Lab Hardware Cad
K-DenseCommunityCreated by K-Dense Inc.
- Skill
- Workflow
- Science and research
- MIT
- Low risk
- Has scripts
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides a structured workflow for designing custom laboratory hardware using parametric Python code with the build123d library. It prioritizes the accurate mating of physical parts with standardized lab equipment, such as optical tables, cage systems, and microplate holders. The workflow mandates a rigorous process: defining interface dimensions from trusted standards, authoring parametric models, running automated geometric checks, and performing visual verification via orthographic snapshots. It is designed to prevent common failure modes in lab hardware fabrication, such as incorrect bolt patterns or incompatible tolerances, by ensuring that every design is numerically and visually validated before production.
What it does
- Designs custom lab hardware as parametric Python models.
- Exports fabrication-ready STEP, STL, and DXF files.
- Verifies interface dimensions against a database of laboratory standards.
- Performs automated go/no-go gauge checks on the generated solid geometry.
- Generates orthographic snapshots for mandatory visual inspection.
- Maintains a provenance manifest for every generated artifact.
When to use it
- When designing custom mounts, adapters, holders, or fixtures for laboratory equipment.
- When a part must mate with standardized hardware like optical breadboards or microplates.
- When you need to ensure a part meets specific tolerance and clearance requirements.
- When you need to verify that a design will fit its intended environment before fabrication.
Advantages
- Reduces costly fabrication errors through automated interface checking.
- Ensures design reproducibility by using parametric source code.
- Provides clear documentation of interface sources and fabrication limits.
- Integrates visual and numerical validation into the design loop.
Usage examples
- “Design a custom holder for a 96-well microplate that mounts onto a standard metric optical breadboard.”
- The agent will define the microplate footprint using the slas-microplate-footprint standard, calculate the necessary clearances for the pocket, add mounting holes for the 25mm metric breadboard grid, and generate the STEP file along with a validation report.
- “Check if my existing STEP file for a lens tube mount will fit a 30mm cage system.”
- The agent will load the STEP file, perform a clearance check against the cage-system-30mm standard, and report whether the bores and dimensions align with the required specifications.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/k-dense-ai/lab-hardware-cad/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip lab-hardware-cad.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by K-Dense Inc.
Lab Hardware CAD
Design physical research hardware as parametric Python source, export STEP as the authoritative artifact, and verify the result both numerically and visually before anything is fabricated.
The hard part of lab hardware is almost never the geometry. It is that the part must mate with equipment whose dimensions are fixed by a published standard or a vendor drawing. A holder that is 0.5 mm too wide does not fit the plate reader; a channel with the wrong aspect ratio collapses during bonding; a mount whose bolt pattern is 25.4 mm instead of 25.0 mm will not reach the optical table. This skill exists to keep those numbers correct and checked.
When to use
Use for any request to design, model, or fabricate a physical part for a lab: chip, mold, mount, adapter, holder, rack, bracket, enclosure, jig, fixture, arena, or maze. Also use to inspect or modify an existing STEP file.
Do not use for finite-element analysis, computational fluid dynamics, molecular structure, or scientific plotting. Those are different skills.
Setup
uv venv --python 3.12 .venv-labcad
uv pip install --python .venv-labcad/bin/python "build123d==0.13.0" "matplotlib>=3.8"build123d 0.13.0 requires Python >=3.11,<3.15 and pulls in the OpenCascade kernel through
cadquery-ocp-novtk. The wheel is large; install once per project and reuse it.
All bundled scripts take --help. check.py standards runs without build123d installed.
Model files are executed, not parsed. gen.py, check.py, and snapshot.py import a
*_model.py and call its build(), which runs arbitrary Python in the current environment. That
is inherent to parametric CAD — the source is the design. Only run model files authored in this
session or supplied by the user from a trusted location. If a model came from the internet, a
shared drive, or an untrusted colleague, read it before running it and say that you did.
Required workflow
Follow these steps in order. Steps 5 and 6 are not optional, and step 6 is not waived by step 5 passing.
