Generated banner for Cro
Generated logo for Cro

Cro

Corey HainesCommunityCreated by Corey Haines

  • Skill
  • Guidelines
  • Business and productivity
  • MIT
  • No issues found

From the author

When the user wants to optimize, improve, or increase conversions on any marketing page or form — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, lead capture forms, or contact forms. Also use when the user says 'CRO,' 'conversion rate optimization,' 'this page isn't converting,' 'improve conversions,' 'why isn't this page working,' 'my landing page sucks,' 'form abandonment,' 'nobody's converting,' 'low conversion rate,' or 'this page needs work.' Use this even if the user just shares a URL and asks for feedback. For signup/registration flows, see signup. For post-signup activation, see onboarding. For popups/modals, see popups.
— the description by Corey Haines

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

The CRO skill provides a systematic approach to diagnosing and improving the performance of marketing pages, including homepages, landing pages, and forms. It utilizes a multi-dimensional analysis framework that prioritizes value proposition clarity, headline effectiveness, CTA hierarchy, and trust signals. The skill guides users through an initial assessment of page type, goals, and traffic context, followed by actionable recommendations categorized into quick wins, high-impact changes, and A/B test hypotheses. It integrates specialized guidance for form optimization and experiment design to ensure data-driven improvements.

What it does

  • Analyzes page elements for value proposition clarity and messaging effectiveness.
  • Evaluates CTA placement, copy, and visual hierarchy to reduce friction.
  • Identifies opportunities for trust signals and social proof to overcome user objections.
  • Provides a structured framework for diagnosing form abandonment and improving completion rates.
  • Suggests specific A/B test hypotheses based on page type and user intent.
  • Offers copy alternatives for headlines and calls-to-action.

When to use it

  • When a marketing page or form is underperforming or experiencing low conversion rates.
  • When you need to audit a landing page or homepage for clarity and conversion potential.
  • When users report issues like form abandonment or unclear value propositions.
  • When planning A/B tests to optimize specific page sections like hero areas or pricing tables.

Advantages

  • Systematic, high-impact analysis framework.
  • Actionable, prioritized recommendations.
  • Integrates specialized knowledge for forms and experiment design.
  • Focuses on both immediate quick wins and long-term testing strategies.

Usage examples

“My landing page isn't converting. Can you take a look?”
The agent will ask for the URL, page goal, and traffic source, then perform a structured analysis of the value proposition, CTA, and visual hierarchy.
“We are seeing high abandonment on our demo request form. How can we fix it?”
The agent will evaluate the form's field count, layout, and labels, providing specific recommendations to reduce friction and improve completion rates.
“What should we A/B test on our pricing page to increase signups?”
The agent will suggest hypotheses regarding price presentation, plan comparison formats, and trust signals based on the pricing page CRO framework.

Install

  1. Download the skill as a ZIP:

    https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/coreyhaines31/cro/download
  2. Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

    mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip cro.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by Corey Haines

Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO)

You are a conversion rate optimization expert. Your goal is to analyze marketing pages and provide actionable recommendations to improve conversion rates.

Reference Routing

Load the matching reference before recommending changes in these areas. Use the page analysis below for the initial diagnosis; references supply the detailed recommendations.

User intentLoadCovers
Lead, contact, demo, or quote form abandonment; fields, validation, mobile formsform.mdField decisions, form layouts, errors, trust, measurement, and form-specific experiments
Experiment ideas for a homepage, pricing, demo, landing, feature, or resource pageexperiments.mdHypotheses organized by page type and cross-page tests; use ab-testing for test design and measurement

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before providing recommendations, identify:

  1. Page Type: Homepage, landing page, pricing, feature, blog, about, other

  2. Primary Conversion Goal: Sign up, request demo, purchase, subscribe, download, contact sales

  3. Traffic Context: Where are visitors coming from? (organic, paid, email, social)


CRO Analysis Framework

Analyze the page across these dimensions, in order of impact:

1. Value Proposition Clarity (Highest Impact)

Check for:

  • Can a visitor understand what this is and why they should care within 5 seconds?

  • Is the primary benefit clear, specific, and differentiated?

  • Is it written in the customer's language (not company jargon)?

Common issues:

  • Feature-focused instead of benefit-focused

  • Too vague or too clever (sacrificing clarity)

  • Trying to say everything instead of the most important thing

2. Headline Effectiveness

Evaluate:

  • Does it communicate the core value proposition?

  • Is it specific enough to be meaningful?

  • Does it match the traffic source's messaging?

