AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
The gcp-to-aws skill provides a deterministic, multi-phase process to migrate Google Cloud Platform (GCP) workloads to AWS. It supports infrastructure migration via Terraform analysis and AI workload migration by mapping models to Amazon Bedrock. The skill enforces a strict state machine, requiring discovery, clarification, design, estimation, and generation phases to ensure a reliable migration path. It includes specific logic for handling hybrid stacks, AI provider transitions, and complex infrastructure clustering.
What it does
- Discovers GCP resources from Terraform, application code, or billing data.
- Clarifies migration requirements through a structured questionnaire.
- Designs AWS architecture based on GCP workload types and AI model requirements.
- Estimates costs for the proposed AWS infrastructure and AI services.
- Generates migration artifacts including Terraform configurations and AI provider adapters.
- Provides specialized guidance for migrating AI workloads from Gemini or OpenAI to Amazon Bedrock.
When to use it
- When you need to migrate existing GCP infrastructure to AWS.
- When you are looking to move AI-driven applications from GCP or OpenAI to Amazon Bedrock.
- When you have Terraform files or billing exports and need a structured migration plan.
- When you require a step-by-step, validated approach to re-platforming cloud services.
Advantages
- Enforces a rigorous, fail-closed state machine to prevent skipped steps.
- Provides intelligent mapping of GCP services to AWS equivalents.
- Includes specific logic for AI workload migration and model compatibility.
- Supports multi-signal discovery using IaC, code, and billing data.
- Ensures consistent artifact generation through a structured 6-phase process.
Usage examples
- “Migrate my GKE and Cloud SQL setup to AWS.”
- The agent initiates the discovery phase, analyzing your Terraform files to identify GKE and Cloud SQL resources, then guides you through the clarification and design phases for EKS and RDS.
- “I need to move my LangChain app from OpenAI to Bedrock.”
- The agent identifies the AI workload, selects the best-fit Bedrock model family, and generates the necessary provider adapters and migration documentation.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/cline/gcp-to-aws/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip gcp-to-aws.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Cline
GCP-to-AWS Migration Skill
Philosophy
Re-platform by default: Select AWS services that match GCP workload types (e.g., Cloud Run → Fargate, Cloud SQL → RDS).
Dev sizing unless specified: Default to development-tier capacity (e.g., db.t4g.micro, single AZ). Upgrade only on user direction.
No human one-time migration costs: Do not present human labor, professional services, or people-time work as dollar estimates or "one-time migration cost" budget categories. Vendor charges grounded in data (for example GCP data transfer egress in the infra estimate when billing exists) are allowed.
Multi-signal approach: Design phase adapts based on available inputs — Terraform IaC for infrastructure, billing data for service mapping, and app code for AI workload detection.
BigQuery /
google_bigquery_*: The skill does not recommend a specific AWS analytics or warehouse service. During Clarify, if discovery shows BigQuery (IaCgoogle_bigquery_*and/or billing rows for BigQuery), you must surface the specialist advisory before Design (seereferences/phases/clarify/clarify.md). Design output usesDeferred — specialist engagement; keep directing the user to their AWS account team and/or a data analytics migration partner through Design, Estimate, and docs (seereferences/phases/design/design-infra.mdBigQuery specialist gate).
Definitions
"Load" = Read the file using the Read tool and follow its instructions. Do not summarize or skip sections.
$MIGRATION_DIR= The run-specific directory under.migration/(e.g.,.migration/0226-1430/). Set during Phase 1 (Discover).
Context Loading Rules
Each phase loads reference files on demand. To keep per-turn context manageable and prevent instruction-following degradation:
Budget: Each phase should load no more than ~800 lines of instructions (excluding user artifacts like JSON profiles and MCP tool results).
Conditional loading: Reference files with trigger conditions (e.g.,
agentic_profile.is_agentic == true) MUST NOT be loaded unless the condition is met. Do not speculatively load files.No duplication: Model mapping tables, pricing data, and shared warnings exist in one canonical file. Other files reference them; they do not copy them inline.
Progressive depth: Phase orchestrators (
design.md,generate.md) contain short routing logic that points to detailed sub-files. Load the sub-file only when its path is selected.
