Pitch Deck
AnthropicOfficialPublished by Anthropic
- Skill
- Content generator
- Documents and content
- Apache-2.0
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill assists in populating investment banking PowerPoint templates with data extracted from external sources like Excel, CSV, or reports. It follows a structured workflow to map data to template sections, apply formatting standards, and ensure consistency across slides. The process includes a validation loop to check for structural accuracy, table implementation, and formatting compliance, while providing guidance on handling common pitfalls like placeholder boxes and text-based tables.
What it does
- Extracts and validates data from source files like Excel or CSV.
- Maps extracted data to specific sections of a provided PowerPoint template.
- Replaces placeholder instruction boxes with properly formatted content.
- Creates actual PowerPoint table objects instead of text-based separators.
- Applies consistent formatting, font sizes, and alignment across slides.
- Performs visual validation checks to ensure content readability and structure.
When to use it
- When you have a PowerPoint template that needs to be filled with specific data.
- When you have source data in Excel or CSV files ready for presentation.
- When you need to ensure consistent formatting and alignment across a pitch deck.
- When you need to verify calculations and data accuracy within a slide deck.
Advantages
- Ensures data consistency across multiple slides.
- Automates the mapping of raw data into structured slide layouts.
- Enforces professional formatting standards for tables and bullet points.
- Provides a systematic validation loop to catch structural errors.
Usage examples
- “Populate the attached pitch deck template using the data in the provided quarterly_results.xlsx file.”
- The agent will extract the data, map it to the template sections, apply the required formatting, and provide a populated PowerPoint file.
- “I have a market sizing slide in my deck that needs to be updated with the figures from this CSV report.”
- The agent will identify the relevant slide, update the figures, ensure the table is correctly formatted, and verify the data against the source.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/anthropics/pitch-deck/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip pitch-deck.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Anthropic
Populating Investment Banking Pitch Deck Templates
Reference Files
Read all reference files at task start before beginning any work. These contain critical patterns and anti-patterns that will affect your approach. Do not wait until you encounter issues.
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
formatting-standards.md | Text, bullets, tables, charts, alignment |
slide-templates.md | Content mapping guidance for common slide types |
xml-reference.md | PowerPoint XML patterns for tables, shapes, arrows |
calculation-standards.md | Financial formulas for verification (CAGR, consensus) |
Workflow Decision Tree
What type of task is this?
┌─ Populating empty template with source data?
│ └─→ Follow "Template Population Workflow" below
│
├─ Editing existing populated slides?
│ └─→ Extract current content, modify, revalidate
│
└─ Fixing formatting issues on existing slides?
└─→ See "Common Failures" table, apply targeted fixes⚠️ Critical Rendering Limitation
LibreOffice is used for validation but DOES NOT render PowerPoint files accurately. It will mangle fonts, gradients, shape positions, text wrapping, and some table formatting.
What this means: A slide that passes visual validation in LibreOffice may still have issues in Microsoft PowerPoint. The validation loop catches structural issues (missing content, broken tables, placeholder formatting retained) but cannot catch font substitution, subtle alignment shifts, or gradient problems.
Required action: Always include this statement when delivering output:
"This file was validated using LibreOffice. Please review in Microsoft PowerPoint before distribution, as rendering differences may exist."
Template Population Workflow
Copy and track progress:
Pitch Deck Progress:
- [ ] Phase 1: Extract and validate source data
- [ ] Phase 2: Map content to template sections
- [ ] Phase 3: Populate slides with proper formatting
- [ ] Phase 4: Validate → Fix → Repeat until clean
- [ ] Phase 5: Final verificationPhase 1: Data Extraction
Create backup of original template before any modifications — copy to
[filename]_backup.pptx. Direct XML editing or unexpected errors can corrupt files.Identify all source materials (Excel, CSV, PDF reports, Word documents, databases, web sources)
Extract relevant data points from each source
Validate all numbers against original sources
Standardize units and currency (convert all figures to the primary unit/currency used in the template)
Note any calculations that need verification → see
calculation-standards.mdfor formulas
Phase 2: Content Mapping
Open and visually review the template — understand its structure, style, and existing content before modifying
Analyze template structure — identify all placeholder areas and content boxes
Map source data to corresponding template sections → see
slide-templates.mdfor mapping guidanceIdentify placeholder guidance boxes (colored instruction boxes from task creator)
Note any data gaps or mismatches → see
slide-templates.mdfor resolution
Phase 3: Template Population
Remove or reformat placeholder boxes — colored instruction boxes show WHAT to create, not HOW to format. Delete them and create properly formatted content in their place. See Critical Anti-Patterns.
