Generated banner for Cloud Solution Architect
Generated logo for Cloud Solution Architect

Cloud Solution Architect

MicrosoftOfficialPublished by Microsoft

  • Skill
  • Guidelines
  • Software development
  • MIT
  • No issues found

From the author

Transform the agent into a Cloud Solution Architect following Azure Architecture Center best practices. Use when designing cloud architectures, reviewing system designs, selecting architecture styles, applying cloud design patterns, making technology choices, or conducting Well-Architected Framework reviews.
— the description by Microsoft

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

This skill configures an AI agent to act as a Cloud Solution Architect, providing structured guidance based on the Azure Architecture Center. It enables the agent to assist with designing production-grade cloud systems, selecting appropriate architecture styles, applying proven design patterns, and conducting systematic reviews against the Well-Architected Framework (WAF). The agent is equipped with knowledge of 10 core design principles, 44 cloud design patterns, and decision frameworks for technology selection, ensuring that architectural decisions are well-reasoned and aligned with industry-standard best practices.

What it does

  • Provides guidance on selecting architecture styles like N-tier, Microservices, and Event-driven.
  • Maps 44 cloud design patterns to WAF pillars for reliability, security, and performance.
  • Offers a decision framework for choosing compute, storage, data, and messaging technologies.
  • Conducts systematic architecture reviews using the Well-Architected Framework.
  • Identifies performance antipatterns and suggests remediation strategies.
  • Supports the creation of Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for project documentation.

When to use it

  • When designing a new cloud-based application or system architecture.
  • When reviewing an existing system design for potential improvements or bottlenecks.
  • When evaluating technology choices for compute, data, or messaging services.
  • When performing a Well-Architected Framework review to ensure system quality.
  • When troubleshooting performance issues caused by common cloud antipatterns.

Advantages

  • Ensures architectural consistency by following official Azure best practices.
  • Facilitates informed decision-making through structured tradeoff analysis.
  • Promotes the use of resilient, scalable, and cost-effective design patterns.
  • Standardizes the documentation of architectural decisions via ADR templates.
  • Helps align technical choices with specific business requirements and SLAs.

Usage examples

“I am designing a high-traffic e-commerce platform. Which architecture style should I choose?”
The agent will compare styles like Microservices versus N-tier based on your team's autonomy, domain complexity, and scaling needs, recommending the best fit.
“Our application is experiencing performance issues under load. Can you help me identify potential antipatterns?”
The agent will review your current design against known performance antipatterns like 'Busy Database' or 'Chatty I/O' and suggest specific fixes.
“Help me conduct a Well-Architected Framework review for my current Azure deployment.”
The agent will guide you through a systematic assessment of your architecture across the five WAF pillars, identifying risks and improvement opportunities.
“We need to choose a messaging service for our event-driven system. What are the options?”
The agent will present a decision framework comparing Service Bus, Event Hubs, and Event Grid based on your specific throughput and ordering requirements.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/microsoft/cloud-solution-architect/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip cloud-solution-architect.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by Microsoft

Cloud Solution Architect

Overview

Design well-architected, production-grade cloud systems following Azure Architecture Center best practices. This skill provides:

  • 10 design principles for Azure applications

  • 6 architecture styles with selection guidance

  • 44 cloud design patterns mapped to WAF pillars

  • Technology choice frameworks for compute, storage, data, messaging

  • Performance antipatterns to avoid

  • Architecture review workflow for systematic design validation


Ten Design Principles for Azure Applications

#PrincipleKey Tactics
1Design for self-healingRetry with backoff, circuit breaker, bulkhead isolation, health endpoint monitoring, graceful degradation
2Make all things redundantEliminate single points of failure, use availability zones, deploy multi-region, replicate data
3Minimize coordinationDecouple services, use async messaging, embrace eventual consistency, use domain events
4Design to scale outHorizontal scaling, autoscaling rules, stateless services, avoid session stickiness, partition workloads
5Partition around limitsData partitioning (shard/hash/range), respect compute & network limits, use CDNs for static content
6Design for operationsStructured logging, distributed tracing, metrics & dashboards, runbook automation, infrastructure as code
7Use managed servicesPrefer PaaS over IaaS, reduce operational burden, leverage built-in HA/DR/scaling
8Use an identity serviceMicrosoft Entra ID, managed identity, RBAC, avoid storing credentials, zero-trust principles
9Design for evolutionLoose coupling, versioned APIs, backward compatibility, async messaging for integration, feature flags
10Build for business needsDefine SLAs/SLOs, establish RTO/RPO targets, domain-driven design, cost modeling, composite SLAs

