Finetuning
MicrosoftOfficialCreated by Microsoft
- Skill
- Tool integration
- Data and AI
- MIT
- Low risk
- Has scripts
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides the necessary procedures and tools for fine-tuning AI models on Microsoft Foundry. It supports three primary training methodologies: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT). The skill encompasses the entire lifecycle, including dataset preparation, training job submission, monitoring, model evaluation, and deployment. It also includes specific guidance for agentic RFT, where models are trained to utilize external tools, and provides scripts for data validation, grader calibration, and resource management.
What it does
- Supports SFT, DPO, and RFT training methodologies.
- Provides data validation scripts for SFT, DPO, and RFT formats.
- Facilitates training job submission and monitoring on Microsoft Foundry.
- Enables calibration of RFT graders and pass thresholds.
- Offers tools for model evaluation and deployment via ARM REST API.
- Includes utilities for synthetic data generation and dataset quality scoring.
When to use it
- When you need to adapt a base model to specific tasks or domains.
- When preparing or validating training datasets for SFT, DPO, or RFT.
- When training models for agentic scenarios involving tool calling.
- When you need to evaluate and deploy a fine-tuned model.
- When troubleshooting training jobs or diagnosing poor model performance.
Advantages
- Standardized workflows for different training types.
- Includes built-in validation to prevent common data formatting errors.
- Supports complex agentic RFT training with tool integration.
- Provides robust scripts for monitoring and evaluating training progress.
- Offers clear guidance on grader design and hyperparameter tuning.
Usage examples
- “How do I validate my SFT dataset before training?”
- The agent will instruct you to use the python scripts/validate/validate_sft.py script on your data.jsonl file to ensure it meets the required format.
- “Submit an SFT training job using gpt-4.1-mini.”
- The agent will provide the command using scripts/submit_training.py with the appropriate flags for model, training file, validation file, and type.
- “How can I calibrate my RFT grader?”
- The agent will guide you to use scripts/calibrate_grader.py to find the optimal pass_threshold, aiming for a 25-50% failure rate on the base model.
- “Deploy my fine-tuned model after training.”
- The agent will provide the command to use scripts/deploy_model.py, specifying the model-id and a deployment name.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/microsoft/finetuning/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip finetuning.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Microsoft
Fine-Tuning on Microsoft Foundry
Fine-tune models using SFT (supervised), DPO (preference), or RFT (reinforcement with graders). Covers dataset prep, training, deployment, and evaluation.
When to Use
Use this sub-skill when the user asks about:
Fine-tuning a model (SFT, DPO, or RFT)
Preparing, validating, or formatting training data
Submitting, monitoring, or diagnosing training jobs
Calibrating graders or pass thresholds for RFT
Deploying or evaluating a fine-tuned model
Choosing between training types (SFT vs DPO vs RFT)
Distillation, synthetic data generation, or dataset quality scoring
Large file uploads for training data
Cleaning up fine-tuning resources (files, deployments)
Do NOT use for: General model deployment without fine-tuning (use deploy-model), agent creation (use agents), prompt optimization without training (use prompt-optimizer).
Workflows
| Stage | Guide |
|---|---|
| Quick start | workflows/quickstart.md |
| Full pipeline | workflows/full-pipeline.md |
| Create data | workflows/dataset-creation.md |
| Iterate | workflows/iterative-training.md |
| Diagnose | workflows/diagnose-poor-results.md |
References
| Topic | File |
|---|---|
| SFT vs DPO vs RFT | references/training-types.md |
| Hyperparameters | references/hyperparameters.md |
| Data formats | references/dataset-formats.md |
| Grader design (RFT) | references/grader-design.md |
| Reward hacking | references/reward-hacking.md |
| Agentic RFT (tools) | references/agentic-rft.md |
| Deployment | references/deployment.md |
| Training curves | references/training-curves.md |
| Evaluation | references/evaluation.md |
| Vision fine-tuning | references/vision-fine-tuning.md |
| Large file uploads | references/large-file-uploads.md |
| Platform gotchas | references/platform-gotchas.md |
Scripts
| Script | Purpose |
|---|---|
scripts/submit_training.py | Submit SFT/DPO/RFT jobs |
scripts/monitor_training.py | Poll job until completion |
scripts/calibrate_grader.py | Find optimal RFT pass_threshold |
scripts/check_training.py | Analyze curves, list checkpoints |
scripts/deploy_model.py | Deploy via ARM REST API |
scripts/evaluate_model.py | LLM judge evaluation |