Populate each section with mapped content (focus on content first)
Then apply formatting to match template style → see
formatting-standards.mdCreate tables as actual table objects (NEVER use pipe/tab-separated text) → see
xml-reference.mdCreate arrows/shapes as PowerPoint objects → see
xml-reference.mdInsert company logo if provided in task files; if not available, flag to user: "[LOGO NOT PROVIDED - please supply company logo]"
Phase 4: Validate → Fix → Repeat
This is a feedback loop. Repeat until all checks pass OR escalation is triggered.
# Convert to images for visual validation
soffice --headless --convert-to pdf presentation.pptx
pdftoppm -jpeg -r 150 presentation.pdf slideValidation checklist (check each slide image):
[ ] Text readable against background?
[ ] Tables are actual objects (columns aligned, NOT pipe/tab-separated text)?
[ ] Charts/tables fill designated areas?
[ ] Bullet formatting consistent within sections?
[ ] Font sizes match across same-level boxes?
[ ] No content beyond slide boundaries?
[ ] No placeholder formatting retained (no large colored boxes with data dumped in)?
[ ] No text-based "tables" (no
|or tab separators creating fake columns)?[ ] Cross-slide consistency: Same metrics/figures identical across all slides where they appear?
Fix cycle protocol:
| Cycle | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 | Fix all identified issues, re-validate |
| 2 | Fix remaining issues, re-validate |
| 3 | If issues persist, document remaining problems and escalate to user |
After 3 cycles, if issues remain:
List each unresolved issue with slide number and description
Explain what was attempted
Deliver the file with explicit disclaimer: "The following issues could not be resolved automatically: [list]. Manual review required."
Do not continue cycling indefinitely. Some issues (font rendering, complex shape alignment) may require manual intervention in PowerPoint.
Phase 5: Final Verification
Run through the Final Quality Checklist before delivering.
Quick Reference Tables
Bullet Symbols
| Context | Symbol | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| Included/Positive | ✓ | Items within scope, features present |
| Excluded/Negative | × | Items outside scope, features absent |
| Neutral list | • | General enumeration, commentary |
| Numbered sequence | 1. 2. 3. | Process steps, rankings |
| Sub-bullets | – | Secondary points under main bullets |
Slide Hierarchy Levels (Typical)
These are typical ranges—adjust based on template specifications:
| Level | Examples | Typical Size | Style |
|---|---|---|---|
| Title | Slide title | 40-48pt | Bold |
| Subtitle | Market definition, slide descriptor | 18-22pt | Bold |
| Section Header | "Key Projections", "Commentary" | 14-16pt | Regular |
| Block Label | "Segments Included", "Definition" sidebar | 12-14pt | Regular |
| Block Content | Bullet points, body text | 11-14pt | Regular |
| Table Header | Column headers | 10-12pt | Bold |
| Table Body | Cell content | 9-11pt | Regular |
| Footnotes | Sources, notes | 8-9pt | Italic |
Font Consistency Matching
Boxes at the same hierarchy level MUST use identical font sizes:
| Same Level | Must Match With |
|---|---|
| "Segments Included" | "Segments Excluded" |
| "Definition" | "Scope Rationale" |
| Left column bullets | Right column bullets |
| All block labels | Each other |
| All section headers | Each other |
Rounding for Presentation
These are typical conventions — adjust based on the magnitude of values and template style:
| Value Type | Typical Rounding | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Large market sizes ($10bn+) | Nearest $1bn | 18.5 → $19bn |
| Smaller market sizes (<$10bn) | Nearest $0.5bn or $0.1bn | 2.3 → $2.5bn |
| Size ranges | Match precision of sources | 14.9-22.1 → $15-22bn |
| CAGR | Whole % or 0.5% | 16.4% → 16% or 16.5% |
| Market share | Nearest 5% or match source | 21.4% → 20% |
| Multiples | 1 decimal | 9.69 → 9.7x |
Principle: Rounding should not materially change the figure. For smaller values, use finer precision.
