Generated banner for Google Cloud Solution Hybrid Search Alloydb
Generated logo for Google Cloud Solution Hybrid Search Alloydb

Google Cloud Solution Hybrid Search Alloydb

GoogleOfficialPublished by Google

  • Skill
  • Workflow
  • Software development
  • Apache-2.0
  • No issues found

From the author

Discovers requirements and generates architectural, design, and deployment guidance for dynamic hybrid search systems by combining semantic search and keyword search. Optimized for AlloyDB hybrid search use cases in Google Cloud. Use when users need vector search combined with structured SQL filtering, faceted attributes, semantic reranking, in-database AI validation, or serverless hosting across transactional relational databases, analytical data warehouses, or managed database engines. DON'T use this skill for simple keyword-only search, or when a standalone non-relational vector database is required.
— the description by Google

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

This skill guides users through a comprehensive, multi-phase workflow to architect and implement hybrid search systems. It combines semantic vector search with structured SQL filtering, faceted metadata, and AI-driven reranking within AlloyDB. The process ensures a secure, scalable, and high-performance deployment by strictly following requirements discovery, architectural design, validation, and implementation steps.

What it does

  • Facilitates requirements gathering for hybrid search workloads.
  • Generates tailored solution architectures for AlloyDB-based search.
  • Provides best practices for security, reliability, and performance.
  • Produces deployment scripts for database extensions and infrastructure.
  • Includes static and runtime validation plans to ensure system integrity.
  • Consolidates design artifacts into a final architecture guide.

When to use it

  • When building search systems requiring both vector similarity and structured SQL filtering.
  • When implementing semantic reranking or in-database AI validation.
  • When deploying hybrid search solutions on Google Cloud AlloyDB.
  • When you need a structured, step-by-step approach to cloud architecture design.

Advantages

  • Ensures architectural consistency through strict phase-based guidance.
  • Promotes security by integrating IAM and database-native access controls.
  • Provides clear paths for both ingestion and serving pipelines.
  • Reduces risk through mandatory validation and approval checkpoints.

Usage examples

“I need to build a hybrid search system for my e-commerce product catalog using AlloyDB.”
The agent will initiate Phase 1, asking for functional requirements like catalog size and search modalities, and non-functional requirements like latency and security targets.
“Can you design an architecture for a hybrid search system that uses vector search and SQL filters?”
The agent will guide you through the requirements discovery phase first, ensuring all constraints are understood before proposing a specific architecture diagram.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/google/google-cloud-solution-hybrid-search-alloydb/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip google-cloud-solution-hybrid-search-alloydb.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by Google

Dynamic Hybrid Search using AlloyDB

This skill provides a workflow to design and implement secure, low-latency, and high-accuracy hybrid search solutions combining structured dataset filtering, vector search indexing, faceted metadata filtering, semantic reranking, recall evaluation, in-database AI validation, database abstraction layers, and serverless application hosting.

Attribution

MUST READ: Before executing any gcloud, REST API, or MCP command, you MUST read and follow the instructions in Usage Attribution.

Overview of the workflow

The workflow consists of the following phases:

  1. Requirements discovery. Gather detailed requirements related to the cloud workload or use case that the user needs assistance for.

  2. Solution architecture. Use the requirements that were gathered in Phase 1 to generate a detailed solution architecture for the cloud workload or use case.

  3. Solution validation. Create a plan to validate the generated solution, generate validation instructions and scripts, and run the validation.

  4. Solution packaging and presentation. Consolidate the generated content and present the solution.

Important notes about the workflow:

  • Strict phase separation: During Phase 1 (Requirements discovery), when you ask the user clarifying questions, DON'T recommend, propose, or outline any architectural designs, cloud services, or component mappings. This prevents premature architecture commitments or hallucinations before the full scope is understood.

  • Halting for approval: For any step where you are instructed to "obtain approval before proceeding", you MUST stop executing, present the completed tasks to the user, and wait for their explicit approval. You MUST NOT proceed to execute any subsequent tasks or generate any further guidance in that response.

