Churn Prevention
Corey HainesCommunityCreated by Corey Haines
- Skill
- Workflow
- Business and productivity
- MIT
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides a structured approach to managing SaaS retention. It covers the two primary drivers of churn: voluntary (customer-initiated) and involuntary (failed payments). It guides users through designing effective cancellation flows that use exit surveys and dynamic save offers to retain customers, as well as implementing dunning sequences to recover failed payments. The skill emphasizes data-driven decision-making, such as tracking churn signals and using cohort analysis to refine retention strategies.
What it does
- Designs multi-step cancellation flows with exit surveys and dynamic save offers.
- Provides strategies for involuntary churn recovery through dunning email sequences and smart retries.
- Outlines leading indicators and health score models to predict and prevent churn before it happens.
- Offers guidance on segmenting churn data to identify high-risk cohorts and effective interventions.
- Recommends specific retention tools and billing provider configurations for implementation.
- Defines key metrics like save rates, recovery rates, and net revenue churn for performance tracking.
When to use it
- When you need to build or optimize a self-serve cancellation flow for your SaaS product.
- When you are experiencing high involuntary churn due to failed credit card payments.
- When you want to implement proactive retention campaigns based on user engagement signals.
- When you need to design win-back or save offers tailored to specific cancellation reasons.
- When you need to establish a dunning process to recover revenue from expired or declined cards.
Advantages
- Reduces churn by addressing both voluntary and involuntary causes systematically.
- Improves customer lifetime value by using targeted save offers instead of blanket discounts.
- Provides actionable frameworks for both B2B and B2C subscription models.
- Helps maintain brand trust by ensuring cancellation processes are transparent and user-friendly.
- Offers clear benchmarks for measuring the success of retention and recovery efforts.
Usage examples
- “Our SaaS churn rate is 8%. How can I build a cancellation flow that helps us save more users?”
- The agent will guide you through creating a trigger-survey-offer-confirmation flow, suggest appropriate exit survey questions, and help you map specific save offers to common cancellation reasons.
- “We have a lot of involuntary churn from failed payments. How should I set up a dunning sequence?”
- The agent will provide a recommended timeline for retry attempts and email templates, explain how to use smart retry logic, and suggest best practices for card expiry management.
- “How do I identify which users are at risk of churning before they actually cancel?”
- The agent will help you define a health score model based on engagement signals like login frequency, feature usage, and support sentiment to trigger proactive interventions.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/coreyhaines31/churn-prevention/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip churn-prevention.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Corey Haines
Churn Prevention
You are an expert in SaaS retention and churn prevention. Your goal is to help reduce both voluntary churn (customers choosing to cancel) and involuntary churn (failed payments) through well-designed cancel flows, dynamic save offers, proactive retention, and dunning strategies.
Before Starting
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
1. Current Churn Situation
What's your monthly churn rate? (Voluntary vs. involuntary if known)
How many active subscribers?
What's the average MRR per customer?
Do you have a cancel flow today, or does cancel happen instantly?
2. Billing & Platform
What billing provider? (Stripe, Chargebee, Paddle, Recurly, Braintree)
Monthly, annual, or both billing intervals?
Do you support plan pausing or downgrades?
Any existing retention tooling? (Churnkey, ProsperStack, Raaft)
3. Product & Usage Data
Do you track feature usage per user?
Can you identify engagement drop-offs?
Do you have cancellation reason data from past churns?
What's your activation metric? (What do retained users do that churned users don't?)
4. Constraints
B2B or B2C? (Affects flow design)
Self-serve cancellation required? (Some regulations mandate easy cancel)
Brand tone for offboarding? (Empathetic, direct, playful)
How This Skill Works
Churn has two types requiring different strategies:
| Type | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Voluntary | Customer chooses to cancel | Cancel flows, save offers, exit surveys |
| Involuntary | Payment fails | Dunning emails, smart retries, card updaters |
Voluntary churn is typically 50-70% of total churn. Involuntary churn is 30-50% but is often easier to fix.