Text Density Rules
Max 6-7 bullets per content box
Max 2 lines per bullet point
Parenthetical examples: same line or indented below
No orphan words (single word on new line)
Alignment Principles
Vertically stacked boxes must have identical:
Left margin position, bullet indentation, text start position, box width
Horizontally adjacent boxes must have identical:
Top position, height (where possible), internal padding
Multi-Slide Consistency
When the same data appears on multiple slides:
Use identical figures, formatting, and terminology
If a metric is updated on one slide, update all occurrences
Cross-reference during validation to catch mismatches
MUST Requirements
These requirements are non-negotiable regardless of template:
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Text Readability | All text MUST have sufficient contrast with background. Examples: white/light text on dark blue, dark green, black backgrounds; black/dark text on white, light gray, light yellow backgrounds. |
| Actual Table Objects | Tabular data MUST be table objects, not tab-separated text. See xml-reference.md. |
| Proper Chart/Table Sizing | Pasted visuals MUST fill designated area. See formatting-standards.md. |
| Consistent Formatting | Bullets within section MUST match (symbol, size, indent). Same-level boxes MUST use same font size. |
| Content Boundaries | All content MUST stay within slide edges. Footnote box width: ~32.5cm for 16:9, ~24cm for 4:3. |
| No Placeholder Formatting | Remove colored instruction boxes. Main body: dark text on light background per template. |
Critical Anti-Patterns: NEVER DO THESE
These failures occur when placeholder formatting is mistaken for output formatting. Recognizing these patterns is essential.
Anti-Pattern 1: Populating Data INTO Placeholder Boxes
What happens: Template has colored instruction boxes (yellow, orange, etc.) with guidance text. Model replaces the guidance text with actual data BUT KEEPS THE COLORED BOX.
Why it's wrong: The colored box IS the placeholder. It tells you what content goes there. The output should have different formatting — typically dark text on white/light background, or properly styled shapes.
Recognition test: If your populated slide has large colored rectangles filled with data text, you have copied the placeholder format instead of replacing it.
Critical distinction — two types of "placeholders":
| Type | How to identify | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Instruction boxes | Bright colors (yellow, orange), contains guidance text like "Insert X here", white/light text on colored background | DELETE the entire shape, then create new content with production formatting |
| Layout placeholders | Part of slide master/layout, neutral colors matching template theme, "Click to add text" | KEEP the shape, REPLACE the text content only |
If uncertain: check if the shape exists on an empty slide from the same template. Layout placeholders persist; instruction boxes are regular shapes.
Anti-Pattern 2: Text-Based "Tables"
What happens: Model creates table-like content using separator characters (|, tabs, spaces) instead of actual table objects.
Why it's wrong: This is NOT a table. Columns will never align properly, it cannot be formatted consistently, and it looks unprofessional.
Recognition test: If you're typing | characters or relying on spaces/tabs to create columns, you're creating text, not a table.
MUST verify: After creating any table, verify it is an actual table object. See xml-reference.md for verification methods.
Anti-Pattern 3: Inheriting Placeholder Contrast
What happens: Placeholder uses light text on colored background (e.g., white on yellow). Model populates data but keeps this color scheme, resulting in hard-to-read output.
Why it's wrong: Placeholder colors are deliberately distinct to signal "replace me." Production slides typically use dark text on light backgrounds for body content.
Recognition test: If your populated content has light/white text on bright colored backgrounds in body areas (not headers), you've inherited placeholder formatting.
Correct approach: Apply production formatting — typically dark text (#000000 or #333333) on white or light backgrounds for body content. Headers and accent areas may use brand colors.
Summary: Placeholder vs. Production
| Element | Placeholder (Input) | Production (Output) |
|---|---|---|
| Instruction boxes | Colored background, guidance text | Removed or reformatted |
| Data areas | "[Insert data here]" text | Actual data with clean formatting |
| Tables | Description of what table should contain | Actual table object with rows/columns |
| Body text | Light text on colored background | Dark text on light background |
The placeholder tells you WHAT to create, not HOW to format it.