Conditional reference files (load ONLY when condition is true):
| File | Condition |
|---|---|
design-refs/ai-gemini-to-bedrock.md | ai-workload-profile.json exists AND summary.ai_source = "gemini" or "both" |
design-refs/ai-openai-to-bedrock.md | ai-workload-profile.json exists AND summary.ai_source = "openai" or "both" |
design-refs/ai-anthropic-to-bedrock.md | ai-workload-profile.json exists AND summary.ai_source = "anthropic" |
design-refs/ai.md | ai-workload-profile.json exists AND summary.ai_source = "other" |
design-refs/design-ref-harness.md | agentic_profile.is_agentic == true AND ai_constraints.agentic.migration_approach == "harness" |
design-refs/design-ref-agentic-to-agentcore.md | agentic_profile.is_agentic == true AND ai_constraints.agentic.migration_approach == "strands" |
shared/retarget-gotchas.md | agentic_profile.is_agentic == true AND ai_constraints.agentic.migration_approach == "retarget" |
When adding new reference files, verify the phase's total loaded instructions remain under budget. If a new file would exceed ~800 lines when combined with other loaded refs, split it or make it conditional.
Hybrid stack budget warning:
When both gcp-resource-inventory.json AND ai-workload-profile.json exist, the combined design refs will approach the ~800-line budget. Output this warning to the user before loading the AI design refs:
"⚠️ This is a large hybrid stack (infrastructure + AI workloads). To ensure complete and accurate recommendations, consider running the migration in two separate passes:
Pass 1 — Infrastructure: Run with only your Terraform files to get infra mapping, Terraform generation, and cost estimates.
Pass 2 — AI workloads: Run with only your application code to get Bedrock model recommendations, provider adapters, and AI migration artifacts.
Continue with the combined run? (Y/N)"
If the user chooses to continue, proceed with the combined run. Load AI refs after infra refs to preserve infra instruction fidelity. If the user declines, stop and instruct them to re-run with a single input source type.
This warning is advisory only — it does not block the run.
Prerequisites
User must provide at least one GCP source:
Terraform IaC:
.tffiles (with optional.tfvars,.tfstate)Application code: Source files with GCP SDK or AI framework imports
Billing data: GCP billing/cost/usage export files (CSV or JSON)
If none of the above are found, stop and ask user to provide at least one source type.
State Machine
This is the execution controller. After completing each phase, consult this table to determine the next action.
| Current State | Condition | Next Action |
|---|---|---|
discover | phases.discover != "completed" | Load references/phases/discover/discover.md |
clarify | phases.discover == "completed" AND phases.clarify != "completed" | Load references/phases/clarify/clarify.md |
design | phases.clarify == "completed" AND phases.design != "completed" | Load references/phases/design/design.md |
estimate | phases.design == "completed" AND phases.estimate != "completed" | Load references/phases/estimate/estimate.md |
generate | phases.estimate == "completed" AND phases.generate != "completed" | Load references/phases/generate/generate.md |
complete | phases.generate == "completed" AND phases.feedback == "pending" | Set phases.feedback to "completed" (user had two chances), then migration complete |
complete | phases.generate == "completed" AND phases.feedback == "completed" | Migration planning complete |
How to determine current state (deterministic):
Read
$MIGRATION_DIR/.phase-status.jsonIf
current_phaseexists, use it (must match one of: discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate, complete)Otherwise use ordered phase evaluation:
discover→clarify→design→estimate→generatePick the first phase in that order where
phases.<phase> != "completed"; if none, state iscomplete
Phase gate checks: If prior phase incomplete, do not advance (e.g., cannot enter estimate without completed design).
Clarify is mandatory: Do not load references/phases/design/design.md, references/phases/estimate/estimate.md, or references/phases/generate/generate.md unless $MIGRATION_DIR/.phase-status.json exists and phases.clarify is exactly "completed". A preferences.json file alone is not sufficient proof that Clarify ran. If the user asks to skip Clarify or jump straight to Design, cost estimate, or artifact generation, refuse briefly, then load references/phases/clarify/clarify.md and run Phase 2. There is no exception for "quick" or "obvious" migrations.
Feedback checkpoints: Feedback is not a sequential phase — it is offered at two interleaved checkpoints (after Discover and after Estimate). See the Feedback Checkpoints section below for details.
Handoff Gate Orchestration (Fail Closed)
Load references/shared/handoff-gates.md when executing any phase completion step.
Single
$MIGRATION_DIR: Use one run directory for the entire migration. Do not mix artifacts across.migration/*/sessions.Re-read from disk: Before each phase (and before each handoff gate), Read required artifacts from
$MIGRATION_DIR/. Do not rely on chat memory.Advance only on
HANDOFF_OK: A phase is complete only when its orchestrator emitsHANDOFF_OK | phase=<name> | artifacts=.... Do not load the next phase without it.On
GATE_FAIL: Output the failure line(s) to the user in plain language. Do NOT modify artifacts to pass the gate. Do NOT continue to the next phase. Tell the user which phase to re-run.Re-entry: Re-running an earlier phase after downstream phases completed requires explicit user confirmation; downstream phases must be reset to
"pending". Seehandoff-gates.mdre-entry table.
