Security Planning
MicrosoftOfficialPublished by Microsoft
- Skill
- Tool integration
- Security
- MIT
- Medium risk
- Has scripts
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
Security Planning provides a structured framework for managing application security throughout the development lifecycle. It includes methodologies for STRIDE threat analysis, NIST control mapping, and data classification. The skill supports plan-drift analysis to correlate security baselines with current findings, and provides robust workflows for generating and validating Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool (TM7) files, including an optional Windows-native feedback loop for visual model validation.
What it does
- Classifies application components into operational security buckets.
- Performs STRIDE-based threat analysis with support for AI-specific extensions.
- Maps security findings to industry standards and NIST control families.
- Generates security-focused backlog items for implementation handoff.
- Analyzes plan-drift by comparing security baselines against current repository findings.
- Automates the generation of TM7 threat models and associated markdown reports.
When to use it
- When performing initial security planning or threat modeling for an application.
- When you need to reconcile an existing security plan with current audit or code review findings.
- When preparing security-related work items for a development backlog.
- When generating or updating TM7 threat model files for compliance or audit workflows.
Advantages
- Provides a consistent, repeatable methodology for security planning and threat modeling.
- Reduces manual effort in mapping security findings to regulatory standards.
- Enables automated detection of drift between planned security controls and actual implementation.
- Supports both portable markdown reporting and native integration with the Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool.
Usage examples
- “Analyze my application components and generate a security backlog based on the current STRIDE findings.”
- The agent will classify the components into operational buckets, perform a STRIDE analysis, and output a prioritized list of security work items formatted for your backlog.
- “Compare my existing security baseline with these new code review findings to identify control drift.”
- The agent will correlate the findings, filter out excluded paths, and produce a report detailing validated controls, residual risks, and any identified control drift.
- “Generate a TM7 threat model file from my current YAML threat-model specification.”
- The agent will process the specification and output a .tm7 file compatible with the Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool, along with a corresponding markdown report.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/microsoft/security-planning/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip security-planning.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Microsoft
Security Planning
This skill packages durable security-planning and plan-drift analysis used by Security Planner, Security Reviewer, and Code Review: operational bucket guidance, STRIDE analysis patterns, standards cross-references, NIST control-family references, security-specific backlog formats, and correlation of a Security Planner baseline with current security findings.
When to use
Use this skill when you need to:
Classify application components into the operational security buckets used during planning.
Evaluate threats with STRIDE-based analysis, including AI-specific extensions when
raiEnabledis true.Map bucket findings to standards references and control families without re-embedding long standard tables.
Derive security-specific backlog priorities and RAI work item categories for Phase 5 handoff.
Correlate a Security Planner baseline with caller-supplied current findings to identify validated controls, control drift, residual planned risks, newly introduced threats, and obsolete plan items.
Generate a dual-output TM7 model plus markdown report from a YAML/JSON threat-model spec for human-reviewed audit workflows.
Security plan drift analysis
Use the drift capability when a Security Planner baseline and current-state security findings already exist. It correlates supplied evidence only: it does not scan, profile, select security skills, verify findings, re-rate severity, invoke another agent, or modify source, plan, reviewer, backlog, or state artifacts.
Resolve and extract the baseline through drift-input-contracts.md.
Normalize caller-supplied audit, diff, or Code Review findings without treating plan-mode evidence as repository state.
Filter default exclusions, then classify only conclusions supported by drift-comparison-model.md.
Render the direct, Security Reviewer, Security Planner, or Code Review adaptation from drift-report-contract.md.
Use drift-worked-examples.md for deterministic behavior scenarios and expected category suppression.
Before full conversational or durable drift output, display the Security Planning CAUTION block in this skill verbatim. Report the default exclusions below in the canonical body's Current repository evidence section. A bounded Code Review section may point to these blocks because its containing review already carries the Code-Review disclaimer.
Default exclusions in effect. Planning and agent-customization artifacts are excluded from drift findings:
Paths:
.copilot-tracking/**,docs/planning/**,docs/adrs/**,.github/agents/**,.github/prompts/**,.github/instructions/**,.github/skills/**File globs:
*.prompt.md,*.agent.md,*.instructions.md,SKILL.mdTo override, pass
scope=explicitly. Overlapping user scope wins and is reported as a warning.
A write-capable direct caller may create one sequence-safe report under .copilot-tracking/security-audits/<project-slug>/. Security Reviewer and Security Planner render in conversation. Code Review renders a bounded section and optional security_plan_drift field. Every destination keeps inputs read-only and recommends follow-up without dispatch.
Stop the affected conclusion when a baseline is incomplete, a required fact is unresolved, evidence scope does not cover the claim, or input format drift prevents exclusions. Report suppressed categories as insufficient evidence rather than zero findings. Stop the entire correlation when no baseline resolves or no finding location is available to enforce exclusions.
TM7 generation workflow
When the user asks for a TM7 threat model, the runtime can generate a .tm7 file and a matching markdown report from the same spec. The generator supports the pre-populated-comprehensive and diagram-only-defer-to-tmt modes and can update an existing model with --update. Use the generate_tm7.py and generate_markdown.py entry points with --template to select a profile.
The .tm7 output mirrors the Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool's real SerializableModelData DataContract and deserializes cleanly under the tool's own DataContractSerializer. Fidelity is validated against the tool's own assemblies by scripts/Deserialize-Tm7.ps1, which the pytest suite runs when the tool is installed and skips cleanly otherwise. See references/tm7-generation.md for the verified contract.
Native TM7 visual feedback workflow
The skill also supports an opt-in, Windows-local feedback loop for the native Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool UI. The feature is off by default. The generator and standard validator keep their existing portable behavior when the feedback flags are absent. Native feedback is enabled only when validate_tm7_with_tmt.py is run with --feedback-loop, --spec, and --overlay-output; optional --overlay-input, --max-iterations, and --require-feedback-evidence refine the execution contract.
The workflow requires Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool 7.3.51110.1, a Windows desktop session, and UI Automation access. The loop is bounded to a baseline run plus at most three refinement iterations, and defaults to a baseline plus one. A single run holds the mouse and keyboard continuously across the baseline and every refinement iteration; control returns only at the release notice. Replaying a corrected overlay is a new run and a new takeover. Exit codes, stop reasons, and the discovery-failure rules are defined in the generation reference.
The harness controls TMT windows and may open, close, and reopen the app for save/reopen validation. It emits a start notice before automation begins, progress updates for the baseline and each refinement candidate, and a release notice when the loop completes or aborts so the operator knows when control is returned. These are notices only; the harness does not block on operator acknowledgment. The agent-facing lockout and release obligations that surround a run are owned by references/tm7-generation-workflow.md.
The loop records one evidence bundle per run under the requested evidence directory, with per-iteration screenshots, UI Automation snapshots, summaries, and candidate models. A run that captured at least one surface and either passed the automated gates or stopped for layout exhaustion also emits agent-review-request.json at the bundle root. The overlay payload remains in approval_state: pending, and no runtime path or flag auto-promotes it to approved or rewrites the canonical baseline.
Scoring keeps deterministic geometry gates separate from advisory screenshot heuristics. Screenshot heuristics are not a semantic approval signal.
A Windows-native example uses the skill's locked Windows dependency group:
uv run --project "<security-planning-skill-root>" --group windows \
python "<security-planning-skill-root>/scripts/validate_tm7_with_tmt.py" model.tm7 \
--evidence-dir ./artifacts/feedback \
--feedback-loop \
--spec ./specs/model.yaml \
--overlay-output ./artifacts/feedback/overlay.json \
--max-iterations 3 \
--require-feedback-evidenceResolve <security-planning-skill-root> from the loaded skill location before running the command.
The overlay contract is versioned and deterministic. It carries layout intent in named rule collections and is invalidated unless its full fingerprint block matches, so a stale overlay is rejected rather than replayed onto a changed model.
See references/tm7-generation.md for the full CLI surface, exit codes, stop reasons, geometry thresholds, the evidence-bundle layout, the overlay fingerprint contract, and the operator runbook covering prerequisites, abort, recovery, and rollback.
Agent-assisted visual review
Some layout defects never reach a metric. TM7 persists no connector label geometry and UI Automation exposes no label element, so label collisions, unreadable label text, and visual crowding are invisible to the deterministic gates. An agent that reads the rendered screenshots can see them and author corrections into the overlay the harness publishes.
This review is a default step of every feedback-loop run, not an opt-in extra. A run that captured at least one surface and either passed the automated gates or stopped for layout exhaustion emits agent-review-request.json at the evidence root, carrying per surface the screenshot and UI Automation paths, the node and zone rectangles, the connector handle points, and the predicted label rectangles in model coordinates, plus the coordinate-translation constants and the port convention. The agent reviews from that payload rather than hand-parsing UI Automation trees. automated-ready-pending-human means the automated gates passed and the result awaits review; it is not an approval. The remedy remains documented rather than proven: it has not yet been demonstrated end to end on a real defect.
