Generated banner for K6 Perf Test Website
Generated logo for K6 Perf Test Website

K6 Perf Test Website

Grafana LabsOfficialPublished by Grafana Labs

  • Skill
  • Workflow
  • Cloud and DevOps
  • Apache-2.0
  • Low risk
  • Has scripts

From the author

Use when the user wants to performance-test, load-test, or stress-test a public website end-to-end with k6. Produces a hybrid (protocol + browser) test suite, SLO-backed thresholds, a load-generator monitor sidecar, and a Grafana-side investigation playbook for backends the user owns. Triggers on "perf test my site", "performance test my site", "load test this URL", "stress test my web app", "I want to load test [URL]", "set up k6 against my website", "write a k6 suite for [site]", "see if my site handles N concurrent users", or "how does my site perform under traffic". Use this skill whenever the user mentions k6, load testing, stress testing, performance testing, or wants to validate a website under traffic — even if they don't explicitly use the word "test" or ask for the specific outputs this skill produces. This skill is for a full multi-test suite across several workflows; for a single browser test — functional OR a browser load test measuring Web Vitals for one journey — use k6-browser-test.
— the description by Grafana Labs

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

This skill provides an opinionated, structured workflow for performance, load, and stress testing public websites. It generates a complete test suite including functional protocol and browser tests, hybrid load scenarios, SLO-backed thresholds, and monitoring sidecars. Designed for teams that need to validate website performance under traffic, it emphasizes a rigorous process: eliciting workflows, ensuring functional tests pass, and then executing various load test types (smoke, average, stress, spike, soak, breakpoint) with proper monitoring and reporting.

What it does

  • Scaffolds a complete performance testing project structure.
  • Facilitates recording user workflows using Playwright.
  • Builds functional protocol and browser tests to ensure baseline stability.
  • Configures hybrid load tests with SLO-backed thresholds and per-endpoint tagging.
  • Provides a load-generator monitor sidecar to ensure test validity.
  • Generates structured reports and investigation playbooks for backend analysis.

When to use it

  • When you need to perform load, stress, or performance testing on a public website.
  • When you want to validate how a website handles specific concurrent user loads.
  • When you need a full suite of tests rather than a single functional browser test.
  • When you need to investigate backend performance bottlenecks under simulated traffic.

Advantages

  • Enforces a disciplined, repeatable testing methodology.
  • Reduces guesswork by requiring explicit workflow elicitation.
  • Ensures load tests are only run against functional, stable code.
  • Provides visibility into both protocol-level performance and real-world browser experience.
  • Includes built-in monitoring to prevent false results caused by load-generator bottlenecks.

Usage examples

“perf test my site”
The agent will initiate the workflow elicitation process to understand your site's critical paths and testing requirements.
“see if my site handles 500 concurrent users”
The agent will guide you through setting up a stress test scenario with appropriate thresholds to evaluate site capacity.
“stress test my web app”
The agent will scaffold the project and help you record the necessary workflows to begin building a hybrid load test suite.
“how does my site perform under traffic”
The agent will help you design a series of load tests (smoke, average, spike) to characterize your site's performance profile.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/grafana/k6-perf-test-website/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip k6-perf-test-website.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by Grafana Labs

k6-perf-test-website

An end-to-end, opinionated workflow for performance-testing any public website with k6. The skill produces:

  • A scaffolded project with one folder per user-described workflow.

  • Functional protocol + browser tests (must pass before load testing).

  • Hybrid load tests (protocol scenario + 1 browser VU) per test type (smoke / average / stress / spike / soak / breakpoint).

  • SLO-backed thresholds with per-endpoint tagging and Web Vitals.

  • A cross-platform load-generator monitor sidecar.

  • Optional Grafana-side investigation when the user owns the backend.

  • A structured Markdown report at the end.

Just want one functional browser test from a plain-language journey? This skill builds a full, multi-test performance suite. For a single k6/browser functional (or standalone browser load) test — with selectors discovered by exploring the live site — use the k6-browser-test skill instead.

This skill enforces a few opinions you should not silently override:

  • Always elicit workflows first. Don't guess.

  • Functional tests must be green before load tests run.

