Google Cloud Solution RAG Enterprise Search Gke Sqldb
GoogleOfficialPublished by Google
- Skill
- Workflow
- Cloud and DevOps
- Apache-2.0
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides a structured, multi-phase workflow to assist users in designing and deploying a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enterprise search solution. It focuses on architectures that utilize Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) for hosting application components, including open models and inference frameworks, alongside a vector-enabled SQL database for storage and indexing. The process encompasses requirements discovery, architectural design, solution validation, and final documentation, ensuring alignment with official Google Cloud guidance.
What it does
- Gathers functional and non-functional requirements for RAG workloads.
- Generates a technical decomposition of RAG system components.
- Provides architectural diagrams and descriptions for GKE-based RAG solutions.
- Offers design recommendations for security, reliability, cost, and performance.
- Creates deployment guidance including Terraform and configuration scripts.
- Develops and executes a validation plan for the implemented solution.
When to use it
- When building a RAG-capable search system using GKE.
- When the architecture requires a vector-enabled SQL database for vector storage.
- When using open models and open-source inferencing frameworks.
- When you need a guided, step-by-step process to move from requirements to deployment.
Advantages
- Ensures architectural consistency through grounding in official Google Cloud documentation.
- Provides a clear, phased approach to prevent premature design decisions.
- Includes built-in validation steps to verify the solution against requirements.
- Facilitates the creation of comprehensive, standardized architecture documentation.
Usage examples
- “I need to design a RAG system on GKE using a vector-enabled SQL database. Can you help me start?”
- The agent initiates Phase 1: Requirements discovery, asking for functional and non-functional requirements to begin the design process.
- “My requirements are defined. How do I proceed with the architecture?”
- The agent reviews the requirements, generates a technical decomposition for your approval, and then moves to Phase 2 to define products and architecture.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/google/google-cloud-solution-rag-enterprise-search-gke-sqldb/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip google-cloud-solution-rag-enterprise-search-gke-sqldb.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Google
RAG for enterprise search using GKE and AlloyDB
This skill provides a workflow to design and implement a secure, low-latency, and high-accuracy RAG-enabled conversational search solution for private enterprise content by using an AlloyDB database, Cloud Storage, and a Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) cluster to host all the application components, including an open model and an open-source inference framework.
Attribution
MUST READ: Before executing any gcloud, REST API, or MCP command, you
MUST read and follow the instructions in
Usage Attribution.
Overview of the workflow
The workflow consists of the following phases:
Phase 1: Requirements discovery. Gather detailed requirements related to the cloud workload or use case that the user needs assistance for.
Phase 2: Solution architecture. Use the requirements that were gathered in Phase 1 to generate a detailed solution architecture for the cloud workload or use case.
Phase 3: Solution validation. Create a plan to validate the generated solution, generate validation instructions and scripts, and run the validation.
Phase 4: Solution packing and presentation. Consolidate the generated content and present the solution.
Important notes about the workflow:
Strict phase separation: During Phase 1 (Requirements discovery), when you ask the user clarifying questions, DON'T recommend, propose, or outline any architectural designs, technical decompositions, cloud services, or component mappings.
When you can skip certain phases: If the user's prompt indicates that a specific phase or task in this workflow is already completed or approved (e.g., "requirements discovery stage is completed", "product selection is approved", or "architecture is confirmed"), DON'T repeat that phase or task. Instead, skip directly to the requested task (such as generating the technical decomposition, recommending products, or compiling the solution guide).
Phase 1: Requirements discovery
In this phase, you must gather detailed requirements related to the RAG workload that the user wants to design and deploy in Google Cloud.
Complete the following steps strictly in the specified order:
Ask the user to describe the functional requirements of the workload, including data types (structured, unstructured), ingestion frequency, and conversational features (e.g., multi-turn chat, citation requirements).
Ask the user to describe the following non-functional requirements:
Security, privacy, and compliance: E.g., network isolation, private endpoints, data residency, and requirements for compliance.
Reliability: E.g., scaling, high availability, resilience against zone or regional outages, disaster recovery goals for RTO and RPO.
Cost: E.g., cost of compute, storage, and database resources.
Operational excellence: E.g., monitoring, alerts, and logging.
Performance: E.g., data upload speed, performance expectations for generating embedding vectors, and latency requirements for model responses and data retrieval queries (including vector and hybrid search).
Sustainability: E.g., carbon footprint, low-carbon regions.
Ask the user whether the workload currently runs on other cloud providers or on-premises.
If the user's answer is "yes", then ask the user to describe the architecture of the current deployment.