Architecture Styles

StyleDescriptionWhen to UseKey Services
N-tierHorizontal layers (presentation, business, data)Traditional enterprise apps, lift-and-shiftApp Service, SQL Database, VNets
Web-Queue-WorkerWeb frontend → message queue → backend workerModerate-complexity apps with long-running tasksApp Service, Service Bus, Functions
MicroservicesSmall autonomous services, bounded contexts, independent deployComplex domains, independent team scalingAKS, Container Apps, API Management
Event-drivenPub/sub model, event producers/consumersReal-time processing, IoT, reactive systemsEvent Hubs, Event Grid, Functions
Big dataBatch + stream processing pipelineAnalytics, ML pipelines, large-scale dataSynapse, Data Factory, Databricks
Big computeHPC, parallel processingSimulations, modeling, rendering, genomicsBatch, CycleCloud, HPC VMs
Selection Criteria
  • Domain complexity → Microservices (high), N-tier (low-medium)

  • Team autonomy → Microservices (independent teams), N-tier (single team)

  • Data volume → Big data (TB+), others (GB)

  • Latency requirements → Event-driven (real-time), Web-Queue-Worker (tolerant)


Cloud Design Patterns

44 patterns organized by primary concern. WAF pillar mapping: R=Reliability, S=Security, CO=Cost Optimization, OE=Operational Excellence, PE=Performance Efficiency.

Messaging & Communication
PatternSummaryPillars
Asynchronous Request-ReplyDecouple request/response with polling or callbacksR, PE
Claim CheckSplit large messages; store payload separately, pass referenceR, PE
ChoreographyServices coordinate via events without central orchestratorR, OE
Competing ConsumersMultiple consumers process messages from shared queue concurrentlyR, PE
Messaging BridgeConnect incompatible messaging systemsR, OE
Pipes and FiltersDecompose complex processing into reusable filter stagesR, OE
Priority QueuePrioritize requests so higher-priority work is processed firstR, PE
Publisher/SubscriberDecouple senders from receivers via topics/subscriptionsR, PE
Queue-Based Load LevelingBuffer requests with a queue to smooth intermittent loadsR, PE
Sequential ConvoyProcess related messages in order while allowing parallel groupsR, PE
Reliability & Resilience
PatternSummaryPillars
BulkheadIsolate resources per workload to prevent cascading failureR
Circuit BreakerStop calling a failing service; fail fast to protect resourcesR
Compensating TransactionUndo previously committed steps when a later step failsR
Health Endpoint MonitoringExpose health checks for load balancers and orchestratorsR, OE
Leader ElectionCoordinate distributed instances by electing a leaderR
RetryHandle transient faults by retrying with exponential backoffR
SagaManage data consistency across microservices with compensating transactionsR
Scheduler Agent SupervisorCoordinate distributed actions with retry and failure handlingR
Data Management
PatternSummaryPillars
Cache-AsideLoad data on demand into cache from data storePE
CQRSSeparate read and write models for independent scalingPE, R
Event SourcingStore state as append-only sequence of domain eventsR, OE
Index TableCreate indexes over frequently queried fields in data storesPE
Materialized ViewPre-compute views over data for efficient queriesPE
ShardingDistribute data across partitions for scale and performancePE, R
Static Content HostingServe static content from cloud storage/CDN directlyPE, CO
Valet KeyGrant clients limited direct access to storage resourcesS, PE
Design & Structure
PatternSummaryPillars
AmbassadorOffload cross-cutting concerns to a helper sidecar proxyOE
Anti-Corruption LayerTranslate between new and legacy system modelsOE, R
Backends for FrontendsCreate separate backends per frontend type (mobile, web, etc.)OE, PE
Compute Resource ConsolidationCombine multiple workloads into fewer compute instancesCO
External Configuration StoreExternalize configuration from deployment packagesOE
SidecarDeploy helper components alongside the main serviceOE
Strangler FigIncrementally migrate legacy systems by replacing piecesOE, R
Security & Access
PatternSummaryPillars
Federated IdentityDelegate authentication to an external identity providerS
GatekeeperProtect services using a dedicated broker that validates requestsS
QuarantineIsolate and validate external assets before allowing useS
Rate LimitingControl consumption rate of resources by consumersR, S
ThrottlingControl resource consumption to sustain SLAs under loadR, PE
Deployment & Scaling
PatternSummaryPillars
Deployment StampsDeploy multiple independent copies of application componentsR, PE
Edge Workload ConfigurationConfigure workloads differently across diverse edge devicesOE
Gateway AggregationAggregate multiple backend calls into a single client requestPE
Gateway OffloadingOffload shared functionality (SSL, auth) to a gatewayOE, S
Gateway RoutingRoute requests to multiple backends using a single endpointOE
GeodeDeploy backends to multiple regions for active-active servingR, PE