  • Always monitor the load generator — server-looks-slow is often laptop-looks-slow.

  • Local for validation, cloud for scale — but ask the user where to run each test type; don't hardcode.

  • No shared tests/lib/. Iteration-body duplication is preferred; each script reads cleanly on its own during incident review.

Prerequisites

  • k6 ≥ v2.0.0 (k6 version) — required for stable k6/browser, expect(), async/await iteration functions, and per-request tags.

  • Node.js ≥ 20 + npm.

  • Playwright with the Chromium download (npx playwright install chromium).

  • har-to-k6 (npm i -D har-to-k6).

  • Network access from the load-generator host to the target site.

Tools the skill prefers when installed:

  • mcp-k6 — script creation, Playwright→k6/browser migration, API lookup. Prefer over hand-writing k6 boilerplate.

  • mcp-grafana — in-session Prometheus/Loki/Tempo/Pyroscope queries during §9 backend investigation.

  • gcx — Grafana Cloud CLI for shell-friendly queries, datasource discovery, and Grafana Cloud k6 cloud-run dispatch.

  • k6 binary — local validation runs and breakpoint hunting.

  • k6 x docs (xk6-docs) — look up k6 API surface when writing or editing scripts without mcp-k6 available.

If these tools are not configured the skill falls back to plain CLI tools (k6, npx, curl) and hand-written scripts. The skill does not own toolchain setup; defer to the user's existing setup process.

Explicit non-goals:

  • Protocol-only suites (out of scope for this skill).

  • API-only / non-browser apps.

  • Mobile-native testing.

  • Capacity planning beyond finding and tagging a breakpoint.

Workflow overview

Tick these off in order. Each step has a section below.

  1. Elicit workflows from the user. §1

  2. Scaffold the project from assets/. §2

  3. Record each workflow with Playwright. §3

  4. Build functional protocol + browser tests; run tests/run-all.sh until green. §4

  5. Design SLO-backed thresholds and per-endpoint tags. §5

  6. Build hybrid load tests, one file per test type. §6

  7. Run validation locally with the LG sidecar. §7

  8. Push to Grafana Cloud k6 for the test types the user chose for cloud. §8

  9. Investigate the backend with Grafana (if owned). §9

  10. Report back to the user. §10

1. Elicit workflows

The single most important step. Without explicit workflows, every later step is guesswork.

Ask the user the questions in references/workflow-elicitation.md and record answers in a runbook.md alongside the scaffolded project.

You must capture: 2-4 named workflows, credentials, read vs write, destructive actions to avoid during soak, worry list, existing SLOs, backend ownership and Grafana access, and per test type whether each runs locally or in Grafana Cloud k6.

If the user can't name at least one workflow, stop and clarify; do not proceed.

2. Scaffold the project

Copy the assets/ tree from this skill into the user's chosen directory. The skill's assets/ directory is at <SKILL_DIR>/assets/, where <SKILL_DIR> is the absolute path to this skill's directory — your harness exposes this (e.g. opencode prefixes skill metadata with a Base directory for this skill: line). If you can't determine <SKILL_DIR> from context, ask the user.

cp -R "<SKILL_DIR>/assets/." "<target-dir>/"

If cp -R is blocked by sandbox permissions, copy files individually via your agent's file-write tool.

The scaffolded layout:

<target-dir>/
├── package.json
├── .gitignore
├── README.md
├── runbook.md                       # you create from §1 answers
├── recordings/
│   ├── README.md
│   └── scripts/
│       └── recorder.template.js     # copy per workflow → wN-<short-name>.js, …
├── tests/
│   ├── run-all.sh
│   └── workflow.template/           # copy per workflow → wN-<short-name>/, …
│       ├── from-har.js
│       ├── protocol.js
│       ├── browser.js
│       ├── smoke.js
│       ├── average.js
│       ├── stress.js
│       ├── spike.js
│       ├── soak.js
│       └── breakpoint.js
└── tools/
    ├── lg-monitor.sh
    └── run-with-monitor.sh

For each workflow: copy recorder.template.js → recordings/scripts/wN-<short-name>.js, copy tests/workflow.template/ → tests/wN-<short-name>/, and replace <WORKFLOW_PLACEHOLDER> markers with the workflow's short name.