1. Route to a device family
Read the request, classify it, and load exactly one family reference. Do not load all four — they are long, and mixing conventions between families is a common source of error.
| If the part is | Load |
|---|---|
| A chip, mold, channel network, flow cell, gasket, or anything with fluid ports | references/microfluidics.md |
| A mount, post, breadboard adapter, cage-system part, filter or sample holder in a beam path | references/optomechanics.md |
| An adapter, insert, rack, or holder for plates, cuvettes, tubes, slides, or dishes | references/labware-adapters.md |
| An arena, maze, head-fixation part, spout, tether, or extrusion-mounted enclosure for animal work | references/behavior-rigs.md |
If the part genuinely spans two families — a microfluidic chip that bolts to an optical table — load the family that owns the critical interface, then read only the interface section of the second. State in your response which family you routed to.
2. Establish the interface dimensions before any geometry
Every part has at least one mating interface. Before writing code, write down for each interface:
the source of the dimension: a published standard, a vendor drawing, or a user measurement;
the nominal value and tolerance;
the clearance or interference you intend, and why.
Look the number up in assets/standards.json or the family reference. Never write an interface
dimension from memory. If the number is not in the standards file or the reference, ask the user
for the vendor drawing or the measurement rather than guessing. A guessed interface dimension is
the single most expensive failure mode in this skill.
A pocket receiving an external component is sized against that component's
maximum material envelope — nominal plus its plus-tolerance — and only then given clearance.
A shaft entering a hole instead uses the hole's minimum diameter; envelope does not model that case.
python scripts/check.py standards --list
python scripts/check.py standards --show slas-microplate-footprintThe bundled standard IDs (exact strings; do not guess variants): slas-microplate-footprint,
slas-microplate-height, slas-microplate-flange, slas-well-positions-96,
slas-well-positions-384, slas-well-positions-1536, cuvette-standard-10mm,
optical-breadboard-metric, optical-breadboard-imperial, cage-system-30mm,
sm1-lens-tube-thread.
If the part mates with nothing in this list, that is common and fine: declare no interfaces, and name every interface dimension with its source (user spec, vendor drawing, measurement) as unchecked in the report. Never declare against an unrelated standard to fill the gap — a fabricated declaration is worse than an honest "nobody checked this".
3. Choose the process before choosing the geometry
Read references/fabrication-limits.md. Process determines minimum wall, minimum feature,
achievable tolerance, and whether the part survives autoclaving or contact with your solvent.
Do not assume FDM can hold ±0.05 mm without calibration. Cell-contact SLA parts need
a validated material and post-processing workflow plus assay-specific testing. Record the process and material in the model docstring.
4. Author a parametric model
Write <part>_model.py. The source is the authoritative artifact — never hand-edit an exported
STEP file, and never regenerate from a mesh.
Requirements:
Every dimension that a user might change is a module-level named constant with units in the name:
bore_d_mm,wall_t_mm,post_h_mm. No bare numbers in the body except 0, 1, and 2.Expose
build() -> Part.gen.pycalls it.Group parameters into an
INTERFACEblock (dimensions fixed by a standard, annotated with the standard ID) and aDESIGNblock (dimensions you are free to choose).Derive every computed dimension inside a function, never at module level, so
--paramoverrides actually reach it.Declare an
interfaces()function returning the dimensions the part must fit, each with its standard ID and intent. This is what makes the interface machine-checkable in step 5.intentis"envelope"when the feature must accept any conforming part (a pocket, bore, or slot — checked one-sided at maximum material condition plus your clearance) and"match"when comparing against the nominal band, expanded by any explicit allowance. This is not a conformance certificate.clearanceis the total intended clearance in mm and must be non-negative. Declare only dimensions that constrain this part's mating features — a property of the mating equipment (a table's edge border, a typical plate thickness) is not an interface of yours. If no bundled standard applies, return[].Declare a
checks()function of go/no-go gauges measured from the built solid: aclearregion for everything that must pass through or fit in (screw shafts, beam corridors, the mating part at maximum material condition dropping into its pocket), amaterialregion with a requirement-sized minimum volume for everything that must remain (a ridge, a ledge, a screw seat), and abbox_*bound for every size limit the user stated. Map every geometric requirement in the request to one entry; these catch the errors thatis_valid, the bounding box, and declared numbers cannot see.gen.pyruns them on every generation and fails the build when one fails. Schema and worked examples:references/build123d-patterns.md.Put the process, material, and every interface source in the module docstring.
"""SLAS base-footprint fit coupon; confirm upper plate body/draft before a full holder.
Process: FDM, PETG, 0.2 mm layer. Tolerance budget +/-0.3 mm.
Interfaces:
- Plate pocket: ANSI/SLAS 1-2004 (R2012) footprint 127.76 x 85.48 mm, +/-0.50 overall.
