AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
The doca-upgrade skill provides a structured, safety-first approach to managing DOCA software versions. It enforces a strict detect-report-ask-act workflow to prevent accidental or broken upgrades. The skill covers host package upgrades, BlueField BFB refreshes, and container tag updates. It is designed to handle planned version transitions as well as recovery from failed or partial upgrades, ensuring that all hardware-related safety steps are delegated to appropriate specialized skills.
What it does
- Detects currently installed DOCA versions across host and DPU components.
- Reports the version gap between the current install and the target release.
- Enforces a mandatory confirmation gate before executing any upgrade commands.
- Provides a recovery ladder for interrupted or failed package installations.
- Routes hardware, firmware, and reboot requirements to the dedicated safety skill.
- Identifies if components are on a deprecation or sunset track.
When to use it
- When you need to upgrade or downgrade your DOCA software environment.
- When an upgrade was interrupted and left the system in a broken state.
- When you need to verify if a newer DOCA release is available for your setup.
- When you need to update NGC DOCA container tags.
- When you suspect your DOCA packages have drifted due to system-wide updates.
Advantages
- Prevents accidental system breakage by requiring explicit user confirmation.
- Standardizes the upgrade process across different DOCA deployment types.
- Provides clear recovery paths for common upgrade failure scenarios.
- Maintains system integrity by delegating hardware-sensitive tasks to safety-focused modules.
Usage examples
- “Should I move to the next DOCA release?”
- The agent will detect your current version, report the available target release, explain the gap, and stop to wait for your explicit confirmation.
- “The upgrade aborted half-way and dpkg is in a broken state.”
- The agent will diagnose the partial upgrade, identify the interrupted transaction, and guide you through the recovery ladder to stabilize the package database.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/nvidia/doca-upgrade/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip doca-upgrade.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by NVIDIA
DOCA upgrade
Examples
"Should I move to the next DOCA release?" — detect what is installed, report the gap, then STOP and ask. Never auto-upgrade.
"apt upgrade drifted my DOCA packages." — this is recovery, not a silent repair. Detect, report, ask, then guide.
Quick answers (answer from this file)
Not changing versions (a runtime error on the current, pinned install)? This skill does not apply: name
doca-debugand stop.
These two answers are complete here; open TASKS.md only for a guided
upgrade after the user confirms. Run only the read-only detection
commands yourself. Package commands (sudo dpkg, apt, apt-get) need
root and change the system: give them to the user to run and stop; in an
agent shell sudo waits for a password and the session stalls.
"Can I just
apt upgradeto the next DOCA?" Never upgrade automatically. Detect the installed release with thedoca-versionfour-source chain (pkg-config --modversion doca-common,cat /opt/mellanox/doca/applications/VERSION,doca_caps --version, and the BFB version on BlueField), report the gap to the target release, then STOP and ask for explicit confirmation. BFB, firmware or reboot steps followdoca-hardware-safety."The upgrade aborted half-way and dpkg reports an interrupted transaction." Recover the package database first: after the user explicitly confirms (both commands change system package state), the user runs
sudo dpkg --configure -a, thensudo apt-get -f install(Debian/Ubuntu). Do not re-run the upgrade as the first action; re-detect the release withdoca-versionbefore deciding the next step.
Instructions
Follow Loading order below. Open the tasks companion for detect → report → ASK → guided upgrade. Open the capabilities companion for the upgrade-mode taxonomy and refuse-auto-upgrade rule. Do not open every companion file.
Where to start: This skill is the bundle's single source of truth for the discipline that wraps a DOCA upgrade or downgrade. Open the tasks companion when the user wants to do something with an upgrade (detect the gap, ask for confirmation, walk the guided upgrade, verify it, or diagnose a failed one); open the capabilities companion when the question is what does an upgrade even cover (the host apt-upgrade vs BFB reflash vs container-tag bump vs downgrade/rollback modes, the never-auto rule, the confirmation gate, the sunset-awareness concern, the error taxonomy, and the upgrade-specific safety overlay).
How to use this skill. Read this file, then search the companion file
for the ## <name> heading the question needs and read that whole section.
Answer completely from it, quoting only its symbols and commands. Do not
browse docs; use the entry points in doca-public-knowledge-map. Give
environment checks as commands for the user's DOCA host. For out-of-scope
requests, name the skill that owns them and stop.