See Design Patterns Reference for detailed implementation guidance.


Technology Choices

Decision Framework

For each technology area, evaluate: requirements → constraints → tradeoffs → select.

AreaKey OptionsSelection Criteria
ComputeApp Service, Functions, Container Apps, AKS, VMs, BatchHosting model, scaling, cost, team skills
StorageBlob Storage, Data Lake, Files, Disks, Managed LustreAccess patterns, throughput, cost tier
Data storesSQL Database, Cosmos DB, PostgreSQL, Redis, Table StorageConsistency model, query patterns, scale
MessagingService Bus, Event Hubs, Event Grid, Queue StorageOrdering, throughput, pub/sub vs queue
NetworkingFront Door, Application Gateway, Load Balancer, Traffic ManagerGlobal vs regional, L4 vs L7, WAF
AI servicesAzure OpenAI, AI Search, AI Foundry, Document IntelligenceModel needs, data grounding, orchestration
ContainersContainer Apps, AKS, Container InstancesOperational control vs simplicity

See Technology Choices Reference for detailed decision trees.


Best Practices

PracticeKey Guidance
API designRESTful conventions, resource-oriented URIs, HATEOAS, versioning via URL path or header
API implementationAsync operations, pagination, idempotent PUT/DELETE, content negotiation, ETag caching
AutoscalingScale on metrics (CPU, queue depth, custom), cool-down periods, predictive scaling, scale-in protection
Background jobsUse queues or scheduled triggers, idempotent processing, poison message handling, graceful shutdown
CachingCache-aside pattern, TTL policies, cache invalidation strategies, distributed cache for multi-instance
CDNStatic asset offloading, cache-busting with versioned URLs, geo-distribution, HTTPS enforcement
Data partitioningHorizontal (sharding), vertical, functional partitioning; partition key selection for even distribution
Partitioning strategiesHash-based, range-based, directory-based; rebalancing approach, cross-partition query avoidance
Host name preservationPreserve original host header through proxies/gateways for cookies, redirects, auth flows
Message encodingSchema evolution (Avro/Protobuf), backward/forward compatibility, schema registry
Monitoring & diagnosticsStructured logging, distributed tracing (W3C Trace Context), metrics, alerts, dashboards
Transient fault handlingRetry with exponential backoff + jitter, circuit breaker, idempotency keys, timeout budgets

See Best Practices Reference for implementation details.


