AWS Cdk

Construct Patterns

Table of Contents

• Overview

• Scope and Construct IDs

• Choosing Construct Levels

• Mixing L1 and L2

• Cross-Stack References

• Creating Custom Constructs

• Testing CDK Infrastructure

Overview

This reference covers construct selection, composition, cross-stack wiring, and testing patterns. It provides decision frameworks for choosing construct levels, mixing them safely, passing references across stacks, building custom constructs, and verifying infrastructure with assertions.

Scope and Construct IDs

Every construct is created with new SomeConstruct(scope, id, props?). The first two arguments are not interchangeable boilerplate — misusing them is a common review finding.

Scope (first argument)

Inside a construct's constructor, you MUST pass this as the scope of child constructs — NOT the incoming scope argument:

// ❌ INCORRECT — child parented to the wrong node
export class MyConstruct extends Construct {
  constructor(scope: Construct, id: string) {
    super(scope, id);
    new ChildConstruct(scope, 'Child');   // wrong: uses 'scope'
  }
}

// ✅ CORRECT
export class MyConstruct extends Construct {
  constructor(scope: Construct, id: string) {
    super(scope, id);
    new ChildConstruct(this, 'Child');     // 'this' is the parent
  }
}

Passing this makes the child a child of the current construct, which is almost always the intent. A scope other than this is legitimate only when it comes from a function parameter or a local variable used to group constructs (e.g. in App or helper/test stacks).

Construct ID (second argument)

The construct ID is the locally unique identifier within a scope. The IDs between a CloudFormation resource and its containing Stack are concatenated into the resource's logical ID — and changing a logical ID replaces the resource.

• Construct IDs SHOULD be short and to the point.

• You SHOULD NOT interpolate variables into a construct ID: if the variable's value changes, the logical ID changes and the resource is replaced. Legitimate exceptions (constructs created in a loop; an intentional, conditional replacement) MUST be annotated with a comment explaining why.

• Construct IDs only need to be unique within their scope. They SHOULD NOT repeat project, region, or stage names already present higher in the construct tree.

Choosing Construct Levels

You SHOULD prefer L2 constructs as the default choice. They provide sensible defaults, grant methods, and metric helpers.

Decision tree

When L1 is viable

L1 (Cfn*) constructs are acceptable when no L2 exists or when you need a property the L2 does not expose. You SHOULD combine L1 with Mixins, Facades, or I<Resource>Ref interfaces to retain type safety and grant support.

When using L3

L3 constructs provision multiple resources behind a single API. You MUST read what they provision (check the source or cdk synth output) before using them in production. Hidden resources may have cost, security, or operational implications.

When an L2 doesn't expose a property

Use this escalation ladder — prefer the first option that works:

1. Cfn<Resource>PropsMixin (preferred) — type-safe, applied via .with():

   Copy

   import { CfnBucketPropsMixin } from '@aws-cdk/cfn-property-mixins/aws-s3';
   new s3.Bucket(this, 'Bucket').with(new CfnBucketPropsMixin({
     analyticsConfigurations: [{ id: 'full', prefix: '' }],
   }));

2. addPropertyOverride — untyped, string-keyed last resort:

   Copy

   const cfnBucket = bucket.node.defaultChild as s3.CfnBucket;
   cfnBucket.addPropertyOverride('AnalyticsConfigurations', [{ Id: 'full', Prefix: '' }]);

Mixing L1 and L2

When a stack contains both L1 and L2 constructs, you MUST use I<Resource>Ref interfaces and Facades to bridge them — do not pass L1 property types to L2 props or vice versa, as their types are not interchangeable.

I<Resource>Ref interfaces (e.g. IBucketRef)

Both L1 and L2 constructs implement I<Resource>Ref-style interfaces (e.g., IBucketRef, IFunctionRef). Use these interfaces as prop types to accept either level:

interface MyProps {
  readonly bucket: s3.IBucketRef;
}

Facades for L1 grants

L1 constructs lack grant*() methods. You SHOULD wrap them with fromCfn<Resource>() or from<Resource>Attributes() to get an L2 interface:

const cfnTable = new dynamodb.CfnTable(this, 'Table', { /* ... */ });
const table = dynamodb.Table.fromTableArn(this, 'TableRef', cfnTable.attrArn);
table.grantReadData(myFunction);

Escalation ladder

When you need to customize a resource, follow this order (least invasive first):

1. L2 prop — use the built-in property if available.

2. Mixin — add behavior via a helper function.

3. Cfn<Resource>PropsMixin — type-safe L1 prop injection.

4. node.defaultChild — access the underlying L1 construct.

5. addPropertyOverride — override arbitrary CloudFormation properties.