scripts/convert_dataset.py | Convert between SFT/DPO/RFT formats |
scripts/generate_distillation_data.py | Generate synthetic training data |
scripts/score_dataset.py | Quality scoring on training data |
scripts/cleanup.py | Delete old files and deployments |
scripts/validate/ | Data validators (SFT, DPO, RFT) + stats |
Rules
Always baseline first — evaluate the base model before fine-tuning
Validate data before submitting — run
scripts/validate/validate_sft.pyCalibrate RFT graders — target 25-50% failure rate on the base model
Evaluate checkpoints — don't blindly deploy the final one
Measure token cost alongside accuracy when comparing models
Quick Reference
| Task | Command |
|---|---|
| Validate SFT data | python scripts/validate/validate_sft.py data.jsonl |
| Submit SFT job | python scripts/submit_training.py --model gpt-4.1-mini --training-file train.jsonl --validation-file val.jsonl --type sft |
| Monitor job | python scripts/monitor_training.py --job-id ftjob-xxx |
| Analyze curves | python scripts/check_training.py --job-id ftjob-xxx |
| Deploy model | python scripts/deploy_model.py --model-id ft:gpt-4.1-mini:... --name my-eval |
| Evaluate model | python scripts/evaluate_model.py --deployment-name my-eval --test-file test.jsonl |
Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| "API version not supported" | Older openai SDK on /v1/ endpoint | Upgrade to openai>=1.0 |
| "does not support fine-tuning with Standard TrainingType" | OSS model needs globalStandard | Use --use-rest flag or script auto-falls back |
| Job stuck in post-training eval | Under-provisioned tool endpoint (RFT) | Scale to S2+, enable Always On |
| "DeploymentNotReady" after ARM succeeds | ARM/data-plane race condition | Delete and recreate deployment, wait 5 min |
| Content safety block at deployment | PII-dense training data | Remove problematic document types |
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer998 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.1 KiB
- SKILL.md5.4 KiB
- references/agentic-rft.md3.2 KiB
- references/dataset-formats.md3.7 KiB
- references/deployment.md3.4 KiB
- references/evaluation.md5.8 KiB
- references/grader-design.md3.4 KiB
- references/hyperparameters.md3.2 KiB
- references/large-file-uploads.md927 B
- references/platform-gotchas.md2.0 KiB
- references/reward-hacking.md2.9 KiB
- references/training-curves.md4.1 KiB
- references/training-types.md3.1 KiB
- references/vision-fine-tuning.md4.1 KiB
- scripts/calibrate_grader.pyScript9.3 KiB
- scripts/check_training.pyScript7.8 KiB
- scripts/cleanup.pyScript9.5 KiB
- scripts/common.pyScript7.6 KiB
- scripts/convert_dataset.pyScript10.7 KiB
- scripts/deploy_model.pyScript9.4 KiB
- scripts/evaluate_model.pyScript11.4 KiB
- scripts/generate_distillation_data.pyScript10.1 KiB
- scripts/monitor_training.pyScript5.7 KiB
- scripts/score_dataset.pyScript7.7 KiB
- scripts/submit_training.pyScript10.8 KiB
- scripts/validate/__init__.pyScript305 B
- scripts/validate/data_stats.pyScript6.2 KiB
- scripts/validate/validate_dpo.pyScript3.7 KiB
- scripts/validate/validate_rft.pyScript8.6 KiB
- scripts/validate/validate_sft.pyScript4.5 KiB
- workflows/dataset-creation.md3.1 KiB
- workflows/diagnose-poor-results.md2.3 KiB
- workflows/full-pipeline.md3.1 KiB
- workflows/iterative-training.md3.1 KiB
- workflows/quickstart.md4.5 KiB
scripts/evaluate_model.py
# /// script
# dependencies = [
# "openai>=1.0",
# "azure-identity",
# ]
# ///
"""
evaluate_model.py — Custom 2-dimension LLM judge evaluator for fine-tuned models.
This is a lightweight evaluation script using the OpenAI API directly.
For production evaluation, prefer the Azure AI Evaluation SDK which provides
built-in graders, batch evaluation, and guardrail metrics. See
references/evaluation.md for SDK patterns.
Uses the OpenAI API directly to:
1. Generate responses from a deployed fine-tuned model
2. Grade each response on correctness and conciseness using an LLM judge
3. Produce aggregate quality scores (weighted 70% correctness, 30% conciseness)
By default, system prompts from each test example's messages array are used
during generation. The --system-prompt flag overrides this for all examples.
Usage:
python evaluate_model.py \
--deployment-name my-ft-eval \
--test-file test.jsonl \
--judge-model gpt-4o \
--output results.json
python evaluate_model.py \
--base-url "$BASE_URL" --api-key "$API_KEY" \
--deployment-name my-ft-eval \
--test-file test.jsonl \
--concurrency 4
"""
import json
import os
import re
import sys
try:
sys.stdout.reconfigure(encoding="utf-8")
sys.stderr.reconfigure(encoding="utf-8")
except (AttributeError, OSError):
pass # Stream not reconfigurable (older Python or non-tty); default encoding is fine
import time
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor, as_completed
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))
from common import HelpOnErrorParser, get_clients, _clamp_score
JUDGE_PROMPT = """You are evaluating the quality of a model's output for a given task.