For a planned move, the single most important rule this skill
exists to enforce is detect → report → ASK → only-then guided
upgrade. Never upgrade automatically. The skill detects the
installed DOCA env and what newer release is available, reports the
gap clearly, then STOPS and asks the user for explicit confirmation.
Only on an explicit "yes" does it walk a guided upgrade. A failed or
partial move instead enters the recovery ladder without presenting a
new target move. In both paths every hardware / firmware / reboot
step is delegated to
doca-hardware-safety/SKILL.md, never
redefined here. Version detection itself is owned by
doca-version/SKILL.md; this skill routes there
and does not restate the detection chain.
Example questions this skill answers well
The CLASSES of upgrade questions this skill is built to answer, each with one worked example. The agent should treat the class as the load-bearing piece — the worked example is a single instance.
"Is there a newer DOCA than what I have, and how far behind am I?" — worked example: "
pkg-config --modversion doca-commonsays<installed X.Y.Z>; what's current and what does moving cost me?". Answered by the detect-and-report-the-gap workflow inconfigure, which routes the
detection to
doca-version/SKILL.mdand the what is current lookup todoca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.md."Should I just run
apt upgradeto move to the next DOCA release?" — worked example: "I want the newest Flow features; can I upgrade in place right now?". Answered by the never-auto rule and the confirmation gate inSafety policy
plus the ask-before-acting step in
run — the agent reports the gap and
STOPS for explicit confirmation before any upgrade command runs.
"My upgrade left the host on a different release than the BlueField — what happened?" — worked example: "after the upgrade
pkg-configreports the new release butbfverstill reports the old one". Answered by the host/BFB-skew row inError taxonomy
and the failed-upgrade diagnosis in
debug, which re-routes the
detection to
doca-version ## test."The upgrade aborted half-way and now
dpkgis wedged — how do I recover?" — worked example: "apt upgradewas interrupted;dpkgreports an interrupted transaction". Answered by the partial-upgrade and aborted-transaction rows inError taxonomy
plus the recovery ladder in ## debug.
"The upgrade needs me to reflash the BFB / flip BlueField mode / reboot — is that safe?" — worked example: "the target release requires a new BFB; can I reflash now?". Answered by routing every hardware / firmware / reboot step to
doca-hardware-safety/SKILL.mdviarun; this skill never redefines the
reflash, mode-flip, or cold-power-cycle discipline.
"My installed component is being sunset — should I keep building on it or move?" — worked example: "I rely on DOCA App Shield / the DOCA Flow Inspector service; are they on a deprecation track?". Answered by the sunset / deprecation awareness concern in
Capabilities and modes,
which routes the user to the public release notes via
doca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.mdto confirm lifecycle status rather than recommending continued investment in a component that may be sunsetting.
When to load this skill
Load this skill whenever an upgrade or downgrade of DOCA is the load-bearing concern — the user is asking whether a newer release exists, whether to move to it, how to move safely, or how to recover a move that went wrong. The decision must be made before the agent composes its first sentence; the activation checklist below is mirrored here so the activation rule is at hand whenever this skill is consulted. For a planned upgrade or downgrade, it reports the gap and then STOPS for explicit user confirmation. For a failed or partial upgrade, it enters ## debug first to capture and stabilize the current state; it never uses another upgrade command as the first recovery action, retries the move, or issues a new upgrade command without explicit confirmation.
Agent activation checklist — load this skill at the START of the answer when any cell below is true
| Trigger class | Concrete prompt-side signals (any one fires the overlay) |
|---|---|
| Upgrade / downgrade intent | "is there a newer DOCA", "should I move to the next release", "upgrade me to the latest", "roll me back to the previous DOCA", "downgrade to 3.1 for a bug repro" |
| Accidental / drifted upgrade | "apt upgrade pulled a newer DOCA point release and broke my build", "my host and BlueField are on different releases now", *"the source channel is latest and I didn't mean to move" * |
| Failed / partial upgrade | "the upgrade aborted half-way", "dpkg is wedged after an interrupted transaction", "upgrade finished but the four-way match no longer holds" |
| Container tag bump | the user wants to move an NGC DOCA container deployment from one tag to a newer one, or asks whether bumping the tag is an upgrade |
| Sunset / deprecation awareness | the user asks whether the component they depend on is deprecated, being sunset, or worth continued investment |
First classify the request. A planned move (including a requested
rollback) follows detect → report → ASK. A failed, partial, or
accidentally drifted move is already a diagnosis/recovery request:
load this skill, capture the current four-source state, and enter
TASKS.md ## debug; do not ask for permission to perform an upgrade
that has already failed, and do not issue another upgrade command as
the first recovery action.