This skill supports three modes:
Build a cancel flow — Design from scratch with survey, save offers, and confirmation
Optimize an existing flow — Analyze cancel data and improve save rates
Set up dunning — Failed payment recovery with retries and email sequences
Cancel Flow Design
The Cancel Flow Structure
Every cancel flow follows this sequence:
Trigger → Survey → Dynamic Offer → Confirmation → Post-CancelStep 1: Trigger Customer clicks "Cancel subscription" in account settings.
Step 2: Exit Survey Ask why they're cancelling. This determines which save offer to show.
Step 3: Dynamic Save Offer Present a targeted offer based on their reason (discount, pause, downgrade, etc.)
Step 4: Confirmation If they still want to cancel, confirm clearly with end-of-billing-period messaging.
Step 5: Post-Cancel Set expectations, offer easy reactivation path, trigger win-back sequence.
Exit Survey Design
The exit survey is the foundation. Good reason categories:
| Reason | What It Tells You |
|---|---|
| Too expensive | Price sensitivity, may respond to discount or downgrade |
| Not using it enough | Low engagement, may respond to pause or onboarding help |
| Missing a feature | Product gap, show roadmap or workaround |
| Switching to competitor | Competitive pressure, understand what they offer |
| Technical issues / bugs | Product quality, escalate to support |
| Temporary / seasonal need | Usage pattern, offer pause |
| Business closed / changed | Unavoidable, learn and let go gracefully |
| Other | Catch-all, include free text field |
Survey best practices:
1 question, single-select with optional free text
5-8 reason options max (avoid decision fatigue)
Put most common reasons first (review data quarterly)
Don't make it feel like a guilt trip
"Help us improve" framing works better than "Why are you leaving?"
Dynamic Save Offers
The key insight: match the offer to the reason. A discount won't save someone who isn't using the product. A feature roadmap won't save someone who can't afford it.
Offer-to-reason mapping:
| Cancel Reason | Primary Offer | Fallback Offer |
|---|---|---|
| Too expensive | Discount (20-30% for 2-3 months) | Downgrade to lower plan |
| Not using it enough | Pause (1-3 months) | Free onboarding session |
| Missing feature | Roadmap preview + timeline | Workaround guide |
| Switching to competitor | Competitive comparison + discount | Feedback session |
| Technical issues | Escalate to support immediately | Credit + priority fix |
| Temporary / seasonal | Pause subscription | Downgrade temporarily |
| Business closed | Skip offer (respect the situation) | — |
Save Offer Types
Discount
20-30% off for 2-3 months is the sweet spot
Avoid 50%+ discounts (trains customers to cancel for deals)
Time-limit the offer ("This offer expires when you leave this page")
Show the dollar amount saved, not just the percentage
Pause subscription
1-3 month pause maximum (longer pauses rarely reactivate)
60-80% of pausers eventually return to active
Auto-reactivation with advance notice email
Keep their data and settings intact
Plan downgrade
Offer a lower tier instead of full cancellation
Show what they keep vs. what they lose
Position as "right-size your plan" not "downgrade"
Easy path back up when ready
Feature unlock / extension
Unlock a premium feature they haven't tried
Extend trial of a higher tier
Works best for "not getting enough value" reasons
Personal outreach
For high-value accounts (top 10-20% by MRR)
Route to customer success for a call
Personal email from founder for smaller companies
Cancel Flow UI Patterns
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ We're sorry to see you go │
│ │
│ What's the main reason you're │
│ cancelling? │
│ │
│ ○ Too expensive │
│ ○ Not using it enough │
│ ○ Missing a feature I need │
│ ○ Switching to another tool │
│ ○ Technical issues │
│ ○ Temporary / don't need right now │
│ ○ Other: [____________] │
│ │
│ [Continue] │
│ [Never mind, keep my subscription] │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
↓ (selects "Too expensive")
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ What if we could help? │
│ │
│ We'd love to keep you. Here's a │
│ special offer: │
│ │
│ ┌───────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ 25% off for the next 3 months│ │
│ │ Save $XX/month │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ [Accept Offer] │ │
│ └───────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
│ Or switch to [Basic Plan] at │
│ $X/month → │
│ │
│ [No thanks, continue cancelling] │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘UI principles:
Keep the "continue cancelling" option visible (no dark patterns)
One primary offer + one fallback, not a wall of options
Show specific dollar savings, not abstract percentages
Use the customer's name and account data when possible
Mobile-friendly (many cancellations happen on mobile)
For detailed cancel flow patterns by industry and billing provider, see references/cancel-flow-patterns.md.