Common Failures
For detailed explanations of the most critical failures, see Critical Anti-Patterns above.
| Failure | Solution | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Unstructured text dumps | Break into bullets (✓, ×, •) | formatting-standards.md |
| Pipe/tab-separated "tables" | Create actual table objects — text with separators is NOT a table | xml-reference.md |
| Poor text/background contrast | Audit every text element | — |
| Tiny pasted charts | Resize to fill area, paste chart only | formatting-standards.md |
| Source data pasted with charts | Select only chart object before copy | — |
| Data dumped into placeholder boxes | Delete colored instruction boxes, create new properly formatted content | Anti-Patterns |
| Inconsistent bullets | Define style once, apply to all | formatting-standards.md |
| Inconsistent fonts across boxes | Standardize same-level boxes | formatting-standards.md |
| Content overflow | Set explicit box widths (footnotes: 32.5cm for 16:9, 24cm for 4:3) | — |
| Missing logo | Use logo from task files; if not provided, flag to user | — |
Remaining [brackets] | Search and replace all placeholders | — |
| Text arrows (→, ⟹) | Use PowerPoint shape objects | xml-reference.md |
Error Handling
If PDF/image conversion fails:
Check LibreOffice is installed:
which sofficeTry alternative:
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf presentation.pptxIf still failing, open in PowerPoint/LibreOffice manually and export
If source data has inconsistencies or conflicts:
Priority order: Use data explicitly provided in the task files first
If using data from other sources (web search, external documents), flag this to the user
Document any discrepancies explicitly
Add footnote explaining data source choice
If calculations don't match source projections:
Show your calculation methodology
Note the discrepancy and possible causes (different base year, methodology)
Present both values if material difference
Flag to user for resolution
Table Structure Guidelines
When creating tables (MUST be actual table objects):
Column Alignment:
Text columns: Left-aligned (header and content)
Numeric columns: Right-aligned or center-aligned (header matches content)
Header Row:
Bold text
Shaded background (template's brand color)
White or contrasting text
Consensus/Total Row:
Bold text
Separator line above
Distinct background shading
Width: Fill designated section width completely.
For XML implementation, see xml-reference.md.
Footnote Format
Format:
Sources: [Source 1] (Year), [Source 2] (Year).
Notes: (1) [First note]; (2) [Second note].Example:
Sources: Grand View Research (2024), Mordor Intelligence (2024), Markets and Markets (2023).
Notes: (1) Excludes hardware revenue; (2) Includes both B2B and B2C segments.All superscript numbers (¹, ², ³) in slide body MUST have corresponding Notes entries.
Logo Placement
Use logo file provided in task materials
If no logo provided, flag to user: "[LOGO NOT PROVIDED - please supply company logo]"
Position: typically top-right, consistent size across slides, must not overlap content
Data Requirements by Slide Type
For detailed data requirements, formatting principles, and example column headers for each slide type, see slide-templates.md.
Common slide types covered: Market Definition, Market Sizing/TAM, Competitive Landscape, Financial Summary, Transaction Comparables.
Final Quality Checklist
Before delivering the populated template, verify:
Data Accuracy
[ ] All figures match original source documents
[ ] Calculated values verified against formulas (see
calculation-standards.md)[ ] Years and time periods are correct
[ ] Company/competitor names spelled correctly
[ ] Same figures are identical across all slides where they appear
Content Mapping
[ ] Every template section populated with appropriate data
[ ] No
[bracket]placeholder text remaining[ ] All source citations included in footnotes
[ ] Footnote numbers (¹²³) have corresponding Notes entries
Formatting
[ ] Text readable against all backgrounds (sufficient contrast)
[ ] Tables are actual table objects (NOT pipe/tab-separated text)
[ ] Charts/tables fill designated areas (no thumbnails)
[ ] Bullet formatting consistent within each section
[ ] Font sizes match across same-level boxes
[ ] No content extends beyond slide boundaries
[ ] No placeholder boxes retained with data dumped inside
[ ] No colored instruction boxes in final output
Template Compliance
[ ] Placeholder instruction boxes reformatted or removed
[ ] Formatting matches template style (colors, fonts)
[ ] Logo present and correctly positioned
[ ] Production formatting applied (dark text on light background for main content)
Final Step
[ ] Recommend user validate in Microsoft PowerPoint before distribution (LibreOffice may render differently)
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer912 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.1 KiB
- SKILL.md19.1 KiB
- reference/calculation-standards.md5.3 KiB
- reference/formatting-standards.md8.4 KiB
- reference/slide-templates.md11.0 KiB
- reference/xml-reference.md10.8 KiB
reference/slide-templates.md
Content Mapping Reference
This file provides guidance for mapping source data to pitch deck template sections. The process is template-agnostic—these principles apply regardless of the specific template design.
