K6 Cloud Investigate Test
Grafana LabsOfficialPublished by Grafana Labs
- Skill
- Workflow
- Cloud and DevOps
- Apache-2.0
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides a systematic approach to investigating Grafana Cloud k6 performance tests. It guides users through identifying test runs, fetching metadata and scripts, analyzing pass/fail status across multiple layers, and extracting metrics and logs. It emphasizes safe practices, such as avoiding accidental script overwrites, and provides a framework for diagnosing failures by correlating run-level results, in-script checks, and infrastructure metrics.
What it does
- Identifies and retrieves metadata for specific k6 cloud tests and runs.
- Lists and paginates run history to identify trends or specific anomalies.
- Determines pass/fail status by evaluating run-level results, status, and per-check metrics.
- Fetches and summarizes raw metric time-series and log lines for deep-dive analysis.
- Provides a safe, step-by-step procedure for editing test scripts.
- Generates structured reports for single-run investigations or multi-run comparisons.
When to use it
- When you need to understand why a specific k6 test run failed.
- When you want to compare performance metrics across multiple test runs.
- When you need to verify if a test is healthy or if thresholds are configured correctly.
- When you need to extract logs or metrics for a past test run.
- When you need to safely update a test script to fix a failing threshold.
Advantages
- Prevents accidental script overwrites by enforcing a read-before-write policy.
- Provides a clear, multi-layered approach to distinguishing between script issues and platform aborts.
- Ensures accurate data analysis by verifying date alignment and handling pagination correctly.
- Standardizes the investigation process with clear reporting templates.
- Helps identify the root cause of 'zero-observation' threshold traps.
Usage examples
- “Why did my k6 test run 12345 fail?”
- The agent will fetch the run metadata, check the logs for errors, analyze the per-check success ratio, and report whether the failure was due to a threshold breach or a platform-side issue.
- “Show me the metrics for the latest run of my search test.”
- The agent will identify the most recent run for the specified test, retrieve the relevant performance metrics, and present a summary of key indicators like iteration duration and check success rates.
- “Is my test healthy? Here is the link: /a/k6-app/tests/555”
- The agent will list the recent run history, check the pass/fail status of the latest runs, and provide a summary of the test's overall health based on the retrieved data.
- “I need to add a threshold to my k6 script to catch navigation failures.”
- The agent will guide you through the safe-edit workflow: fetching the current script, creating a backup, applying the threshold change, and verifying the update.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/grafana/k6-cloud-investigate-test/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip k6-cloud-investigate-test.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Grafana Labs
k6 Cloud test investigator
Structured 9-step workflow for investigating a Grafana Cloud k6 test or run.
This skill is workflow-only. All API calls go through gcx api against the plugin proxy, using v6 for REST and v5 for metrics. For the underlying mechanics (gcx auth, path conventions, endpoint discovery, log queries, script editing, threshold semantics, gotchas), see the k6-manage skill — every step below references it.
The content unique to this skill is:
the ordered investigation flow (Steps 1-9 below)
the date-alignment check ("last 7 days" ≠ "last 7 runs")
the 3-layer pass/fail determination (
resultvsstatusvs per-checkchecksquery)a worked example with realistic numbers (
references/worked-example.md)
Core principles
Read before write. Always GET the script before any PUT.
gcx k6 load-tests update-scriptis a write that replaces the live script with whatever file you pass — running it "just to see the URL it hits" has cost users their production scripts. If you need to learn URLs, run any non-mutating command with-vvv --log-http-payloadinstead.Paginate when enumerating runs. The
/test_runsendpoint caps at 1000 rows andgcx k6 runs list --limit 0does not auto-follow@nextLink. Use thegcx apiloop documented ink6-manage§3.Verify date framing. When the user says "last 7 days", "this week", "recent runs" — confirm the most-recent run's
createdactually falls in that window. Surface the gap if not.check()doesn't fail runs; onlythresholdsdo. And thresholds with zero observations are reported as ✓ pass. See "Threshold semantics" below for the full deep dive; the per-checkchecksmetric query in Step 5 catches both cases.