On the success path the published overlay addresses every captured surface, so a correction can be authored for any of them. When the run found no automated correction, that overlay is the seed shape, carrying an overlay-seed- identifier and empty rule collections. A layout-exhaustion stop publishes the same seed shape; a correctness or environment stop publishes nothing at all.
See references/tm7-generation.md for the protocol, the request payload, the accepted rule fields, the coordinate translation, and the constraints that bound an agent-authored overlay.
[!CAUTION] Disclaimer: This agent is an assistive tool only. It does not provide legal, regulatory, or compliance advice and does not replace professional security review boards, penetration testing teams, compliance auditors, legal counsel, or other qualified human reviewers. The output consists of suggested actions and considerations to support a user's own internal security review and decision‑making. All security plans, threat models, security models, and mitigation recommendations generated by this tool must be independently reviewed and validated by appropriate security and compliance reviewers before use. Outputs from this tool do not constitute security approval, compliance certification, or regulatory sign‑off.
The human-in-the-loop contract governing authorship confirmation, native feedback-loop operator safety, and layout overlay promotion is owned by references/tm7-generation-workflow.md. This skill owns the mechanics only.
Skill layout
Load the reference file that matches the phase or topic you need.
| Reference | Topic |
|---|---|
| references/00-index.md | Navigation catalog and consolidated attribution |
| references/operational-buckets.md | Operational bucket definitions, GS overlay, and classification guidance |
| references/stride-model.md | STRIDE methodology, AI extensions, risk matrix, and data-flow analysis |
| references/standards-cross-reference.md | Bucket-to-standards mapping table and component mapping output format |
| references/nist-control-families.md | NIST 800-53 priority tiers and NIST AI RMF subcategory mappings |
| references/backlog-formats.md | Security-specific prioritization and RAI work item categories |
| references/data-classification.md | Public-safe data-classification taxonomy, tiers/categories/retention, and schema mapping |
| references/threat-model-review.md | Threat-model completeness checklist, PASS/INCOMPLETE verdict, and gap list |
| references/drift-input-contracts.md | Security Planner baseline extraction, normalized current-finding forms, evidence scope, and drift handling |
| references/drift-comparison-model.md | Exclusions, evidence preconditions, five plan-drift categories, matching order, and recommendation-only handoffs |
| references/drift-report-contract.md | Canonical body and direct, Security Reviewer, Security Planner, and Code Review destination adaptations |
| references/drift-worked-examples.md | Synthetic complete, incomplete, malformed, diff-scoped, exclusion, and caller-regression behavior scenarios |
| references/tm7-generation-workflow.md | Human-in-the-loop contract for TM7 generation: authorship confirmation, native feedback-loop operator safety, and layout overlay promotion |
| references/tm7-generation.md | TM7 input schema, dual-output generation contract, profile mapping, emission contract, native feedback loop, overlay and fingerprint contract, and operator runbook |
Bundled executable and data resources:
| Resource | Use |
|---|---|
scripts/generate_tm7.py | Run to build a .tm7 from a threat-model spec |
scripts/generate_markdown.py | Run to render the same spec as a markdown report |
scripts/generate_tb7.py | Run to emit a template file |
scripts/validate_tm7_with_tmt.py | Run for native Windows TMT validation and the opt-in feedback loop |
scripts/Deserialize-Tm7.ps1 | Run to check round-trip fidelity against the tool's own assemblies |
assets/schemas/tm7-layout-overlay.schema.json | Read as the layout overlay schema |
assets/schemas/tm7-agent-review-request.schema.json | Read as the agent visual-review request schema |
assets/schemas/tm7-visual-feedback-manifest.schema.json | Read as the evidence manifest schema |
templates/threat-model-spec-example.yaml | Copy as the starting point for a new spec |
The skill ships public defaults for the taxonomy and the completeness checklist. Organization-specific internal details such as internal data-type taxonomies, internal auth service names, and internal review-gate steps are supplied through a private config overlay referenced by state.overlayConfigPath and are never embedded in the public skill.
Attribution
The durable reference content in this skill is organized by reference file and summarized in references/00-index.md. See that index for the consolidated attribution and delegation notes.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer847 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.1 KiB
- README.md5.3 KiB
- SECURITY.md24.9 KiB
- SKILL.md16.9 KiB
- assets/schemas/tm7-agent-review-request.schema.json4.6 KiB
- assets/schemas/tm7-layout-overlay.schema.json6.8 KiB
- assets/schemas/tm7-visual-feedback-manifest.schema.json8.3 KiB
- assets/template-profiles/LICENSE-MIT-REFERENCE.txt366 B
- assets/template-profiles/README.md795 B
- assets/template-profiles/sdl_core_generic.yaml324 B
- assets/templates/LICENSE1.1 KiB
- assets/templates/default-kb.xml1.0 MiB
- assets/templates/default.tb7375.2 KiB
- pyproject.toml1.0 KiB
- references/00-index.md6.7 KiB
- references/backlog-formats.md2.0 KiB
- references/data-classification.md5.3 KiB
- references/drift-comparison-model.md8.0 KiB
- references/drift-input-contracts.md7.0 KiB
- references/drift-report-contract.md5.9 KiB
- references/drift-worked-examples.md11.5 KiB
- references/nist-control-families.md1.1 KiB
- references/operational-buckets.md2.9 KiB
- references/standards-cross-reference.md1.5 KiB
- references/stride-model.md4.0 KiB
- references/threat-model-review.md6.1 KiB
- references/tm7-generation-workflow.md3.9 KiB
- references/tm7-generation.md59.0 KiB
- scripts/Deserialize-Tm7.ps1Script7.8 KiB
- scripts/generate_markdown.pyScript8.0 KiB
- scripts/generate_tb7.pyScript11.6 KiB
- scripts/generate_tm7.pyScript256.5 KiB
- scripts/populate_tm7_threats.pyScript24.9 KiB
- scripts/tm7_threat_contract.pyScript38.3 KiB
- scripts/tm7_visual_feedback.pyScript119.6 KiB
- scripts/validate_gap_citations.pyScript2.5 KiB
- scripts/validate_tm7_with_tmt.pyScript262.9 KiB
- templates/threat-model-spec-example.yaml5.8 KiB
- tests/corpus/minimal-spec.yaml111 B
- tests/corpus/minimal-tm7.xml17 B
- tests/fixtures/README.md3.2 KiB
- tests/fixtures/comprehensive-spec.yaml78.5 KiB
- tests/fixtures/expected.tm71.1 MiB
- tests/fixtures/tmp-sample.tm71.1 MiB
- tests/fixtures/tmt-reference-threats.tm71.3 MiB
- tests/fixtures/tmt-reference.tm71.2 MiB
- tests/fixtures/visual-feedback/valid-manifest.json921 B
- tests/fixtures/visual-feedback/valid-overlay.yaml1.4 KiB
- tests/fuzz_harness.pyScript3.0 KiB
- tests/test_generate_tb7.pyScript11.9 KiB
- tests/test_generate_tm7.pyScript189.8 KiB
- tests/test_populate_tm7_threats.pyScript13.5 KiB
- tests/test_tm7_threat_contract.pyScript36.4 KiB
- tests/test_tm7_visual_feedback.pyScript59.5 KiB
- tests/test_validate_tm7_with_tmt.pyScript208.7 KiB
- uv.lock100.6 KiB
tests/test_tm7_visual_feedback.py
# Copyright (c) 2026 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
# SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
"""Focused tests for the TM7 visual feedback contracts and scoring kernel."""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
import math
import sys
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from pathlib import Path
import pytest
ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
SCRIPTS_DIR = ROOT / "scripts"
if str(SCRIPTS_DIR) not in sys.path:
sys.path.insert(0, str(SCRIPTS_DIR))
import generate_tm7 # noqa: E402
import tm7_visual_feedback as feedback # noqa: E402
FIXTURES_DIR = ROOT / "tests" / "fixtures" / "visual-feedback"
SCHEMAS_DIR = ROOT / "assets" / "schemas"
def test_given_schema_documents_when_inspected_then_require_v2_strict_shape() -> None:
# Arrange
overlay_schema_path = SCHEMAS_DIR / "tm7-layout-overlay.schema.json"
manifest_schema_path = SCHEMAS_DIR / "tm7-visual-feedback-manifest.schema.json"
# Act
overlay_schema = json.loads(overlay_schema_path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
manifest_schema = json.loads(manifest_schema_path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
# Assert
assert overlay_schema["properties"]["schema_version"]["const"] == 2
assert overlay_schema["additionalProperties"] is False
assert manifest_schema["properties"]["schema_version"]["const"] == 2
assert manifest_schema["additionalProperties"] is False
def test_given_manifest_schema_when_compared_then_allow_list_matches() -> None:
# Arrange
manifest_schema_path = SCHEMAS_DIR / "tm7-visual-feedback-manifest.schema.json"
# Act
manifest_schema = json.loads(manifest_schema_path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