Then install:

cd <target-dir> && npm install && npx playwright install chromium

3. Record each workflow

Per workflow:

  1. Fill in recordings/scripts/wN-<short-name>.js: user-action sequence, recordHar.urlFilter regex (allow-list the target host; block third-party RUM/ads — see references/recording-with-playwright.md), and a real Chrome userAgent (the default HeadlessChrome UA triggers bot-blocking on many sites).

  2. Run: node recordings/scripts/wN-<short-name>.js → writes recordings/har/wN-<short-name>.har

  3. Convert: npx har-to-k6 recordings/har/wN-<short-name>.har -o tests/wN-<short-name>/from-har.js

  4. Commit both HAR and from-har.js (audit trail for bundle-path changes).

If the recorder fails or produces an unusable HAR (bot-blocking, missing hydration, third-party noise), see the Recording section of references/gotchas.md and references/recording-with-playwright.md.

Prefer mcp-k6 recording and migration tools if available.

4. Build functional tests

Per workflow:

  1. Hand-clean from-har.js into protocol.js — drop per-request UA headers, rename groups, parameterise BASE_URL, replace session tokens, drop sleep(1), add expect() on every load-bearing response. Full procedure in references/functional-tests.md.

  2. Hand-write browser.js from the Playwright recorder using the 5-step procedure in references/functional-tests.md.

  3. Run ./tests/run-all.sh. Do not proceed to §5 until it exits 0.

Prefer mcp-k6 migration tools for Playwright→k6/browser conversion.

5. Design SLOs and thresholds

Adjust the opinionated defaults in assets/tests/workflow.template/ to the user's stated SLOs from §1. Four layers:

  1. Global SLOs — overall error rate + aggregate latency.

  2. Per-endpoint thresholds — tag every protocol request, threshold per tag.

  3. Per-iteration thresholds — workflow time + iteration completion rate.

  4. Web Vitals — LCP/INP/CLS only (no FCP).

Default globals:

http_req_failed: ['rate<0.01'],
http_req_duration: ['p(95)<500'],
checks: ['rate>0.99'],

Per-endpoint tagging:

http.get(`${BASE_URL}/api/things`, { tags: { name: 'GetThings' } });
'http_req_duration{name:GetThings}': ['p(95)<400', 'p(99)<800'],

Web Vitals:

browser_web_vital_lcp: ['p(95)<2500'],
browser_web_vital_inp: ['p(95)<200'],
browser_web_vital_cls: ['p(95)<0.1'],

See references/slo-design.md for per-iteration tuning, the performance.mark custom-Trend pattern, iteration_completed Rate, breakpoint abort-on-fail thresholds, and loosening rules.

6. Build hybrid load tests

Per workflow, one file per test type. Each file has a protocol scenario (drives load) plus a single browser VU (measures Web Vitals under load). Breakpoint is protocol-only — a browser VU adds noise to the signal.

TypeExecutorDefaults
smokeconstant-vus3 VUs × 1m
averageramping-vus0→20→0 over 14m
stressramping-vus0→50→0 over 20m
spikeramping-vus0→100→0 over 2m
soakramping-vus0→10→0 over 70m
breakpointramping-arrival-rate5/s→500/s over 20m, abortOnFail

Tune per workflow once you've seen smoke results. See references/test-types.md for rationale and references/hybrid-load-design.md for why one file per type and why duplication between files is acceptable.

7. Run locally with LG sidecar

./tools/run-with-monitor.sh tests/wN-<short-name>/smoke.js

Starts lg-monitor.sh in the background, runs k6, then prints a summary verdict: OK (≥30% idle), NOTE (10–30%), or WARNING (<10%). If WARNING, the laptop is the bottleneck — reduce VUs, switch to cloud, or split across multiple LGs. See references/lg-monitoring.md.

8. Push to Grafana Cloud k6

For each test type assigned to cloud in the §1 runbook:

  1. Confirm k6 cloud login works (the skill does not own auth setup).

  2. Run smoke locally first to validate the script.

  3. k6 cloud run tests/wN-<short-name>/<type>.js

  4. Capture the run URL for the §10 report.

Cost reminder: browser VU-hours are billed 10× protocol VU-hours. Soak and breakpoint are the most expensive. Check limits before long runs. See references/local-vs-cloud.md.