Prerequisites
gcx installed and authenticated against the user's stack. See k6-manage §1. Verify with:
gcx --context <stack> config check # expect "✔ Connectivity: online"Investigation workflow
Step 1: Identify the test and target run(s)
From the user's URL:
/a/k6-app/tests/<id>→ load test (parent of many runs)/a/k6-app/runs/<id>→ a specific run
To go run → test: fetch the run via gcx api, see k6-manage §2 for the path-shape rules:
gcx --context <stack> api /api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v6/test_runs/<run_id>and read .test_id from the response. To list runs for a test, see Step 3.
Step 2: Fetch test metadata and script
gcx --context <stack> k6 load-tests get <test_id> -o jsonFor the script, follow the GET half of the safe-edit recipe in k6-manage §5 — save a backup if you'll be editing later.
Two script endpoints exist, and the difference matters for investigation. k6-manage §5 documents both: the current load-test script and the per-run snapshot that was actually executed. They drift apart whenever the script is edited after a run. Whenever the question involves "what changed", "why did this run fail", or you're examining a run more than a few days old, also fetch the run-bundled snapshot(s) via k6-manage §5's run-script endpoint and diff against the current load-test script (or against another run's snapshot). The current load-test script is the wrong artifact to reason about a past run.
Step 3: List runs WITH pagination
Use the gcx api + @nextLink loop pattern documented in k6-manage §3 against /cloud/v6/load_tests/<test_id>/test_runs. After collecting all_runs:
print(f"Total: {len(all_runs)}")
runs_sorted = sorted(all_runs, key=lambda r: r['created'], reverse=True)
for r in runs_sorted[:10]:
print(f" {r['created']:30s} id={r['id']:>8} status={r['status']:<10} result={r.get('result','?')}")Report to user: total run count, date range, latest run date. If "latest run" is more than a day old, call it out — they may believe the schedule is firing when it isn't.
Step 4: Verify date alignment with user's intent
If the user asked for "last 7 days" / "this week" / "recent": filter by date range, not by row count — "7 most recent runs" could span a day or a year depending on how often the test runs.
last7 = [r for r in all_runs if r['created'] >= '<today_minus_7_days_iso>']If len(last7) == 0: surface this to the user immediately. Don't proceed with stale data.
Step 5: Determine pass/fail status
For each run examine three independent layers:
| Layer | Field | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Run-level outcome | result (passed / failed / error / aborted) | Whether thresholds breached |
| Run-level status | status (completed / aborted) | Whether the run finished orderly |
| In-script checks | v5 checks metric, aggregated by the check label | Per-check success rate |
For a run that the user thinks is "failing" but reports result: passed: check the third layer. Common pattern: every iteration's check() returns false but the run still "passes" because no threshold is defined on checks. See "Threshold semantics" below for the full deep dive (zero-observation trap, abortOnFail cloud delay, operator support).
Query the per-check breakdown via v5 (see k6-manage/references/metrics.md §7 for query_aggregate_k6 shape):
gcx --context <stack> api \
"/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/<run_id>/query_aggregate_k6(query='ratio by (check)',metric='checks')"Each result entry in the response carries a check label with the check name and a single value: the success ratio (0.0–1.0). For raw success/fail counts, also query increase_nz by (check) (successes) and increase_z by (check) (failures).
Step 6: Fetch metrics for a run
Use the v5 metrics endpoints documented in k6-manage/references/metrics.md. Typical workflow:
# 6a. List metrics available for the run (metrics.md §1)
gcx --context <stack> api /api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/<run_id>/metrics
# 6b. List labels for a metric to know what's available to filter/group by (metrics.md §4)
gcx --context <stack> api \
"/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/<run_id>/labels?match[]=http_req_duration"
# 6c. Time-series — pick a query method that matches the metric's type (metrics.md §6)
gcx --context <stack> api \
"/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/<run_id>/query_range_k6(query='histogram_quantile(0.95) by (name,status)',metric='http_req_duration',step=10)"
# 6d. Scalar aggregate over the whole run (metrics.md §7)
gcx --context <stack> api \
"/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/<run_id>/query_aggregate_k6(query='increase',metric='http_reqs')"Picking the right query method per metric type matters — see the "Query methods" tables in k6-manage/references/metrics.md. For browser tests, the URL/status breakdown comes from labels + label/{name}/values (metrics.md §4/§5), not from a separate tags endpoint.