For a planned move, the agent MUST:
Route planned-upgrade version detection to
doca-version ## configure. For failed or partial upgrades, start withdoca-version ## debuganddebug. Do NOT restate the
four-source detection chain here; this skill consumes the detected state and four-way match status.
Report the gap and STOP for explicit confirmation. Present the installed release, the available target release, and what moving costs (per
Version compatibility),
then ask the user to confirm. Do NOT proceed to any upgrade command until the user explicitly says yes.
Route every hardware / firmware / reboot step to
doca-hardware-safety/SKILL.md. This skill names when such a step is part of the upgrade; that skill names how it is applied safely.
For a failed/partial move, the agent MUST instead classify the
captured state against
CAPABILITIES.md ## Error taxonomy,
delegate the single documented corrective action, and re-enter the
recovery ladder. Any unsupported installed → target jump fails
closed: do not improvise intermediate releases or commands; require
an upgrade path explicitly documented by the Compatibility Policy or
release notes.
Do not load this skill for first-time install (use
doca-setup/SKILL.md), for the version-detection
chain in isolation (use doca-version/SKILL.md),
or for general orientation (use
doca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.md).
What this skill provides
This is a thin loader. The body keeps only the orientation needed to pick the right next file. The substantive upgrade material lives in two companion files:
the capabilities companion — the upgrade surface: the upgrade-mode taxonomy (host apt upgrade vs BFB reflash vs container-tag bump vs downgrade/rollback), the never-auto rule and the confirmation gate, the sunset / deprecation-awareness concern, the version-compatibility overlay that redirects to
doca-version, the error taxonomy (partial upgrade, apt-source drift, host/BFB skew, aborted transaction /dpkginterrupted), the observability surface (which commands prove the upgrade did or did not happen), and the upgrade-specific safety overlay on top ofdoca-hardware-safety.the tasks companion — step-by-step workflows for the in-scope verbs:
configure(detect + discover target + apt-source precheck),buildandmodify(routing stubs — the version-pin change is owned elsewhere),run(the confirmation-gated guided upgrade),test(post-upgrade four-way verification),debug(diagnose a failed / partial upgrade), plus aDeferred task verbsblock.
Loading order
Read this skill first to confirm the user's question is in scope (an upgrade / downgrade is being contemplated or recovered).
For the upgrade-mode taxonomy, the never-auto rule, the sunset-awareness concern, the error taxonomy, observability, and the safety overlay, see the capabilities companion.
For step-by-step workflows — detect-and-report, the confirmation-gated guided upgrade, post-upgrade verification, and failed-upgrade diagnosis — see the tasks companion.
Related skills
doca-version/SKILL.md— owns the four-source detection chain and the four-way match rule. This skill's detect step routes there and does not redefine version detection; the gap report consumes the detected version.doca-setup/SKILL.md— owns first-time install, install verification, and the apt-source path. This skill's apt-source consistency precheck cross-links there before anyapt-shaped upgrade is contemplated.doca-hardware-safety/SKILL.md— owns every hardware / firmware / reboot step (mlxconfig, BFB reflash, BlueField mode flip, cold power cycle). This skill's## Safety policyoverlays that meta-policy and adds only the upgrade-specific surface (confirmation gate, rollback-first, maintenance window).doca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.md— the routing table to public DOCA docs, including the release notes and the Compatibility Policy. This skill routes what is the current release and is this component sunsetting there; it does not duplicate the routing.doca-debug/SKILL.md— the cross-cutting debug ladder. A failed upgrade whose residual symptom lives at a software layer hands off there once the upgrade state is known.doca-programming-guide/SKILL.md— the build pattern a consumer rebuilds against after an upgrade. This skill surfaces that a rebuild may be needed; the build mechanics live there.doca-structured-tools-contract/SKILL.md— the JSON schemas the agent prefers when present; the upgrade detect step reuses the samedoca-envone-shot the version skill uses, when the host has it.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer894 B
- BENCHMARK.md9.8 KiB
- CAPABILITIES.md15.0 KiB
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.2 KiB
- SKILL.md14.8 KiB
- TASKS.md13.5 KiB
- evals/evals.json3.3 KiB
- skill-card.md4.7 KiB
- skill.oms.sig4.9 KiB
CAPABILITIES.md
DOCA upgrade — capabilities, version compatibility, errors, observability, safety
Where to start: Pick the H2 anchor that matches your question (what an upgrade covers / how the target release is chosen / which failure modes to recognize / how to prove the upgrade happened / the upgrade-specific safety overlay) and read that section end-to-end. The tables in each section are the load-bearing content; the prose is interpretation.