# Assert
# The schema is the published contract and the constant is the runtime
# guard, so a key added to one and not the other either rejects a valid
# manifest or lets an invalid one through. The allow-list was written
# without layout_calibration_v1 and sat unused, so the divergence was
# invisible until the guard was wired up.
assert set(manifest_schema["properties"]) == (
feedback.ALLOWED_MANIFEST_TOP_LEVEL_KEYS
)
def test_given_valid_overlay_when_validating_then_accepts_and_normalizes() -> None:
# Arrange
overlay = feedback.load_layout_overlay(FIXTURES_DIR / "valid-overlay.yaml")
context = feedback.OverlayContext(
model_id="demo-model",
spec_path=Path("threat-model-spec.yaml"),
spec_sha256="abc",
generator_profile="default",
generator_profile_sha256="def",
surface_ids={"context"},
surface_node_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal", "trust-zone-identity"}},
surface_zone_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal"}},
surface_flow_ids={"context": {"flow-001"}},
)
# Act
feedback.validate_layout_overlay(overlay, context)
# Assert
assert overlay["applies_to"][0]["surface_id"] == "context"
assert overlay["node_rules"][0]["layout_role"] == "main"
def test_given_datetime_values_when_fingerprinting_then_serializes_them() -> None:
# Arrange
timestamp = datetime(2026, 7, 17, 19, 15, 30, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
# Act
fingerprint = feedback._fingerprint({"created_at": timestamp})
normalized_fingerprint = feedback._fingerprint(
{"created_at": "2026-07-17T19:15:30+00:00"}
)
# Assert
assert fingerprint == normalized_fingerprint
assert isinstance(fingerprint, str)
assert len(fingerprint) == 64
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
("version", "expected_message"),
[(0, "schema_version"), (1, "schema_version")],
)
def test_given_unsupported_schema_version_when_validating_then_raises(
version: int,
expected_message: str,
) -> None:
# Arrange
overlay = {
"schema_version": version,
"overlay_type": "tm7_layout_overlay",
"model_id": "demo-model",
"overlay_id": "overlay-001",
"applies_to": [{"surface_id": "context", "generator_profile": "default"}],
"zone_rules": [],
"node_rules": [],
"connector_rules": [],
"surface_rules": [],
"provenance": {
"evidence_ref": "evidence/iteration-01",
"approval_state": "pending",
},
"invalidation": {
"spec_fingerprint": "abc",
"generator_profile_fingerprint": "def",
"surface_identity_fingerprint": "ghi",
"surface_zone_identity_fingerprint": "ghi",
"surface_flow_identity_fingerprint": "ghi",
},
}
context = feedback.OverlayContext(
model_id="demo-model",
spec_path=Path("threat-model-spec.yaml"),
spec_sha256="abc",
generator_profile="default",
generator_profile_sha256="def",
surface_ids={"context"},
surface_node_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal"}},
surface_zone_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal"}},
surface_flow_ids={"context": {"flow-001"}},
)
# Act and Assert
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match=expected_message):
feedback.validate_layout_overlay(overlay, context)
def test_given_unknown_rule_type_when_validating_then_raises() -> None:
# Arrange
overlay = {
"schema_version": 2,
"overlay_type": "tm7_layout_overlay",
"model_id": "demo-model",
"overlay_id": "overlay-001",
"applies_to": [{"surface_id": "context", "generator_profile": "default"}],
"zone_rules": [],
"node_rules": [
{
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "trust-zone-portal",
"layout_role": "bad-role",
"absolute_position": {"left": 10, "top": 20, "width": 10, "height": 10},
}
],
"connector_rules": [],
"surface_rules": [],
"provenance": {
"evidence_ref": "evidence/iteration-01",
"approval_state": "pending",
},
"invalidation": {
"spec_fingerprint": "abc",
"generator_profile_fingerprint": "def",
"surface_identity_fingerprint": "ghi",
"surface_zone_identity_fingerprint": "ghi",
"surface_flow_identity_fingerprint": "ghi",
},
}
context = feedback.OverlayContext(
model_id="demo-model",
spec_path=Path("threat-model-spec.yaml"),
spec_sha256="abc",
generator_profile="default",
generator_profile_sha256="def",
surface_ids={"context"},
surface_node_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal"}},
surface_zone_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal"}},
surface_flow_ids={"context": {"flow-001"}},
)
# Act and Assert
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="layout_role"):
feedback.validate_layout_overlay(overlay, context)
def test_given_duplicate_rule_keys_when_validating_then_raises() -> None:
# Arrange
overlay = {
"schema_version": 2,
"overlay_type": "tm7_layout_overlay",
"model_id": "demo-model",
"overlay_id": "overlay-001",
"applies_to": [{"surface_id": "context", "generator_profile": "default"}],
"zone_rules": [],
"node_rules": [
{
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "trust-zone-portal",
"layout_role": "main",
"absolute_position": {"left": 10, "top": 15, "width": 10, "height": 10},
},
{
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "trust-zone-portal",
"layout_role": "main",
"absolute_position": {"left": 20, "top": 25, "width": 10, "height": 10},
},
],
"connector_rules": [],
"surface_rules": [],
"provenance": {
"evidence_ref": "evidence/iteration-01",
"approval_state": "pending",
},
"invalidation": {
"spec_fingerprint": "abc",
"generator_profile_fingerprint": "def",
"surface_identity_fingerprint": "ghi",
"surface_zone_identity_fingerprint": "ghi",
"surface_flow_identity_fingerprint": "ghi",
},
}
context = feedback.OverlayContext(
model_id="demo-model",
spec_path=Path("threat-model-spec.yaml"),
spec_sha256="abc",
generator_profile="default",
generator_profile_sha256="def",
surface_ids={"context"},
surface_node_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal", "trust-zone-identity"}},
surface_zone_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal"}},
surface_flow_ids={"context": {"flow-001"}},
)
# Act and Assert
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="duplicate"):
feedback.validate_layout_overlay(overlay, context)
def test_given_stale_invalidation_fingerprint_when_validating_then_raises() -> None:
# Arrange
overlay = feedback.load_layout_overlay(FIXTURES_DIR / "valid-overlay.yaml")
overlay["invalidation"]["spec_fingerprint"] = "stale"
context = feedback.OverlayContext(
model_id="demo-model",
spec_path=Path("threat-model-spec.yaml"),
spec_sha256="abc",
generator_profile="default",
generator_profile_sha256="def",
surface_ids={"context"},
surface_node_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal", "trust-zone-identity"}},
surface_zone_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal"}},
surface_flow_ids={"context": {"flow-001"}},
)
# Act and Assert
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="fingerprint"):
feedback.validate_layout_overlay(overlay, context)
def test_given_same_candidate_when_scored_twice_then_score_is_identical() -> None:
"""Scoring must be a pure function of the candidate and viewport.
This test previously carried a copy-pasted threshold parametrization it
never referenced, so it ran thirteen identical cases and asserted only that
two score members were non-negative. Neither the repetition nor the name's
determinism claim was actually exercised.
"""
# Arrange
candidate = {
"surface_id": "context",
"orientation": "horizontal",
"zone_order": ["zone-a", "zone-b"],
"node_ranks": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 1},
"branch_groups": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 0},
"reverse_edge_members": {"node-a"},
"fan_in": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 1},
"fan_out": {"node-a": 1, "node-b": 0},
}
viewport = (0.0, 0.0, 1920.0, 1080.0)
# Act
first = feedback.score_surface_layout_candidate(
candidate,
viewport_target=viewport,
)
second = feedback.score_surface_layout_candidate(
candidate,
viewport_target=viewport,
)
# Assert
assert first == second
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
("metric_name", "metric_value", "expected_severity"),
[
("overlap_ratio", 0.009, "pass"),
("overlap_ratio", 0.025, "warn"),
("overlap_ratio", 0.035, "review"),
("edge_node_intersections", 0, "pass"),
("edge_node_intersections", 2, "warn"),
("edge_node_intersections", 3, "review"),
("edge_crossing_count", 0, "pass"),
("edge_crossing_count", 2, "warn"),
("edge_crossing_count", 3, "review"),
("min_spacing_ratio", 0.65, "pass"),
("min_spacing_ratio", 0.5, "warn"),
("min_spacing_ratio", 0.24, "warn"),
("min_spacing_ratio", 0.2, "review"),
],
)
def test_given_boundary_metric_when_findings_derived_then_severity_matches(
metric_name: str,
metric_value: float,
expected_severity: str,
) -> None:
# Arrange
metrics = {
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "trust-zone-portal",
"evidence_path": "evidence/iteration-01/surfaces/context/metrics.json",
metric_name: metric_value,
}
# Act
findings = feedback.derive_findings(metrics, density="simple")
# Assert
matching_finding = next(
finding for finding in findings if finding["metric_name"] == metric_name
)
assert matching_finding["severity"] == expected_severity
def test_given_zone_metrics_when_evaluating_then_reports_pending_review() -> None:
# Arrange
geometry = feedback.SurfaceGeometry(
surface_id="context",
nominal_node_size=48.0,
node_rects={"node-a": (0.0, 0.0, 12.0, 12.0)},
connector_segments=[],
boundary_rects={
"boundary-a": (0.0, 0.0, 100.0, 100.0),
"boundary-b": (90.0, 90.0, 180.0, 180.0),
},
boundary_label_rects={"boundary-label": (0.0, 0.0, 20.0, 20.0)},
connector_label_rects={"conn-label": (5.0, 5.0, 25.0, 25.0)},
layout_roles={"node-a": "main"},
zone_membership={"node-a": "zone-a"},
zone_content_rects={"zone-a": (0.0, 0.0, 100.0, 100.0)},
viewport_target=(0.0, 0.0, 960.0, 540.0),
diagram_bounds=(0.0, 0.0, 1000.0, 600.0),
outer_margin=24.0,
selected_flow_ids={"flow-001"},
expected_semantic_node_ids={"node-a"},
expected_semantic_flow_ids={"flow-001"},
)
# Act
metrics = feedback.derive_geometry_metrics(geometry)
findings = feedback.derive_findings(metrics, density="simple")
# Assert
assert metrics["boundary_overlap_count"] == 1
assert metrics["boundary_min_gutter"] == 0.0
assert metrics["semantic_flow_coverage"] == 1.0
assert any(
finding["metric_name"] == "boundary_overlap_count" for finding in findings
)
def test_given_unoccupied_zone_when_findings_derived_then_review_is_blocking() -> None:
# Arrange
geometry = feedback.SurfaceGeometry(
surface_id="context",
nominal_node_size=100.0,
node_rects={"node-a": (20.0, 70.0, 120.0, 170.0)},
connector_segments=[],
zone_membership={"node-a": "zone-a"},
zone_content_rects={
"zone-a": (10.0, 60.0, 200.0, 240.0),
"zone-empty": (220.0, 60.0, 410.0, 240.0),
},
)
# Act
metrics = feedback.derive_geometry_metrics(geometry)
findings = feedback.derive_findings(metrics, density="simple")
# Assert
assert metrics["unoccupied_zone_count"] == 1
finding = next(
item for item in findings if item["metric_name"] == "unoccupied_zone_count"
)
assert finding["severity"] == "review"
def _composition_geometry(**overrides: object) -> feedback.SurfaceGeometry:
"""Build a readable three-rank surface used by composition metric tests."""