9. Investigate the backend

Only if the user owns the backend and has Grafana access.

  1. Discover datasources via mcp-grafana or gcx datasources list.

  2. Ask the user for service label keys — do not guess.

  3. Correlate the k6 run window with RED metrics, error logs, traces, and profiles (Pyroscope — use explicit from/to for the run window).

  4. Hand back specific evidence: timestamps, query strings, panel links.

See references/grafana-investigation.md for the full flow including how to verify absence before reporting it.

10. Report back

Fill in the report template from references/reporting.md:

  • Summary — workflows, test types, dates

  • SLOs — pass/fail per threshold

  • Findings — one paragraph per finding, ordered by severity, with specific evidence

  • Evidence — k6 output paths, LG monitor CSVs, cloud run URLs, Grafana links

  • Suggested next steps

Always be specific. "Latency is high" is not a finding. "GetPizza p(95) hit 1.4s at iteration ~200; correlated with sustained 100% CPU on the recommender service per Grafana panel link" is.


Reference index

Files

references/test-types.md

Test types

Six test types, one file per type, all hybrid except breakpoint.

TypePurposeExecutorDefault ramp
smokesanity check the script + thresholdsconstant-vus3 VUs × 1m
averageexpected production loadramping-vus0→20→0 over 14m
stressbeyond expected, find the clifframping-vus0→50→0 over 20m
spikesudden VU jump, check recoveryramping-vus0→100→0 over 2m
soaksustained load, find leaks / driftramping-vus0→10→0 over 70m
breakpointramping arrival rate, find the ceilingramping-arrival-rate5/s→500/s over 20m, abortOnFail

Defaults are starting points. Always tune after smoke.

smoke

Goal: confirm the script behaves correctly under production-like but trivially small load. Always run before any other test type. If smoke fails, fix the script before scaling.

scenarios: {
  protocol: {
    executor: 'constant-vus',
    exec: 'protocolIteration',
    vus: 3, duration: '1m',
  },
  browser: { executor: 'constant-vus', vus: 1, duration: '1m',
             exec: 'browserIteration',
             options: { browser: { type: 'chromium' } } },
},
thresholds: { /* full SLO + per-endpoint + iteration + web vitals */ },

A passing smoke means: thresholds compile, the script doesn't error, all assertions hold at low load. Smoke is not a measurement.

average

Expected production load. Tune target VUs to match the customer's typical concurrent user count.

protocol: {
  executor: 'ramping-vus',
  exec: 'protocolIteration',
  startVUs: 0,
  stages: [
    { duration: '2m',  target: 20 },   // ramp up
    { duration: '10m', target: 20 },   // hold
    { duration: '2m',  target: 0  },   // ramp down
  ],
},
browser: { /* constant 1 VU for the full 14m */ },

Pass criteria: every SLO threshold holds.

stress

Beyond expected load. Goal: find where SLOs start to break.

protocol: {
  executor: 'ramping-vus',
  exec: 'protocolIteration',
  startVUs: 0,
  stages: [
    { duration: '5m',  target: 50 },
    { duration: '10m', target: 50 },
    { duration: '5m',  target: 0  },
  ],
},

Expected outcome: some thresholds fail. The specific thresholds that fail tell you which part of the system is the bottleneck. Report each failure with its tag (which endpoint), peak VU count, and timestamp.

spike

Sudden jump in VUs; goal is to verify the system recovers.

protocol: {
  executor: 'ramping-vus',
  exec: 'protocolIteration',
  startVUs: 0,
  stages: [
    { duration: '30s', target: 100 },   // spike
    { duration: '1m',  target: 100 },   // hold at peak
    { duration: '30s', target: 0   },   // drop
  ],
},

What to look for:

  • During the spike: do http_req_failed and latency stay within acceptable bounds? (Some degradation is expected.)

  • After the drop: does the system return to baseline?