Step 7: Fetch logs for a run
Follow the Loki recipe in k6-manage §4 (gcx api against /api/plugins/k6-app/resources/logs/..., {test_run_id="<id>"} selector, mandatory X-K6TestRun-Id header, scope start/end to run.created/run.ended). Save the response to /tmp/run_<id>_logs.json and summarise from the file as described there.
Step 8: (If asked) edit the script safely
Use the full safe-edit recipe in k6-manage §5 (GET → backup → edit → k6 inspect → 1-iter smoke → PUT with Content-Type: application/octet-stream → sha256 verify).
When the edit involves thresholds, also read "Threshold semantics" below for the zero-observation trap, the abortOnFail cloud delay, and operator support (==/!= work despite docs).
Step 9: Report
Pick a template based on the question shape.
For single-run investigations ("what's going on with run X"):
Test: <name> (id <test_id>)
Run: <run_id> @ <created> → <ended>, load_zone=<zone>, result=<result>
Logs (<n> streams, <m> lines):
- <stream summary>
Metrics (key indicators):
- <metric>: <method> = <value> (n=<count>)
...
Per-check breakdown:
- <check name>: <success_rate> (succ=<n>, fail=<n>)
...
Diagnosis: <one-paragraph>For multi-run comparisons ("what's different between passing and failing runs", "did this change cause the failures"):
Question: <one-line restatement of what the user is trying to attribute>
Run timeline (relevant window):
| Run ID | Created (UTC) | Result | exec_duration | processing_duration | k6 build | error code | key check ratios |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | passed | 60s | 195s | <build> | — | 1.0/1.0/1.0 |
| ... | ... | failed | 27s | 193s | <build> | — | 0.0/n=0/n=0 |
| ... | ... | error | 51s | 3601s aborted | <build> | 8016 | 1.0/1.0/1.0 |
Differences that matter:
- <field>: <value-in-passing> vs <value-in-failing> — <interpretation>
...
Script diff (if relevant): <bundled-script diff between a representative passing and failing run, summarised>
Diagnosis: <one-paragraph attributing the change to test-side, SUT-side, or platform-side, with the supporting evidence>The table makes side-by-side anomalies obvious (e.g. a column that's identical across passing and failing rules out that dimension as the cause; a column that flips between them is your candidate).
If the user asked for raw data dumps, also save them to /tmp/k6inv/run<id>/ and tell them the paths.
Threshold semantics
Thresholds, not check() calls, are what determine a run's result. The behaviour has several non-obvious corners that mislead first-time investigators, so they're collected here. Step 5 ("Determine pass/fail status") and Step 8 ("edit the script safely") both depend on this section.
What result means
result value | Meaning |
|---|---|
passed | All thresholds passed (or none defined) |
failed | At least one threshold failed |
error | Either the script crashed before finishing (e.g. browser wouldn't launch) or k6 Cloud aborted the run platform-side. To tell which, check status_history[*].extra.code on the run — a non-null code indicates a platform abort (e.g. 8016 = "Test run max lifetime exceeded" during processing_metrics). Platform aborts are not your code's fault even though they surface as error. |
aborted | User or system aborted the run |
check() calls do not affect result directly. They emit observations into the built-in checks rate metric, which a threshold may then evaluate. If no threshold references checks, failing checks are invisible to the run-level result.
The "zero observations = pass" trap
k6 reports a threshold as ✓ pass when the underlying metric has zero samples — even if the threshold expression would otherwise evaluate to false:
checks{check:response is 200}
✓ 'rate==1.0' rate=0.00% ← ✓ pass!?This bites when the script throws before reaching the relevant check() call. Force a check observation in a catch block to make the threshold see something:
try {
const r = await page.goto(URL);
check(r, { "response is 200": x => x.status() === 200 });
// ... rest of iteration body
check(true, { "script completed without exception": () => true });
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
check(null, { "script completed without exception": () => false });
} finally {
await page.close();
}Then add 'checks{check:script completed without exception}': ['rate==1.0'] to thresholds. This catches both navigation failures AND later-stage exceptions.
abortOnFail cloud delay
When k6 runs in the cloud, thresholds are evaluated every 60 seconds. The
abortOnFailfeature may be delayed by up to 60 seconds.