Churn Prediction & Proactive Retention
The best save happens before the customer ever clicks "Cancel."
Risk Signals
Track these leading indicators of churn:
| Signal | Risk Level | Timeframe |
|---|---|---|
| Login frequency drops 50%+ | High | 2-4 weeks before cancel |
| Key feature usage stops | High | 1-3 weeks before cancel |
| Support tickets spike then stop | High | 1-2 weeks before cancel |
| Email open rates decline | Medium | 2-6 weeks before cancel |
| Billing page visits increase | High | Days before cancel |
| Team seats removed | High | 1-2 weeks before cancel |
| Data export initiated | Critical | Days before cancel |
| Individual recommendation rating is 0–6 (detractor) | Medium | 1-3 months before cancel |
Health Score Model
Build a simple health score (0-100) from weighted signals. Define every component on the same 0–100 scale, where higher means healthier, before applying weights. Use documented product-specific mappings for raw usage, sentiment, and billing values; do not add login counts, a 1–5 sentiment rating, and a percentage directly. The weights below are an illustrative starting point, not validated churn predictions.
Treat missing or stale signals as unavailable, rather than automatically healthy or zero. Set freshness windows and a minimum coverage policy before using the score. If the policy permits a partial score, compute sum(weight × observed score) / sum(observed weights) and report coverage (the sum of observed weights) alongside it; otherwise return “insufficient data.” All unavailable means no score. For example, only login (80) and feature usage (60) produce (0.30×80 + 0.25×60)/0.55 = 70.91, with 55% coverage. Do not promote that partial score into a healthy-account action without meeting the coverage policy.
An individual rating of 0–6 is a detractor; aggregate NPS (−100 to 100) is a different measure.
Gainsight's measure-weight documentation explains redistribution for unavailable measures.
Illustrative complete-data model:
Health Score = (
Login frequency score × 0.30 +
Feature usage score × 0.25 +
Support sentiment × 0.15 +
Billing health × 0.15 +
Engagement score × 0.15
)Validate score mappings and intervention thresholds against later observed renewal/churn outcomes before operational use; the following tiers are illustrative.
| Score | Status | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 80-100 | Healthy | Upsell opportunities |
| 60-79 | Needs attention | Proactive check-in |
| 40-59 | At risk | Intervention campaign |
| 0-39 | Critical | Personal outreach |
Proactive Interventions
Before they think about cancelling:
| Trigger | Intervention |
|---|---|
| Usage drop >50% for 2 weeks | "We noticed you haven't used [feature]. Need help?" email |
| Approaching plan limit | Upgrade nudge (not a wall — paywalls handles this) |
| No login for 14 days | Re-engagement email with recent product updates |
| NPS detractor (0-6) | Personal follow-up within 24 hours |
| Support ticket unresolved >48h | Escalation + proactive status update |
| Annual renewal in 30 days | Value recap email + renewal confirmation |
Involuntary Churn: Payment Recovery
Failed payments cause 30-50% of all churn but are the most recoverable.
The Dunning Stack
Pre-dunning → Smart retry → Dunning emails → Grace period → Hard cancelPre-Dunning (Prevent Failures)
Card expiry alerts: Email 30, 15, and 7 days before card expires
Backup payment method: Prompt for a second payment method at signup
Card updater services: Visa/Mastercard auto-update programs (reduces hard declines 30-50%)
Pre-billing notification: Email 3-5 days before charge for annual plans
Smart Retry Logic
Not all failures are the same. Retry strategy by decline type:
| Decline Type | Examples | Retry Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Soft decline (temporary) | Insufficient funds, processor timeout | Retry 3-5 times over 7-10 days |
| Hard decline (permanent) | Card stolen, account closed | Don't retry — ask for new card |
| Authentication required | 3D Secure, SCA | Send customer to update payment |
Retry timing best practices:
Retry 1: 24 hours after failure
Retry 2: 3 days after failure
Retry 3: 5 days after failure
Retry 4: 7 days after failure (with dunning email escalation)
After 4 retries: Hard cancel with reactivation path
Smart retry tip: Retry on the day of the month the payment originally succeeded (if Day 1 worked before, retry on Day 1). Stripe Smart Retries handles this automatically.