Generate phase additionally loads references/shared/validate-artifacts.md before writing migration-report.html.
State Validation
When reading $MIGRATION_DIR/.phase-status.json, validate before proceeding:
Multiple sessions: If multiple directories exist under
.migration/, list them with their phase status and ask: [A] Resume latest, [B] Start fresh, [C] Cancel.Invalid JSON: If
.phase-status.jsonfails to parse, STOP. Output: "State file corrupted (invalid JSON). Delete the file and restart the current phase."Unrecognized phase: If
phasesobject contains a phase not in {discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate, feedback}, STOP. Output: "Unrecognized phase: [value]. Valid phases: discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate, feedback."Unrecognized status: If any
phases.*value is not in {pending, in_progress, completed}, STOP. Output: "Unrecognized status: [value]. Valid values: pending, in_progress, completed."Invalid
current_phase(if present): Ifcurrent_phaseis not in {discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate, complete}, STOP. Output: "Unrecognized current_phase: [value]. Valid values: discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate, complete."Out-of-order completion: For ordered phases [discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate], if any later phase is
"completed"while an earlier phase is not"completed", STOP. Output: "Inconsistent phase ordering detected. Reconcile.phase-status.jsonbefore resuming."Multiple active phases: Across core phases {discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate}, at most one phase may be
"in_progress". If >1, STOP. Output: "Multiple phases are in_progress. Keep only one active phase before resuming."
State Management
Migration state lives in $MIGRATION_DIR (.migration/[MMDD-HHMM]/), created by Phase 1 and persisted across invocations.
.phase-status.json schema:
{
"migration_id": "0226-1430",
"last_updated": "2026-02-26T15:35:22Z",
"current_phase": "design",
"phases": {
"discover": "completed",
"clarify": "completed",
"design": "in_progress",
"estimate": "pending",
"generate": "pending",
"feedback": "pending"
}
}Status values: "pending" → "in_progress" → "completed". Never goes backward.
For core phases (discover, clarify, design, estimate, generate), at most one phase may be "in_progress" at any time.
current_phase is optional but recommended; when present it is authoritative.
The .migration/ directory is automatically protected by a .gitignore file created in Phase 1.
Phase Status Update Protocol
Use read-merge-write updates for .phase-status.json:
Read the current file before every update.
Change only the phase keys being advanced and
last_updated.Keep prior completed phases unchanged.
Set
current_phaseto the next deterministic phase (orcompleteafter generate).Write the full file in the same turn as your final phase work message.
Example — after completing the Clarify phase, write $MIGRATION_DIR/.phase-status.json with:
{
"migration_id": "MMDD-HHMM",
"last_updated": "2026-02-26T15:35:22Z",
"current_phase": "design",
"phases": {
"discover": "completed",
"clarify": "completed",
"design": "pending",
"estimate": "pending",
"generate": "pending",
"feedback": "pending"
}
}Replace MMDD-HHMM with the actual migration ID, generate the last_updated ISO 8601 UTC timestamp yourself, and set each phase to its correct status at that point.
Phase Summary Table
| Phase | Inputs | Outputs | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discover | .tf files, app source code, and/or billing exports (at least one required) | gcp-resource-inventory.json, gcp-resource-clusters.json, ai-workload-profile.json, billing-profile.json, .phase-status.json updated (outputs vary by input) | references/phases/discover/discover.md |
| Clarify | Discovery artifacts (gcp-resource-inventory.json, gcp-resource-clusters.json, ai-workload-profile.json, billing-profile.json — whichever exist) | preferences.json, .phase-status.json updated | references/phases/clarify/clarify.md |
| Design | preferences.json + discovery artifacts | aws-design.json (infra), aws-design-ai.json (AI), aws-design-billing.json (billing-only) | references/phases/design/design.md |
| Estimate | aws-design.json or aws-design-billing.json or aws-design-ai.json, preferences.json | estimation-infra.json or estimation-ai.json or estimation-billing.json, .phase-status.json updated | references/phases/estimate/estimate.md |
| Generate | estimation-infra.json or estimation-ai.json or estimation-billing.json, aws-design.json or aws-design-billing.json or aws-design-ai.json, preferences.json | generation-infra.json or generation-ai.json or generation-billing.json + terraform/, scripts/, ai-migration/, validation-report.json (when infra route active), MIGRATION_GUIDE.md, README.md, .phase-status.json updated | references/phases/generate/generate.md |
| Feedback | .phase-status.json (discover completed minimum), all existing migration artifacts | feedback.json, trace.json, .phase-status.json updated | references/phases/feedback/feedback.md |
MCP Servers
awspricing (for cost estimation):
Provides
get_pricing,get_pricing_service_codes,get_pricing_service_attributestoolsOnly needed during Estimate phase. Discover and Design do not require it.