Read this file when the loader sent you here from
SKILL.md. For the how of executing each workflow, jump
to TASKS.md. The version-detection chain this skill
consumes is owned by
doca-version/SKILL.md; the hardware / firmware /
reboot discipline this skill delegates to is owned by
doca-hardware-safety/SKILL.md.
Pattern overview
Every planned-upgrade question resolves into detect what is installed → report the gap to the target → ASK for explicit confirmation → only then walk a guided upgrade. A failed/partial upgrade instead resolves into capture the current state → classify the failure → apply one documented corrective action → re-verify or rollback/escalate. The patterns are CLASSES — they apply across every DOCA release, every upgrade mode, and every host kind.
| Upgrade pattern | Class shape | Where the substance lives |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Detect + discover the gap | Read the installed version (via doca-version) and the available target release (via the public release notes) and state the delta | ## Capabilities and modes + TASKS.md ## configure |
| 2. Report + confirm | Present installed, target, and cost; STOP; obtain explicit user confirmation before any command runs | ## Safety policy confirmation gate + TASKS.md ## run |
| 3. Walk the guided upgrade | Execute the mode-appropriate steps; delegate every hardware / firmware / reboot step to doca-hardware-safety | ## Capabilities and modes mode table + TASKS.md ## run |
| 4. Verify the upgrade landed | Re-run the four-way match (via doca-version) and prove the new version is what is loaded | ## Observability + TASKS.md ## test |
| 5. Diagnose a failed / partial upgrade | Map the symptom (partial upgrade, source drift, host/BFB skew, aborted transaction) to a recovery action | ## Error taxonomy + TASKS.md ## debug |
Two cross-cutting rules that apply to every pattern above:
Never upgrade automatically. The agent detects and reports; the user decides. No upgrade command runs until the user has seen the gap report and explicitly confirmed (see
## Safety policy).Surface sunset / deprecation status before recommending more investment. When the gap report touches a component that may be on a deprecation track, route the user to the public release notes to confirm lifecycle status rather than recommending continued investment.
Capabilities and modes
An "upgrade" is not one operation. The agent identifies which
upgrade mode the user is in before reporting the gap, because
the mode determines the steps, the rollback shape, and which
hardware-touching steps (if any) are delegated to
doca-hardware-safety/SKILL.md.
| Upgrade mode | What moves | What it touches | Who owns the touching step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Host apt upgrade | The host-side DOCA packages (doca-common, the per-tool packages, doca-host) move to a newer release | Userspace packages; may pull a new kernel module / DKMS / OFED step | The apt-source path is owned by doca-setup ## configure (doca-setup/TASKS.md#configure); the precheck is doca-version ## apt-source consistency (doca-version/TASKS.md#apt-source-consistency) |
| BFB reflash | The BlueField OS image and DPU-side DOCA install move to a newer BFB | The BlueField OS image, the DPU PCIe surface, every hosted service container; a link-breaking, reboot-class change | Delegated entirely to doca-hardware-safety ## modify (doca-hardware-safety/TASKS.md#modify); never redefined here |
| Container image tag bump | An NGC DOCA container deployment moves from one tag to a newer one | The container image only; the host packages and BFB are independent anchors | The tag-selection rule is owned by doca-setup/SKILL.md; the version inside the new tag is verified via doca-version ## test (doca-version/TASKS.md#test) |
| Downgrade / rollback | The host packages, BFB, or container tag move back to a prior release (e.g. for a bug repro or a regression rollback) | The same surfaces as the forward modes, in reverse | Same delegation as the forward mode; the rollback discipline overlays doca-hardware-safety ## debug (doca-hardware-safety/TASKS.md#debug) |
The agent's rule: identify the mode, then report the gap for that mode. A host apt upgrade and a BFB reflash are different changes with different blast radii even when they move the same release number; the agent does not conflate them.