If the user's answer is "no", then proceed to the next step.
Ask the user to describe dependencies, if any, on other workloads, products, or tools (e.g., identity providers, external sources, CRM/ERP database integrations).
Review the input that the user has provided so far, and check whether there are any ambiguities or contradictions.
If you identify any ambiguities or contradictions in the requirements that the user has provided, then do the following for each ambiguity or contradiction that you identify:
Describe the ambiguity or contradiction.
Ask the user how they wish to resolve the ambiguity or contradiction.
If the user delegates the choice to you (e.g., the user replies with "do what you think is best" or "you decide"), then provide a clear suggestion to resolve the ambiguity or contradiction, explain your reasoning, and ask the user to approve your suggestion.
Critical: Until all the ambiguities and contradictions that you identify are resolved according to the preceding guidance, you must NOT recommend or generate any architecture design, technical decomposition, or Google Cloud product recommendations.
Important: DON'T start this step if there are unresolved contradictions or ambiguities from Step 5.
Generate a technical decomposition of the components of the workload. The technical decomposition must break down the solution into logical components, as follows:
Data ingestion: Blob storage for raw corporate documents.
Data processing and chunking: Containerized pipeline to extract data, clean it, and chunk it.
Embedding vectors generation: Containerized service to convert data chunks to embedding vectors.
Storing and indexing the embedding vectors: Vector-enabled SQL database for storing embedding vectors.
Handling non-vector data: Preparing non-vector data, like tables, views, and aggregations for data retrieval. Analyzing whether any indexing, partitioning, or other performance techniques can be applied on the original data schema.
Query and retrieval: Accepting client queries, identifying intent, and routing to a retrieval workflow, which might include conversion of the request to an embedding for semantic search, extracting and applying filters for filtered search or supplying all to the hybrid search.
Prompt augmentation: Augmenting the prompts with the retrieved context.
Response generation: Requesting and generating responses from the model.
Response sanity checks: Evaluating responses using an AI model and performing procedural checks according to defined criteria.
Ask the user to approve the generated technical decomposition.
Critical: You MUST stop execution immediately, call no more tools (such as file editors, searches, or code tools), and wait for the user to respond with their feedback or approval in the chat. Do NOT compile the architecture, recommend products, construct maps, or write any files/drafts for Phase 2 until the user's explicit approval is received.
If the user requests changes, then generate an updated technical decomposition.
Repeat steps 5 through 8 until the user approves the generated technical decomposition.
Only after the user has explicitly approved the technical decomposition, proceed to Phase 2.
Important: You are strictly prohibited from recommending product choices, generating the architecture diagram, or drafting design recommendations until the technical decomposition is approved.
Phase 2: Solution architecture
Ground all generated content
For each task in this phase, to ensure that the generated content aligns with the latest and official Google Cloud guidance, you must ground the generated content by using the following resources:
Google Developer Knowledge MCP server: https://developers.google.com/knowledge/mcp.md.txt
Server: https://developerknowledge.googleapis.com/mcp
Tools:
developerknowledge:search_documentsdeveloperknowledge:get_documentsdeveloperknowledge:answer_query
Relevant skills from https://github.com/google/skills
Official Google Cloud documentation, including the following:
Primary architecture reference: https://docs.cloud.google.com/architecture/rag-capable-gen-ai-app-using-gke.md.txt
Architecture guidance and decision-making guides:
references/product-selection-recommendations.mdreferences/design-recommendations.mdreferences/related-documentation.md
For each item in the generated guidance, you must include citations to the relevant official Google Cloud documentation pages.
Task 2.1: Identify Google Cloud products and features required for the workload.
Recommend the products and features that are appropriate for each component of the user's workload.
Important: The Google Cloud products and features that you recommend MUST be consistent with the guidance in
references/product-selection-recommendations.md.Present the generated product recommendations and ask the user to approve the recommendations.
If the user requests changes, then make the required changes.
Repeat steps 2 and 3 until the user approves the product recommendations.
After the user approves the product recommendations, proceed to Task 2.2.
Task 2.2: Generate an architecture diagram.
Generate an architecture diagram in the Mermaid format: https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid.
The diagram must show the data flows and request flows across the components of the architecture, based on the technical composition that you generated.
The following is an example of the data flows and request flows that the architecture diagram should show:
Embedding pipeline (batch/streaming): Data source -> Cloud Storage -> Cloud Storage FUSE -> GKE Ray Worker (Chunking) --> Embedding generation using GemmaEmbedding -> AlloyDB.