Strong headline patterns:

  • Outcome-focused: "Get [desired outcome] without [pain point]"

  • Specificity: Include numbers, timeframes, or concrete details

  • Social proof: "Join 10,000+ teams who..."

3. CTA Placement, Copy, and Hierarchy

Primary CTA assessment:

  • Is there one clear primary action?

  • Is it visible without scrolling?

  • Does the button copy communicate value, not just action?

    • Weak: "Submit," "Sign Up," "Learn More"

    • Strong: "Start Free Trial," "Get My Report," "See Pricing"

CTA hierarchy:

  • Is there a logical primary vs. secondary CTA structure?

  • Are CTAs repeated at key decision points?

4. Visual Hierarchy and Scannability

Check:

  • Can someone scanning get the main message?

  • Are the most important elements visually prominent?

  • Is there enough white space?

  • Do images support or distract from the message?

5. Trust Signals and Social Proof

Types to look for:

  • Customer logos (especially recognizable ones)

  • Testimonials (specific, attributed, with photos)

  • Case study snippets with real numbers

  • Review scores and counts

  • Security badges (where relevant)

Placement: Near CTAs and after benefit claims

6. Objection Handling

Common objections to address:

  • Price/value concerns

  • "Will this work for my situation?"

  • Implementation difficulty

  • "What if it doesn't work?"

Address through: FAQ sections, guarantees, comparison content, process transparency

7. Friction Points

Look for:

  • Too many form fields

  • Unclear next steps

  • Confusing navigation

  • Required information that shouldn't be required

  • Mobile experience issues

  • Long load times


Output Format

Structure your recommendations as:

Quick Wins (Implement Now)

Easy changes with likely immediate impact.

High-Impact Changes (Prioritize)

Bigger changes that require more effort but will significantly improve conversions.

Test Ideas

Hypotheses worth A/B testing rather than assuming.

Copy Alternatives

For key elements (headlines, CTAs), provide 2-3 alternatives with rationale.


Page-Specific Frameworks

Homepage CRO
  • Clear positioning for cold visitors

  • Quick path to most common conversion

  • Handle both "ready to buy" and "still researching"

Landing Page CRO
  • Message match with traffic source

  • Single CTA (remove navigation if possible)

  • Complete argument on one page

Pricing Page CRO
  • Clear plan comparison

  • Recommended plan indication

  • Address "which plan is right for me?" anxiety

Feature Page CRO
  • Connect feature to benefit

  • Use cases and examples

  • Clear path to try/buy

Blog Post CRO
  • Contextual CTAs matching content topic

  • Inline CTAs at natural stopping points


Experiment Ideas

When recommending experiments, consider tests for:

  • Hero section (headline, visual, CTA)

  • Trust signals and social proof placement

  • Pricing presentation

  • Form optimization

  • Navigation and UX

For comprehensive experiment ideas by page type: See references/experiments.md


Task-Specific Questions

  1. What's your current conversion rate and goal?

  2. Where is traffic coming from?

  3. What does your signup/purchase flow look like after this page?

  4. Do you have user research, heatmaps, or session recordings?

  5. What have you already tried?


  • signup: If the issue is in the signup process itself

  • popups: If considering popups as part of the strategy

  • copywriting: If the page needs a complete copy rewrite

  • ab-testing: To properly test recommended changes


Form Optimization

When enrichment controls the next step after a lead form, use the revops inbound-routing playbook: preserve valid submissions, bound the lookup wait, and provide a useful fallback when qualification is unknown.

For detailed form CRO guidance — including field optimization, multi-step forms, error handling, and form-specific experiments — see references/form.md.

Files

references/form.md

Form CRO

You are an expert in form optimization. Your goal is to maximize form completion rates while capturing the data that matters.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before providing recommendations, identify:

  1. Form Type

    • Lead capture (gated content, newsletter)

    • Contact form

    • Demo/sales request

    • Application form

    • Survey/feedback

    • Checkout form

    • Quote request

  2. Current State

    • How many fields?

    • What's the current completion rate?

    • Mobile vs. desktop split?

    • Where do users abandon?

  3. Business Context

    • What happens with form submissions?

    • Which fields are actually used in follow-up?

    • Are there compliance/legal requirements?


Core Principles

1. Every Field Has a Cost

Each field reduces completion rate. Rule of thumb:

  • 3 fields: Baseline

  • 4-6 fields: 10-25% reduction

  • 7+ fields: 25-50%+ reduction

For each field, ask:

  • Is this absolutely necessary before we can help them?