## Task prompt
{prompt}
## Reference answer
{reference}
## Model output
{output}
## Scoring
Rate the output on two dimensions, each on a scale of 1-10:
**Correctness** (1-10): Does the output correctly accomplish the task?
- 1-3: Fundamentally wrong or broken
- 4-6: Partially correct with significant issues
- 7-8: Mostly correct with minor issues
- 9-10: Fully correct
**Conciseness** (1-10): Is the output appropriately concise?
- 1-3: Extremely verbose or padded
- 4-6: Contains unnecessary content
- 7-8: Mostly concise with minor excess
- 9-10: Clean and focused
Return ONLY a JSON object: {{"correctness": <int>, "conciseness": <int>}}"""
def load_test_data(filepath):
"""Load held-out test set. Expects JSONL with 'messages' array.
Extracts the system prompt (if present), user prompt, and assistant
reference from each example so per-example system prompts are preserved.
"""
data = []
with open(filepath, encoding="utf-8") as f:
for i, line in enumerate(f):
if not line.strip():
continue
try:
ex = json.loads(line)
except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
print(f"⚠️ Skipping malformed JSON on line {i+1}: {e}")
continue
msgs = ex.get("messages")
if not isinstance(msgs, list):
print(f"⚠️ Skipping example {i}: missing or invalid 'messages' list")
continue
prompt = next((m["content"] for m in msgs if m["role"] == "user"), None)
reference = next((m["content"] for m in msgs if m["role"] == "assistant"), None)
if not prompt:
print(f"⚠️ Skipping example {i}: missing 'user' message")
continue
if not reference:
print(f"⚠️ Skipping example {i}: missing 'assistant' message")
continue
system_msgs = [m["content"] for m in msgs if m["role"] == "system"]
system_prompt = system_msgs[0] if system_msgs else None
data.append({"prompt": prompt, "reference": reference, "system_prompt": system_prompt})
return data
def generate_response(client, deployment, prompt, system_prompt=None, max_retries=3):
"""Generate a single response from the deployed model."""
messages = []
if system_prompt:
messages.append({"role": "system", "content": system_prompt})
messages.append({"role": "user", "content": prompt})
for attempt in range(max_retries):
try:
resp = client.chat.completions.create(
model=deployment,
messages=messages,
temperature=0.0,
max_completion_tokens=2048,
)
content = resp.choices[0].message.content
if content is None:
# Content filter or empty completion — surface as an error sentinel
# so the aggregate filter at line ~`.startswith("ERROR:")` skips it.
finish = getattr(resp.choices[0], "finish_reason", "unknown")
return f"ERROR: empty content (finish_reason={finish})"
return content
except Exception as e:
if attempt >= max_retries - 1:
return f"ERROR: {e}"
time.sleep(3 * (attempt + 1))
return "ERROR: max retries exceeded"
def grade_response(judge_client, judge_model, prompt, reference, output, max_retries=3):
"""Grade a response using the LLM judge."""
judge_input = JUDGE_PROMPT.format(prompt=prompt, reference=reference, output=output)
for attempt in range(max_retries):
try:
resp = judge_client.chat.completions.create(
model=judge_model,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": judge_input}],
temperature=0.0,
max_completion_tokens=200,
)
text = (resp.choices[0].message.content or "").strip()
# Extract JSON from response
match = re.search(r'\{[^}]+\}', text)
if match:
scores = json.loads(match.group())
return {
"correctness": _clamp_score(scores.get("correctness")),
"conciseness": _clamp_score(scores.get("conciseness")),
}
except Exception as e:
if attempt < max_retries - 1:
time.sleep(2)
else:
return {"correctness": 0, "conciseness": 0, "error": str(e)}
return {"correctness": 0, "conciseness": 0, "error": "All retries failed"}
def main():
parser = HelpOnErrorParser(description="Evaluate a fine-tuned model with LLM judge")
parser.add_argument("--base-url", default=os.environ.get("OPENAI_BASE_URL"),
help="Project /v1/ URL (preferred)")
parser.add_argument("--endpoint", default=os.environ.get("AZURE_OPENAI_ENDPOINT"),
help="Azure OpenAI endpoint (fallback)")
parser.add_argument("--project-endpoint", default=os.environ.get("AZURE_AI_PROJECT_ENDPOINT"),
help="Azure AI project endpoint (Foundry SDK)")
parser.add_argument("--api-key", default=os.environ.get("AZURE_OPENAI_API_KEY"))
parser.add_argument("--deployment-name", required=True, help="Deployed model name")
parser.add_argument("--test-file", required=True, help="Held-out test set (JSONL)")
parser.add_argument("--system-prompt", default=None,