- Upper plate body, lid and stage mounting: not represented in this coupon.
"""
from build123d import *
# --- INTERFACE (fixed by standard; do not tune) ---
plate_l_mm = 127.76 # ANSI/SLAS 1-2004 nominal
plate_w_mm = 85.48 # ANSI/SLAS 1-2004 nominal
plate_tol_mm = 0.50 # ANSI/SLAS 1-2004; the pocket is sized to nominal + this
# --- DESIGN (free) ---
pocket_clearance_mm = 0.40 # per-side; FDM, see fabrication-limits.md
wall_t_mm = 3.0
floor_t_mm = 2.5
body_h_mm = 12.0
def pocket_mm() -> tuple[float, float]:
"""Pocket at the plate's maximum material condition plus clearance per side.
A pocket sized from nominal can jam on conforming plates.
"""
growth = plate_tol_mm + 2 * pocket_clearance_mm
return plate_l_mm + growth, plate_w_mm + growth
def interfaces() -> list[dict]:
"""What this part must fit. `check.py interfaces` verifies every entry."""
pocket_l, pocket_w = pocket_mm()
return [
{"feature": "plate pocket length", "standard": "slas-microplate-footprint",
"dimension": "footprint_length", "value": pocket_l,
"intent": "envelope", "clearance": 2 * pocket_clearance_mm},
{"feature": "plate pocket width", "standard": "slas-microplate-footprint",
"dimension": "footprint_width", "value": pocket_w,
"intent": "envelope", "clearance": 2 * pocket_clearance_mm},
]
def checks() -> list[dict]:
"""Gauges measured from the built solid. Sized from the REQUIREMENT's numbers
(plate MMC, the user's height limit), not from the pocket parameters, so a
wrong parameter cannot shrink the gauge to match the wrong geometry."""
depth = body_h_mm - floor_t_mm
return [
{"feature": "plate at MMC drops into the pocket",
"clear": {"box": (plate_l_mm + plate_tol_mm, plate_w_mm + plate_tol_mm, depth),
"at": [(0.0, 0.0, floor_t_mm + depth / 2)]}},
{"feature": "under 15 mm for the stage", "bbox_z": {"max": 15.0}},
]
def build() -> Part:
pocket_l, pocket_w = pocket_mm()
with BuildPart() as carrier:
Box(pocket_l + 2 * wall_t_mm, pocket_w + 2 * wall_t_mm, body_h_mm,
align=(Align.CENTER, Align.CENTER, Align.MIN))
with Locations((0, 0, floor_t_mm)):
Box(pocket_l, pocket_w, body_h_mm, mode=Mode.SUBTRACT,
align=(Align.CENTER, Align.CENTER, Align.MIN))
return carrier.partSee references/build123d-patterns.md for the builder-vs-algebra choice, the interfaces()
contract, sketching, selectors, fillets, and threaded-insert bores.
5. Generate and run the checks
python scripts/gen.py carrier_model.py --outdir out/
python scripts/check.py facts out/carrier.step
python scripts/check.py interfaces out/carrier.manifest.json
python scripts/check.py geometry out/carrier.step --model carrier_model.pygen.py also evaluates the model's checks() gauges against the solid it just built, prints
each PASS/FAIL, records them in the manifest, and exits non-zero on a failure — so a part that
violates its own declared geometry never silently becomes an artifact. check.py geometry
re-runs the same gauges against the exported STEP. Repeat any gen.py --param overrides
with check.py geometry --param; otherwise the gauges use the source defaults.
out/ is a scratch convention, not a requirement. When the user asked for deliverables in a
specific place, generate there (--outdir .) or copy the STEP, manifest, and DXF to it before
finishing — a deliverable that exists only inside out/ has not been delivered.
gen.py writes carrier.step (authoritative), carrier.stl (mesh preview and printing), and
carrier.manifest.json recording the source hash, resolved parameters, declared interfaces,
library versions, and measured bounding box, volume, and validity. The manifest is the provenance
record — keep it with the artifact.
check.py facts reports is_valid, bounding box, volume, surface area, centre of mass, and
solid count. A part that reports is_valid: false is broken geometry; fix the source before going
further.
check.py interfaces evaluates every entry the model declared against the standards database
and exits non-zero on failure. Be clear about what it does and does not verify: it checks the
declared numbers — catching a transcribed dimension, the wrong standard, and
nominal-instead-of-MMC sizing — but it never measures the built geometry, and a value computed
from the same constants it is checked against passes with zero headroom by construction. Do not
cite it as evidence the geometry is right; facts and the snapshot are the geometry checks.