payload: dict[str, object] = {
"surface_id": "context",
"nominal_node_size": 100.0,
"node_rects": {
"node-a": (100.0, 300.0, 200.0, 400.0),
"node-b": (400.0, 300.0, 500.0, 400.0),
"node-c": (700.0, 300.0, 800.0, 400.0),
},
"connector_segments": [
("node-a", "node-b", (200.0, 350.0), (400.0, 350.0)),
("node-b", "node-c", (500.0, 350.0), (700.0, 350.0)),
],
"connector_label_rects": {
"f-1": (270.0, 300.0, 350.0, 330.0),
"f-2": (570.0, 300.0, 650.0, 330.0),
},
"zone_membership": {
"node-a": "zone-a",
"node-b": "zone-a",
"node-c": "zone-a",
},
"zone_content_rects": {"zone-a": (50.0, 250.0, 900.0, 450.0)},
"viewport_target": (0.0, 0.0, 1200.0, 800.0),
"connector_routes": {
"f-1": {
"source_id": "node-a",
"target_id": "node-b",
"source_point": (200.0, 350.0),
"handle_point": (300.0, 350.0),
"target_point": (400.0, 350.0),
},
"f-2": {
"source_id": "node-b",
"target_id": "node-c",
"source_point": (500.0, 350.0),
"handle_point": (600.0, 350.0),
"target_point": (700.0, 350.0),
},
},
"node_ranks": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 1, "node-c": 2},
"branch_groups": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 0, "node-c": 0},
"orientation": "horizontal",
}
payload.update(overrides)
return feedback.SurfaceGeometry(**payload)
def _blocking_metric_names(findings: list[dict[str, object]]) -> set[str]:
return {
str(finding["metric_name"])
for finding in findings
if finding["severity"] == "review"
}
def test_given_readable_surface_when_deriving_then_composition_gates_pass() -> None:
# Arrange
geometry = _composition_geometry()
# Act
metrics = feedback.derive_geometry_metrics(geometry)
findings = feedback.derive_findings(metrics, density="simple")
# Assert
assert metrics["visible_clipping_count"] == 0
assert metrics["visible_coverage_ratio"] == pytest.approx(1.0)
assert metrics["backward_edge_count"] == 0
assert metrics["max_handle_cluster_size"] == 1
assert metrics["duplicate_route_leg_count"] == 0
assert metrics["rank_monotonicity_ratio"] == pytest.approx(1.0)
assert metrics["branch_alignment_variance"] == pytest.approx(0.0)
composition_names = set(feedback.derive_composition_metrics(geometry))
assert not _blocking_metric_names(findings) & composition_names
def test_given_all_composition_metrics_when_derived_then_values_are_finite() -> None:
# Arrange
geometry = _composition_geometry()
# Act
first = feedback.derive_composition_metrics(geometry)
second = feedback.derive_composition_metrics(geometry)
# Assert
assert first == second
numeric_values = [
value for value in first.values() if isinstance(value, (int, float))
]
assert numeric_values
assert all(math.isfinite(float(value)) for value in numeric_values)
def test_given_node_outside_viewport_when_deriving_then_clipping_blocks() -> None:
# Arrange
geometry = _composition_geometry(
node_rects={
"node-a": (100.0, 300.0, 200.0, 400.0),
"node-b": (400.0, 300.0, 500.0, 400.0),
"node-c": (1150.0, 300.0, 1400.0, 400.0),
},
)
# Act
metrics = feedback.derive_geometry_metrics(geometry)
findings = feedback.derive_findings(metrics, density="simple")
# Assert
assert metrics["visible_clipping_count"] == 1
assert metrics["visible_coverage_ratio"] < feedback.MIN_VISIBLE_COVERAGE_RATIO
blocking = _blocking_metric_names(findings)
assert "visible_clipping_count" in blocking
assert "visible_coverage_ratio" in blocking
def test_given_two_connectors_sharing_a_handle_when_deriving_then_gate_blocks() -> None:
"""A shared handle superimposes both connector labels in native rendering."""
# Arrange
routes = dict(_composition_geometry().connector_routes)
routes["f-2"] = dict(routes["f-2"], handle_point=(300.0, 350.0))
geometry = _composition_geometry(connector_routes=routes)
# Act
metrics = feedback.derive_geometry_metrics(geometry)
findings = feedback.derive_findings(metrics, density="simple")
# Assert
assert metrics["max_handle_cluster_size"] == 2
assert "max_handle_cluster_size" in _blocking_metric_names(findings)
def test_given_distinct_handles_when_deriving_then_cluster_gate_passes() -> None:
# Arrange
geometry = _composition_geometry()
# Act
metrics = feedback.derive_geometry_metrics(geometry)
findings = feedback.derive_findings(metrics, density="simple")
# Assert
assert metrics["max_handle_cluster_size"] == 1
assert "max_handle_cluster_size" not in _blocking_metric_names(findings)
def test_given_clustered_handles_when_deriving_then_density_blocks() -> None:
# Arrange
routes = dict(_composition_geometry().connector_routes)
routes["f-2"] = dict(routes["f-2"], handle_point=(300.0, 350.0))
routes["f-3"] = {
"source_id": "node-a",
"target_id": "node-c",
"source_point": (200.0, 350.0),
"handle_point": (302.0, 351.0),
"target_point": (700.0, 350.0),
}
geometry = _composition_geometry(connector_routes=routes)
# Act
metrics = feedback.derive_geometry_metrics(geometry)
findings = feedback.derive_findings(metrics, density="simple")
# Assert
assert metrics["max_handle_cluster_size"] == 3
assert "max_handle_cluster_size" in _blocking_metric_names(findings)
def test_given_duplicate_route_legs_when_deriving_then_overlap_blocks() -> None:
# Arrange
routes = dict(_composition_geometry().connector_routes)
routes["f-3"] = {
"source_id": "node-a",
"target_id": "node-b",
"source_point": (200.0, 350.0),
"handle_point": (300.0, 350.0),
"target_point": (400.0, 350.0),
}
geometry = _composition_geometry(connector_routes=routes)
# Act
metrics = feedback.derive_geometry_metrics(geometry)
findings = feedback.derive_findings(metrics, density="simple")
# Assert
assert metrics["duplicate_route_leg_count"] == 2
assert "duplicate_route_leg_count" in _blocking_metric_names(findings)
def test_given_orphaned_label_when_deriving_then_ownership_warns() -> None:
"""Predicted label geometry is advisory: TM7 never persists label rects."""
# Arrange
geometry = _composition_geometry(
connector_label_rects={
"f-1": (270.0, 20.0, 350.0, 50.0),
"f-2": (570.0, 300.0, 650.0, 330.0),
},
)
# Act
metrics = feedback.derive_geometry_metrics(geometry)
findings = feedback.derive_findings(metrics, density="simple")
# Assert
assert (
metrics["max_label_ownership_distance"] > feedback.MAX_LABEL_OWNERSHIP_DISTANCE
)
finding = next(
item
for item in findings
if item["metric_name"] == "max_label_ownership_distance"
)
assert finding["severity"] == "warn"
assert finding["category"] == "predicted_label_advisory"
assert finding["flow_id"] == "f-1"
assert finding["coordinate_space"] == "tm7-model"
def test_given_label_on_arrowhead_when_deriving_then_clearance_warns() -> None:
"""Predicted label geometry is advisory: TM7 never persists label rects."""