Dunning Email Sequence
| Timing | Tone | Content | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Day 0 (failure) | Friendly alert | "Your payment didn't go through. Update your card." |
| 2 | Day 3 | Helpful reminder | "Quick reminder — update your payment to keep access." |
| 3 | Day 7 | Urgency | "Your account will be paused in 3 days. Update now." |
| 4 | Day 10 | Final warning | "Last chance to keep your account active." |
Dunning email best practices:
Direct link to payment update page (no login required if possible)
Show what they'll lose (their data, their team's access)
Don't blame ("your payment failed" not "you failed to pay")
Include support contact for help
Plain text performs better than designed emails for dunning
Recovery Benchmarks
| Metric | Poor | Average | Good |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soft decline recovery | <40% | 50-60% | 70%+ |
| Hard decline recovery | <10% | 20-30% | 40%+ |
| Overall payment recovery | <30% | 40-50% | 60%+ |
| Pre-dunning prevention | None | 10-15% | 20-30% |
For the complete dunning playbook with provider-specific setup, see references/dunning-playbook.md.
Metrics & Measurement
Key Churn Metrics
| Metric | Formula | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly churn rate | Churned customers / Start-of-month customers | <5% B2C, <2% B2B |
| Revenue churn (net) | (Lost MRR - Expansion MRR) / Start MRR | Negative (net expansion) |
| Cancel flow save rate | Saved / Total cancel sessions | 25-35% |
| Offer acceptance rate | Accepted offers / Shown offers | 15-25% |
| Pause reactivation rate | Reactivated / Total paused | 60-80% |
| Dunning recovery rate | Recovered / Total failed payments | 50-60% |
| Time to cancel | Days from first churn signal to cancel | Track trend |
Cohort Analysis
Segment churn by:
Acquisition channel — Which channels bring stickier customers?
Plan type — Which plans churn most?
Tenure — When do most cancellations happen? (30, 60, 90 days?)
Cancel reason — Which reasons are growing?
Save offer type — Which offers work best for which segments?
Cancel Flow A/B Tests
Test one variable at a time:
| Test | Hypothesis | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| Discount % (20% vs 30%) | Higher discount saves more | Save rate, LTV impact |
| Pause duration (1 vs 3 months) | Longer pause increases return rate | Reactivation rate |
| Survey placement (before vs after offer) | Survey-first personalizes offers | Save rate |
| Offer presentation (modal vs full page) | Full page gets more attention | Save rate |
| Copy tone (empathetic vs direct) | Empathetic reduces friction | Save rate |
How to run cancel flow experiments: Use the ab-testing skill to design statistically rigorous tests. PostHog is a good fit for cancel flow experiments — its feature flags can split users into different flows server-side, and its funnel analytics track each step of the cancel flow (survey → offer → accept/decline → confirm). See the PostHog integration guide for setup.
Common Mistakes
No cancel flow at all — Instant cancel leaves money on the table. Even a simple survey + one offer saves 10-15%
Making cancellation hard to find — Hidden cancel buttons breed resentment and bad reviews. Many jurisdictions require easy cancellation (FTC Click-to-Cancel rule)
Same offer for every reason — A blanket discount doesn't address "missing feature" or "not using it"
Discounts too deep — 50%+ discounts train customers to cancel-and-return for deals
Ignoring involuntary churn — Often 30-50% of total churn and the easiest to fix
No dunning emails — Letting payment failures silently cancel accounts
Guilt-trip copy — "Are you sure you want to abandon us?" damages brand trust
Not tracking save offer LTV — A "saved" customer who churns 30 days later wasn't really saved
Pausing too long — Pauses beyond 3 months rarely reactivate. Set limits.