Serving pipeline (real-time): User client -> GKE Frontend (LangChain Orchestration) -> Database Query (semantic or hybrid search on the vector store) -> Retrieve matching data -> Augment prompt -> Gemma vLLM endpoint API -> Output (Responsible AI filtering) -> User client.
Present the generated diagram to the user and ask the user to approve the architecture diagram.
If the user requests changes, then make the required changes.
Repeat steps 2 and 3 until the user approves the architecture diagram.
After the user approves the architecture diagram, proceed to Task 2.3.
Task 2.3: Generate an architecture description.
Generate a description that explains the purpose of each component, the relationships between the components, and the task flow or data flow.
Present the generated architecture description to the user and ask the user to approve the description.
If the user requests any changes, then make the required changes.
Repeat steps 2 and 3 until the user approves the architecture description.
After the user approves the architecture description, proceed to Task 2.4.
Task 2.4: Generate design recommendations.
Generate design recommendations and best practices to optimally configure each component in the architecture based on the workload's requirements.
Important: The design recommendations and best practices that you generate MUST be consistent with the guidance in the resources that are listed in the following files:
references/related-documentation.mdreferences/design-recommendations.md
Present the generated recommendations to the user and ask whether the user needs any changes.
If the user needs changes, then make the required changes.
Repeat steps 2 and 3 until the user confirms that the generated design recommendations meet their requirements.
Proceed to Task 2.5.
Task 2.5: Generate deployment guidance.
Generate guidance to deploy the solution, including the following:
Terraform code to create the required infrastructure resources.
Steps or scripts to deploy workloads, such as Ray-on-GKE (KubeRay coordinator and worker nodes) and the LangChain frontend deployment.
Important: The deployment guidance that you generate MUST be consistent with the guidance in the resources that are listed in the following resources:
references/related-documentation.mdreferences/design-recommendations.mdRelevant skills in https://github.com/google/skills/tree/main/skills/cloud
Present the generated deployment guidance to the user and ask whether the user needs any changes.
If the user requests changes, then make the required changes.
Repeat steps 2 and 3 until the user confirms that the generated deployment guidance meets their requirements.
Proceed to Phase 3.
Phase 3: Solution validation
Create a plan to validate the generated solution. The plan must outline the steps that are necessary to verify that the generated solution meets the workload's requirements. The following are examples of validation steps:
Deployment dry-run: Run commands like
terraform planto preview the infrastructure resources that will be provisioned.Connectivity and routing: Verify network paths, load balancer routing, and service endpoints.
Vector index: Verify that vector indexes are correctly created and populated in the AlloyDB database. This can involve querying the database to check index status and content.
Embedding pipeline: Test the end-to-end embedding pipeline from data ingestion to vector storage, ensuring documents are chunked, embedded, and stored correctly.
Retrieval latency: Measure the latency of vector and hybrid search queries against the AlloyDB vector store to ensure performance meets requirements.
Retrieval accuracy: Perform sample queries and evaluate the relevance of retrieved documents or chunks.
Security policies: Verify restricted access, firewall rules, and IAM enforcement.
Present the validation plan to the user and request feedback or approval.
If the user requests changes, update the plan as required.
Repeat steps 2 and 3 until the user approves the validation plan.
Generate scripts or commands using tools like
curlorgcloudto perform the steps in the approved validation plan.Request permission from the user to perform the validation checks.
If the user gives permission, run the validation checks and troubleshoot any deployment issues.
When all the validation checks pass, proceed to Phase 4.
Phase 4: Solution packaging and presentation
Consolidate the final text artifacts that were generated in Phase 2 into a single Markdown file named
solution-architecture-guide.md, based on the template inassets/output-template.md.Request the user's permission to write the code files in the user's workspace.
After the user gives permission, write the final code files in the user's workspace.
Supporting references
references/product-selection-recommendations.mdreferences/design-recommendations.mdreferences/related-documentation.md
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer924 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.1 KiB
- SKILL.md15.7 KiB
- assets/output-template.md5.5 KiB
- references/attribution.md2.0 KiB
- references/design-recommendations.md1.9 KiB
- references/product-selection-recommendations.md2.9 KiB
- references/related-documentation.md7.4 KiB
assets/output-template.md
<!-- Use this template to compile the content that you generate based on the instructions in `SKILL.md`. -->
Google Cloud solution architecture: RAG for enterprise search using GKE and AlloyDB
1. Executive summary and workload overview
[A brief description of the conversational search workload, the business goals of the enterprise search system, and the proposed high-level RAG solution architecture combining GKE orchestration with AlloyDB vector search]
2. Requirements and current state
2.1. Functional requirements
Business processes: [Details of the enterprise documents and conversational search processes that the workload supports]
Activities and use cases: [Details of user interactions and task/data flows: e.g., query rates, chunking/embedding batch ingestion schedules, and retrieval needs]
2.2. Non-functional requirements
Security: [Details of security requirements: e.g., identity and access control, network isolation, private endpoints, data residency, and any compliance requirements.]