Performance Antipatterns

Avoid these common patterns that degrade performance under load:

AntipatternProblemFix
Busy DatabaseOffloading too much processing to the databaseMove logic to application tier, use caching
Busy Front EndResource-intensive work on frontend request threadsOffload to background workers/queues
Chatty I/OMany small I/O requests instead of fewer large onesBatch requests, use bulk APIs, buffer writes
Extraneous FetchingRetrieving more data than neededProject only required fields, paginate, filter server-side
Improper InstantiationRecreating expensive objects per requestUse singletons, connection pooling, HttpClientFactory
Monolithic PersistenceSingle data store for all data typesPolyglot persistence — right store for each workload
No CachingRepeatedly fetching unchanged dataCache-aside pattern, CDN, output caching, Redis
Noisy NeighborOne tenant consuming all shared resourcesBulkhead isolation, per-tenant quotas, throttling
Retry StormAggressive retries overwhelming a recovering serviceExponential backoff + jitter, circuit breaker, retry budgets
Synchronous I/OBlocking threads on I/O operationsAsync/await, non-blocking I/O, reactive streams

Mission-Critical Design

For workloads targeting 99.99%+ SLO, address these design areas:

Design AreaKey Considerations
Application platformMulti-region active-active, availability zones, Container Apps or AKS with zone redundancy
Application designStateless services, idempotent operations, graceful degradation, bulkhead isolation
NetworkingAzure Front Door (global LB), DDoS Protection, private endpoints, redundant connectivity
Data platformMulti-region Cosmos DB, zone-redundant SQL, async replication, conflict resolution
Deployment & testingBlue-green deployments, canary releases, chaos engineering, automated rollback
Health modelingComposite health scores, dependency health tracking, automated remediation, SLI dashboards
SecurityZero-trust, managed identity everywhere, key rotation, WAF policies, threat modeling
Operational proceduresAutomated runbooks, incident response playbooks, game days, postmortems

See Mission-Critical Reference for detailed guidance.


Well-Architected Framework (WAF) Pillars

Every architecture decision should be evaluated against all five pillars:

PillarFocusKey Questions
ReliabilityResiliency, availability, disaster recoveryWhat is the RTO/RPO? How does it handle failures? Is there redundancy?
SecurityThreat protection, identity, data protectionIs identity managed? Is data encrypted? Are there network controls?
Cost OptimizationCost management, efficiency, right-sizingIs compute right-sized? Are there reserved instances? Is there waste?
Operational ExcellenceMonitoring, deployment, automationIs deployment automated? Is there observability? Are there runbooks?
Performance EfficiencyScaling, load testing, performance targetsCan it scale horizontally? Are there performance baselines? Is caching used?
WAF Tradeoff Matrix
Optimizing for...May impact...
Reliability (redundancy)Cost (more resources)
Security (isolation)Performance (added latency)
Cost (consolidation)Reliability (shared failure domains)
Performance (caching)Cost (cache infrastructure), Reliability (stale data)

Architecture Review Workflow

When reviewing or designing a system, follow this structured approach:

Step 1: Identify Requirements
Functional: What must the system do?
Non-functional:
  - Availability target (e.g., 99.9%, 99.99%)
  - Latency requirements (p50, p95, p99)
  - Throughput (requests/sec, messages/sec)
  - Data residency and compliance
  - Recovery targets (RTO, RPO)
  - Cost constraints
Step 2: Select Architecture Style

Match requirements to architecture style using the selection criteria table above.

Step 3: Choose Technology Stack

Use the technology choices decision framework. Prefer managed services (PaaS) over IaaS.

Step 4: Apply Design Patterns

Select relevant patterns from the 44 cloud design patterns based on identified concerns.

Step 5: Address Cross-Cutting Concerns
  • Identity & access — Microsoft Entra ID, managed identity, RBAC

  • Monitoring — Application Insights, Azure Monitor, Log Analytics

  • Security — Network segmentation, encryption at rest/in transit, Key Vault

  • CI/CD — GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps Pipelines, infrastructure as code

Step 6: Validate Against WAF Pillars

Review each pillar systematically. Document tradeoffs explicitly.

Step 7: Document Decisions

Use Architecture Decision Records (ADRs):

# ADR-NNN: [Decision Title]

## Status: [Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated]

## Context
[What is the issue we're addressing?]

## Decision
[What did we decide and why?]

## Consequences
[What are the positive and negative impacts?]

References


Source

Content derived from the Azure Architecture Center — Microsoft's official guidance for cloud solution architecture on Azure. Covers design principles, architecture styles, cloud design patterns, technology choices, best practices, performance antipatterns, mission-critical design, and the Well-Architected Framework.