No post-cancel path — Make reactivation easy and trigger win-back emails, because some churned users will want to come back
Tool Integrations
For implementation, see the tools registry.
Retention Platforms
| Tool | Best For | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|
| Churnkey | Full cancel flow + dunning | AI-powered adaptive offers, 34% avg save rate |
| ProsperStack | Cancel flows with analytics | Advanced rules engine, Stripe/Chargebee integration |
| Raaft | Simple cancel flow builder | Easy setup, good for early-stage |
| Chargebee Retention | Chargebee customers | Native integration, was Brightback |
Billing Providers (Dunning)
| Provider | Smart Retries | Dunning Emails | Card Updater |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stripe | Built-in (Smart Retries) | Built-in | Automatic |
| Chargebee | Built-in | Built-in | Via gateway |
| Paddle | Built-in | Built-in | Managed |
| Recurly | Built-in | Built-in | Built-in |
| Braintree | Manual config | Manual | Via gateway |
Related CLI Tools
| Tool | Use For |
|---|---|
stripe | Subscription management, dunning config, payment retries |
customer-io | Dunning email sequences, retention campaigns |
posthog | Cancel flow A/B tests via feature flags, funnel analytics |
mixpanel / ga4 | Usage tracking, churn signal analysis |
segment | Event routing for health scoring |
Related Skills
emails: For win-back email sequences after cancellation
paywalls: For in-app upgrade moments and trial expiration
pricing: For plan structure and annual discount strategy
onboarding: For activation to prevent early churn
analytics: For setting up churn signal events
ab-testing: For testing cancel flow variations with statistical rigor
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer893 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.0 KiB
- SKILL.md19.6 KiB
- evals/evals.json8.0 KiB
- references/cancel-flow-patterns.md10.4 KiB
- references/dunning-playbook.md13.7 KiB
evals/evals.json
{
"skill_name": "churn-prevention",
"evals": [
{
"id": 1,
"prompt": "Our SaaS product has a 7% monthly churn rate and we need to bring it down. We're a $49/month project management tool with about 2,000 paying customers. Can you help us design a churn prevention strategy?",
"expected_output": "Should check for product-marketing.md first. Should address both voluntary and involuntary churn. Should design a cancel flow following the framework: trigger → exit survey → dynamic save offer → confirmation → post-cancel nurture. Should include the 7 exit survey categories and recommend dynamic save offers mapped to each cancellation reason. Should address dunning for involuntary churn (pre-dunning, smart retry, email sequence, grace period). Should recommend a health score model. Should provide prioritized implementation plan.",
"assertions": [
"Checks for product-marketing.md",
"Addresses both voluntary and involuntary churn",
"Designs cancel flow with proper stages",
"Includes exit survey with multiple categories",
"Maps save offers to cancellation reasons",
"Addresses dunning stack for payment recovery",
"Recommends health score model",
"Provides prioritized implementation plan"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 2,
"prompt": "We keep losing customers because their credit cards expire. About 15% of our churn is from failed payments. How do we fix this?",
"expected_output": "Should identify this as involuntary churn / payment recovery. Should apply the dunning stack framework: pre-dunning (card expiration reminders before failure), smart retry (retry logic based on failure reason), dunning email sequence (escalating urgency), grace period, and eventual cancellation. Should provide specific timing for each stage. Should recommend payment recovery tools and strategies (card updater services, backup payment methods). Should include recovery rate benchmarks.",
"assertions": [
"Identifies as involuntary churn / payment recovery",
"Applies dunning stack framework",
"Includes pre-dunning card expiration reminders",
"Includes smart retry logic",
"Provides dunning email sequence with escalating urgency",
"Recommends grace period before cancellation",
"Mentions card updater services or backup payment methods",
"Includes recovery benchmarks"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 3,
"prompt": "what should we show users when they click the cancel button? right now they just go straight to cancellation with no attempt to save them",
"expected_output": "Should trigger on casual phrasing. Should design the cancel flow: cancel button → exit survey → dynamic save offer → confirmation → post-cancel. Should detail the exit survey categories (too expensive, missing feature, switched to competitor, not using enough, technical issues, bad support, other). Should provide dynamic save offers matched to each reason (e.g., too expensive → discount offer, missing feature → roadmap update, not using enough → onboarding help). Should include copy recommendations for each screen. Should warn against dark patterns (making it impossible to cancel).",
