Generated banner for M365 Agent Evaluator
Generated logo for M365 Agent Evaluator

M365 Agent Evaluator

MicrosoftOfficialPublished by Microsoft

  • Skill
  • Tool integration
  • Software development
  • MIT
  • Low risk

From the author

Use this skill when a user wants to create, run, or analyze evaluation suites for Microsoft 365 Copilot declarative agents with the public @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval CLI. Trigger on intents such as "evaluate my agent", "test my agent", "run my evals", "create eval prompts", "add multi-turn tests", "tune evaluator thresholds", "why is my agent failing", or "set up eval environment variables".
— the description by Microsoft

From the skill’s files

Taken from the skill’s own files (its description, section headings and stated usage). Not an AutoGineer summary, and not written by the author as one.

Use this skill when a user wants to create, run, or analyze evaluation suites for Microsoft 365 Copilot declarative agents with the public @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval CLI. Trigger on intents such as "evaluate my agent", "test my agent", "run my evals", "create eval prompts", "add multi-turn tests", "tune evaluator thresholds", "why is my agent failing", or "set up eval environment variables". Use this skill to help users evaluate Microsoft 365 Copilot declarative agents with @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval. The skill designs schema-compatible eval datasets, runs the public preview CLI, analyzes results, and recommends targeted fixes.

What it does

  • Always use this CLI invocation
  • Activation workflow
  • Current dataset contract
  • Public evaluator names
  • Common commands
  • Version and PATH safety

When to use it

  • Use this skill when a user wants to create, run, or analyze evaluation suites for Microsoft 365 Copilot declarative agents with the public @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval CLI.
  • Trigger on intents such as "evaluate my agent", "test my agent", "run my evals", "create eval prompts", "add multi-turn tests", "tune evaluator thresholds", "why is my agent failing", or "set up…
  • Identify the user goal: setup, dataset authoring, running evals, analyzing results, or updating an existing eval suite.
  • Load only the reference needed for the current goal:
  • references/workflow.md for the end-to-end operator workflow and CLI commands.
  • references/azure-setup.md for prerequisites, env files, and secret handling.

Advantages

The skill’s files do not state this.

Usage examples

The skill’s files do not state this.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/microsoft/m365-agent-evaluator/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip m365-agent-evaluator.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by Microsoft

M365 Agent Evaluator

Use this skill to help users evaluate Microsoft 365 Copilot declarative agents with @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval. The skill designs schema-compatible eval datasets, runs the public preview CLI, analyzes results, and recommends targeted fixes.

Default to Microsoft 365 Agents Toolkit (ATK) projects when detected, but do not hard-stop solely because the current directory is not ATK. The CLI can also evaluate deployed agents with an explicit M365_AGENT_ID or --m365-agent-id.

Always use this CLI invocation

npx -y --package @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval@latest runevals

Do not recommend the old private aka.ms installer, global installs, bare runevals, bare npx runevals, --input, or --html.

Activation workflow

  1. Identify the user goal: setup, dataset authoring, running evals, analyzing results, or updating an existing eval suite.

  2. Load only the reference needed for the current goal:

    • references/workflow.md for the end-to-end operator workflow and CLI commands.

    • references/azure-setup.md for prerequisites, env files, and secret handling.

    • references/eval-templates.md when creating or editing eval datasets.

    • references/pra-framework.md when deciding what scenarios to generate.

    • references/result-analysis.md after JSON/CSV/HTML results exist.

    • references/guardrails.md before writing files, handling secrets, clearing cache, signing out, or troubleshooting.

  3. Detect project shape:

    • ATK: .env.local, .env.local.user, env\.env.local.user, m365agents.yml, or appPackage\declarativeAgent.json.

    • Non-ATK: an eval dataset plus M365_AGENT_ID, --m365-agent-id, or a named environment file such as env\.env.dev.

  4. Verify prerequisites without exposing values:

    • Node.js 24.12.0 or newer.

    • Microsoft 365 Copilot license and a deployed M365 Copilot agent.

    • Tenant admin consent for the WorkIQ Client App.

    • TENANT_ID, Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models endpoint/key, and recommended/default gpt-4o-mini deployment.

  5. Choose the workflow:

    • No dataset: create evals\evals.json.

    • Existing dataset: run, analyze prior results, or propose changes.

    • Quick check: use inline prompts.

    • Exploration: use interactive mode.