# Arrange
geometry = _composition_geometry(
connector_label_rects={
"f-1": (390.0, 340.0, 410.0, 360.0),
"f-2": (570.0, 300.0, 650.0, 330.0),
},
)
# Act
metrics = feedback.derive_geometry_metrics(geometry)
findings = feedback.derive_findings(metrics, density="simple")
# Assert
assert (
metrics["min_label_arrowhead_clearance"]
< feedback.MIN_LABEL_ARROWHEAD_CLEARANCE
)
finding = next(
item
for item in findings
if item["metric_name"] == "min_label_arrowhead_clearance"
)
assert finding["severity"] == "warn"
assert finding["category"] == "predicted_label_advisory"
assert finding["flow_id"] == "f-1"
def test_given_composition_drift_when_deriving_then_advisory_gates_only_warn() -> None:
# Arrange
geometry = _composition_geometry(
node_rects={
"node-a": (100.0, 300.0, 200.0, 400.0),
"node-b": (400.0, 620.0, 500.0, 720.0),
"node-c": (700.0, 300.0, 800.0, 400.0),
},
node_ranks={"node-a": 2, "node-b": 1, "node-c": 0},
branch_groups={"node-a": 0, "node-b": 0, "node-c": 0},
zone_content_rects={
"zone-a": (50.0, 250.0, 900.0, 780.0),
"zone-b": (910.0, 250.0, 1000.0, 400.0),
},
zone_membership={
"node-a": "zone-a",
"node-b": "zone-a",
"node-c": "zone-b",
},
)
# Act
metrics = feedback.derive_geometry_metrics(geometry)
findings = feedback.derive_findings(metrics, density="simple")
# Assert
assert metrics["backward_edge_count"] == 2
assert metrics["rank_monotonicity_ratio"] < feedback.MIN_RANK_MONOTONICITY_RATIO
assert metrics["branch_alignment_variance"] > feedback.MAX_BRANCH_ALIGNMENT_VARIANCE
advisory_names = {
"backward_edge_count",
"rank_monotonicity_ratio",
"branch_alignment_variance",
"zone_whitespace_imbalance",
}
blocking = _blocking_metric_names(findings)
assert not advisory_names & blocking
warned = {
str(finding["metric_name"])
for finding in findings
if finding["severity"] == "warn"
}
assert {
"backward_edge_count",
"rank_monotonicity_ratio",
"branch_alignment_variance",
} <= warned
def _refinement_candidate(
candidate_id: str,
*,
orientation: str = "horizontal",
zone_order: list[str] | None = None,
node_ids: list[str] | None = None,
flow_ids: list[str] | None = None,
) -> dict[str, object]:
return {
"candidate_id": candidate_id,
"node_ids": node_ids if node_ids is not None else ["node-a", "node-b"],
"flow_ids": flow_ids if flow_ids is not None else ["f-1"],
"zone_ids": ["zone-a", "zone-b"],
"orientation": orientation,
"zone_order": zone_order if zone_order is not None else ["zone-a", "zone-b"],
"node_ranks": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 1},
"branch_groups": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 0},
}
def test_given_dominated_candidates_when_pruning_then_only_frontier_remains() -> None:
# Arrange
scored = [
{"candidate_id": "best", "score": (1.0, 1.0, 1.0)},
{"candidate_id": "dominated", "score": (2.0, 2.0, 2.0)},
{"candidate_id": "tradeoff", "score": (0.5, 3.0, 1.0)},
{"candidate_id": "duplicate", "score": (1.0, 1.0, 1.0)},
]
# Act
survivors = feedback.prune_dominated_surface_candidates(scored)
# Assert
survivor_ids = {str(entry["candidate_id"]) for entry in survivors}
assert "dominated" not in survivor_ids
assert "duplicate" not in survivor_ids
assert survivor_ids == {"best", "tradeoff"}
def test_given_no_improving_candidate_when_selecting_then_loop_stops() -> None:
# Arrange
incumbent = _refinement_candidate("incumbent")
incumbent_score = feedback.score_surface_layout_candidate(incumbent)
# Act
decision = feedback.select_surface_refinement(
incumbent_score=incumbent_score,
incumbent_semantic_fingerprint=feedback.surface_semantic_fingerprint(incumbent),
candidates=[_refinement_candidate("same")],
)
# Assert
assert decision["selected"] is None
assert decision["stop_reason"] == "repeated-defect-no-improvement"
assert decision["requires_native_launch"] is False
def test_given_improving_candidate_when_selecting_then_native_launch_allowed() -> None:
# Arrange
incumbent = _refinement_candidate("incumbent", orientation="vertical")
incumbent_score = feedback.score_surface_layout_candidate(
incumbent,
viewport_target=(0.0, 0.0, 1920.0, 1080.0),
)
improved = _refinement_candidate("improved", orientation="horizontal")
# Act
decision = feedback.select_surface_refinement(
incumbent_score=incumbent_score,
incumbent_semantic_fingerprint=feedback.surface_semantic_fingerprint(incumbent),
candidates=[improved],
viewport_target=(0.0, 0.0, 1920.0, 1080.0),
)
# Assert
assert decision["requires_native_launch"] is True
assert decision["selected_candidate_id"] == "improved"
assert tuple(decision["selected_score"]) < tuple(incumbent_score)
def test_given_semantic_drift_when_selecting_then_candidate_is_rejected() -> None:
# Arrange
incumbent = _refinement_candidate("incumbent", orientation="vertical")
incumbent_score = feedback.score_surface_layout_candidate(
incumbent,
viewport_target=(0.0, 0.0, 1920.0, 1080.0),
)
drifted = _refinement_candidate(
"drifted",
orientation="horizontal",
node_ids=["node-a", "node-b", "node-injected"],
)
# Act
decision = feedback.select_surface_refinement(
incumbent_score=incumbent_score,
incumbent_semantic_fingerprint=feedback.surface_semantic_fingerprint(incumbent),
candidates=[drifted],
viewport_target=(0.0, 0.0, 1920.0, 1080.0),
)
# Assert
assert decision["semantic_rejected_ids"] == ["drifted"]
assert decision["selected"] is None
assert decision["requires_native_launch"] is False
def test_given_oversized_candidate_set_when_selecting_then_search_is_bounded() -> None:
# Arrange
incumbent = _refinement_candidate("incumbent", orientation="vertical")
incumbent_score = feedback.score_surface_layout_candidate(
incumbent,
viewport_target=(0.0, 0.0, 1920.0, 1080.0),
)
candidates = [
_refinement_candidate(f"candidate-{index:04d}", orientation="horizontal")
for index in range(feedback.MAX_SURFACE_REFINEMENT_CANDIDATES * 3)
]
# Act
decision = feedback.select_surface_refinement(
incumbent_score=incumbent_score,
incumbent_semantic_fingerprint=feedback.surface_semantic_fingerprint(incumbent),
candidates=candidates,
viewport_target=(0.0, 0.0, 1920.0, 1080.0),
)
# Assert
assert decision["evaluated_count"] == feedback.MAX_SURFACE_REFINEMENT_CANDIDATES
assert (
feedback.MIN_SURFACE_REFINEMENT_CANDIDATES
<= feedback.MAX_SURFACE_REFINEMENT_CANDIDATES
)
assert decision["selected_candidate_id"] == "candidate-0000"
def test_given_manifest_when_validated_then_requires_pending_human_status() -> None:
# Arrange
manifest = {
"schema_version": 2,
"manifest_type": "tm7_visual_feedback",
"model_id": "demo-model",
"spec_path": "threat-model-spec.yaml",
"spec_sha256": "abc",
"generator_profile": "default",
"generator_profile_sha256": "def",
"candidate_sha256": "a" * 64,
"iteration_id": "2026-07-16.001",
"pinned_tmt_version": "7.3.51110.1",
"created_at": "2026-07-16T00:00:00Z",
"surfaces": [
{
"surface_id": "context",
"surface_guid": "surface-context",
"surface_name": "System context",
"capture_path": "evidence/context.png",
"uia_path": "uia/context",
"metrics": {},
"findings": [],
"human_review_status": "pending",
"human_review_required": True,
}
],
"convergence": {
"status": "pending",
"selected_candidate": None,
"stop_reason": "pending",
"evidence_complete": True,
},
}
# Act and Assert
feedback.validate_feedback_manifest(manifest)
def test_given_zero_sized_pane_when_calibrated_then_rejected() -> None:
"""Reject calibration payloads that report a zero-sized pane."""