Primary pricing source:
references/shared/pricing-cache.md(cached 2026 rates, ±5-10% for infrastructure, ±15-25% for AI models). MCP is secondary — used only for services not found in the cache.
Files in This Skill
gcp-to-aws/
├── SKILL.md ← You are here (orchestrator + state machine)
│
├── references/
│ ├── phases/
│ │ ├── discover/
│ │ │ ├── discover.md # Phase 1: Discover orchestrator
│ │ │ ├── discover-iac.md # Terraform/IaC discovery
│ │ │ ├── discover-app-code.md # App code discovery
│ │ │ └── discover-billing.md # Billing data discovery
│ │ ├── clarify/
│ │ │ ├── clarify.md # Phase 2: Clarify orchestrator
│ │ │ ├── clarify-global.md # Category A: Global/Strategic (Q1-Q7)
│ │ │ ├── clarify-compute.md # Categories B+C: Config Gaps + Compute (Q8-Q11)
│ │ │ ├── clarify-database.md # Category D: Database (Q12–Q13b)
│ │ │ ├── clarify-ai.md # Category F: AI/Bedrock (Q14-Q22)
│ │ │ └── clarify-ai-only.md # Standalone AI-only migration flow
│ │ ├── design/
│ │ │ ├── design.md # Phase 3: Design orchestrator
│ │ │ ├── design-infra.md # Infrastructure design (IaC-based)
│ │ │ ├── design-ai.md # AI workload design (Bedrock)
│ │ │ └── design-billing.md # Billing-only design (fallback)
│ │ ├── estimate/
│ │ │ ├── estimate.md # Phase 4: Estimate orchestrator
│ │ │ ├── estimate-infra.md # Infrastructure cost analysis
│ │ │ ├── estimate-ai.md # AI workload cost analysis
│ │ │ └── estimate-billing.md # Billing-only cost analysis
│ │ ├── generate/
│ │ │ ├── generate.md # Phase 5: Generate orchestrator
│ │ │ ├── generate-infra.md # Infrastructure migration plan
│ │ │ ├── generate-ai.md # AI migration plan
│ │ │ ├── generate-billing.md # Billing-only migration plan
│ │ │ ├── generate-artifacts-infra.md # Terraform configurations
│ │ │ ├── generate-artifacts-scripts.md # Migration scripts
│ │ │ ├── generate-artifacts-ai.md # Provider adapter + test harness
│ │ │ ├── generate-artifacts-billing.md # Skeleton Terraform
│ │ │ └── generate-artifacts-docs.md # MIGRATION_GUIDE.md + README.md
│ │ └── feedback/
│ │ ├── feedback.md # Phase 6: Feedback orchestrator
│ │ └── feedback-trace.md # Anonymized trace builder
│ │
│ ├── design-refs/
│ │ ├── index.md # Lookup table: GCP type → design-ref file
│ │ ├── fast-path.md # Deterministic 1:1 mappings (Pass 1)
│ │ ├── compute.md # Compute mappings (Cloud Run, GCE, GKE, etc.)
│ │ ├── database.md # Database mappings (Cloud SQL, Spanner, etc.)
│ │ ├── storage.md # Storage mappings (GCS, Filestore, etc.)
│ │ ├── networking.md # Networking mappings (VPC, LB, DNS, etc.)
│ │ ├── messaging.md # Messaging mappings (Pub/Sub, etc.)