Sunset / deprecation awareness
When the agent detects what is installed, part of the gap report is
checking whether an installed component is on a deprecation / sunset
track. DOCA App Shield and the DOCA Flow Inspector service (both
outside this bundle's scope; see AGENTS.md ## Non-goals (bundle AGENTS.md#non-goals-questions-the-agent-should-recognize-and-refuse-politely)
item 7) are worked examples to watch on this front. The discipline is:
Treat a possible sunset as a finding to surface, not a fact to assert from memory. The authoritative statement of a component's lifecycle status is the public release notes, reached via
doca-public-knowledge-map ## Public documentation entry points(doca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.md#public-documentation-entry-points) (DOCA Release Notes) — the agent routes the user there to confirm.When a component does appear to be sunsetting, the agent does NOT recommend continued investment in it as part of an upgrade. It surfaces the sunset status, points at the public migration / docs path via
doca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.md, and lets the user decide whether to upgrade-in-place or migrate.This is class-shaped: DOCA App Shield and the Flow Inspector service are the worked examples, but the discipline applies to any component whose release notes mark it deprecated.
Version compatibility
For the canonical DOCA version-detection chain, the four-way match
rule, NGC container semantics, and the headers-win-over-docs rule,
see doca-version/SKILL.md. The body lives there;
this skill does not duplicate it.
The upgrade overlay is:
The gap is
installed → target. The installed version comes from the four-source chain indoca-version ## Capabilities and modes(doca-version/CAPABILITIES.md#capabilities-and-modes); the target release is the one the user wants, confirmed against the public release notes — never a version string from agent memory.The target must be a supported pairing. Before recommending a move, the agent confirms the
installed → targetjump is inside the window NVIDIA documents in the DOCA Compatibility Policy (cited once viadoca-version ## Version compatibility(doca-version/CAPABILITIES.md#version-compatibility)). If the target is outside that documented window, or the policy and target release notes do not document the exact requested jump, report it as unsupported and STOP; do not recommend or execute the move or synthesize an intermediate-release ladder. Route the user throughdoca-public-knowledge-mapto the release-matched policy and ask for a documented supported path, or keep the current release in place.Host, BFB, firmware, and container tag are independent anchors. An upgrade that moves one anchor must bring the others into a supported pairing; a move that leaves them skewed is a failed upgrade, caught by the post-upgrade four-way match in
## Observability.Never quote a version literal from memory. The version-handling anti-hallucination rules in
doca-version ## Safety policy(doca-version/CAPABILITIES.md#safety-policy) apply here without modification.
Error taxonomy
The upgrade-level failure modes the agent should recognize and
disambiguate before continuing. For the cross-library DOCA_ERROR_*
taxonomy itself, see
doca-programming-guide CAPABILITIES.md ## Error taxonomy (doca-programming-guide/CAPABILITIES.md#error-taxonomy);
the rows below are the upgrade-level causes that bubble up as
those errors.
| Symptom | Most-likely upgrade cause | First action |
|---|---|---|
| Some DOCA packages moved to the target release; others did not | Partial upgrade — the package set converged unevenly (a held package, a missing per-tool package, or an interrupted run) | Re-detect the four sources per doca-version ## debug (doca-version/TASKS.md#debug); converge the package set on one release before any other diagnosis |
apt-cache policy doca-common shows a Candidate from a different release than what is installed | Apt-source drift — the configured source channel disagrees with the installed release | Reconcile the apt source first per doca-version ## apt-source consistency (doca-version/TASKS.md#apt-source-consistency); do not upgrade until the source matches the intended target |
After the upgrade, pkg-config/doca_caps report the new release but bfver still reports the old BFB | Host/BFB version skew post-upgrade — the host moved but the BFB did not | The BFB reflash is the missing step; route it to doca-hardware-safety ## modify (doca-hardware-safety/TASKS.md#modify), and re-verify per doca-version ## test (doca-version/TASKS.md#test) |
dpkg reports an interrupted / half-configured transaction; further apt invocations refuse to proceed | Aborted transaction / dpkg interrupted — the upgrade run was interrupted mid-flight | Recover the package database (sudo dpkg --configure -a, then sudo apt-get -f install) before retrying; see TASKS.md ## debug for the recovery ladder |
Upgrade completed but the program now returns DOCA_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED / builds against a symbol the runtime lacks | Build/runtime skew after upgrade — the runtime *.so and the headers/pkg-config are now from different releases | Same partial-install diagnosis owned by doca-version ## debug (doca-version/TASKS.md#debug); reconverge, do not patch around in code |
| Downgrade left the host on the older release but a co-tenant workload now fails | Rollback blast radius — the downgrade affected shared host state | Treat the rollback with the same discipline as the forward move; route any hardware-touching rollback step to doca-hardware-safety ## debug (doca-hardware-safety/TASKS.md#debug) |
Observability
The upgrade observability surface is the set of commands that prove
whether the upgrade did or did not happen. There is no DOCA
"upgrade counter"; the visibility comes from comparing the version
state before and after against the sources
doca-version/SKILL.md owns. The agent reads the
same chain before the upgrade (to establish the baseline) and after
(to prove the move).
