Generated banner for Aks Cost Optimization
Generated logo for Aks Cost Optimization

Aks Cost Optimization

MicrosoftOfficialCreated by Microsoft

  • Skill
  • Research and analysis
  • Cloud and DevOps
  • MIT
  • No issues found

From the author

Analyze advanced AKS cost efficiency. WHEN: "AKS NAP readiness", "AKS bin packing", "AKS node scaling bottleneck", "AKS blocked scale-down", "AKS storage cost". DO NOT USE AS DIRECT ENTRY FOR: overall AKS cost assessments or rightsizing/VPA/CAS/Spot (azure-kubernetes); spend/anomalies/commitments (cost-analysis/cost-optimization); incidents (aks-troubleshooting).
— the description by Microsoft

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

This skill provides a structured workflow for analyzing advanced cost efficiency in Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) clusters. It focuses on technical placement and scheduling factors rather than high-level financial reporting. The skill guides users through evaluating Node Auto-Provisioning (NAP) readiness, bin-packing efficiency, node scaling bottlenecks, and storage costs. It is designed to be used for specific technical investigations, requiring the user to route broader cost or incident-related queries to their respective specialized skills.

What it does

  • Evaluates cluster bin-packing efficiency and identifies consolidation candidates.
  • Assesses readiness for adopting Node Auto-Provisioning (NAP).
  • Identifies root causes for node scaling bottlenecks and blocked scale-down events.
  • Analyzes storage cost and mapping configurations.
  • Provides evidence-based recommendations for pool adjustments or placement changes.
  • Requires explicit user approval before any cluster configuration changes.

When to use it

  • When investigating inefficient resource utilization or poor bin-packing in an AKS cluster.
  • When evaluating whether to migrate from fixed node pools or Cluster Autoscaler to NAP.
  • When troubleshooting persistent node scaling bottlenecks or blocked scale-down operations.
  • When analyzing storage-related costs within an AKS environment.

Advantages

  • Provides deep technical insights into scheduling and placement constraints.
  • Prevents conflicting recommendations by routing to specialized skills for financial or incident data.
  • Ensures safe operations by requiring manual approval for all proposed changes.
  • Uses standardized evidence collection for consistent analysis across clusters.

Usage examples

“Analyze why my AKS cluster is failing to scale down nodes.”
The agent will investigate blocked scale-down events, check for PDBs or disruption budgets, and identify if the nodes are managed by NAP or CAS to provide a resolution path.
“Is my cluster ready for Node Auto-Provisioning?”
The agent will perform an eligibility check, verify current networking and identity configurations, and report if NAP is a viable and cost-effective alternative for your workload.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/microsoft/aks-cost-optimization/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip aks-cost-optimization.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by Microsoft

AKS Cost Optimization

When to Use This Skill

Use for advanced existing-cluster analysis requiring scheduling, placement, or verified storage mapping. Route overall AKS cost assessments to azure-kubernetes, spend/anomalies to cost-analysis, commitments to cost-optimization, and incidents to aks-troubleshooting when those skills are available. When called from an overall assessment, return findings for its ranked report.

MCP Tools

Prefer fitting Azure MCP reads. Never invent tools or use az/kubectl without approved shell access and a target-bound context.

Workflow/Steps

  1. Bind the subscription, cluster, resource group, and kube context.

  2. Route to NAP readiness, bin-packing, node-scaling bottlenecks, or storage optimization.

  3. When invoked for AKS commitment context, use the commitment-demand handoff and return demand evidence without benefit analysis or a transaction.

  4. Keep reads non-mutating; require approval for every change.

Error Handling

  • Missing capability: analyze supplied evidence or provide a collection plan; mark dependent cost or commitment results unavailable.

  • Evidence conflict: mark the conclusion unconfirmed.

Files

references/storage-metrics.md

AKS Storage Capacity and Performance Evidence

For active, verified Azure Disk mappings. Reuse evidence for the same cluster/period.

Capacity History

Use history only for the verified current PVC/PV/disk binding. Prefer managed Prometheus through an approved query API. Confirm the target's unique cluster label/alias and use it in both selectors and groupings, replacing cluster if needed. Substitute the verified cluster value, namespace, PVC, and lookback below. Unresolved identity means ambiguous history, not rightsizing evidence.

Use the requested period, otherwise up to 30 days, within verified binding and retention. Replace <lookback> with that duration, e.g. 30d; never include samples from an earlier binding.

Run instant queries at assessment end for current capacity, maximum per-series p95, and overall peak usage:

max by (cluster, namespace, persistentvolumeclaim) (
  kubelet_volume_stats_capacity_bytes{
    cluster="<cluster-label-value>", namespace="<namespace>",
    persistentvolumeclaim="<pvc>"
  }
)

max by (cluster, namespace, persistentvolumeclaim) (
  quantile_over_time(0.95, kubelet_volume_stats_used_bytes{
    cluster="<cluster-label-value>", namespace="<namespace>",
    persistentvolumeclaim="<pvc>"
  }[<lookback>])
)

max by (cluster, namespace, persistentvolumeclaim) (
  max_over_time(kubelet_volume_stats_used_bytes{
    cluster="<cluster-label-value>", namespace="<namespace>",
    persistentvolumeclaim="<pvc>"
  }[<lookback>])
)

Report p95 as maximum per-series p95, not combined PVC-history p95; use peak usage and headroom for sizing. Verify representative coverage and capacity changes; investigate uncertain gaps over short windows. Missing/invalid data is unknown, not zero; never sum duplicate volume reports.

If unavailable, use the Container Insights query. Report requested/observed periods, retention, binding verification, coverage/gaps, current capacity, p95/max used bytes and aggregation basis, capacity changes, and growth/batch/recovery headroom. Divide by verified positive current capacity only when labeling percentages relative to current capacity, not historical utilization. Missing, sparse, ambiguous, or unrepresentative history means unknown utilization, not zero. azureblob-* lacks Container Insights PV usage.

Disk Performance

Discover each disk's Azure Monitor metric definitions; query supported read/write operations/sec and bytes/sec. Preserve units; rates are not totals.

For latency and consumed IOPS/bandwidth percentage, map the exact disk resource ID to each VMSS instance where it was attached and obtain its LUN from that instance's data-disk configuration. Query the VM instance's Data Disk Latency, Data Disk IOPS Consumed Percentage, and Data Disk Bandwidth Consumed Percentage metrics for that LUN. Verify metric availability for the VM/controller. Check available disk throttling and VM-level saturation evidence; missing metrics mean unknown, not zero.

Track disk/instance/LUN attachment intervals as disks move between nodes. Combine only verified intervals; if historical attachment timing is unavailable, report incomplete performance history rather than attributing another disk's LUN metrics. For each source, report coverage, average and maximum, plus p95 of collected samples when supported. Label aggregation/grain: p95 of minute averages is not per-I/O p95.

Compare historical demand with the candidate disk's capacity, IOPS, throughput, burst behavior, and the attached VM or node aggregate disk limits. A lower tier is eligible only when it preserves workload latency, durability, zone, redundancy, and recovery requirements. Do not recommend a tier from allocation or capacity usage alone.

Requirements and compatibility

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Needs: Needs Node.js

Security

No issues found by our static scan· No issues found

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Created by
Microsoft
Publisher
Microsoft (Official)
Source
microsoft/skills · .github/plugins/aks-skills/skills/aks-cost-optimization · commit 0696600
Licence
MIT License (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from .github/plugins/aks-skills/LICENSE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Microsoft or Microsoft.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download aks-cost-optimization.zip