│ │ └── ai.md # AI mappings (Vertex AI → Bedrock)
│ │
│ ├── clustering/terraform/
│ │ ├── classification-rules.md # Primary/secondary classification
│ │ ├── clustering-algorithm.md # Cluster formation rules
│ │ ├── depth-calculation.md # Topological depth calculation
│ │ └── typed-edges-strategy.md # Edge type assignment
│ │
│ └── shared/
│ ├── schema-phase-status.md # .phase-status.json schema (canonical reference)
│ ├── schema-discover-iac.md # gcp-resource-inventory + clusters schemas (loaded by discover-iac.md)
│ ├── schema-discover-ai.md # ai-workload-profile schema (loaded by discover-app-code.md and discover-iac.md Step 7d)
│ ├── schema-discover-billing.md # billing-profile schema (loaded by discover-billing.md)
│ ├── schema-estimate-infra.md # estimation-infra.json schema (loaded by estimate-infra.md at write time)
│ ├── handoff-gates.md # Fail-closed phase handoff protocol (GATE_FAIL / HANDOFF_OK)
│ ├── validate-artifacts.md # Pre-report validation (Generate Step 0; read-only)
│ ├── migration-complexity.md # Complexity tier definitions (small/medium/large) for timeline scaling
│ ├── pricing-cache.md # Cached AWS + source provider pricing (±5-25%, primary source)
│ └── bedrock-quotas.md # Bedrock TPM/RPM quota awareness, burndown rates, capacity planning| Condition | Action |
|---|---|
No GCP sources found (no .tf, no app code, no billing data) | Stop. Output: "No GCP sources detected. Provide at least one source type (Terraform files, application code, or billing exports) and try again." |
.phase-status.json missing phase gate | Stop. Output: "Cannot enter Phase X: Phase Y-1 not completed. Start from Phase Y or resume Phase Y-1." |
| awspricing unavailable after 3 attempts | Display user warning about ±5-25% accuracy. Use pricing-cache.md. Add pricing_source: "cached_fallback" to the applicable estimation-*.json file. |
| User skips questions or says "use defaults for the rest" | Apply documented defaults for remaining questions in the current batch and all subsequent batches. Phase 2 completes either way. |
aws-design.json missing required clusters | Stop Phase 4. Output: "Re-run Phase 3 to generate missing cluster designs." |
Defaults
IaC output: Terraform configurations, migration scripts, AI migration code, and documentation
Region:
us-east-1(unless user specifies, or GCP region → AWS region mapping suggests otherwise)Sizing: Development tier (e.g.,
db.t4g.microfor databases, 0.5 CPU for Fargate)Migration mode: Adapts based on available inputs (infrastructure, AI, or billing-only)
Cost currency: USD
Timeline assumption: 2-16 weeks depending on migration complexity — small (2-6 weeks), medium (6-12 weeks), large (12-18 weeks). See
references/shared/migration-complexity.mdfor tier definitions.
Workflow Execution
When invoked, the agent MUST follow this exact sequence:
Load phase status: Read
.phase-status.jsonfrom.migration/*/.If missing: Initialize for Phase 1 (Discover)
If exists: Determine current phase using deterministic rules in State Machine
Determine phase to execute:
If
current_phaseexists: execute that phase.Otherwise execute the first non-completed phase in ordered list: discover → clarify → design → estimate → generate.
If all ordered phases are completed: migration is complete (with feedback finalization rule).
Read phase reference: Load the full reference file for the target phase.
Execute ALL steps in order: Follow every numbered step in the reference file. Do not skip, optimize, or deviate.
Validate outputs: Confirm all required output files exist with correct schema before proceeding. Phase orchestrators run Completion Handoff Gate checks per
shared/handoff-gates.md.Handoff gate: Emit
HANDOFF_OKorGATE_FAILpershared/handoff-gates.md. OnGATE_FAIL, stop — do not update phase status or load the next phase.Update phase status: Only after
HANDOFF_OK. Use the Phase Status Update Protocol (read-merge-write) in the same turn as the phase's final output message.Feedback checkpoint: After a phase completes, check if feedback is due (see rules below). This runs before advancing to the next phase.
After Discover (if
phases.feedbackis"pending"): Output to user: "Would you like to share quick feedback (5 optional questions + anonymized usage data) to help improve this tool? Your data never includes resource names, file paths, or account IDs. [A] Send feedback now [B] Wait until after the Estimate phase"If user picks A → Load
references/phases/feedback/feedback.md, execute it, then continue to Clarify.If user picks B → Continue to Clarify (feedback stays
"pending").
After Estimate (if
phases.feedbackis"pending"): Output to user: "Would you like to share quick feedback now? (5 optional questions + anonymized usage data) [A] Yes, share feedback [B] No thanks, continue to Generate"If user picks A → Load
references/phases/feedback/feedback.md, execute it, then continue to Generate.If user picks B → Use the Phase Status Update Protocol to set
phases.feedbackto"completed". Continue to Generate.
After Generate: No feedback offer. If
phases.feedbackis still"pending", use the Phase Status Update Protocol to set it to"completed"(user had two chances and chose to defer/skip).