Contents
Template Analysis Process
Content Mapping Workflow
Common Slide Types and Data Requirements
Mapping Verification Checklist
Handling Data-Template Mismatches
Template-Specific Adaptation
Template Analysis Process
Before populating any template, analyze its structure:
Step 1: Identify All Content Areas
Scan each slide for:
Title/header placeholders — Where slide titles go
Subtitle/definition areas — Secondary headers or definitions
Content boxes — Main content areas (may have label sidebars)
Table placeholders — Areas designated for tabular data
Chart/visual areas — Spaces for charts, diagrams, or images
Metric callout boxes — Highlighted key figures
Footnote/source bars — Bottom areas for citations and notes
Logo placeholder — Usually top-right corner
Step 2: Note Template Conventions
Each template has its own style. Observe:
Color scheme — What colors are used for headers, backgrounds, accents?
Font choices — What fonts and sizes are already set?
Box styling — Do content boxes have sidebars, borders, or shading?
Bullet styles — What bullet symbols does the template use?
Alignment patterns — How are parallel sections aligned?
Step 3: Identify Instruction vs. Output Areas
Templates often include guidance:
Instruction boxes — Colored boxes with guidance text (often yellow background, white text)
Placeholder text — Text in [brackets] indicating what to replace
Example content — Sample content showing expected format
Key distinction: Instruction boxes tell you what to do; they should be reformatted or removed in final output. Output areas are where your content goes.
Content Mapping Workflow
Step 1: Inventory Source Data
Create a list of all available data:
Market size figures and ranges
Growth rates (CAGR, YoY)
Company names and descriptions
Segment definitions
Financial metrics
Source citations and dates
Footnote content
Step 2: Match Data to Template Sections
For each template section, identify:
| Template Section | Required Data | Source Location |
|---|---|---|
| [Section name] | [Data needed] | [Where to find it] |
Step 3: Identify Gaps
After mapping, note:
Missing data — Template requires data not in sources
Extra data — Sources contain data with no template home
Format mismatches — Data exists but in wrong format
Step 4: Resolve Gaps Before Populating
Missing data: Flag for user or search for additional sources
Extra data: Confirm if it should be excluded or if template needs adjustment
Format mismatches: Transform data to required format
Common Slide Types and Data Requirements
These are typical data requirements for common slide types. Your specific template may vary—always follow the template's actual structure.
Market Definition Slides
Typical content areas:
Segments included in scope (with examples/key players)
Segments excluded from scope (with examples)
Market definition text
Scope rationale/justification
Data mapping considerations:
Source data should clearly distinguish included vs. excluded segments
Key players should be mapped to their respective segments
Definition text should align with how sources define the market
Data typically needed:
List of market segments to include (with key player examples)
List of market segments to exclude (with examples)
Market definition text
Scope rationale or justification
Formatting principle: Parallel sections (included vs. excluded) should use matching formatting.
Verification questions:
Does every segment have the appropriate symbol (✓ for included, × for excluded)?
Are key players correctly assigned to segments?
Does the definition match the source methodology?
Market Sizing / TAM Slides
Typical content areas:
Current market size (with year)
Growth rate (CAGR with period)
Future projection (with target year)
Source-by-source breakdown table
Consensus/summary figures
Key takeaways or insights
Data typically needed:
Market size figures with base year
Growth rates (CAGR with time period)
Projection figures with target year
Source citations for each data point
Example column headers: Source | [Base Year] Size | CAGR | [Target Year] Projection
Formatting principle: If showing multiple sources, include a consensus/summary row.
Data mapping considerations:
Multiple sources may have different estimates—map each to table rows
Consensus figures require calculation from individual sources
Projections should be verifiable using CAGR formula
Verification questions:
Do all source figures match original documents?
Is the consensus calculated correctly (not just copied from one source)?
Are projection years consistent across all figures?
Do CAGR-based projections match when manually verified?
Competitive Landscape Slides
Typical content areas:
Comparison table with competitors as columns
Feature/capability rows
Financial metric rows (revenue, growth, market share)
Key observations or positioning notes
Data typically needed:
List of competitors to compare
Features or capabilities for each
Financial metrics (revenue, growth, market share) if available
Time period for financial data
Formatting principle: Subject company should be visually distinguished from competitors (e.g., bold text, different background color, border, or positioned in rightmost column).
Data mapping considerations:
Ensure all competitors from source data are included
Feature comparisons should use consistent criteria
Financial figures should be from comparable periods
Verification questions:
Are all competitors from the source data represented?