You SHOULD exhaust each level before moving to the next.

Cross-Stack References

Same app, same region

Pass construct references via stack props. CDK automatically creates CloudFormation exports and imports:

interface ConsumerProps extends cdk.StackProps {
  readonly bucket: s3.IBucket;
}

class ConsumerStack extends cdk.Stack {
  constructor(scope: Construct, id: string, props: ConsumerProps) {
    super(scope, id, props);
    props.bucket.grantRead(myFunction);
  }
}

Cross-region or cross-account (same app)

Enable crossRegionReferences: true on the consuming stack and use explicit physical names on shared resources:

new ConsumerStack(app, 'Consumer', {
  env: { account: process.env.CDK_DEFAULT_ACCOUNT, region: process.env.CDK_DEFAULT_REGION },
  crossRegionReferences: true,
  bucket: producerStack.bucket,
});

Different apps

When stacks are in different CDK apps, automatic exports do not work. You MUST use one of:

• CfnOutput + Fn.importValue:

  Copy

  // Producer app
  new cdk.CfnOutput(this, 'BucketArn', { value: bucket.bucketArn, exportName: '$EXPORT_NAME' });
  
  // Consumer app
  const arn = cdk.Fn.importValue('$EXPORT_NAME');

• SSM Parameter Store for decoupled lookups.

Fixing cycles

If cross-stack references create a dependency cycle, you MUST extract the shared resource into a third stack so that dependencies flow one way.

Creating Custom Constructs

Extend L2 (is-a)

Use when you want a single resource with stricter defaults:

export class SecureBucket extends s3.Bucket {
  constructor(scope: Construct, id: string, props?: s3.BucketProps) {
    super(scope, id, {
      encryption: s3.BucketEncryption.S3_MANAGED,
      blockPublicAccess: s3.BlockPublicAccess.BLOCK_ALL,
      enforceSSL: true,
      ...props,
    });
  }
}

Compose L3 (has-a)

Use when you combine multiple resources behind a single API:

export class ApiWithQueue extends Construct {
  public readonly queue: sqs.Queue;

  constructor(scope: Construct, id: string) {
    super(scope, id);
    this.queue = new sqs.Queue(this, 'Queue');
    // ... additional resources
  }
}

Stable logical IDs

The default child ID determines the CloudFormation logical ID. You MUST NOT change construct IDs after deployment — this causes resource replacement. Use the Default child ID convention for the primary resource in an L3.

Escape via defaultChild

When extending an L2, you can access the underlying CFN resource:

const cfn = this.node.defaultChild as s3.CfnBucket;
cfn.addPropertyOverride('$PROPERTY_PATH', '$VALUE');

Testing CDK Infrastructure

Fine-grained assertions

Use Template.fromStack() to assert on specific resources:

const template = Template.fromStack(myStack);

template.hasResourceProperties('AWS::SQS::Queue', {
  VisibilityTimeout: 300,
});

Partial matching

Use Match.* helpers for flexible assertions:

template.hasResourceProperties('AWS::Lambda::Function', {
  Runtime: Match.stringLikeRegexp('nodejs'),
  Environment: Match.objectLike({
    Variables: Match.objectLike({
      TABLE_NAME: Match.anyValue(),
    }),
  }),
});

Snapshot tests

Capture the full template and compare against a stored baseline:

expect(template.toJSON()).toMatchSnapshot();

You SHOULD use snapshot tests to detect unintended drift but MUST NOT rely on them as the sole testing strategy — they are brittle and hard to review.

Logical ID stability tests

Assert that critical resource logical IDs remain stable to prevent accidental replacement:

template.hasResource('AWS::DynamoDB::Table', {
  // Verifying the resource exists with this logical ID
});

Integration tests

Use @aws-cdk/integ-tests-alpha for tests that deploy real infrastructure:

const integ = new IntegTest(app, 'MyIntegTest', {
  testCases: [myStack],
});

integ.assertions
  .awsApiCall('DynamoDB', 'DescribeTable', { TableName: '$TABLE_NAME' })
  .assertAtPath('Table.TableStatus', ExpectedResult.stringLikeRegexp('ACTIVE'));

Integration tests SHOULD be run in a dedicated test account. They MUST NOT run against production.

Application best practices

• Make decisions at synth time — use explicit env to enable synth-time logic.

• Use generated physical names (CDK default) unless cross-stack or cross-app references require explicit names.

• Set explicit removalPolicy and logRetention on every resource.

• Separate stateful resources (databases, buckets) into their own stack.

• Commit cdk.context.json to version control for reproducible synth.

• Use grant*() methods for IAM instead of hand-written policy statements.