Files

references/mission-critical.md

Mission-Critical Architecture on Azure

Guidance for designing mission-critical workloads on Azure that prioritize cloud-native capabilities to maximize reliability and operational effectiveness.

Target SLO: 99.99% or higher — permitted annual downtime: 52 minutes 35 seconds.

All encompassed design decisions are intended to accomplish this target SLO.

SLO TargetPermitted Annual DowntimeTypical Use Case
99.9%8 hours 45 minutesStandard business apps
99.95%4 hours 22 minutesImportant business apps
99.99%52 minutes 35 secondsMission-critical workloads
99.999%5 minutes 15 secondsSafety-critical systems

Key Design Strategies

1. Redundancy in Layers

Deploy redundancy at every layer of the architecture to eliminate single points of failure.

  • Deploy to multiple regions in an active-active model — application distributed across 2+ Azure regions handling active user traffic simultaneously

  • Utilize availability zones for all considered services — distributing components across physically separate datacenters inside a region

  • Choose resources that support global distribution natively

  • Apply zone-redundant configurations for all stateful services

  • Ensure data replication meets RPO requirements across regions

Azure services: Azure Front Door (global routing), Azure Traffic Manager (DNS failover), Azure Cosmos DB (multi-region writes), Azure SQL (geo-replication)

2. Deployment Stamps

Deploy regional stamps as scale units — a logical set of resources that can be independently provisioned to keep up with demand changes.

  • Each stamp is a self-contained scale unit with its own compute, caching, and local state

  • Multiple nested scale units within a stamp (e.g., Frontend APIs and Background processors scale independently)

  • No dependencies between scale units — they only communicate with shared services outside the stamp

  • Scale units are temporary/ephemeral — store persistent system-of-record data only in the replicated database

  • Use stamps for blue-green deployments by rolling out new units, validating, and gradually shifting traffic

Key benefit: Compartmentalization enables independent scaling and fault isolation per region.

3. Reliable and Repeatable Deployments

Apply the principle of Infrastructure as Code (IaC) for version control and standardized operations.

  • Use Terraform or Bicep for infrastructure definition with version control

  • Implement zero-downtime blue/green deployment pipelines — build and release pipelines fully automated

  • Apply environment consistency — use the same deployment pipeline code across production and pre-production environments

  • Integrate continuous validation — automated testing as part of DevOps processes

  • Include synchronized load and chaos testing to validate both application code and underlying infrastructure

  • Deploy stamps as a single operational unit — never partially deploy a stamp

4. Operational Insights

Build comprehensive observability without introducing single points of failure.

  • Use federated workspaces for observability data — monitoring data for global and regional resources stored independently

  • A centralized observability store is NOT recommended (it becomes a single point of failure)

  • Use cross-workspace querying to achieve a unified data sink and single pane of glass for operations

  • Construct a layered health model mapping application health to a traffic light model for contextualizing

  • Health scores calculated for each individual component, then aggregated at user flow level

  • Combine with key non-functional requirements (performance) as coefficients to quantify application health


Design Areas

Each design area must be addressed for a mission-critical architecture.

Design AreaDescriptionKey Concerns
Application platformInfrastructure choices and mitigations for potential failure casesAKS vs App Service, availability zones, containerization
Application designDesign patterns that allow for scaling and error handlingStateless services, async messaging, queue-based decoupling
Networking and connectivityNetwork considerations for routing incoming traffic to stampsGlobal load balancing, WAF, DDoS protection, private endpoints
Data platformChoices in data store technologiesVolume, velocity, variety, veracity; active-active vs active-passive
Deployment and testingStrategies for CI/CD pipelines and automationBlue/green deployments, load testing, chaos testing
Health modelingObservability through customer impact analysisCorrelated monitoring, traffic light model, health scores
SecurityMitigation of attack vectorsMicrosoft Zero Trust model, identity-based access, encryption
Operational proceduresProcesses related to runtime operationsDeployment SOPs, key management, patching, incident response

Active-Active Multi-Region Architecture

The core topology for mission-critical workloads distributes the application across multiple Azure regions.