  • Ground all generated content: For all tasks across all phases, you MUST first look in the following resources:

Product Renaming & Terminology

When generating solution designs, architecture diagrams, and documentation, check the latest Google Cloud documentation for the most up-to-date product names. The table below provides examples of name mappings to be aware of. Note that underlying APIs, Terraform resources, and IAM roles may retain their legacy identifiers.

<table> <thead> <tr> <th>Legacy Name</th> <th>Updated Name</th> <th>Notes</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>Vertex AI</td> <td>Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform</td> <td>Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform can be shortened to Agent Platform after first instance</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Vertex AI Embedding</td> <td>Text embedding on Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform</td> <td>This refers to the text embedding models available on Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Vertex AI Matching Engine</td> <td>Vector Search</td> <td></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

Phase 1: Requirements discovery

In this phase, you must gather detailed requirements related to the hybrid search workload that the user wants to design and deploy in Google Cloud.

Acknowledge provided requirements: If the user's prompt already contains some requirements (functional or non-functional, such as catalog size, search modalities, faceted attributes, or latency targets), you MUST explicitly acknowledge and restate all of these requirements in your response. Do NOT ask the user to describe or re-describe any requirements that they have already provided in the prompt.

Complete the following steps strictly in the specified order:

  • [ ] [ ] Step 1: Ask the user to describe the functional requirements of the workload, including catalog dataset details (e.g., e-commerce apparel, retail products, patent database), search modalities (natural language text, visual search, attribute filters), metadata attributes for faceted filtering (e.g., category, sub_category, color, gender, price), and quality checks (reranking, LLM validation).

  • [ ] [ ] Step 2: You MUST explicitly ask the user to describe ALL of the following six categories of non-functional requirements. You need this information because each category represents a critical architectural pillar, and neglecting any of them can result in a solution that is insecure, unreliable, or inefficient (do NOT omit any of them):

    • Security, privacy, and compliance: E.g., private VPC endpoints, Private Service Connect, Direct VPC Egress, and access control.

    • Reliability: E.g., high availability, failover, disaster recovery goals (RTO/RPO), regional vs multi-region AlloyDB topology.

    • Cost: E.g., budget constraints for compute, database instances, and Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform API calls.

    • Operational excellence: E.g., monitoring, logging, dashboards, and automated deployment.

    • Performance: E.g., target P95 query latency (e.g., < 100ms), vector search recall target (e.g., > 95%), catalog item scale, and QPS expectations.

    • Sustainability: E.g., carbon footprint, low-carbon region selection.

  • [ ] [ ] Step 3: Ask the user whether the workload currently runs on other cloud providers or on-premises.

    • If the user's answer is "yes", then ask the user to describe the architecture of the current deployment.

    • If the user's answer is "no", then proceed to the next step.

  • [ ] [ ] Step 4: Ask the user to describe dependencies, if any, on other workloads, products, or tools (e.g., existing inventory databases, ERP systems, application runtime languages like Java or Python).

  • [ ] [ ] Step 5: Review the input that the user has provided so far, and check whether there are any ambiguities, conflicts, or contradictions in the functional requirements, non-functional requirements, and dependencies. You MUST compare all requirements against each other to identify any conflicts.

    If you identify any ambiguities, conflicts, or contradictions in the requirements that the user has provided, you MUST do the following for each ambiguity, conflict, or contradiction:

    • [ ] Identify exactly where each contradiction lies and explain to the user why the requirements are incompatible and cannot be simultaneously satisfied. Do NOT treat fundamental contradictions as design choice questions (e.g., asking how to implement or configure a conflicting requirement).

    • [ ] Ask the user to clarify their trade-off preferences to resolve the contradiction.

    • [ ] If the user delegates the choice to you (e.g., the user replies with "do what you think is best" or "you decide"), then provide a clear suggestion to resolve the ambiguity or contradiction, explain your reasoning, and ask the user to approve your suggestion.