An empty declaration list passes: a part that mates with nothing in the bundled database has
nothing to declare, and its interface dimensions are instead named as unchecked in the report.
A manifest must contain an explicit interfaces list; a missing field or null is a malformed
manifest, not evidence that interfaces were reviewed and none applied.
Use interfaces rather than check.py fit for anything internal — a pocket, bore, or slot does
not appear in the part's outer bounding box, which is what fit measures. Reach for fit only
to check one number by hand (--value footprint_length=129.06), or when the part's own outline
is the interface, such as a gasket cut to a plate footprint.
For assemblies, check that parts do not interfere:
python scripts/check.py clearance out/carrier.step out/lid.step --min 0.36. Snapshot and actually look at it
python scripts/snapshot.py out/carrier.step --out out/carrier.pngThen read the PNG. This step is mandatory after every generation and every modification.
Deterministic checks passing is not a reason to skip it: is_valid and a correct bounding box are
both fully consistent with a pocket cut on the wrong face, a boss placed outside the body, or a
fillet that ate a feature. Those errors are obvious in a picture and invisible in the numbers.
Know the render's limits too. A feature much smaller than the frame — a 0.3 mm mold ridge on a
40 mm part, a counterbore step on a plate — may not be decidable from the views at all. Do not
report seeing something the image cannot resolve; that is worse than not looking. For such
features the skill has instruments: check.py bores prints every cylindrical face (diameter,
axis, position, span, sweep) so you can reconcile the drilling against the model's intent, and
check.py probe answers a one-off "is this region clear / is material present here" without
editing the model. Cite the measured numbers; report from the picture only what the picture
actually shows.
The six views are true orthographic projections, and the outlines are the model's real edges drawn without hidden-line removal. So a circle visible "through" material is a bore on the far side, not a window — the part is not transparent. Read it that way rather than reporting a hole that is not there.
State in your response what you saw in the snapshot, not merely that you generated one.
7. Repair through the source
If any check fails, edit the parameters or the model code, rerun gen.py, and rerun both
step 5 and step 6. Never patch the STEP.
8. Report before fabrication
Work through references/validation.md and give the user: the process and material, every
interface dimension with its source and tolerance, the clearances chosen, what the snapshot showed,
and any check that did not pass.
Flag explicitly every interface the automatic check could not cover — a vendor drawing, a user
measurement, a standard not in the bundled database. check.py interfaces reports only what the
model declared against a known standard, so silence there is not confirmation; a dimension nobody
could check has to be named as such.
Units
build123d is unitless internally. Geometry uses millimetres and degrees; mesh
angular_tolerance uses radians (0.1 rad ≈ 5.7°).
export_step is called with Unit.MM. Imperial hardware appears throughout optomechanics
(1/4-20 screws, 1 inch grids, SM1 threads); convert to millimetres in a single named constant at
the point of definition and never mix systems inside an expression. 1 inch is exactly 25.4 mm, and
a 25 mm metric optical grid is not interchangeable with a 1 inch imperial grid — the error
accumulates to 1.6 mm over four pitches (five hole centres).
Tolerances and fits
A nominal dimension is not a fit. Every mating dimension needs a deliberate clearance chosen from
the process tolerance in references/fabrication-limits.md. Common defaults, per side:
| Fit | FDM | SLA | CNC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free-sliding (plate in a pocket) | 0.40 mm | 0.20 mm | 0.10 mm |
| Located but removable | 0.25 mm | 0.10 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Press / interference | Coupon-specific | Coupon-specific | Toleranced fit design |
Budget the receiving part's worst-case undersize separately: minimum actual pocket size must exceed the mating part's maximum size plus the required functional gap. These are starting points for a first article, not guarantees. Say so when you report them, and recommend printing a test coupon of the critical interface before committing to a full part.
Scientific caveats
Material compatibility governs. A geometrically perfect part in the wrong polymer fails in service: autoclave cycles distort PLA, many solvents craze acrylic, and uncured SLA resin is cytotoxic. Check
references/fabrication-limits.mdbefore recommending a material for anything contacting cells, tissue, solvents, or heat.Optical parts have non-geometric requirements. Autofluorescence, surface roughness, and stray-light scatter are not visible in a STEP file. Black resin is not automatically low-scatter.