Architecture Characteristics
  • Application distributed across 2+ Azure regions handling active user traffic simultaneously

  • Each region contains independent deployment stamps (scale units)

  • Azure Front Door provides global routing, SSL termination, and WAF at the edge

  • Scale units have no cross-dependencies — they communicate only with shared services (e.g., global database, DNS)

  • Persistent data resides only in the replicated database — stamps store no durable local state

  • When scale units are replaced or retired, applications reconnect transparently

Data Replication Strategies
StrategyWritesReadsConsistencyBest For
Active-passive (Azure SQL)Single primary regionAll regions via read replicasStrongRelational data, ACID transactions
Active-active (Cosmos DB)All regionsAll regionsTunable (5 levels)Document/key-value data, global apps
Write-behind (Redis → SQL)Redis first, async to SQLRedis or SQLEventualHigh-throughput writes, rate limiting
Regional Stamp Composition

Each stamp typically includes:

  • Compute tier — App Service or AKS with multiple instances across availability zones

  • Caching tier — Azure Managed Redis for session state, rate limiting, feature flags

  • Configuration — Azure App Configuration for settings (capacity correlates with requests/second)

  • Secrets — Azure Key Vault for certificates and secrets

  • Networking — Virtual network with private endpoints, NSGs, and service endpoints


Health Modeling and Traffic Light Approach

Health modeling provides the foundation for automated operational decisions.

Building the Health Model
  1. Identify user flows — map critical paths through the application (e.g., "user login", "checkout", "search")

  2. Decompose into components — each flow depends on specific compute, data, and network components

  3. Assign health scores — each component reports a health score based on metrics (latency, error rate, saturation)

  4. Aggregate per flow — combine component scores weighted by criticality to produce a flow-level health score

  5. Apply traffic light — map aggregate scores to Green (healthy), Yellow (degraded), Red (unhealthy)

Health Score Coefficients
FactorMetric ExamplesWeight Guidance
AvailabilityError rate, HTTP 5xx ratioHigh — directly impacts users
PerformanceP95 latency, request durationMedium — affects user experience
SaturationCPU %, memory %, queue depthMedium — indicates future problems
FreshnessData replication lag, cache ageLower — depends on consistency needs
Operational Actions by Health State
StateMeaningAutomated Action
🟢 GreenAll components healthyNormal operations
🟡 YellowDegraded but functionalAlert on-call, increase monitoring frequency
🔴 RedCritical failure detectedTrigger failover, page on-call, block deployments

Zero-Downtime Deployment (Blue/Green)

Deployment must never cause downtime in a mission-critical system.

Blue/Green Process
  1. Provision new stamp — deploy a complete new scale unit ("green") alongside the existing one ("blue")

  2. Run validation — execute automated smoke tests, integration tests, and synthetic transactions against the green stamp

  3. Canary traffic — route a small percentage of production traffic (e.g., 5%) to the green stamp

  4. Monitor health — compare health scores between blue and green stamps over a defined observation period

  5. Gradual shift — increase traffic to green stamp in increments (5% → 25% → 50% → 100%)

  6. Decommission blue — once green is fully validated, tear down the blue stamp

Key Requirements
  • Build and release pipelines must be fully automated — no manual deployment steps

  • Use the same pipeline code for all environments (dev, staging, production)

  • Each stamp deployed as a single operational unit — never partial

  • Rollback is achieved by shifting traffic back to the previous stamp (still running during validation)

  • Continuous validation runs throughout the deployment, not just at the end


Chaos Engineering and Continuous Validation

Proactive failure testing ensures recovery mechanisms work before real incidents occur.