    Critical: Until all the ambiguities and contradictions that you identify are resolved according to the preceding guidance, you must NOT recommend or generate any architecture design or Google Cloud product recommendations.

  • [ ] [ ] Step 6: Summarize the functional and non-functional requirements provided by the user into a consolidated requirements summary.

  • [ ] [ ] Step 7: Present the generated requirements summary to the user and obtain approval (the user MUST explicitly say "yes" or "I approve") before proceeding to Phase 2.

Important: STOP, DON'T proceed to generate architecture diagram, architecture description or product recommendations until you have confirmed the generated requirements summary and resolved all ambiguities and contradictions in this phase.

Phase 2: Solution architecture

Task 2.1: Identify Google Cloud products and features required for the workload.
  • [ ] [ ] Step 1: Recommend products and features that are appropriate for each component of the user's workload, prioritizing Google Cloud products.

    Important: The Google Cloud products and features that you recommend MUST be consistent with the guidance in Product Mapping.

  • [ ] [ ] Step 4: Present the generated product recommendations to the user and obtain approval (the user MUST explicitly say "yes" or "I approve") before proceeding to Task 2.2.

    Important: STOP, DON'T proceed to generate architecture diagram until you have confirmed the generated product recommendations with the user.

Task 2.2: Generate an architecture diagram and description
  • [ ] [ ] Step 1: Generate an architecture diagram in the Mermaid format: https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid.

    The diagram must show the data flows and request flows across the components of the architecture, based on the gathered requirements and product recommendations. The diagram MUST explicitly show both the ingestion pipeline and serving pipeline.

    The following is an example of the data flows and request flows that the architecture diagram should show:

    • Ingestion pipeline: Catalog Data -> AlloyDB Table (apparels) -> B-Tree Indexes on Facets -> Text embedding (text-embedding-005) -> ScaNN Vector Index.

    • Serving pipeline: User Browser -> Cloud Run Web App -> MCP Toolbox for Databases -> AlloyDB Single-Query Hybrid Search (ScaNN Vector Search + SQL WHERE Filters) -> ai.rank Reranker -> Gemini Pro ai.generate Quality Validation -> Validated Results -> User Browser.

  • [ ] [ ] Step 2: Generate a description that explains the purpose of each component, the relationships between the components, and the task flow or data flow.

  • [ ] [ ] Step 3: Present the generated architecture diagram and description to the user and obtain approval (the user MUST explicitly say "yes" or "I approve") before proceeding to Task 2.3.

    Important: STOP, DON'T proceed to generate design recommendations until you have confirmed the generated architecture description with the user.

Task 2.3: Generate design recommendations.
  • [ ] [ ] Step 1: Generate design recommendations and best practices to optimally configure each component in the architecture based on the workload requirements.

    Important:

    • When you generate design recommendations, consider the following:

      • Functional requirements that were gathered in Phase 1.

      • Non-functional requirements that were gathered in Phase 1.

    • Align the generated design recommendations with the recommendations in Design Recommendations.

    • To generate guidance for the non-functional requirements, use the following skills:

      • google-cloud-waf-security

      • google-cloud-waf-reliability

      • google-cloud-waf-cost-optimization

      • google-cloud-waf-operational-excellence

      • google-cloud-waf-performance-optimization

      • google-cloud-waf-sustainability

  • [ ] [ ] Step 2: Present the generated recommendations to the user and obtain approval (the user MUST explicitly say "yes" or "I approve") before proceeding to Task 2.4.

    Important: STOP, DON'T proceed to generate deployment guidance until you have confirmed the design recommendations with the user.

Task 2.4: Generate deployment guidance.
  • [ ] [ ] Step 1: Generate guidance to deploy the solution, including the following:

    • AlloyDB DDL & SQL setup scripts for extensions (google_ml_integration, alloydb_scan), tables, B-Tree indexes, ScaNN vector indexes, hybrid search SQL, and Gemini validation CTEs.