Vendor labware varies. The SLAS standards fix the plate footprint but not well geometry, skirt profile, or lid fit, and consumable tubes differ between suppliers. Design to the standard where one exists; otherwise require a measurement.
A passing bounding box is not a passing part.
fitchecks the dimensions it is given. It cannot see a missing feature, and it does not replace the snapshot.
References
| File | Contents |
|---|---|
references/microfluidics.md | Channel cross-sections and aspect ratios, mold vs chip polarity, minimum features by process, port and tubing interfaces, bonding lands, dead volume |
references/optomechanics.md | Breadboard grids and screw clearances, post and pedestal heights, 30 mm cage geometry, SM lens-tube threads, beam height |
references/labware-adapters.md | ANSI/SLAS 1-4 microplate dimensions, cuvettes, tubes, slides, dishes, deck and stage constraints |
references/behavior-rigs.md | Arena and maze geometry, head-fixation interfaces, spouts and ports, T-slot extrusion, cleaning and durability |
references/fabrication-limits.md | Process tolerances, minimum walls and features, clearance and thread inserts, materials, autoclave and solvent and biocompatibility |
references/validation.md | Pre-fabrication checklist and the failure modes each item catches |
references/build123d-patterns.md | build123d 0.13.0 API cookbook: builder vs algebra, sketches, selectors, joints, exports |
Scripts
| Command | Purpose |
|---|---|
gen.py <model.py> --outdir DIR | Run build(), export STEP and STL, write the provenance manifest |
gen.py <model.py> --dxf [--dxf-z MM] | Also slice a 2D DXF profile for laser cutting (default plane: mid-height) |
check.py facts <step> | Validity, bounding box, volume, area, centre of mass, solid count |
check.py interfaces <manifest|model.py> | Check every declared interface number against its standard; non-zero exit on failure |
check.py geometry <model.py|step --model M> | Evaluate the model's checks() gauges against the built solid — measured, not declared |
check.py probe <step> --cyl D|--box X,Y,Z --at ... | One ad-hoc gauge: is this region clear of material, or filled with it |
check.py bores <step> | Census of every cylindrical face: diameter, axis, position, span, sweep |
check.py fit --standard ID --value DIM=MM | Check one dimension by hand, or a part whose outer envelope is the interface |
check.py clearance <a> <b> --min MM | Minimum distance between two solids; detects interference |
check.py standards [--list|--show ID] | Browse the bundled standards data (standard library only) |
snapshot.py <step> --out PNG | Six-view orthographic and isometric render for visual review |
gen.py accepts --json; place check.py --json before its subcommand.
snapshot.py writes a PNG and has no --json option. Progress goes to stderr.
check.py standards, and check.py interfaces on a manifest, run without build123d installed.
Citing Scientific Agent Skills
This skill is part of Scientific Agent Skills by K-Dense. If it materially contributed to a manuscript, report, presentation, or code release, add the paper to the references or software section and tell the user you did so:
Kassis, T., Agarwal, V., He, Y., Patel, D., & Brueckner, A. M. (2026). Scientific Agent Skills: A Library of Procedural Knowledge for Research Agents. arXiv:2609.00065. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00065
Always cite the current version. The DOI and https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00065 resolve to the
latest arXiv version, so never append a version suffix such as v1. When network access is
available, fetch https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00065 (or
http://export.arxiv.org/api/query?id_list=2609.00065) before writing the reference and take
the author list, year, and version from that record. If the record lists a journal reference
or publisher DOI, cite the published version instead.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer934 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.0 KiB
- SKILL.md22.3 KiB
- assets/standards.json16.8 KiB
- references/behavior-rigs.md7.6 KiB
- references/build123d-patterns.md17.8 KiB
- references/fabrication-limits.md9.0 KiB
- references/labware-adapters.md10.6 KiB
- references/microfluidics.md9.5 KiB
- references/optomechanics.md7.2 KiB
- references/validation.md6.7 KiB
- scripts/_common.pyScript27.2 KiB
- scripts/check.pyScript27.9 KiB
- scripts/gen.pyScript10.5 KiB
- scripts/snapshot.pyScript10.7 KiB
references/fabrication-limits.md
Fabrication limits, tolerances, and materials
Read this before finalising any geometry. Process determines what geometry is possible; material determines whether the part survives the lab.