Chaos Engineering Practices
  • Use Azure Chaos Studio to run controlled experiments against production or pre-production environments

  • Test failure modes: availability zone outage, network partition, dependency failure, CPU/memory pressure

  • Run chaos experiments as part of the CI/CD pipeline — every deployment is validated under fault conditions

  • Synchronized load and chaos testing — inject faults while the system is under realistic load

Validation Checklist
  • [ ] Health model detects injected faults within SLO-defined time windows

  • [ ] Automated failover completes within target RTO

  • [ ] No data loss exceeding target RPO during regional failover

  • [ ] Application degrades gracefully (reduced functionality, not total failure)

  • [ ] Alerts fire correctly and reach the on-call team

  • [ ] Runbooks and automated remediation execute successfully


Application Platform Considerations

Platform Options
PlatformBest ForAvailability Zone SupportComplexity
Azure App ServiceWeb apps, APIs, PaaS-first approachYes (zone-redundant)Low-Medium
AKSComplex microservices, full K8s controlYes (zone-redundant node pools)High
Container AppsServerless containers, event-drivenYesMedium
Recommendations
  • Prioritize availability zones for all production workloads — spread across physically separate datacenters

  • Containerize workloads for reliability and portability between platforms

  • Ensure all services in a scale unit support availability zones — don't mix zonal and non-zonal services

  • For latency-sensitive or chatty workloads, consider tradeoffs of cross-zone traffic cost and latency


Data Platform Considerations

Choosing a Primary Database
ScenarioRecommended ServiceDeployment Model
Relational data, ACID transactionsAzure SQLActive-passive with geo-replication
Global distribution, multi-modelAzure Cosmos DBActive-active with multi-region writes
Multiple microservice databasesMixed (polyglot)Per-service database with appropriate model
Azure SQL in Mission-Critical
  • Azure SQL does not natively support active-active concurrent writes in multiple regions

  • Use active-passive strategy: single primary region for writes, read replicas in secondary regions

  • Partial active-active possible at the application tier — route reads to local replicas, writes to primary

  • Configure auto-failover groups for automated regional failover

Azure Managed Redis in Mission-Critical
  • Use within or alongside each scale unit for:

    • Cache data — rebuildable, repopulated on demand

    • Session state — user sessions during scale unit lifetime

    • Rate limit counters — per-user and per-tenant throttling

    • Feature flags — dynamic configuration without redeployment

    • Coordination metadata — distributed locks, leader election

  • Active geo-replication enables Redis data to replicate asynchronously across regions

  • Design cached data as either rebuildable (repopulate without availability impact) or durable auxiliary state (protected by persistence and geo-replication)


Security in Mission-Critical

Zero Trust Principles
  • Verify explicitly — authenticate and authorize based on all available data points (identity, location, device, service)

  • Use least privilege access — limit user access with Just-In-Time and Just-Enough-Access (JIT/JEA)

  • Assume breach — minimize blast radius and segment access, verify end-to-end encryption, use analytics for threat detection

Security Controls
LayerControlAzure Service
EdgeDDoS protection, WAFAzure Front Door, Azure DDoS Protection
IdentityManaged identities, RBACMicrosoft Entra ID, Azure RBAC
NetworkPrivate endpoints, NSGsAzure Private Link, Virtual Network
DataEncryption at rest and in transitAzure Key Vault, TDE, TLS 1.2+
OperationsPrivileged access managementMicrosoft Entra PIM, Azure Bastion

Operational Procedures

Key Operational Processes
ProcessDescriptionAutomation Level
DeploymentBlue/green with automated validationFully automated
ScalingStamp provisioning and decommissioningAutomated with manual approval gates
Key rotationCertificate and secret rotationAutomated via Key Vault policies
PatchingOS and runtime updatesAutomated via platform (PaaS) or pipeline (IaaS)
Incident responseDetection, triage, mitigation, resolutionSemi-automated (alert → runbook → human)
Capacity planningForecast demand, pre-provision stampsManual with data-driven analysis
Runbook Requirements
  • All operational runbooks must be tested in pre-production with the same chaos/load scenarios as production

  • Automated remediation preferred over manual intervention for known failure modes

  • Runbooks must include rollback procedures for every change type

  • Post-incident reviews (blameless) must feed back into health model and chaos experiment improvements


Source: Azure Architecture Center

Requirements and compatibility

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Security

No issues found by our static scan· No issues found

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Published by
Microsoft
Publisher
Microsoft (Official)
Source
microsoft/skills · .github/skills/cloud-solution-architect · commit 0696600
Licence
MIT License (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Microsoft or Microsoft.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download cloud-solution-architect.zip