    • MCP Toolbox deployment configuration on Cloud Run.

    • Python Cloud Run Function shim deployment command.

    • Application deployment command (gcloud run deploy {app_name}).

    • Terraform code or gcloud CLI commands to create required infrastructure.

    Important: The deployment guidance that you generate MUST be consistent with the guidance in the following resources:

  • [ ] [ ] Step 2: Present the generated deployment guidance to the user and obtain approval (the user MUST explicitly say "yes" or "I approve") before proceeding to Phase 3.

    Important: STOP, DON'T proceed to generate solution validation until you have confirmed the deployment guidance with the user.

Phase 3: Solution validation

Task 3.1: Pre-deployment validation
  • [ ] Step 1: Create a pre-deployment plan to statically validate the generated solution and verify that it meets the workload requirements without provisioning live resources:

    • Deployment dry-run: Validate infrastructure syntax and preview the resources that will be provisioned using dry-run commands (e.g., terraform plan or (where supported) gcloud ... --dry-run).

    • Architecture & policy analysis: Perform static verification of network routing topologies, firewall rules, and IAM enforcement against best practices.

  • [ ] Step 2: Present the static validation plan to the user, obtain approval (the user MUST explicitly say "yes" or "I approve"), and execute the dry-run commands.

  • [ ] Step 3: Troubleshoot and fix any errors or policy discrepancies identified during dry-run checks until validation succeeds.

  • [ ] Step 4: Proceed to Task 3.2

Task 3.2: Runtime validation (Post-deployment)
  • [ ] Step 1: Ask the user whether they choose to deploy the infrastructure now to perform live runtime verification, or skip directly to Phase 4.

  • [ ] Step 2: If the user chooses to deploy the infrastructure:

    • After the user deploys the infrastructure, generate runtime verification commands (using tools like curl, ping, or gcloud) and provide them to the user to execute, to test live endpoint reachability, networking paths, and load balancer routing.

    • Troubleshoot any deployment or runtime routing issues until checks pass.

  • [ ] Step 3: Proceed to Phase 4.

Phase 4: Solution packaging and presentation

  • [ ] Step 1: Consolidate the final text artifacts that were generated in Phase 2 into a single Markdown file named solution-architecture-guide.md, based on the template in Output Template.

  • [ ] Step 2: Request the user's permission to write the code files in the user's workspace.

  • [ ] Step 3: After the user gives permission, write the final code files in the user's workspace.

Files

references/product-mapping.md

Product Mapping Guidance for Hybrid Search Solutions

Use the guidance in this file to do the following:

  • Recommend appropriate products and features for the components of the hybrid search system

  • Explain the rationale and trade-offs for each recommendation.

ComponentProduct / Architecture OptionLine hints
Database & Vector Search StoreAlloyDB for PostgreSQL (AlloyDB AI) (Primary)Lines 24-39
Database & Vector Search StoreBigQuery Vector Search (Alt 1)Lines 41-67
Database & Vector Search StoreCloud SQL (Alt 2)Lines 69-86
Vector Embeddings EngineText embeddings on Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform (Primary)Lines 90-98
Vector Embeddings EngineSelf-hosted embedding model (Alt 1)Lines 100-109
Database Abstraction & Agentic ToolingMCP Toolbox for Databases (Primary)Lines 113-124
Database Abstraction & Agentic ToolingManaged Google Cloud Remote MCP Servers (Alt 1)Lines 126-139
Database Abstraction & Agentic ToolingRemote Custom MCP Servers Hosted on Cloud Run (Alt 2)Lines 141-152
Web Application HostingCloud Run (Primary)Lines 156-165
Networking & Security TopologyRegional External Application Load Balancer and Direct VPC Egress (Primary)Lines 169-177

<a id="database-vector-search-store"></a>Database & Vector Search Store

<a id="alloydb-for-postgresql-alloydb-ai"></a>Primary Recommendation: AlloyDB for PostgreSQL (AlloyDB AI)
  • Description: Fully managed, PostgreSQL-compatible relational database designed for demanding enterprise workloads, equipped with built-in ScaNN vector indexing and Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform integration using google_ml_integration.