For runs shorter than 60 s, abortOnFail may not fire before iterations complete naturally. The threshold is still evaluated at end-of-run and result flips to failed — abort just doesn't save execution time.
Operators
Docs show <, >, <=, >=. == and != also work even though they aren't in the docs. For rate metrics (value 0.00–1.00), rate==1.0 means "every observation was non-zero" and rate==0 means "all observations were zero."
Workflow-specific gotchas
For the canonical gotcha list (auth expiry, doubled cloud/cloud/, 415 on script PUT, Loki missing X-K6TestRun-Id, script PUT not bumping updated, gcx k6 runs list --limit 0 not following @nextLink), see k6-manage §7. The entries below are specific to this investigation workflow:
| Symptom | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| "Latest run was 6 months ago" but schedule says daily | You didn't paginate /test_runs | Use the @nextLink loop in k6-manage §3 (Step 3) |
| "Last 7 days" report contains only old runs | Filtered by row count, not date | Re-filter by created >= <iso_date> (Step 4) |
| Threshold reports ✓ pass but checks fail | Zero check observations; iteration aborted before check() ran | See "Threshold semantics" above |
result: error but the script logs/metrics look fine | Likely a platform abort (e.g. processing_metrics exceeded the 1h cap, code 8016). The execution itself completed normally. | Check status_history[*].extra.code on the run. Non-null platform code → not your code's fault. See "Threshold semantics" |
| Investigating a past run by reading the current load-test script | Script may have been edited since the run executed — what you're reading isn't what ran | GET the run's bundled script via the per-run endpoint (k6-manage §5) and diff against the current load-test script before drawing conclusions |
| Just overwrote the user's script | Invoked update-script to "see the URL" | Restore from the backup taken in Step 2. To learn URLs without writing, use -vvv --log-http-payload on any non-mutating command. |
CLI --iterations 1 breaks browser scenarios | Overrides scenario block entirely | Edit iterations: in-file with sed instead |
Reference
references/worked-example.md— a synthetic investigation with realistic findings, useful as a template for the Step 9 report.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer889 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.1 KiB
- SKILL.md14.9 KiB
- references/worked-example.md5.8 KiB
references/worked-example.md
Worked investigation example — what a "good" report looks like
Synthetic example. Names, URLs, IDs, and the user email below are fictional placeholders. Replace them with your real stack / test / run when applying this recipe.
Investigating test 100001 ("Search for products") on https://acme.grafana.net. Run 999999 (manually triggered 2026-05-11) is used as the worked example — it's the first run in this test's history (out of 1177) to finish with result: "failed" rather than "passed".
Use this file as a template for the Step 9 report in SKILL.md. For the how (fetching the data), see the workflow steps in SKILL.md and the underlying mechanics in k6-manage — this file just shows the what.
Run summary
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Run ID | 999999 |
| Test ID | 100001 ("Search for products") |
| Created | 2026-05-11T16:00:25Z |
| Ended | 2026-05-11T16:06:01Z |
| Started by | [email protected] (manual) |
| Load zone | amazon:gb:london |
| Status | completed |
| Result | failed (first in the test's history) |
Logs (from k6 cloud, 11 lines across 2 streams)
| Stream labels | Lines | Content |
|---|---|---|
source=console, level=info, lz=amazon:gb:london | 10× | navigating page: navigating frame to "https://shop.example.com/search": net::ERR_ADDRESS_UNREACHABLE |
level=warning | 1× | The options.ext.loadimpact option is deprecated, please use options.cloud instead |
So every iteration aborted at the navigation step (DNS or routing failure to shop.example.com). No HTTP request body, no DOM, no later log lines.