# Arrange
calibration = {
"contract": "layout_calibration_v1",
"scope": "same-run",
"viewport_target": [0.0, 0.0, 1200.0, 800.0],
"pane_rect": [0, 0, 0, 0],
"scroll_percentages": {"horizontal": 0.0, "vertical": 0.0},
"effective_scale": {"x": 1.0, "y": 1.0},
"screenshot_dimensions": {"width": 1200, "height": 800},
"crop_dimensions": {"width": 0, "height": 0},
"confidence": {
"pane_measured": True,
"scroll_interface_found": True,
"consistent": True,
"failure_reason": None,
},
}
# Act and Assert
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="pane_rect"):
feedback._validate_layout_calibration_v1(calibration)
def test_given_calibration_contract_when_validated_then_same_run_is_accepted() -> None:
"""Accept a same-run calibration contract with complete confidence data."""
# Arrange
manifest = {
"schema_version": 2,
"manifest_type": "tm7_visual_feedback",
"model_id": "demo-model",
"spec_path": "threat-model-spec.yaml",
"spec_sha256": "abc",
"generator_profile": "default",
"generator_profile_sha256": "def",
"candidate_sha256": "a" * 64,
"iteration_id": "2026-07-16.001",
"pinned_tmt_version": "7.3.51110.1",
"created_at": "2026-07-16T00:00:00Z",
"surfaces": [],
"convergence": {
"status": "automated-ready-pending-human",
"selected_candidate": "candidate.tm7",
"stop_reason": "evidence",
"evidence_complete": True,
},
"layout_calibration_v1": {
"contract": "layout_calibration_v1",
"scope": "same-run",
"viewport_target": [0.0, 0.0, 1200.0, 800.0],
"pane_rect": [0, 0, 1200, 800],
"scroll_percentages": {"horizontal": 0.0, "vertical": 0.0},
"effective_scale": {"x": 1.0, "y": 1.0},
"screenshot_dimensions": {"width": 1200, "height": 800},
"crop_dimensions": {"width": 1200, "height": 800},
"confidence": {
"pane_measured": True,
"scroll_interface_found": True,
"consistent": True,
"failure_reason": None,
},
},
}
# Act and Assert
feedback.validate_feedback_manifest(manifest)
def test_given_connector_label_when_measured_then_generator_and_feedback_agree() -> (
None
):
# Act
generator_layout = generate_tm7._build_connector_label_layout(
"Access the service",
"HTTPS",
handle=(120.0, 80.0),
label_offset=(12.0, 10.0),
)
feedback_layout = feedback.build_connector_label_layout(
"Access the service",
"HTTPS",
handle=(120.0, 80.0),
label_offset=(12.0, 10.0),
)
# Assert
assert generator_layout["display_label"] == feedback_layout["display_label"]
assert generator_layout["label_lines"] == feedback_layout["label_lines"]
assert generator_layout["label_rect"] == feedback_layout["label_rect"]
def test_given_connector_endpoints_when_metrics_derived_then_they_are_excluded() -> (
None
):
# Arrange
geometry = feedback.SurfaceGeometry(
surface_id="context",
nominal_node_size=100.0,
node_rects={
"a": (0.0, 0.0, 100.0, 100.0),
"b": (200.0, 0.0, 100.0, 100.0),
},
connector_segments=[
("a", "b", (0.0, 50.0), (200.0, 50.0)),
],
)
# Act
metrics = feedback.derive_geometry_metrics(geometry)
# Assert
assert metrics["edge_node_intersections"] == 0
assert metrics["edge_crossing_count"] == 0
def test_given_dense_surface_when_deriving_findings_then_marks_crossings_as_warn() -> (
None
):
# Arrange
metrics = {
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "trust-zone-portal",
"evidence_path": "evidence/iteration-01/surfaces/context/metrics.json",
"edge_crossing_count": 3,
}
# Act
findings = feedback.derive_findings(metrics, density="dense")
# Assert
crossing_finding = next(
finding
for finding in findings
if finding["metric_name"] == "edge_crossing_count"
)
assert crossing_finding["severity"] == "warn"
def test_given_background_image_when_deriving_image_metrics_then_reports_review() -> (
None
):
# Arrange
image_path = Path("/tmp/background-image.png")
image_path.write_bytes(b"\x00" * 64)
try:
viewport = feedback.ViewportBounds(left=0, top=0, width=800, height=600)
# Act
metrics = feedback.derive_image_metrics(image_path, viewport)
# Assert
assert metrics["is_all_background"] is True
assert metrics["capture_status"] == "ok"
assert metrics["severity"] == "review"
finally:
image_path.unlink(missing_ok=True)
def test_given_overlay_candidates_when_ranked_then_uses_deterministic_order() -> None:
# Arrange
candidates = [
{
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "node-b",
"constraint_type": "position",
"gate_failure_count": 1,
"review_count": 0,
"warn_count": 0,
"max_severity_score": 2.0,
},
{
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "node-a",
"constraint_type": "position",
"gate_failure_count": 1,
"review_count": 0,
"warn_count": 0,
"max_severity_score": 1.0,
},
{
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "node-a",
"constraint_type": "relative_to",
"gate_failure_count": 1,
"review_count": 0,
"warn_count": 0,
"max_severity_score": 1.0,
},
]
# Act
ranked = feedback.rank_overlay_candidates(candidates)
# Assert
assert [candidate["node_id"] for candidate in ranked] == [
"node-a",
"node-a",
"node-b",
]
assert ranked[0]["ranking_key"] == (
1,
0,
0,
1.0,
"context",
"node-a",
"position",
)
def test_given_differing_zone_order_when_scored_then_scores_differ() -> None:
# Arrange
horizontal_candidate = {
"surface_id": "context",
"orientation": "horizontal",
"zone_order": ["zone-a", "zone-b"],
"node_ranks": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 1},
"branch_groups": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 0},
"reverse_edge_members": set(),
"fan_in": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 1},
"fan_out": {"node-a": 1, "node-b": 0},
}
vertical_candidate = {
"surface_id": "context",
"orientation": "vertical",
"zone_order": ["zone-b", "zone-a"],
"node_ranks": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 1},
"branch_groups": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 0},
"reverse_edge_members": set(),
"fan_in": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 1},
"fan_out": {"node-a": 1, "node-b": 0},
}
# Act
horizontal_score = feedback.score_surface_layout_candidate(horizontal_candidate)
vertical_score = feedback.score_surface_layout_candidate(vertical_candidate)
# Assert
assert horizontal_score[0] < vertical_score[0]
def test_given_repeated_defect_history_when_evaluated_then_convergence_stops() -> None:
# Arrange
history = [
feedback.IterationResult(
iteration_id=1,
defect_signature="overlap|crossing",
gate_failure_count=1,
evidence_complete=True,
),
feedback.IterationResult(
iteration_id=2,
defect_signature="overlap|crossing",
gate_failure_count=1,
evidence_complete=True,
),
]
# Act
convergence = feedback.evaluate_convergence(history, max_iterations=3)
# Assert
assert convergence.should_stop is True
assert convergence.stop_reason == "repeated-defect-no-improvement"
def test_given_two_iteration_limit_when_evaluated_then_one_refinement_runs() -> None:
# Arrange
history = [
feedback.IterationResult(
iteration_id=0,
defect_signature="initial",
gate_failure_count=1,
),
feedback.IterationResult(
iteration_id=1,
defect_signature="initial",
gate_failure_count=1,
),
]
# Act
convergence = feedback.evaluate_convergence(history, max_iterations=2)
# Assert
assert convergence.should_stop is False
assert convergence.stop_reason == "continue"
def test_given_zero_gates_but_incomplete_evidence_when_evaluated_then_not_ready() -> (
None
):
"""No observed failures is not the same as observed success.
The zero-gate success path used to run before the evidence check, so a run
that captured nothing reported `automated-ready-pending-human` on the
strength of having seen no failures.
"""
# Arrange
history = [
feedback.IterationResult(
iteration_id=0,
defect_signature="none",
gate_failure_count=0,
evidence_complete=False,
)
]
# Act
convergence = feedback.evaluate_convergence(history, max_iterations=3)
# Assert
assert convergence.should_stop is True
assert convergence.stop_reason == "evidence-incomplete"
assert convergence.stop_reason != "automated-ready-pending-human"
def test_given_scored_candidates_when_compared_then_every_dimension_discriminates() -> (
None
):
"""Each declared score member must be able to separate two candidates.
Six of the eleven previously declared dimensions were returned as constant
0.0, so the stop decision ran on a score blind to more than half of what it
advertised. A constant member can never order two candidates, so this
asserts the property rather than the specific dimension list.