Display summary: Show user what was accomplished, highlight next phase, or confirm migration completion.
Critical constraint: Agent must strictly adhere to the reference file's workflow. If unable to complete a step, stop and report the exact step that failed.
User can invoke the skill again to resume from current_phase (or deterministic ordered evaluation when current_phase is absent).
Scope Notes
v1.0 includes:
Terraform infrastructure discovery
App code scanning (AI workload detection)
Billing data import from GCP
User requirement clarification (adaptive questions by category)
Multi-path Design (infrastructure, AI workloads, billing-only fallback)
AWS cost estimation (from pricing API or fallback)
Migration artifact generation (Terraform, scripts, AI adapters, documentation)
Optional feedback collection with anonymized telemetry
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer826 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer10.5 KiB
- SKILL.md29.6 KiB
- data/sdk-capability-map.json1.1 KiB
- references/clustering/terraform/classification-rules.md6.5 KiB
- references/clustering/terraform/clustering-algorithm.md7.9 KiB
- references/clustering/terraform/depth-calculation.md4.5 KiB
- references/clustering/terraform/typed-edges-strategy.md4.6 KiB
- references/design-refs/ai-anthropic-to-bedrock.md2.9 KiB
- references/design-refs/ai-gemini-to-bedrock.md15.4 KiB
- references/design-refs/ai-openai-to-bedrock.md17.5 KiB
- references/design-refs/ai.md3.4 KiB
- references/design-refs/compute.md6.8 KiB
- references/design-refs/database.md9.1 KiB
- references/design-refs/design-ref-agentic-to-agentcore.md18.8 KiB
- references/design-refs/design-ref-harness.md7.9 KiB
- references/design-refs/fast-path.md10.3 KiB
- references/design-refs/index.md6.2 KiB
- references/design-refs/messaging.md3.5 KiB
- references/design-refs/networking.md5.5 KiB
- references/design-refs/security.md3.8 KiB
- references/design-refs/storage.md4.7 KiB
- references/phases/clarify/clarify-ai-only.md16.4 KiB
- references/phases/clarify/clarify-ai.md57.7 KiB
- references/phases/clarify/clarify-compute.md10.0 KiB
- references/phases/clarify/clarify-database.md10.8 KiB
- references/phases/clarify/clarify-global.md23.7 KiB
- references/phases/clarify/clarify.md50.5 KiB
- references/phases/design/design-ai.md29.6 KiB
- references/phases/design/design-billing.md12.7 KiB
- references/phases/design/design-infra.md12.8 KiB
- references/phases/design/design.md4.5 KiB
- references/phases/discover/discover-app-code.md41.7 KiB
- references/phases/discover/discover-billing.md7.2 KiB
- references/phases/discover/discover-iac.md33.0 KiB
- references/phases/discover/discover-preview.md19.9 KiB
- references/phases/discover/discover.md11.5 KiB
- references/phases/estimate/estimate-ai.md17.2 KiB
- references/phases/estimate/estimate-billing.md12.4 KiB
- references/phases/estimate/estimate-infra.md46.6 KiB
- references/phases/estimate/estimate.md8.1 KiB
- references/phases/feedback/feedback-trace.md4.5 KiB
- references/phases/feedback/feedback.md3.2 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-ai.md13.5 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-artifacts-ai.md33.6 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-artifacts-billing.md6.1 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-artifacts-docs.md21.0 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-artifacts-infra.md43.2 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-artifacts-report.md40.1 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-artifacts-scripts.md14.5 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-billing.md16.5 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate-infra.md22.0 KiB
- references/phases/generate/generate.md7.9 KiB
- references/shared/ai-migration-guardrails.md6.6 KiB
- references/shared/ai-model-lifecycle.md8.8 KiB
- references/shared/bedrock-quotas.md7.1 KiB
- references/shared/handoff-gates.md4.7 KiB
- references/shared/migration-complexity.md11.0 KiB
- references/shared/pricing-cache.md41.2 KiB
- references/shared/pricing-fallback.md1.5 KiB
- references/shared/retarget-gotchas.md10.9 KiB
- references/shared/schema-discover-ai.md16.7 KiB
- references/shared/schema-discover-billing.md5.0 KiB
- references/shared/schema-discover-iac.md6.9 KiB
- references/shared/schema-estimate-infra.md15.6 KiB
- references/shared/schema-phase-status.md1.2 KiB
- references/shared/terraform-validation.md10.4 KiB
- references/shared/validate-artifacts.md6.2 KiB
references/phases/clarify/clarify-compute.md
Category B — Configuration Gaps + Category C — Compute Model
This file covers two related categories:
Category B — Configuration gaps for billing-source inventories (factual questions to fill inferred data)
Category C — Compute model questions (platform and traffic pattern decisions)
Category B — Configuration Gaps (Billing-Only Mode)
Fire when: billing-profile.json exists AND gcp-resource-inventory.json does NOT exist (billing-only mode).