Reliability: [Details of reliability requirements: e.g., resource scaling, HA, multi-zone vs. regional, SLA]
Cost: [Details of cost constraints]
Operations: [Details of operational requirements: e.g., logging, monitoring]
Performance: [Details of performance requirements: e.g., search latencies, content generation speed]
Sustainability: [Details of resource utilization and carbon footprints]
2.3. Current state
[If applicable, describe the current on-premises or other-cloud solution.]
Current solution: [Details of existing indexes or databases]
Pain points and drivers for migration/redesign: [Details about why the existing solution is not optimal]
2.4. Dependencies
Internal dependencies: [Details of internal dependencies: e.g., ERP, CRM, or identity directories]
External dependencies: [Details of external connections: e.g., public datasets, SaaS platforms]
3. Technical decomposition of the workload
[Technical decomposition of the workload components, breaking down the application into logical layers: data ingestion, data preprocessing & chunking, embedding generation, creating/updating the vector index, context retrieval, prompt augmentation, and response generation.]
4. Proposed solution architecture
4.1. Google Cloud products and features mapping
[List the Google Cloud products and features mapped to the technical components of the workload. For each component, justify the selection, note alternatives considered, and describe the pros and cons of the recommended product/feature.]
4.2. Architecture diagram
[Architecture diagram in the Mermaid format showing the relationships and data flows between the components.]
4.3. Architecture description
[Detailed description of the architecture. Describe the task flow and data flow between the components.]
Embedding flow: [E.g., document ingestion, FUSE mounting, chunking logic in Ray, vectorization, and SQL inserting.]
Serving flow: [E.g., prompt submission, database lookup, prompt augmentation, calling Gemma vLLM endpoint API, and safety filtering.]
5. Design and configuration recommendations
5.1. Security, privacy, and compliance
Access control: [E.g., IAM-based authentication]
Data protection: [E.g., Cloud KMS CMEK, Sensitive Data Protection scanning of ingestion documents]
Network security: [E.g., Private IP only for AlloyDB and GKE, Private Service Connect (PSC), VPC Service Controls perimeters]
5.2. Reliability
Redundant deployment: [E.g., Regional GKE cluster across three zones, AlloyDB HA instance]
Backup and disaster recovery: [E.g., AlloyDB backup and recovery, GKE image streaming to avoid cold starts]
5.3. Operational excellence
Monitoring and logging: [E.g., Cloud Logging, Cloud Monitoring, System Insights, Query Insights]
Infrastructure as Code (IaC): [E.g., Terraform for infra provisioning]
5.4. Cost optimization
Sizing and scaling: [E.g., GKE Autopilot scaling, Spot VMs for Ray workers, Object Lifecycle Management on Storage]
Pricing models: [E.g., Committed Use Discounts (CUD) for AlloyDB and GKE compute]
5.5. Performance efficiency
Caching and database indexing: [E.g., HNSW index strategy for fast ANN searches, performance tracking using Query Insights]
Data updates: [E.g., Parallel composite uploads to Cloud Storage]
5.6. Sustainability
[E.g., Serverless API offloading, GKE right-sizing node utilization]
6. Deployment guidance
[Instructions and code for deploying the RAG architecture.]
6.1. Deployment prerequisites
[E.g., Enabled APIs: container.googleapis.com, sqladmin.googleapis.com, secretmanager.googleapis.com, aiplatform.googleapis.com]
[E.g., Tools: Google Cloud CLI, Terraform, kubectl, helm]
6.2. Step-by-step deployment instructions
[E.g., Terraform init and apply for infra setup]
[E.g., Install KubeRay operator on GKE and submit chunking job]
[E.g., Connect to Postgres, verify pgvector extension, test query flow]
7. Validation plan
[Details of the steps to verify that the generated solution meets the workload's requirements. Also include references to any validation scripts that were generated.]
8. References
[Links to useful and authoritative resources, such as relevant Google Cloud documentation pages.]
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Needs an MCP server
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Publisher
- Google (Official)
- Source
- google/skills · skills/cloud/google-cloud-solution-rag-enterprise-search-gke-sqldb · commit 2194d3b
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Google or Google.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download google-cloud-solution-rag-enterprise-search-gke-sqldb.zip