  • Advantages:

    • ScaNN index algorithm delivers up to 4x faster vector search queries than standard HNSW/IVFFlat at high recall.

    • In-database vector embeddings (embedding('text-embedding-005', ...)), reranking (ai.rank), and LLM calls (ml_predict_row) eliminate data movement outside the database boundary.

    • Integrated evaluate_query_recall function provides automated, in-database accuracy measurement.

    • Single SQL query seamlessly combines vector similarity ordering with structured relational filters (WHERE category = ANY(...)).

<a id="bigquery-vector-search"></a>Alternative 1: BigQuery Vector Search
  • Description: Enterprise data warehouse and lakehouse platform featuring native hybrid search (AI.SEARCH with mode => 'HYBRID', and VECTOR_SEARCH with lexical_search_columns), batch embedding generation (AI.GENERATE_EMBEDDING), autonomous background embeddings (AI.EMBED), and ScaNN (TREE_AH) / IVF vector indexing (CREATE VECTOR INDEX).

  • Advantages:

    • Scales to billions of rows across structured tables, unstructured documents (ObjectRef), and data lakehouses without infrastructure management.

    • Provides native SQL hybrid search functions: AI.SEARCH (TVF combining vector similarity with lexical search on autonomous embedding tables) and VECTOR_SEARCH (with lexical_search_columns).

    • Accelerates hybrid search with CREATE VECTOR INDEX supporting ScaNN (TREE_AH) and Inverted File (IVF) algorithms with STORING clauses for metadata pre-filtering and join elimination.

    • Includes Gemini in BigQuery for AI-assisted data exploration, conversational analytics with custom data agents, automated data insights, and natural language SQL/Python code generation.

    • Supports both batch embedding generation across very large tables via AI.GENERATE_EMBEDDING (TVF) and continuous autonomous maintenance via AI.EMBED stored generated columns.

    • Ideal for gigabyte to petabyte-scale analytical RAG, log analytics, audience segmentation, and batch hybrid search entirely in standard SQL (vs low-latency transactional OLTP in AlloyDB).

  • Resources (Only put into context if the user selects this alternative product):

    • https://docs.cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/vector-search-intro.md.txt

    • https://docs.cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/gemini-overview.md.txt

    • https://docs.cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/reference/standard-sql/bigqueryml-syntax-ai-search.md.txt

    • https://docs.cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/vector-index.md.txt

<a id="cloud-sql"></a>Alternative 2: Cloud SQL
  • Description: Fully managed relational database service offering native vector search (VECTOR data type, ScaNN TREE_SQ indexing, approx_distance and vector_distance functions) for MySQL, and pgvector for PostgreSQL.

  • Advantages:

    • Lower entry cost and simpler operational setup for small to medium workloads (less than 10M rows).

    • Fully transactionally consistent, real-time ACID-compliant vector index updates during DML operations.

    • Supports ScaNN algorithm and iterative filtering (cloudsql_vector_iterative_filtering) for ANN similarity queries in Cloud SQL for MySQL.

  • Resources (Only put into context if the user selects this alternative product):

    • https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/mysql/vector-search.md.txt

    • https://docs.cloud.google.com/sql/docs/mysql/integrate-cloud-sql-with-vertex-ai.md.txt

<a id="vector-embeddings-engine"></a>Vector Embeddings Engine

<a id="text-embeddings-on-gemini-enterprise-agent-platform"></a>Primary Recommendation: Text embeddings on Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform
  • Description: Managed text embedding model producing 768-dimensional dense vector representations optimized for semantic search and retrieval.

  • Advantages:

    • Directly invocable from SQL inside AlloyDB, BigQuery, and Cloud SQL.

    • High semantic accuracy across multi-lingual and domain-specific retail search queries.

    • Fully managed scaling and zero model server maintenance.