Skip when: gcp-resource-inventory.json exists (Terraform/IaC provides configuration directly).
These fill factual gaps that billing data alone cannot answer. Answers update the inventory understanding — they do not produce design constraints directly.
Each question fires only when the matching gcp_service_type appears in billing-profile.json → services[]:
Cloud SQL HA: Single-zone or high-availability? (fire if
google_sql_database_instancein billing services)Default: assume Zonal is intentional.
Cloud Run service count: How many distinct services? (fire if
google_cloud_run_servicein billing services)Default: assume 1 service.
Memorystore memory size: How much memory (GB)? (fire if
google_redis_instancein billing services)Default: estimate from usage amount.
Cloud Functions generation: Gen 1 or Gen 2? (fire if
google_cloudfunctions_functionin billing services)Default: assume Gen 1.
Record Category B answers in metadata.inventory_clarifications.
Category C — Compute Model (If Compute Resources Present)
Fire when: Compute resources present (Cloud Run, Cloud Functions, GKE, GCE).
Q8 — How does your team feel about managing Kubernetes?
Fire when: GKE cluster present AND Q5 != A (multi-cloud). Skip when: Q5 = A (already resolved to EKS) or no GKE in inventory.
Rationale: When multi-cloud is not required (Q5=No) and GKE is detected, team sentiment is the deciding factor between EKS and ECS Fargate. This is subjective and cannot be inferred from IaC.
Context for user: When asking, frame it practically so the user gives an honest answer rather than aspirational:
Love it / K8s expert — your team writes Helm charts, debugs CrashLoopBackOff in their sleep, and actively chose K8s
Neutral / Competent — K8s works, your team can operate it, but it's not a passion project
Frustrated / Steep curve — K8s feels like overhead; your team spends more time fighting YAML than shipping features
Your team's Kubernetes experience determines whether we recommend EKS (Kubernetes on AWS) or ECS Fargate (simpler managed containers).
A) Love it / Team is K8s expert B) Neutral / Competent with K8s C) Frustrated / Learning curve steep D) N/A — We don't use Kubernetes E) I don't know
| Answer | Recommendation Impact |
|---|---|
| Love it / K8s expert | EKS recommended — preserves existing Kubernetes investment and expertise |
| Neutral / Competent | EKS recommended with managed node groups to reduce operational burden |
| Frustrated / Steep curve | Strong ECS Fargate recommendation — eliminates Kubernetes management entirely; simpler operational model |
Note: If Q5=Yes (multi-cloud), this question is skipped and EKS is already decided.
Interpret:
A -> kubernetes: "eks-managed" — EKS recommended, preserves K8s investment
B -> kubernetes: "eks-or-ecs" — EKS with managed node groups to reduce operational burden
C -> kubernetes: "ecs-fargate" — Strong ECS Fargate recommendation, eliminates K8s management
D -> (no constraint written — no K8s workloads)
E -> same as default — see IaC-signal default rule belowDefault (IaC-signal driven):
If
gcp-resource-inventory.jsoncontainsgoogle_container_clusterresources → Default C (kubernetes: "ecs-fargate"). Teams that answer "I don't know" are better served by Fargate's lower operational overhead; EKS remains available via explicit answers A and B.If no
google_container_clusterin inventory (Cloud Run, Cloud Functions, or billing-only) → Default C (kubernetes: "ecs-fargate"). No Kubernetes signal; Fargate is the lower-ops starting point.If inventory is absent (billing-only mode) → Default C (
kubernetes: "ecs-fargate").
Rationale: Teams that answer E ("I don't know") have not expressed a Kubernetes preference. Defaulting to Fargate gives them a simpler, lower-ops starting point regardless of what discovery found. Teams who actively want EKS will answer A or B explicitly. EKS remains fully available via explicit answers A and B.
Q9 — Do any of your services need WebSocket support or long-lived connections?
Fire when: Compute resources present AND WebSocket usage cannot be determined from inventory.
Auto-extract signal: Only when application code was analyzed (see Clarify Step 2 item 14). If code was scanned and no WebSocket patterns found, extract websocket: false and skip. If no code was analyzed (Terraform-only), always ask Q9 — do not infer absence of WebSockets.