| Phase | Signal | What it tells the agent |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-upgrade | The four-source detection chain + four-way match status, captured per doca-version ## configure (doca-version/TASKS.md#configure) | The baseline the post-upgrade state is compared against; without it the agent cannot prove the move happened |
| Pre-upgrade | apt-cache policy <pkg> / the configured apt source channel | Whether the host will resolve to the intended target before any command runs; the apt-source precheck owns this |
| Post-upgrade | The same four-source chain re-read, plus the four-way match per doca-version ## test (doca-version/TASKS.md#test) | Whether the install converged on the target release and is internally consistent; a partial result is a failed upgrade |
| Post-upgrade | The BFB version (bfver) on BlueField hosts | Whether the BFB moved in step with the host packages, or is now skewed |
| Post-upgrade | The structured one-shot doca-env --json version.consistent field when present, per doca-structured-tools-contract ## Schemas (doca-structured-tools-contract/SKILL.md#schemas) | The four-way match pre-computed in one read; prefer it when the host has the helper |
The agent prefers the structured one-shot when present and falls
back to the manual chain doca-version documents otherwise. The
load-bearing rule: prove the upgrade with the same sources before
and after; a claim that the upgrade "worked" without a post-upgrade
four-way match is not evidence.
Safety policy
This skill's safety surface is the confirmation gate on top of
the hardware-safety meta-policy. For the cross-cutting discipline
that wraps any hardware / firmware / reboot step — pre-flight
inventory, out-of-band access, maintenance window, replica-first
validation, rollback discipline, refuse-and-escalate — see
doca-hardware-safety ## Safety policy (doca-hardware-safety/CAPABILITIES.md#safety-policy).
The body lives there; this skill does not redefine it.
The upgrade-specific overlay is:
Confirmation gate (never auto-upgrade). The agent reports the
installed → targetgap and STOPS. No upgrade command runs until the user has seen the report and explicitly confirmed. "Should I upgrade?" is answered with the gap and a request to confirm, never with an upgrade command issued on the user's behalf.Rollback-first. Before the guided upgrade begins, the agent confirms a rollback path exists for the chosen mode (reinstall the prior release, reflash the prior BFB, redeploy the prior container tag) and that the prior version anchors are captured — the same documented-and-rehearsed rollback rule the hardware-safety meta-policy requires for any hardware-touching step. Viability means the prior artifact is identified by an immutable version/tag and is available through the release-matched documented source: the package manager can resolve the prior host package set, the prior BFB plus its published checksum is locally available or retrievable and has an OOB restore path, or the prior container tag resolves and the prior config is saved. Record the exact rollback artifact and verification command. If any required artifact, checksum, config snapshot, or recovery path is unavailable, STOP; a conceptual rollback is not a rollback path.
Maintenance window when disruptive. An explicit, time-boxed maintenance window with stakeholders notified is mandatory when the target carries real workload, when the move disrupts a shared service, and for every BFB reflash or reboot-class step. A non-disruptive move on an idle, dedicated non-production target does not require a fictional stakeholder window; record that the target is isolated and why no window is needed.
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
The author says: No DOCA install required to read this skill (it is a cross-cutting overlay loaded against any DOCA artifact skill); the detection, gap-report, and guided-upgrade steps within DO require a live DOCA install at /opt/mellanox/doca, and the hardware / firmware / reboot steps require a BlueField DPU or ConnectX NIC plus out-of-band console reachability as gated by doca-hardware-safety.
Security
What our scanner noticed· Medium risk
- Phrasing that asks for actions without confirmation
- Large base64-encoded blobs
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- NVIDIA
- Publisher
- NVIDIA (Official)
- Source
- NVIDIA/skills · skills/doca-upgrade · commit fce3cca
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE-APACHE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by NVIDIA or NVIDIA.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download doca-upgrade.zip