  • Cold caches, connection pool warmup, autoscaler latency — all surface here.

soak

Sustained moderate load over a long window. Goal: find memory leaks, connection drift, scheduled-job interference, cache eviction patterns.

protocol: {
  executor: 'ramping-vus',
  exec: 'protocolIteration',
  startVUs: 0,
  stages: [
    { duration: '5m',  target: 10 },
    { duration: '60m', target: 10 },
    { duration: '5m',  target: 0  },
  ],
},

What to look for:

  • Is iteration_duration flat, or trending up?

  • Is k6's RSS (LG monitor) climbing without bound? See gotchas: the climb may be client-side metric accumulation, not a real leak. Verify against backend metrics before reporting.

  • Are there periodic spikes (cron jobs, GC, log rotations)?

Soak is the most likely test type to exhaust Grafana Cloud k6 budget. Confirm with the user before pushing to cloud.

breakpoint

Find the ceiling. Protocol-only (no browser scenario — adds noise to the signal).

scenarios: {
  protocol: {
    executor: 'ramping-arrival-rate',
    exec: 'protocolIteration',
    startRate: 5,
    timeUnit: '1s',
    preAllocatedVUs: 50,
    maxVUs: 500,
    stages: [{ duration: '20m', target: 500 }],
  },
},
thresholds: {
  http_req_failed:   [{ threshold: 'rate<0.05', abortOnFail: true,
                        delayAbortEval: '30s' }],
  http_req_duration: [{ threshold: 'p(95)<2000', abortOnFail: true,
                        delayAbortEval: '30s' }],
  checks: ['rate>0.95'],
},

The abortOnFail thresholds stop the run once SLOs break. The delayAbortEval window prevents instantaneous fluctuations from triggering an abort prematurely.

Read the final iteration rate / arrival rate at the abort point — that's the breakpoint. Document it in the report.

Why arrival rate, not VUs: the cliff is in requests per second, not in concurrent users. VU-based ramps are bounded by iteration duration; if iterations slow down, VUs back off and you never reach the cliff. ramping-arrival-rate injects requests at a fixed schedule regardless of iteration speed.

Two ways the arrival-rate advantage gets silently lost — avoid both:

  • Think-time sleep in the iteration body. Every started iteration holds a VU until it finishes. A 1-4s sleep() (the think-time the other test types use) makes each iteration last ~2.5s, so one VU serves only ~0.4 iters/s. The breakpoint body must run requests back-to-back with no think-time. Think-time belongs in average/stress/soak, not breakpoint.

  • maxVUs set below target_rate × iteration_seconds. When k6 runs out of VUs it logs Insufficient VUs, reached N active VUs and cannot initialize more and emits dropped_iterations; the achieved rate plateaus from VU exhaustion, not from the backend. If you see those messages, the run found your VU ceiling, not the server's — raise maxVUs (and confirm there's no stray think-time) and re-run.

When to use each

Phase the test types as the project matures:

  1. Always start with smoke. Until smoke is green, nothing else is meaningful.

  2. Run average next to confirm SLOs hold at production load.

  3. Run stress to find the cliff and get the first set of findings.

  4. Run spike if the customer cares about traffic surges (launches, marketing campaigns, news cycles).

  5. Run soak before any deployment that introduces persistent state (caches, connection pools, in-memory caches).

  6. Run breakpoint when you want a single number to report: "system handles X req/s before degrading".

Local vs cloud per test type

Decided per-customer in workflow elicitation. The skill does not hardcode this. See local-vs-cloud.md.

A typical decision matrix the customer may end up at:

Test typeCommon choice
smokelocal (validation)
averagecloud (real measurement)
stresscloud (reach the ceiling)
spikelocal OR cloud (depends on target rate)
soaklocal (cheap) OR cloud (real LGs)
breakpointcloud (LG ceiling matters)

But every one of these is the customer's call.

Requirements and compatibility

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Needs: Needs Node.js

Security

What our scanner noticed· Low risk

  • Scripts that your agent may run

This skill includes scripts that your agent may run. Read them before you use it.

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Published by
Grafana Labs
Publisher
Grafana Labs (Official)
Source
grafana/skills · skills/grafana-k6/k6-perf-test-website · commit 8fb72a5
Licence
Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Grafana Labs or Grafana Labs.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download k6-perf-test-website.zip