<a id="self-hosted-embedding-model"></a>Alternative 1: Self-hosted embedding model
  • Description: Custom-deployed open-source or fine-tuned text embedding model hosted on Cloud Run or Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform.

  • Advantages: Complete control over customized fine-tuned open-source models.

  • Resources (Only put into context if the user selects this alternative product):

    • https://docs.cloud.google.com/gemini-enterprise-agent-platform/models/model-garden/self-deployed-models.md.txt

    • https://docs.cloud.google.com/run/docs/deploying.md.txt

<a id="database-abstraction-agentic-tooling"></a>Database Abstraction & Agentic Tooling

<a id="mcp-toolbox-for-databases"></a>Primary Recommendation: MCP Toolbox for Databases
  • Description: Model Context Protocol (MCP) Toolbox is an open source Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that connects your AI agents, IDEs, and applications directly to your enterprise databases.

  • Advantages:

    • Decouples database execution and complex hybrid search SQL logic from application code.

    • Exposes clean REST/MCP tool endpoints for AI agents and application services.

    • Supports agentic tool integration out of the box with custom tools that enforce tenant isolation boundaries.

<a id="managed-google-cloud-remote-mcp-servers"></a>Alternative 1: Managed Google Cloud Remote MCP Servers
  • Description: Fully managed remote MCP servers provided by Google Cloud (managed via Agent Registry) offering built-in IAM governance, Model Armor security scanning, and pre-packaged toolsets for Google Cloud services.

  • Advantages:

    • Zero server infrastructure management; built-in IAM authentication, fine-grained access policies, and Model Armor prompt injection protection.

    • Exposes tools, prompts, and resources via standardized MCP discovery (tools/list).

  • Resources (Only put into context if the user selects this alternative product):

    • https://docs.cloud.google.com/mcp/overview.md.txt

<a id="remote-custom-mcp-servers-hosted-on-cloud-run"></a>Alternative 2: Remote Custom MCP Servers Hosted on Cloud Run
  • Description: Custom MCP servers built using open-source SDKs (TypeScript, Python, Go, FastMCP) deployed on Cloud Run using streamable HTTP or Server-Sent Events (SSE) transport.

  • Advantages:

    • Complete flexibility to implement custom tools, prompts, and resources tailored to hybrid search applications.

    • Supports serverless auto-scaling, sidecar deployment alongside AI agents, and service-to-service IAM authentication (roles/run.invoker).

  • Resources (Only put into context if the user selects this alternative product):

    • https://docs.cloud.google.com/run/docs/host-mcp-servers.md.txt

<a id="web-application-hosting"></a>Web Application Hosting

<a id="cloud-run"></a>Primary Recommendation: Cloud Run
  • Description: Fully managed serverless container platform that automatically scales compute instances based on incoming traffic.

  • Advantages:

    • Scales to zero when idle; seamlessly handles traffic bursts.

    • Native integration with Direct VPC Egress for secure private connection to AlloyDB.

    • Supports any containerized web framework (Java Spring Boot, Python FastAPI, Node.js).

<a id="networking-security-topology"></a>Networking & Security Topology

<a id="regional-external-application-load-balancer-and-direct-vpc-egress"></a>Primary Recommendation: Regional External Application Load Balancer and Direct VPC Egress
  • Description: Edge load balancer providing Cloud Armor DDoS/WAF protection, routing traffic to Cloud Run services configured with Direct VPC Egress to communicate with AlloyDB over private IP ranges.

  • Advantages:

    • Strict physical and network isolation for database tier.

    • Cloud Armor protection against SQL injection and web threats.

Requirements and compatibility

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Needs: Needs an MCP server

Security

No issues found by our static scan· No issues found

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Published by
Google
Publisher
Google (Official)
Source
google/skills · skills/cloud/google-cloud-solution-hybrid-search-alloydb · commit 2194d3b
Licence
Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Google or Google.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download google-cloud-solution-hybrid-search-alloydb.zip