Current dataset contract

Generate schema version 1.2.0 documents with a root items array. Do not generate the old PromptsObject or root prompts format.

Minimum shape:

{
  "schemaVersion": "1.2.0",
  "metadata": {
    "name": "Agent evaluation suite",
    "tags": ["starter"]
  },
  "default_evaluators": {
    "Relevance": {},
    "Coherence": {}
  },
  "items": [
    {
      "prompt": "What can this agent help me with?",
      "expected_response": "The agent explains its supported scope without inventing unsupported capabilities."
    }
  ]
}

Use references\prompts-schema.json as the local schema source and references\eval-templates.md for copyable single-turn, multi-turn, evaluator, and threshold examples.

Public evaluator names

Evaluator names are case-sensitive. Use only the public configurable evaluator names unless a newer authoritative source proves otherwise.

EvaluatorSemantics
RelevanceLLM score from 1-5; default threshold 3.
CoherenceLLM score from 1-5; default threshold 3.
GroundednessLLM score from 1-5 against context/expected evidence; default threshold 3.
SimilarityLLM score from 1-5 against expected_response; default threshold 3.
CitationsCount-based citation check; default threshold 1.
ExactMatchBoolean exact string match.
PartialMatchString similarity from 0.0-1.0; default threshold 0.5.

Treat ToolCallAccuracy as legacy/private for authoring. Do not add it to generated datasets unless current public CLI/schema documentation explicitly reintroduces it.

Common commands

# Version/help checks
npx -y --package @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval@latest runevals --version
npx -y --package @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval@latest runevals --help

# First-time setup / EULA
npx -y --package @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval@latest runevals accept-eula
npx -y --package @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval@latest runevals --init-only

# Batch run with explicit JSON output
npx -y --package @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval@latest runevals --prompts-file evals\evals.json --output .evals\results.json

# Human-review HTML or spreadsheet-friendly CSV
npx -y --package @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval@latest runevals --prompts-file evals\evals.json --output .evals\results.html
npx -y --package @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval@latest runevals --prompts-file evals\evals.json --output .evals\results.csv

# Quick checks
npx -y --package @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval@latest runevals --prompts "What can you help me with?" --expected "The agent describes its supported scope."

# Non-ATK or named environment
npx -y --package @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval@latest runevals --prompts-file evals\evals.json --m365-agent-id <agent-id> --env dev

Use --concurrency only with values 1-5. Start with 1 for debugging and increase only after setup is stable.

Version and PATH safety

Before diagnosing agent behavior, confirm which executable is running:

Get-Command runevals -All
npm list -g @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval --depth=0
npm view @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval version
npx -y --package @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval@latest runevals --version
npx -y --package @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval@latest where runevals

If bare runevals prints This version of the M365 Evals CLI has stopped working and must be updated, treat it as a stale PATH/global install. Re-run with the npx --package ...@latest command above, then ask before removing global shims with npm uninstall -g @microsoft/m365-copilot-eval.

File conventions

PathPurpose
.env.localNon-secret ATK config such as M365_TITLE_ID.
.env.local.user or env\.env.local.userLocal secrets such as tenant ID and Azure OpenAI key.
env\.env.<environment>Named environment config for non-ATK or explicit --env workflows.
evals\evals.jsonSource-controlled eval dataset if the user wants it committed.
.evals\Local run outputs; usually gitignored.

Never print or commit secrets, prompts containing sensitive data, retrieved content, debug logs, or raw result files unless the user explicitly asks and confirms the data is safe to share.

Generation guidance

Use PRA as a scenario-design framework:

  • Perceive: retrieval, grounding, and source coverage.

  • Reason: instruction adherence, synthesis, ambiguity handling, and refusal behavior.

  • Act: declared capability/action behavior. Score with public evaluators such as Relevance, Coherence, Similarity, ExactMatch, or PartialMatch; do not use legacy ToolCallAccuracy.

Ask before overwriting an existing dataset. When writing generated evals, write to a temporary file first and rename on success.

Result analysis guidance

Analyze only evaluator keys that are present. Missing score keys usually mean the evaluator was not configured for that item, not that it failed.

Use current score keys when present: relevance, coherence, groundedness, similarity, citations, exactMatch, and partialMatch. Group failures into likely root causes: instruction issue, grounding issue, citation issue, expected-answer mismatch, capability gap, auth/environment issue, or eval-quality issue.