Process tolerances
Achievable tolerance and minimum feature size, as planning figures. Every number here depends on the specific machine, material, and operator. Use them to choose a process and to size a first article, then verify with a test coupon.
| Process | Typical tolerance | Min wall | Min feature | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDM | ±0.3 mm (often worse over 100 mm) | 1.2 mm (3 x 0.4 mm nozzle) | ~0.8 mm | Anisotropic: much weaker across layers. Porous. |
| SLA / DLP | ±0.1 mm | 0.8 mm | ~0.3 mm | Better surface and detail. Resin choice dominates properties. |
| SLS (nylon) | ±0.2 mm | 0.8 mm | ~0.5 mm | Often less anisotropic than FDM; no supports; porous surface. |
| CNC milling | ±0.05 mm or better | 0.8 mm in metal | Set by tool diameter | Internal corners carry the tool radius — you cannot mill a sharp internal corner. |
| Laser cutting | ±0.1 mm | n/a | Kerf ~0.1-0.3 mm | 2D only. Edge taper on thick stock. Kerf offset must be applied. |
Two consequences that catch people:
Holes print undersize on both FDM and SLA. A 6.0 mm modelled hole typically measures under 6.0 mm. Oversize functional bores, or plan to ream them.
Internal corners cannot be sharp in milling. If a milled pocket must accept a square part, add corner relief cuts. (For a part with rounded corners the tool radius is harmless as long as it stays at or below the part's minimum corner radius — see the corner-radius rule in
references/labware-adapters.md.)
Laser cutting
Kerf direction is fixed by the physics, so get it right in the handover. The beam removes a strip of width k (~0.1–0.3 mm) centred on the drawn line. Cutting on the line therefore makes holes and internal cutouts come out oversize by ~k, and the part's outer outline undersize by ~k. Say which convention the DXF uses (on-the-line is the default assumption) and let the shop offset, or offset the geometry yourself and say so — never both.
Put cut geometry on a named layer (one layer per operation:
CUT,ENGRAVE). Shops key power and speed to layer or colour; geometry on layer 0 forces them to guess.Cut order matters: internal features before the outer outline, or the part shifts once it is freed from the sheet.
Sheet stock is not its nominal thickness. "3 mm" acrylic commonly runs ~2.8–3.2 mm; slots sized for nominal will be loose or tight. For solvent-welded joints prefer cast acrylic over extruded — cleaner cut edge, less vapour crazing — and remember alcohols craze acrylic either way (see Chemical, below).
Laser-cut edges are sharp and slightly tapered; call out deburring or flame-polishing for anything handled or animal-facing.
Fits and clearances
Nominal dimensions do not produce fits. Choose a clearance deliberately, per side:
| Fit | FDM | SLA | CNC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free-sliding (a plate dropping into a pocket) | 0.40 mm | 0.20 mm | 0.10 mm |
| Located but removable by hand | 0.25 mm | 0.10 mm | 0.05 mm |
| Press / interference | Coupon-specific | Coupon-specific | Use a toleranced shaft/hole fit |
For a guaranteed free fit, receiving-feature CAD size minus its undersize tolerance must exceed the mating part's maximum size plus the required functional gap. A nominal allowance is not the guaranteed assembled clearance.
Then remember the other part has tolerance too. When mating to a standardised component,
design the receiving feature against the component's maximum material condition, not its
nominal — a pocket sized from nominal does not guarantee clearance for conforming parts. This is what
intent: "envelope" enforces. Declare it in the model and check the manifest:
python scripts/check.py interfaces out/part.manifest.jsonOr check a single number by hand:
python scripts/check.py fit --standard slas-microplate-footprint \
--intent envelope --clearance 0.8 --value footprint_length=129.06Threads and inserts
Printed threads are usually a mistake. Layer resolution is comparable to the thread pitch, so printed threads are weak, dimensionally unreliable, and shed particles.
In descending order of preference:
Heat-set threaded inserts — the standard solution for printed parts. Model a straight bore to the insert manufacturer's specified diameter (it varies by insert; get the datasheet) and provide enough surrounding wall, typically at least 2 mm.
Clearance hole plus a captive nut in a hex pocket. Reliable and cheap.
Tapping the printed material directly — acceptable for light, infrequently-assembled joints.
Printing the thread — only for coarse threads (roughly M6 and above), never for fine threads like the 0.635 mm pitch SM1 (see
references/optomechanics.md).