Rationale: WebSocket support affects load balancer configuration.
WebSocket support affects load balancer configuration. This confirms whether ALB WebSocket configuration is needed in the migration templates.
A) Yes — Real-time features, WebSockets, persistent connections B) No — Standard HTTP/HTTPS only C) I don't know
| Answer | Recommendation Impact |
|---|---|
| Yes — WebSockets needed | ECS Fargate or EKS required; ALB with WebSocket support included in templates |
| No — HTTP only | ECS Fargate recommended for simple stateless services |
Interpret:
A -> websocket: "required" — ALB with WebSocket support, ECS Fargate or EKS required
B -> (no constraint written)
C -> same as default (B) — assume no WebSocket; can be reconfigured laterDefault: B — no constraint.
Q10 — What's your typical traffic pattern for your Cloud Run services?
Fire when: Cloud Run present in inventory. Skip when: no Cloud Run.
Auto-extract signal: When Cloud Run min_instance_count / min_instances > 0 in Terraform config, extract cloud_run_traffic_pattern: "constant-24-7" with chosen_by: "extracted" and skip Q10.
Rationale: Cloud Run's scale-to-zero is its primary cost advantage.
Cloud Run's scale-to-zero is its primary cost advantage. Understanding your traffic pattern helps me determine whether migrating Cloud Run to AWS makes financial sense.
A) Business hours only (9am–5pm weekdays, ~40 hrs/week) B) Active most of the day (16–20 hours, ~120 hrs/week) C) Constant 24/7 traffic (~168 hrs/week) D) N/A — We don't use Cloud Run E) I don't know
| Answer | Recommendation Impact |
|---|---|
| Business hours only | AWS likely 40–50% MORE expensive — recommend staying on Cloud Run or flagging cost increase prominently |
| Active most of day | Moderate cost difference — present both options with cost comparison |
| Constant 24/7 | AWS costs similar or cheaper — ECS Fargate recommended as straightforward migration |
Interpret:
A -> cloud_run_traffic_pattern: "business-hours" — AWS likely 40-50% MORE expensive; flag cost increase
B -> cloud_run_traffic_pattern: "most-of-day" — Moderate cost difference; present both options
C -> cloud_run_traffic_pattern: "constant-24-7" — AWS costs similar or cheaper; ECS Fargate recommended
D -> (no constraint written — Cloud Run not used)
E -> same as default (C) — assume constant traffic for conservative estimateDefault: C — cloud_run_traffic_pattern: "constant-24-7".
Q11 — Approximately how much are you spending on Cloud Run per month?
Fire when: Cloud Run present in inventory. Skip when: no Cloud Run.
Rationale: Absolute spend determines whether the migration math makes financial sense regardless of traffic pattern. Low-spend Cloud Run workloads are rarely worth the migration complexity.
Absolute Cloud Run spend determines whether the migration math makes financial sense regardless of traffic pattern.
A) < $100/month B) $100–$500/month C) $500–$1,500/month D) > $1,500/month E) N/A — We don't use Cloud Run F) I don't know
| Answer | Recommendation Impact |
|---|---|
| < $100/month | Recommend staying on Cloud Run — migration cost and complexity exceeds savings |
| $100–$500/month | Present cost comparison; migration may make sense if consolidating to AWS |
| $500–$1,500/month | Fixed-cost AWS options (ECS Fargate reserved capacity) become attractive |
| > $1,500/month | Strong case for migration to ECS Fargate with Savings Plans or reserved capacity |
Interpret:
A -> cloud_run_monthly_spend: "<$100" — Recommend staying on Cloud Run; migration cost exceeds savings
B -> cloud_run_monthly_spend: "$100-$500" — Present cost comparison; migration may make sense if consolidating
C -> cloud_run_monthly_spend: "$500-$1500" — Fixed-cost AWS options attractive (ECS Fargate reserved)
D -> cloud_run_monthly_spend: ">$1500" — Strong case for ECS Fargate with Savings Plans
E -> (no constraint written)
F -> same as default (B)Default: B — cloud_run_monthly_spend: "$100-$500".
Requirements and compatibility
Written for: Claude Code
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Names Claude Code tools, Needs an MCP server
Security
What our scanner noticed· Low risk
- Instructions that use the network
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Cline
- Publisher
- Cline (Official)
- Source
- cline/skills · skills/gcp-to-aws · commit 2637846
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Cline or Cline.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download gcp-to-aws.zip