Metrics (from the v5 k6 cloud API)
| Metric | Query | min | median | max | n datapoints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
checks | ratio | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 10 |
checks | rate_total | 0.33/s | 0.33/s | 0.33/s | 10 |
iterations | value (cumulative) | 1 | 5.5 | 10 | 10 |
iteration_duration | histogram_avg | 3,462 ms | 6,500 ms | 6,588 ms | 10 |
browser_http_req_duration | histogram_avg | 3,001 ms | 3,001 ms | 3,005 ms | 10 |
browser_web_vital_ttfb | histogram_avg | 3,002 ms | 3,003 ms | 3,006 ms | 9 |
browser_web_vital_fcp | histogram_avg | 3,168 ms | 6,230 ms | 6,340 ms | 8 |
browser_data_received | increase | 114 B | 114 B | 114 B | 10 |
Per-check breakdown (v5 checks metric, ratio by (check))
| Check name | Success ratio | Successes | Failures |
|---|---|---|---|
script completed without exception | 0.0 | 0 | 10 |
Interpretation
All 10 iterations completed (
iterationsreached 10), each ~6.5 s.browser_http_req_durationclusters tightly at exactly 3 s — that's a connection timeout firing.checksratio = 0% on every datapoint — the patched script's catch block correctly forced acheck(null, …false)observation. The threshold'checks{check:script completed without exception}': ['rate==1.0']then evaluated to false →result: "failed".
Diagnosis
shop.example.com was unreachable from amazon:gb:london for the duration of the run. The 3-second clustering on browser_http_req_duration is the connection-establishment timeout in Chromium. The threshold-based failure detection worked exactly as intended: the catch block recorded a forced check failure on every aborted iteration, the threshold saw rate=0.0 against rate==1.0, and result flipped to failed. No script bug — this is an external/infrastructure issue to investigate (DNS, peering, or upstream availability of shop.example.com).
Concrete commands used to gather the above
Sample IDs: RUN=999999, TEST_ID=100001, START=1778515225, END=1778515561, STACK=acme. All paths use the doubled cloud/cloud/ plugin-proxy prefix (see k6-manage §2).
# Run metadata (v6 REST)
gcx --context $STACK api \
/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v6/test_runs/$RUN
# Logs (Loki via gcx api — full recipe in k6-manage §4)
QUERY=$(printf '{test_run_id="%s"}' "$RUN" | jq -sRr @uri)
gcx --context $STACK api \
"/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/logs/api/v1/query_range?query=${QUERY}&direction=backward&start=${START}&end=${END}&limit=1000" \
-H "X-K6TestRun-Id: ${RUN}"
# List metrics emitted by the run (v5; see k6-manage/references/metrics.md §1)
gcx --context $STACK api \
/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/$RUN/metrics
# Per-check pass rate (v5 query_aggregate_k6 on the `checks` rate metric)
gcx --context $STACK api \
"/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/$RUN/query_aggregate_k6(query='ratio by (check)',metric='checks')"
# Raw success/failure counts per check
gcx --context $STACK api \
"/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/$RUN/query_aggregate_k6(query='increase_nz by (check)',metric='checks')"
gcx --context $STACK api \
"/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/$RUN/query_aggregate_k6(query='increase_z by (check)',metric='checks')"
# p95 request latency by endpoint/status (v5 query_range_k6 on a trend metric)
gcx --context $STACK api \
"/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/$RUN/query_range_k6(query='histogram_quantile(0.95) by (name,status)',metric='http_req_duration',step=10)"
# Label discovery for browser tests — what URLs/statuses were recorded?
gcx --context $STACK api \
"/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/$RUN/labels?match[]=browser_http_req_duration"
gcx --context $STACK api \
"/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/$RUN/label/url/values?match[]=browser_http_req_duration"
gcx --context $STACK api \
"/api/plugins/k6-app/resources/cloud/cloud/v5/test_runs/$RUN/label/status/values?match[]=browser_http_req_duration"Converting the run's ISO timestamps to the unix seconds the Loki query expects: see the START/END conversion idiom in k6-manage §4 (uses jq's fromdateiso8601, with a .fraction strip for k6's sub-second precision).
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Needs Python
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Grafana Labs
- Publisher
- Grafana Labs (Official)
- Source
- grafana/skills · skills/grafana-k6/k6-cloud-investigate-test · commit 8fb72a5
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Grafana Labs or Grafana Labs.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download k6-cloud-investigate-test.zip