Orientation and anisotropy
For FDM especially, orientation is a design decision, not a printing detail:
Parts are substantially weaker across layers than along them. Orient so that load runs along layers, and state the intended orientation in the model docstring.
Overhangs beyond roughly 45 degrees need support, and supported surfaces come out rough and dimensionally poor. If a surface is a sealing or mating face, orient it so it is not supported.
Holes printed with their axis vertical are usually more circular; printed horizontally they come out with a drooped top. Teardrop or chamfer horizontal holes that must stay round.
Every enclosed cavity needs a drain path in resin printing. See
references/microfluidics.md.
Materials
Thermal
| Material | Approximate service limit | Autoclave (121 °C)? |
|---|---|---|
| PLA | ~50-60 °C | No — distorts well below autoclave temperature |
| PETG | ~70-80 °C | No |
| ABS / ASA | ~90-100 °C | Marginal, generally no |
| Polypropylene | Grade/application dependent | Some molded labware is rated for 121 °C; printed parts need validation |
| Nylon (SLS) | ~120-160 °C | Sometimes; verify per grade |
| PEEK | Grade/load dependent | Often compatible; verify grade and cycles |
| Stainless steel, aluminium, glass | Grade/coating dependent | Often compatible; verify corrosion and thermal-shock limits |
Assume a printed part is not autoclavable unless it is a verified high-temperature material. Offer chemical or gas sterilisation as the alternative, and check that against the solvent notes below.
Chemical
Acrylic (PMMA) crazes on contact with alcohols, including 70% ethanol — a serious problem in a lab that disinfects everything with ethanol.
Polycarbonate is attacked by many solvents and by some alkaline cleaners.
PLA hydrolyses; it degrades in warm, wet, or repeatedly-cleaned service.
PP, PTFE, PEEK have broad chemical resistance, but require compatibility checks for the exact chemical, concentration, temperature and exposure time; none is universally safe.
Always ask what the part will be cleaned with, not just what it will contain. Cleaning agent compatibility is more often the failure than the sample.
Biocompatibility
Uncured SLA resin is cytotoxic. Even nominally biocompatible resins require the manufacturer's full post-cure and wash protocol, and leachables can still affect sensitive cell assays.
For anything contacting cells, tissue, or animals: prefer glass, medical-grade polymer, or PTFE for the contact surface, and use the printed part as a holder that does not touch the sample.
"Biocompatible" on a resin datasheet refers to a specific certified process and application. It does not transfer to your printer, your cure schedule, or your assay. Say this rather than implying a printed part is cell-safe.
Optical
Printed and milled surfaces scatter; they are not optical surfaces.
Most printed resins autofluoresce, often strongly, which contaminates fluorescence readouts.
Black is not automatically non-reflective.
Where an optical surface is needed, use glass or a bonded film and model the holder around it.
Cost and lead-time reality
Mention these when recommending a process: FDM is hours and pennies; SLA is hours and modest cost; SLS and CNC are typically outsourced with days of lead time and much higher cost. For ±0.05 mm requirements, ask the supplier to confirm process capability and inspection method; CNC or post-machining may be needed.
Before fabrication
Work through references/validation.md.
Review sources
The dimensional tables are illustrative planning values, not supplier acceptance criteria.
Resin cure and biocompatibility are process-specific: https://formlabs.com/support/Best-practices-for-post-curing-prints/
Polypropylene labware sterilisation: https://www.thermofisher.com/de/de/home/life-science/lab-plasticware-supplies/plastic-material-selection/polypropylene-pp-labware.html
Grade/chemical/temperature compatibility: https://documents.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/LCD/posters/LCD-Chemical-Resistance-Guide-GALSPCHEMRESPOSTER-EN.pdf
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Declares allowed tools, Needs network access, Needs Python
The author says: Python 3.11-3.14 with build123d 0.13.0 and matplotlib for snapshots. Geometry commands require build123d; the standards lookup and the interface check run on the standard library alone. Network needed for installation and current vendor drawings; local geometry checks run offline.
Security
What our scanner noticed· Low risk
- Instructions that use the network
- Scripts that your agent may run
This skill includes scripts that your agent may run. Read them before you use it.
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- K-Dense Inc.
- Publisher
- K-Dense (Community)
- Source
- K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills · skills/lab-hardware-cad · commit a25cf9e
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE.md)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by K-Dense Inc. or K-Dense.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download lab-hardware-cad.zip