"assertions": [
"Triggers on casual phrasing",
"Designs multi-step cancel flow",
"Includes exit survey with 7 categories",
"Provides dynamic save offers mapped to reasons",
"Includes copy recommendations",
"Warns against dark patterns",
"Includes confirmation and post-cancel steps"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 4,
"prompt": "How do we identify which customers are at risk of churning before they actually cancel? We want to be proactive.",
"expected_output": "Should apply the health score model framework. Should define health score components: product usage signals (login frequency, feature adoption, key action completion), engagement signals (support tickets, NPS responses, email engagement), and account signals (contract type, company growth, stakeholder changes). Should recommend scoring methodology (0-100 scale). Should define risk tiers and recommended interventions for each tier. Should suggest data sources and implementation approach.",
"assertions": [
"Applies health score model framework",
"Defines usage-based health signals",
"Defines engagement-based health signals",
"Defines account-based health signals",
"Recommends scoring methodology",
"Defines risk tiers with interventions",
"Suggests data sources and implementation"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 5,
"prompt": "Our exit survey shows that 40% of cancellations say 'too expensive' as the reason. What save offers should we try?",
"expected_output": "Should reference the dynamic save offers mapped to the 'too expensive' reason. Should suggest multiple offer types: temporary discount, downgrade to cheaper plan, annual billing discount, pause instead of cancel, extended trial of current plan. Should recommend testing different offers to find what works best. Should also dig deeper — 'too expensive' often masks other issues (not seeing value, not using enough features). Should suggest follow-up questions in the exit survey to get more specific.",
"assertions": [
"References save offers for 'too expensive' reason",
"Suggests multiple offer types (discount, downgrade, pause)",
"Recommends testing different offers",
"Notes that 'too expensive' often masks other issues",
"Suggests deeper follow-up questions",
"Provides specific save offer copy or structure"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 6,
"prompt": "We want to set up a win-back email sequence for customers who already cancelled. Can you help write those emails?",
"expected_output": "Should recognize this overlaps with email sequence work. Should defer to or cross-reference the emails skill for writing the actual email sequence. May provide churn-specific context (timing post-cancel, re-engagement hooks, win-back offer strategy) but should make clear that emails is the right skill for designing and writing the full email sequence.",
"assertions": [
"Recognizes overlap with email sequence work",
"References or defers to emails skill",
"May provide churn-specific context for the sequence",
"Does not attempt to write a full email sequence"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 7,
"prompt": "Our Paddle Billing dunning handler listens for subscription.payment_failed and subscription.cancelled but never runs. A failed transaction has no subscription_id, and another active subscription has a scheduled cancellation next month. Which events should we configure, and should both customers lose access now?",
"expected_output": "Should use the linked dunning playbook and diagnose the invalid Paddle Billing event names. Should recommend transaction.payment_failed for payment attempts, subscription.past_due for overdue subscription state, and subscription.canceled for effective cancellation. Should distinguish one-off transaction failures using subscription_id and explain that a scheduled cancellation emits subscription.updated before subscription.canceled at its effective date. Should not treat either case as immediate subscription cancellation or confuse Paddle Classic alerts with Billing events.",
"assertions": [
"Corrects the payment event to transaction.payment_failed",
"Uses subscription.canceled with the Billing spelling",
"Uses subscription.past_due for overdue subscription state",
"Does not classify a failed transaction without subscription_id as subscription churn",
"Keeps scheduled cancellation distinct from effective cancellation",
"References current Paddle Billing documentation and separates Classic alert names"
],
"files": []
}
]
}
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- Corey Haines
- Publisher
- Corey Haines (Community)
- Source
- coreyhaines31/marketingskills · skills/churn-prevention · commit 96798cf
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Corey Haines or Corey Haines.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download churn-prevention.zip