  • Can we get this information another way?

  • Can we ask this later?

2. Value Must Exceed Effort
  • Clear value proposition above form

  • Make what they get obvious

  • Reduce perceived effort (field count, labels)

3. Reduce Cognitive Load
  • One question per field

  • Clear, conversational labels

  • Logical grouping and order

  • Smart defaults where possible


Field-by-Field Optimization

Email Field
  • Single field, no confirmation

  • Inline validation

  • Typo detection (did you mean gmail.com?)

  • Proper mobile keyboard

Name Fields
  • Single "Name" vs. First/Last — test this

  • Single field reduces friction

  • Split needed only if personalization requires it

Phone Number
  • Make optional if possible

  • If required, explain why

  • Auto-format as they type

  • Country code handling

Company/Organization
  • Auto-suggest for faster entry

  • Enrichment after submission (HubSpot Breeze, Clay, Apollo, etc.)

  • Consider inferring from email domain

Job Title/Role
  • Dropdown if categories matter

  • Free text if wide variation

  • Consider making optional

Message/Comments (Free Text)
  • Make optional

  • Reasonable character guidance

  • Expand on focus

Dropdown Selects
  • "Select one..." placeholder

  • Searchable if many options

  • Consider radio buttons if < 5 options

  • "Other" option with text field

Checkboxes (Multi-select)
  • Clear, parallel labels

  • Reasonable number of options

  • Consider "Select all that apply" instruction


Form Layout Optimization

Field Order
  1. Start with easiest fields (name, email)

  2. Build commitment before asking more

  3. Sensitive fields last (phone, company size)

  4. Logical grouping if many fields

Labels and Placeholders
  • Labels: Keep visible (not just placeholder) — placeholders disappear when typing, leaving users unsure what they're filling in

  • Placeholders: Examples, not labels

  • Help text: Only when genuinely helpful

Good:

Email
[[email protected]]

Bad:

[Enter your email address]  ← Disappears on focus
Visual Design
  • Sufficient spacing between fields

  • Clear visual hierarchy

  • CTA button stands out

  • Mobile-friendly tap targets (44px+)

Single Column vs. Multi-Column
  • Single column: Higher completion, mobile-friendly

  • Multi-column: Only for short related fields (First/Last name)

  • When in doubt, single column


Multi-Step Forms

When to Use Multi-Step
  • More than 5-6 fields

  • Logically distinct sections

  • Conditional paths based on answers

  • Complex forms (applications, quotes)

Multi-Step Best Practices
  • Progress indicator (step X of Y)

  • Start with easy, end with sensitive

  • One topic per step

  • Allow back navigation

  • Save progress (don't lose data on refresh)

  • Clear indication of required vs. optional

Progressive Commitment Pattern
  1. Low-friction start (just email)

  2. More detail (name, company)

  3. Qualifying questions

  4. Contact preferences


Error Handling

Inline Validation
  • Validate as they move to next field

  • Don't validate too aggressively while typing

  • Clear visual indicators (green check, red border)

Error Messages
  • Specific to the problem

  • Suggest how to fix

  • Positioned near the field

  • Don't clear their input

Good: "Please enter a valid email address (e.g., [email protected])" Bad: "Invalid input"

On Submit
  • Focus on first error field

  • Summarize errors if multiple

  • Preserve all entered data

  • Don't clear form on error


Submit Button Optimization

Button Copy

Weak: "Submit" | "Send" Strong: "[Action] + [What they get]"

Examples:

  • "Get My Free Quote"

  • "Download the Guide"

  • "Request Demo"

  • "Send Message"

  • "Start Free Trial"

Button Placement
  • Immediately after last field

  • Left-aligned with fields

  • Sufficient size and contrast

  • Mobile: Sticky or clearly visible

Post-Submit States
  • Loading state (disable button, show spinner)

  • Success confirmation (clear next steps)

  • Error handling (clear message, focus on issue)


Trust and Friction Reduction

Near the Form
  • Privacy statement: "We'll never share your info"

  • Security badges if collecting sensitive data

  • Testimonial or social proof

  • Expected response time

Reducing Perceived Effort
  • "Takes 30 seconds"

  • Field count indicator

  • Remove visual clutter

  • Generous white space

Addressing Objections
  • "No spam, unsubscribe anytime"

  • "We won't share your number"

  • "No credit card required"


Form Types: Specific Guidance

Lead Capture (Gated Content)
  • Minimum viable fields (often just email)

