetune-huggingface-model · commit fce3cca
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE-APACHE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by NVIDIA Corporation or NVIDIA.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download tao-finetune-huggingface-model.zip