help="Override system prompt for all examples (default: use per-example system prompt from test data)")
# Judge config
parser.add_argument("--judge-model", default="gpt-4o", help="Model for LLM judge")
parser.add_argument("--judge-endpoint", help="Endpoint for judge (default: same as model)")
parser.add_argument("--judge-api-key", help="API key for judge (default: same as model)")
# Output
parser.add_argument("--output", default="eval_results.json", help="Output file")
parser.add_argument("--concurrency", type=int, default=1,
help="Parallel grading workers (generation is always sequential)")
args = parser.parse_args()
# Set up model client via shared auth (supports /v1/, Foundry SDK, AzureOpenAI)
model_client, method = get_clients(
base_url=args.base_url, azure_endpoint=args.endpoint,
project_endpoint=args.project_endpoint, api_key=args.api_key
)
# Set up judge client (defaults to same connection as model)
judge_key = args.judge_api_key or args.api_key
if args.judge_endpoint:
judge_client, _ = get_clients(azure_endpoint=args.judge_endpoint, api_key=judge_key)
elif args.judge_api_key:
# Different API key but same endpoint — create a new client with the judge key
judge_client, _ = get_clients(
base_url=args.base_url, azure_endpoint=args.endpoint,
project_endpoint=args.project_endpoint, api_key=judge_key
)
else:
judge_client = model_client
# Load data
test_data = load_test_data(args.test_file)
print(f"Loaded {len(test_data)} test examples from {args.test_file}")
# Phase 1: Generate responses (sequential to avoid rate limits)
print(f"\nGenerating responses from {args.deployment_name}...")
for i, ex in enumerate(test_data):
# Use CLI override if provided, otherwise use per-example system prompt
effective_system_prompt = args.system_prompt if args.system_prompt is not None else ex.get("system_prompt")
ex["output"] = generate_response(
model_client, args.deployment_name, ex["prompt"], effective_system_prompt
)
if (i + 1) % 10 == 0:
print(f" Generated {i+1}/{len(test_data)}")
errors = sum(1 for ex in test_data if ex["output"].startswith("ERROR:"))
print(f" Done. {errors} errors out of {len(test_data)}.")
# Phase 2: Grade responses (parallel)
print(f"\nGrading with {args.judge_model} (concurrency={args.concurrency})...")
def grade_one(ex):
return grade_response(judge_client, args.judge_model,
ex["prompt"], ex["reference"], ex["output"])
with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=args.concurrency) as pool:
futures = {pool.submit(grade_one, ex): i for i, ex in enumerate(test_data)}
for future in as_completed(futures):
idx = futures[future]
test_data[idx]["scores"] = future.result()
# Aggregate
valid_scores = [ex["scores"] for ex in test_data
if ex["scores"]["correctness"] > 0]
if not valid_scores:
print("No valid scores — all grading failed.")
sys.exit(1)
avg_corr = sum(s["correctness"] for s in valid_scores) / len(valid_scores)
avg_conc = sum(s["conciseness"] for s in valid_scores) / len(valid_scores)
combined = 0.7 * avg_corr + 0.3 * avg_conc
print(f"\n{'='*50}")
print(f"Results for {args.deployment_name}")
print(f" Correctness: {avg_corr:.2f}")
print(f" Conciseness: {avg_conc:.2f}")
print(f" Combined: {combined:.2f}")
print(f" (N={len(valid_scores)} scored, {len(test_data)-len(valid_scores)} failed)")
print(f"{'='*50}")
# Save
results = {
"deployment": args.deployment_name,
"judge_model": args.judge_model,
"n_examples": len(test_data),
"n_scored": len(valid_scores),
"correctness": round(avg_corr, 2),
"conciseness": round(avg_conc, 2),
"combined": round(combined, 2),
"details": [
{
"prompt": ex["prompt"][:200],
"scores": ex.get("scores", {}),
}
for ex in test_data
],
}
with open(args.output, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
json.dump(results, f, indent=2)
print(f"\nDetailed results saved to {args.output}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Needs Python
Security
What our scanner noticed· Low risk
- Scripts that your agent may run
This skill includes scripts that your agent may run. Read them before you use it.
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- Microsoft
- Publisher
- Microsoft (Official)
- Source
- microsoft/skills · .github/plugins/azure-skills/skills/microsoft-foundry/finetuning · commit 0696600
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from .github/plugins/azure-skills/LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
- Also distributed in
- microsoft/azure-skills
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Microsoft or Microsoft.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download finetuning.zip