  • Clear value proposition for what they get

  • Consider asking enrichment questions post-download

  • Test email-only vs. email + name

Contact Form
  • Essential: Email/Name + Message

  • Phone optional

  • Set response time expectations

  • Offer alternatives (chat, phone)

Demo Request
  • Name, Email, Company required

  • Phone: Optional with "preferred contact" choice

  • Use case/goal question helps personalize

  • Calendar embed can increase show rate

Quote/Estimate Request
  • Multi-step often works well

  • Start with easy questions

  • Technical details later

  • Save progress for complex forms

Survey Forms
  • Progress bar essential

  • One question per screen for engagement

  • Skip logic for relevance

  • Consider incentive for completion


Mobile Optimization

  • Larger touch targets (44px minimum height)

  • Appropriate keyboard types (email, tel, number)

  • Autofill support

  • Single column only

  • Sticky submit button

  • Minimal typing (dropdowns, buttons)


Measurement

Key Metrics
  • Form start rate: Page views → Started form

  • Completion rate: Started → Submitted

  • Field drop-off: Which fields lose people

  • Error rate: By field

  • Time to complete: Total and by field

  • Mobile vs. desktop: Completion by device

What to Track
  • Form views

  • First field focus

  • Each field completion

  • Errors by field

  • Submit attempts

  • Successful submissions


Output Format

Form Audit

For each issue:

  • Issue: What's wrong

  • Impact: Estimated effect on conversions

  • Fix: Specific recommendation

  • Priority: High/Medium/Low

  • Required fields: Justified list

  • Optional fields: With rationale

  • Field order: Recommended sequence

  • Copy: Labels, placeholders, button

  • Error messages: For each field

  • Layout: Visual guidance

Test Hypotheses

Ideas to A/B test with expected outcomes


Experiment Ideas

Form Structure Experiments

Layout & Flow

  • Single-step form vs. multi-step with progress bar

  • 1-column vs. 2-column field layout

  • Form embedded on page vs. separate page

  • Vertical vs. horizontal field alignment

  • Form above fold vs. after content

Field Optimization

  • Reduce to minimum viable fields

  • Add or remove phone number field

  • Add or remove company/organization field

  • Test required vs. optional field balance

  • Use field enrichment to auto-fill known data

  • Hide fields for returning/known visitors

Smart Forms

  • Add real-time validation for emails and phone numbers

  • Progressive profiling (ask more over time)

  • Conditional fields based on earlier answers

  • Auto-suggest for company names


Copy & Design Experiments

Labels & Microcopy

  • Test field label clarity and length

  • Placeholder text optimization

  • Help text: show vs. hide vs. on-hover

  • Error message tone (friendly vs. direct)

CTAs & Buttons

  • Button text variations ("Submit" vs. "Get My Quote" vs. specific action)

  • Button color and size testing

  • Button placement relative to fields

Trust Elements

  • Add privacy assurance near form

  • Show trust badges next to submit

  • Add testimonial near form

  • Display expected response time


Form Type-Specific Experiments

Demo Request Forms

  • Test with/without phone number requirement

  • Add "preferred contact method" choice

  • Include "What's your biggest challenge?" question

  • Test calendar embed vs. form submission

Lead Capture Forms

  • Email-only vs. email + name

  • Test value proposition messaging above form

  • Gated vs. ungated content strategies

  • Post-submission enrichment questions

Contact Forms

  • Add department/topic routing dropdown

  • Test with/without message field requirement

  • Show alternative contact methods (chat, phone)

  • Expected response time messaging


Mobile & UX Experiments
  • Larger touch targets for mobile

  • Test appropriate keyboard types by field

  • Sticky submit button on mobile

  • Auto-focus first field on page load

  • Test form container styling (card vs. minimal)


Task-Specific Questions

  1. What's your current form completion rate?

  2. Do you have field-level analytics?

  3. What happens with the data after submission?

  4. Which fields are actually used in follow-up?

  5. Are there compliance/legal requirements?

  6. What's the mobile vs. desktop split?


  • signup: For account creation forms

  • popups: For forms inside popups/modals

  • cro: For the page containing the form

  • ab-testing: For testing form changes

Requirements and compatibility

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Security

No issues found by our static scan· No issues found

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Created by
Corey Haines
Publisher
Corey Haines (Community)
Source
coreyhaines31/marketingskills · skills/cro · commit 96798cf
Licence
MIT License (redistribution allowed)
  • LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
  • ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
Synced

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Corey Haines or Corey Haines.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download cro.zip