"""
# Arrange
base = {
"orientation": "horizontal",
"zone_order": ["zone-a", "zone-b"],
"node_ranks": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 1},
"branch_groups": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 0},
"reverse_edge_members": set(),
"fan_in": {"node-a": 0, "node-b": 1},
"fan_out": {"node-a": 1, "node-b": 0},
}
variants = [
{**base, "orientation": "vertical"},
{**base, "reverse_edge_members": {"node-a"}},
{
**base,
"zone_order": ["zone-b", "zone-a"],
"zone_flow_ranks": {"zone-a": 0.0, "zone-b": 1.0},
},
{**base, "fan_in": {"node-a": 5, "node-b": 5}},
{**base, "node_ranks": {"node-a-longer-identifier": 0, "node-b": 1}},
]
# Act
baseline_score = feedback.score_surface_layout_candidate(base)
variant_scores = [
feedback.score_surface_layout_candidate(variant) for variant in variants
]
# Assert
for index in range(len(baseline_score)):
assert any(score[index] != baseline_score[index] for score in variant_scores), (
f"score dimension {index} is constant and cannot order candidates"
)
def test_given_automation_overlay_when_emitted_then_approval_state_is_pending() -> None:
# Arrange
geometry = feedback.SurfaceGeometry(
surface_id="context",
nominal_node_size=100.0,
node_rects={"trust-zone-portal": (0.0, 0.0, 100.0, 100.0)},
connector_segments=[],
)
context = feedback.OverlayContext(
model_id="demo-model",
spec_path=Path("threat-model-spec.yaml"),
spec_sha256="abc",
generator_profile="default",
generator_profile_sha256="def",
surface_ids={"context"},
surface_node_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal"}},
)
metrics = {
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "trust-zone-portal",
"evidence_path": "evidence/iteration-01/surfaces/context/metrics.json",
"overlap_ratio": 0.04,
}
# Act
candidates = feedback.derive_overlay_candidates(
surface_geometry=geometry,
overlay_context=context,
metrics=metrics,
density="simple",
)
# Assert
assert candidates
assert candidates[0]["provenance"]["approval_state"] == "pending"
def test_given_boundary_overlap_when_candidates_derived_then_zone_rule_is_typed() -> (
None
):
# Arrange
geometry = feedback.SurfaceGeometry(
surface_id="context",
nominal_node_size=100.0,
node_rects={"node-a": (40.0, 80.0, 140.0, 180.0)},
connector_segments=[],
boundary_rects={"zone-a": (24.0, 24.0, 500.0, 500.0)},
)
context = feedback.OverlayContext(
model_id="demo-model",
spec_path=Path("spec.yaml"),
spec_sha256="abc",
generator_profile="default",
generator_profile_sha256="def",
surface_ids={"context"},
surface_node_ids={"context": {"node-a"}},
surface_zone_ids={"context": {"zone-a"}},
)
# Act
candidate = feedback.derive_overlay_candidates(
surface_geometry=geometry,
overlay_context=context,
metrics={
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "node-a",
"boundary_overlap_count": 1,
},
)[0]
# Assert
assert candidate["target_type"] == "zone"
assert candidate["target_id"] == "zone-a"
assert candidate["rule_collection"] == "zone_rules"
assert candidate["overlay_rule"]["zone_id"] == "zone-a"
def test_given_non_exact_candidate_fingerprint_when_validated_then_rejected() -> None:
# Arrange
manifest = json.loads(
(FIXTURES_DIR / "valid-manifest.json").read_text(encoding="utf-8")
)
manifest["candidate_sha256"] = "not-a-sha"
# Act and Assert
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="candidate_sha256"):
feedback.validate_feedback_manifest(manifest)
def test_given_screenshot_review_when_deriving_candidates_then_gate_ignores_it() -> (
None
):
# Arrange
geometry = feedback.SurfaceGeometry(
surface_id="context",
nominal_node_size=100.0,
node_rects={"trust-zone-portal": (0.0, 0.0, 100.0, 100.0)},
connector_segments=[],
)
context = feedback.OverlayContext(
model_id="demo-model",
spec_path=Path("threat-model-spec.yaml"),
spec_sha256="abc",
generator_profile="default",
generator_profile_sha256="def",
surface_ids={"context"},
surface_node_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal"}},
)
metrics = {
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "trust-zone-portal",
"evidence_path": "evidence/iteration-01/surfaces/context/metrics.json",
"capture_status": "ok",
"severity": "review",
"is_all_background": True,
}
# Act
candidates = feedback.derive_overlay_candidates(
surface_geometry=geometry,
overlay_context=context,
metrics=metrics,
density="simple",
)
# Assert
assert candidates[0]["review_count"] == 1
assert candidates[0]["gate_failure_count"] == 0
def test_given_connector_intersection_when_candidate_derived_then_node_moves_away() -> (
None
):
# Arrange
geometry = feedback.SurfaceGeometry(
surface_id="context",
nominal_node_size=100.0,
node_rects={
"ext-dev": (100.0, 100.0, 150.0, 150.0),
"comp-logsink": (10.0, 10.0, 60.0, 60.0),
},
connector_segments=[
("comp-logsink", "api-gateway", (0.0, 0.0), (200.0, 200.0)),
],
)
context = feedback.OverlayContext(
model_id="demo-model",
spec_path=Path("threat-model-spec.yaml"),
spec_sha256="abc",
generator_profile="default",
generator_profile_sha256="def",
surface_ids={"context"},
surface_node_ids={"context": {"ext-dev", "comp-logsink"}},
)
metrics = {
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "ext-dev",
"evidence_path": "evidence/iteration-01/surfaces/context/metrics.json",
"edge_node_intersections": 3,
"edge_crossing_count": 1,
"min_spacing_ratio": 1.0,
"overlap_ratio": 0.0,
}
# Act
candidates = feedback.derive_overlay_candidates(
surface_geometry=geometry,
overlay_context=context,
metrics=metrics,
density="simple",
)
rule = candidates[0]["rule"]
moved_rects = dict(geometry.node_rects)
left, top, right, bottom = geometry.node_rects["ext-dev"]
width = right - left
height = bottom - top
moved_rects["ext-dev"] = (
rule["left"],
rule["top"],
rule["left"] + width,
rule["top"] + height,
)
moved_geometry = feedback.SurfaceGeometry(
surface_id=geometry.surface_id,
nominal_node_size=geometry.nominal_node_size,
node_rects=moved_rects,
connector_segments=geometry.connector_segments,
)
def centre_distance(rect: tuple[float, float, float, float]) -> float:
rect_left, rect_top, rect_right, rect_bottom = rect
centre = (
(rect_left + rect_right) / 2.0,
(rect_top + rect_bottom) / 2.0,
)
return feedback._point_to_segment_distance(centre, (0.0, 0.0), (200.0, 200.0))
# Assert
assert rule["constraint"] == "position"