Is the subject company visually distinguished?
Are financial figures from the same time period?
Is the ✓/× usage consistent and accurate?
Financial Summary Slides
Typical content areas:
Key metric callouts (headline figures)
Historical financials table (actuals)
Projected financials table (estimates)
Growth rates and margins
Optional trend charts
Data typically needed:
Historical financials (actuals) for recent years
Projected financials (estimates) for future years
Key metrics: Revenue, Growth %, Margins, EBITDA
Example column headers: Metric | FY[Year-2] | FY[Year-1] | FY[Year]A | FY[Year+1]E | FY[Year+2]E
Formatting principle: Clearly distinguish historical (A) from projected (E) data.
Data mapping considerations:
Clearly distinguish historical (A) from projected (E) data
Ensure metric definitions match source (Revenue vs. Net Revenue, EBITDA vs. Adjusted EBITDA)
Growth rates should be calculated consistently
Verification questions:
Are historical vs. projected periods clearly labeled?
Do calculated growth rates match source or manual calculation?
Are metric definitions consistent with source documents?
Transaction Comparables Slides
Typical content areas:
Transaction table (date, target, acquirer, deal value)
Valuation multiples (EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA)
Summary statistics (mean, median, high, low)
Implied valuation for subject company
Data typically needed:
Transaction details: Date, Target, Acquirer, Deal Value
Valuation multiples: EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA
Subject company metrics for implied valuation
Formatting principle: Include summary statistics (Mean, Median, High, Low) for multiples.
Data mapping considerations:
Multiples should be calculated from transaction data, not just copied
Summary statistics require calculation across all transactions
Implied valuation applies multiples to subject company metrics
Verification questions:
Are all relevant transactions from the source included?
Are multiples calculated correctly (EV ÷ Metric)?
Do summary statistics cover all transactions in the table?
Is implied valuation clearly labeled as illustrative?
Mapping Verification Checklist
Before moving to formatting, verify mapping completeness:
Data Completeness
[ ] Every template placeholder has mapped source data
[ ] All source citations are recorded for footnotes
[ ] No placeholder [brackets] remain unmapped
Data Accuracy
[ ] Figures match original source documents exactly
[ ] Years and time periods are correctly noted
[ ] Company names are spelled correctly
[ ] Calculated values (consensus, projections, multiples) verified
Logical Consistency
[ ] Included vs. excluded segments are logically coherent
[ ] Historical data precedes projected data chronologically
[ ] Comparison data uses consistent time periods
[ ] Totals and subtotals sum correctly
Source Attribution
[ ] Every data point can be traced to a source
[ ] Source names and publication years recorded
[ ] Footnote numbers assigned for special notes
Handling Data-Template Mismatches
Template Requires More Data Than Available
Options:
Flag the gap explicitly for user review
Mark section as "Data not available" with explanation
Search for additional sources if appropriate
Recommend template adjustment if data doesn't exist
Do not: Fabricate data or make unsupported estimates.
Source Has More Data Than Template Accommodates
Options:
Include most relevant/recent data points
Summarize or aggregate where appropriate
Add footnotes referencing additional available data
Recommend template expansion if data is critical
Data Format Doesn't Match Template Format
Common transformations:
Individual figures → Range (use min-max from sources)
Detailed breakdown → Summary category
Annual figures → CAGR (calculate from endpoints)
Absolute values → Percentages (calculate share)
Multiple sources → Consensus (apply methodology)
Template Uses Different Terminology
Resolution process:
Identify template term and source term
Confirm they refer to the same concept
Use template terminology in output
Add footnote if clarification needed
Template-Specific Adaptation
Remember: This guidance describes common patterns, not requirements. Always:
Follow the template — If template uses different section names, use those
Match template style — Use template's existing fonts, colors, bullet styles
Preserve template structure — Don't rearrange sections unless necessary
Respect template spacing — Content should fit designated areas without overflow
The goal is to populate the template as designed, not to redesign it.
Requirements and compatibility
Written for: Claude Code, Claude apps
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Anthropic
- Publisher
- Anthropic (Official)
- Source
- anthropics/financial-services · plugins/agent-plugins/pitch-agent/skills/pitch-deck · commit 6056506
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
- Also distributed in
- anthropics/financial-services
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Anthropic or Anthropic.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download pitch-deck.zip