Do not run real tenant-dependent evals unless the user has provided or approved the necessary tenant, agent, and Azure OpenAI configuration.

Files

references/result-analysis.md

Result analysis

Use this reference after an evaluation run has produced JSON, CSV, or HTML output.

Current output shape

JSON output is an eval-document-style object:

{
  "schemaVersion": "1.2.0",
  "metadata": {
    "evaluatedAt": "2025-01-01T00:00:00Z",
    "agentId": "<agent-id>",
    "agentName": "<agent-name>",
    "cliVersion": "<version>"
  },
  "default_evaluators": {},
  "items": [
    {
      "prompt": "What can this agent help me with?",
      "response": "The agent response.",
      "expected_response": "The expected behavior.",
      "scores": {
        "relevance": {
          "score": 4,
          "result": "pass",
          "threshold": 3
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

The scores object is sparse. A missing score key usually means that evaluator was not configured for that item.

CSV output includes metadata comments, aggregate statistics, single-turn and multi-turn sections, and serialized score JSON. HTML output is best for human review and may open in a browser.

Score keys and semantics

Score keyAuthoring evaluatorInterpretation
relevanceRelevance1-5 LLM score for whether the answer addresses the prompt.
coherenceCoherence1-5 LLM score for clarity and structure.
groundednessGroundedness1-5 LLM score for support from provided or retrieved context.
similaritySimilarity1-5 LLM comparison to expected_response.
citationsCitationsCount-based citation result against the configured threshold.
exactMatchExactMatchBoolean exact match result.
partialMatchPartialMatch0.0-1.0 partial string match result.

Analyze only keys that are present. Do not assume a missing evaluator failed.

Triage patterns

SignalLikely root causeRecommended remediation
Low relevanceWrong intent, vague prompt, or agent ignored the askClarify instructions, add examples, improve scenario routing, or update the eval prompt if it is ambiguous.
Low coherenceResponse is disorganized, contradictory, or too verboseTighten response-format instructions and add expected structure.
Low groundednessResponse uses unsupported facts or ignores contextImprove grounding instructions, retrieval configuration, source selection, or refusal behavior when evidence is missing.
Low similarityActual response diverges from expected answerCheck whether expected response is too rigid; otherwise update instructions or data access.
Failed citationsResponse lacks required source citationsAdd citation requirements to instructions and verify source-citation support in the agent.
Failed exactMatchDeterministic output is not exactUse stricter formatting instructions or replace with PartialMatch if exact text is not necessary.
Low partialMatchKey expected terms are missingAdd expected terminology to instructions or adjust expected response to match acceptable variants.
Auth, consent, schema, or model errorsEnvironment failureFix setup before judging agent quality.

Multi-turn analysis

For multi-turn items, check whether failure starts on the first failing turn or compounds across turns:

  1. First-turn failure usually means prompt handling, grounding, or data access is broken.

  2. Later-turn failure usually means the agent loses conversation context or mishandles follow-up references.

  3. Mixed pass/fail patterns can indicate evaluator thresholds are too strict for some turns.

Keep conversation IDs and turn order stable when comparing runs.

Comparing runs over time

For regression checks:

  1. Keep the same dataset and expected responses.

  2. Keep evaluator names and thresholds stable.

  3. Use the same Azure OpenAI model deployment when comparing score movement.

  4. Save outputs with explicit names, for example .evals\2025-01-01-baseline.json and .evals\2025-01-02-after-instructions.json.

  5. Separate environment failures from quality failures before reporting a pass rate.

Reporting recommendations

When summarizing results to the user:

  • Lead with pass/fail themes, not raw JSON.

  • Group failures by likely fix area: instructions, grounding/retrieval, citations, expected-answer quality, capability gap, or setup.

  • Include the smallest concrete manifest/instruction change that is likely to address the issue.

  • Do not paste raw prompts, retrieved data, responses, or logs if they may contain sensitive content.

Requirements and compatibility

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Needs: Needs Node.js

Security

What our scanner noticed· Low risk

  • Instructions that use the network

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Published by
Microsoft
Publisher
Microsoft (Official)
Source
microsoft/skills · .github/plugins/microsoft-365-agents-toolkit/skills/m365-agent-evaluator · commit 0696600
Licence
MIT License (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Microsoft or Microsoft.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download m365-agent-evaluator.zip