assert rule["left"] >= 1.0
assert rule["top"] >= 1.0
# The node starts centred on the connector. The candidate must push it off
# that line. Asserting the intersection count reaches zero instead would be
# vacuous: one refinement of a quarter node size cannot clear a segment that
# runs through the node's centre, and the count is capped at one per
# connector anyway. Strict growth in centre-to-connector distance is the
# property the candidate actually promises.
assert centre_distance(geometry.node_rects["ext-dev"]) == 0.0
assert centre_distance(moved_rects["ext-dev"]) > 0.0
assert moved_geometry.node_rects["ext-dev"] != geometry.node_rects["ext-dev"]
def test_given_overlap_when_deriving_candidates_then_overlap_ratio_reduces() -> None:
# Arrange
geometry = feedback.SurfaceGeometry(
surface_id="context",
nominal_node_size=80.0,
node_rects={
"node-a": (80.0, 80.0, 120.0, 120.0),
"node-b": (100.0, 100.0, 140.0, 140.0),
},
connector_segments=[],
)
context = feedback.OverlayContext(
model_id="demo-model",
spec_path=Path("threat-model-spec.yaml"),
spec_sha256="abc",
generator_profile="default",
generator_profile_sha256="def",
surface_ids={"context"},
surface_node_ids={"context": {"node-a", "node-b"}},
)
metrics = {
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "node-a",
"evidence_path": "evidence/iteration-01/surfaces/context/metrics.json",
"overlap_ratio": 0.25,
"edge_node_intersections": 0,
"edge_crossing_count": 0,
"min_spacing_ratio": 0.2,
}
# Act
candidates = feedback.derive_overlay_candidates(
surface_geometry=geometry,
overlay_context=context,
metrics=metrics,
density="simple",
)
rule = candidates[0]["rule"]
moved_rects = dict(geometry.node_rects)
left, top, right, bottom = geometry.node_rects["node-a"]
width = right - left
height = bottom - top
moved_rects["node-a"] = (
rule["left"],
rule["top"],
rule["left"] + width,
rule["top"] + height,
)
moved_geometry = feedback.SurfaceGeometry(
surface_id=geometry.surface_id,
nominal_node_size=geometry.nominal_node_size,
node_rects=moved_rects,
connector_segments=geometry.connector_segments,
)
moved_metrics = feedback.derive_geometry_metrics(moved_geometry)
# Assert
assert moved_metrics["overlap_ratio"] < metrics["overlap_ratio"]
def test_given_identical_inputs_when_deriving_candidates_then_rules_are_stable() -> (
None
):
# Arrange
geometry = feedback.SurfaceGeometry(
surface_id="context",
nominal_node_size=50.0,
node_rects={
"node-a": (10.0, 10.0, 40.0, 40.0),
"node-b": (80.0, 10.0, 110.0, 40.0),
},
connector_segments=[],
)
context = feedback.OverlayContext(
model_id="demo-model",
spec_path=Path("threat-model-spec.yaml"),
spec_sha256="abc",
generator_profile="default",
generator_profile_sha256="def",
surface_ids={"context"},
surface_node_ids={"context": {"node-a", "node-b"}},
)
metrics = {
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "node-a",
"evidence_path": "evidence/iteration-01/surfaces/context/metrics.json",
"overlap_ratio": 0.02,
"edge_node_intersections": 0,
"edge_crossing_count": 0,
"min_spacing_ratio": 0.5,
}
# Act
first = feedback.derive_overlay_candidates(
surface_geometry=geometry,
overlay_context=context,
metrics=metrics,
density="simple",
)
second = feedback.derive_overlay_candidates(
surface_geometry=geometry,
overlay_context=context,
metrics=metrics,
density="simple",
)
# Assert
assert first[0]["rule"] == second[0]["rule"]
def test_given_negative_coordinates_when_deriving_candidates_then_rule_is_clamped() -> (
None
):
# Arrange
geometry = feedback.SurfaceGeometry(
surface_id="context",
nominal_node_size=60.0,
node_rects={"node-a": (-10.0, -10.0, 20.0, 20.0)},
connector_segments=[],
)
context = feedback.OverlayContext(
model_id="demo-model",
spec_path=Path("threat-model-spec.yaml"),
spec_sha256="abc",
generator_profile="default",
generator_profile_sha256="def",
surface_ids={"context"},
surface_node_ids={"context": {"node-a"}},
)
metrics = {
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "node-a",
"evidence_path": "evidence/iteration-01/surfaces/context/metrics.json",
"overlap_ratio": 0.04,
"edge_node_intersections": 0,
"edge_crossing_count": 0,
"min_spacing_ratio": 0.5,
}
# Act
candidates = feedback.derive_overlay_candidates(
surface_geometry=geometry,
overlay_context=context,
metrics=metrics,
density="simple",
)
rule = candidates[0]["rule"]
# Assert
assert math.isfinite(rule["left"])
assert math.isfinite(rule["top"])
assert rule["left"] >= 1.0
assert rule["top"] >= 1.0
def test_given_advisory_only_input_when_deriving_candidates_then_rule_is_empty() -> (
None
):
# Arrange
geometry = feedback.SurfaceGeometry(
surface_id="context",
nominal_node_size=60.0,
node_rects={"node-a": (10.0, 10.0, 40.0, 40.0)},
connector_segments=[],
)
context = feedback.OverlayContext(
model_id="demo-model",
spec_path=Path("threat-model-spec.yaml"),
spec_sha256="abc",
generator_profile="default",
generator_profile_sha256="def",
surface_ids={"context"},
surface_node_ids={"context": {"node-a"}},
)
metrics = {
"surface_id": "context",
"node_id": "node-a",
"evidence_path": "evidence/iteration-01/surfaces/context/metrics.json",
"capture_status": "ok",
"severity": "review",
"is_all_background": True,
}
# Act
candidates = feedback.derive_overlay_candidates(
surface_geometry=geometry,
overlay_context=context,
metrics=metrics,
density="simple",
)
# Assert
assert candidates[0]["constraint_type"] == "none"
assert candidates[0]["rule"] == {}
def test_given_v1_overlay_when_validating_then_rejects_with_schema_version_error() -> (
None
):
# Arrange
overlay = {
"schema_version": 1,
"overlay_type": "tm7_layout_overlay",
"model_id": "demo-model",
"overlay_id": "overlay-001",
"applies_to": [{"surface_id": "context", "generator_profile": "default"}],
"zone_rules": [],
"node_rules": [],
"connector_rules": [],
"surface_rules": [],
"provenance": {
"evidence_ref": "evidence/iteration-01",
"approval_state": "pending",
},
"invalidation": {
"spec_fingerprint": "abc",
"generator_profile_fingerprint": "def",
"surface_identity_fingerprint": "ghi",
"surface_zone_identity_fingerprint": "ghi",
"surface_flow_identity_fingerprint": "ghi",
},
}
context = feedback.OverlayContext(
model_id="demo-model",
spec_path=Path("threat-model-spec.yaml"),
spec_sha256="abc",
generator_profile="default",
generator_profile_sha256="def",
surface_ids={"context"},
surface_node_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal"}},
surface_zone_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal"}},
surface_flow_ids={"context": {"flow-001"}},
)
# Act and Assert
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="schema_version"):
feedback.validate_layout_overlay(overlay, context)
def test_given_overlay_payload_when_validated_then_schema_stays_strict() -> None:
# Arrange
overlay = {
"schema_version": 2,
"overlay_type": "tm7_layout_overlay",
"model_id": "demo-model",
"overlay_id": "overlay-001",
"applies_to": [{"surface_id": "context", "generator_profile": "default"}],
"zone_rules": [],
"node_rules": [],
"connector_rules": [],
"surface_rules": [],
"provenance": {
"evidence_ref": "evidence/iteration-01",
"generated_at": "2026-07-17T19:00:00Z",
"approval_state": "pending",
},
"invalidation": {
"spec_fingerprint": "abc",
"generator_profile_fingerprint": "def",
"surface_identity_fingerprint": "ghi",
"surface_zone_identity_fingerprint": "ghi",
"surface_flow_identity_fingerprint": "ghi",
},
}
schema = json.loads(
(SCHEMAS_DIR / "tm7-layout-overlay.schema.json").read_text(encoding="utf-8")
)
context = feedback.OverlayContext(
model_id="demo-model",
spec_path=Path("threat-model-spec.yaml"),
spec_sha256="abc",
generator_profile="default",
generator_profile_sha256="def",
surface_ids={"context"},
surface_node_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal"}},
surface_zone_ids={"context": {"trust-zone-portal"}},
surface_flow_ids={"context": {"flow-001"}},
)
# Act and Assert
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="fingerprint"):
feedback.validate_layout_overlay(overlay, context)
assert schema["additionalProperties"] is False
assert "ranking_key" not in schema["properties"]
def test_given_corner_endpoint_within_axis_budget_when_measured_then_attached() -> None:
# Arrange
# An endpoint one unit past both edges sits on a corner. Measuring the
# diagonal would report 1.414 and fail a 1.0 budget, penalising a corner
# for the same per-axis overshoot an edge endpoint is allowed.
routes = {
"f-1": {
"source_id": "node-a",
"target_id": "node-b",
"source_point": (201.0, 401.0),
"handle_point": (300.0, 350.0),
"target_point": (400.0, 350.0),
}
}
geometry = _composition_geometry(connector_routes=routes)
# Act
metrics = feedback.derive_composition_metrics(geometry)
# Assert
assert metrics["detached_endpoint_count"] == 0
def test_given_endpoint_past_one_axis_when_measured_then_detached() -> None:
# Arrange
routes = {
"f-1": {
"source_id": "node-a",
"target_id": "node-b",
"source_point": (260.0, 350.0),
"handle_point": (300.0, 350.0),
"target_point": (400.0, 350.0),
}
}
geometry = _composition_geometry(connector_routes=routes)
# Act
metrics = feedback.derive_composition_metrics(geometry)
# Assert
assert metrics["detached_endpoint_count"] == 1
assert metrics["detached_endpoint_flow_id"] == "f-1"
assert metrics["detached_endpoint_node_id"] == "node-a"
def test_given_detached_endpoint_when_reported_then_names_its_own_node() -> None:
# Arrange
# The surface-level node_id belongs to a different element. Inheriting it
# would assert that this flow attaches to that node, which the
# measurement never established.
metrics = {
"surface_id": "ctx-01",
"node_id": "comp-unrelated",
"flow_id": "unknown",
"detached_endpoint_count": 1,
"detached_endpoint_flow_id": "flow-03",
"detached_endpoint_node_id": "ext-ghmcp",
}
# Act
findings = feedback.derive_findings(metrics, density="dense")
# Assert
finding = next(
item for item in findings if item["metric_name"] == "detached_endpoint_count"
)
assert finding["node_id"] == "ext-ghmcp"
assert finding["flow_id"] == "flow-03"
assert finding["node_id_attributed"] is True
def test_given_surface_wide_metric_when_reported_then_marks_ids_unattributed() -> None:
# Arrange
metrics = {
"surface_id": "ctx-01",
"node_id": "comp-artifacts",
"flow_id": "unknown",
"visible_clipping_count": 3,
}
# Act
findings = feedback.derive_findings(metrics, density="dense")
# Assert
finding = next(
item for item in findings if item["metric_name"] == "visible_clipping_count"
)
assert finding["node_id_attributed"] is False
assert finding["flow_id_attributed"] is False
Requirements and compatibility
Written for: GitHub Copilot, Claude Code
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Claude Code frontmatter, Needs Python, Needs Node.js
The author says: Generation requires Python 3.11+ and uv. The native TM7 feedback loop additionally requires Windows with an interactive desktop session and the pinned Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool 7.3.51110.1.
Security
What our scanner noticed· Medium risk
- Large base64-encoded blobs
- Scripts that your agent may run
This skill includes scripts that your agent may run. Read them before you use it.
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Microsoft
- Publisher
- Microsoft (Official)
- Source
- microsoft/hve-core · .github/skills/project-planning/security-planning · commit f425e94
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Microsoft or Microsoft.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download security-planning.zip