Draft Response
AnthropicOfficialPublished by Anthropic
- Skill
- Content generator
- Business and productivity
- Apache-2.0
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides a structured framework for drafting customer-facing responses. It helps users generate professional, empathetic, and clear communications tailored to specific situations—such as product questions, escalations, billing issues, or delivering bad news—while ensuring the tone matches the customer relationship stage and communication channel.
What it does
- Parses input to determine customer context, urgency, and communication channel.
- Generates structured draft responses including tone, subject, and internal notes.
- Provides best practices for customer communication, including empathy and clarity.
- Offers templates for common scenarios like bug reports, billing issues, and feature requests.
- Includes guidance on follow-up cadences and when to escalate issues internally.
- Provides a checklist for quality control before sending communications.
When to use it
- When you need to draft a professional response to a customer inquiry or issue.
- When you need to deliver difficult news, such as a feature rejection or delay.
- When you need to handle a customer escalation or billing dispute.
- When you want to ensure your communication tone is appropriate for the customer's relationship stage.
- When you need to structure a response for a specific channel like email or chat.
Advantages
- Ensures consistent, professional, and empathetic communication across the team.
- Reduces the time spent drafting complex or sensitive customer messages.
- Helps prevent common pitfalls like overpromising or using overly technical jargon.
- Provides clear frameworks for handling difficult conversations like escalations.
- Encourages ownership and accountability in customer interactions.
Usage examples
- “/draft-response Acme Corp is asking when the new dashboard feature will ship”
- Generates a professional response acknowledging the interest in the dashboard feature and providing a clear, honest update on the timeline.
- “/draft-response Customer escalation — their integration has been down for 2 days”
- Generates an urgent, empathetic, and action-oriented response that takes ownership of the issue and outlines the next steps for resolution.
- “/draft-response Responding to a feature request we won't be building”
- Generates a respectful, candid response that explains the reasoning behind the decision while offering alternatives and keeping the door open for future feedback.
- “/draft-response Customer hit a billing error and wants a resolution ASAP”
- Generates a precise, factual, and resolution-focused response that addresses the billing error and provides a clear timeline for the fix.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/anthropics/draft-response/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip draft-response.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Anthropic
/draft-response
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Draft a professional, customer-facing response tailored to the situation, customer relationship, and communication context.
Usage
/draft-response <context about the customer question, issue, or request>Examples:
/draft-response Acme Corp is asking when the new dashboard feature will ship/draft-response Customer escalation — their integration has been down for 2 days/draft-response Responding to a feature request we won't be building/draft-response Customer hit a billing error and wants a resolution ASAP
Workflow
1. Understand the Context
Parse the user's input to determine:
Customer: Who is the communication for? Look up account context if available.
Situation type: Question, issue, escalation, announcement, negotiation, bad news, good news, follow-up
Urgency: Is this time-sensitive? How long has the customer been waiting?
Channel: Email, support ticket, chat, or other (adjust formality accordingly)
Relationship stage: New customer, established, frustrated/escalated
Stakeholder level: End user, manager, executive, technical, business
2. Research Context
Gather relevant background from available sources:
~~email:
Previous correspondence with this customer on this topic
Any commitments or timelines previously shared
Tone and style of the existing thread
~~chat:
Internal discussions about this customer or topic
Any guidance from product, engineering, or leadership
Similar situations and how they were handled
~~CRM (if connected):
Account details and plan level
Contact information and key stakeholders
Previous escalations or sensitive issues
~~support platform (if connected):
Related tickets and their resolution
Known issues or workarounds
SLA status and response time commitments
~~knowledge base:
Official documentation or help articles to reference
Product roadmap information (if shareable)
Policy or process documentation
3. Generate the Draft
Produce a response tailored to the situation:
## Draft Response
**To:** [Customer contact name]
**Re:** [Subject/topic]
**Channel:** [Email / Ticket / Chat]
**Tone:** [Empathetic / Professional / Technical / Celebratory / Candid]
---
[Draft response text]
---
### Notes for You (internal — do not send)
- **Why this approach:** [Rationale for tone and content choices]
- **Things to verify:** [Any facts or commitments to confirm before sending]
- **Risk factors:** [Anything sensitive about this response]
- **Follow-up needed:** [Actions to take after sending]
- **Escalation note:** [If this should be reviewed by someone else first]4. Run Quality Checks
Before presenting the draft, verify:
[ ] Tone matches the situation and relationship
[ ] No commitments beyond what's authorized
[ ] No product roadmap details that shouldn't be shared externally
[ ] Accurate references to previous conversations
[ ] Clear next steps and ownership
[ ] Appropriate for the stakeholder level (not too technical for executives, not too vague for engineers)
[ ] Length is appropriate for the channel (shorter for chat, fuller for email)
5. Offer Iterations
After presenting the draft:
"Want me to adjust the tone? (more formal, more casual, more empathetic, more direct)"
"Should I add or remove any specific points?"
"Want me to make this shorter/longer?"
"Should I draft a version for a different stakeholder?"
"Want me to draft the internal escalation note as well?"
"Should I prepare a follow-up message to send after [X days] if no response?"
Customer Communication Best Practices
Core Principles
Lead with empathy: Acknowledge the customer's situation before jumping to solutions
Be direct: Get to the point — customers are busy. Bottom-line-up-front.
Be honest: Never overpromise, never mislead, never hide bad news in jargon
Be specific: Use concrete details, timelines, and names — avoid vague language
Own it: Take responsibility when appropriate. "We" not "the system" or "the process"
Close the loop: Every response should have a clear next step or call to action
Match their energy: If they're frustrated, be empathetic first. If they're excited, be enthusiastic.
Response Structure
For most customer communications, follow this structure:
1. Acknowledgment / Context (1-2 sentences)
- Acknowledge what they said, asked, or are experiencing
- Show you understand their situation
2. Core Message (1-3 paragraphs)
- Deliver the main information, answer, or update
- Be specific and concrete
- Include relevant details they need
3. Next Steps (1-3 bullets)
- What YOU will do and by when
- What THEY need to do (if anything)
- When they'll hear from you next
4. Closing (1 sentence)
- Warm but professional sign-off
- Reinforce you're available if neededLength Guidelines
Chat/IM: 1-4 sentences. Get to the point immediately.
Support ticket response: 1-3 short paragraphs. Structured and scannable.
Email: 3-5 paragraphs max. Respect their inbox.
Escalation response: As long as needed to be thorough, but well-structured with headers.
Executive communication: Shorter is better. 2-3 paragraphs max. Data-driven.
Tone and Style Guidelines
Tone Spectrum
| Situation | Tone | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Good news / wins | Celebratory | Enthusiastic, warm, congratulatory, forward-looking |
| Routine update | Professional | Clear, concise, informative, friendly |
| Technical response | Precise | Accurate, detailed, structured, patient |
| Delayed delivery | Accountable | Honest, apologetic, action-oriented, specific |
| Bad news | Candid | Direct, empathetic, solution-oriented, respectful |
| Issue / outage | Urgent | Immediate, transparent, actionable, reassuring |
| Escalation | Executive | Composed, ownership-taking, plan-presenting, confident |
| Billing / account | Precise | Clear, factual, empathetic, resolution-focused |
Tone Adjustments by Relationship Stage
New Customer (0-3 months):
More formal and professional
Extra context and explanation (don't assume knowledge)
Proactively offer help and resources
Build trust through reliability and responsiveness
Established Customer (3+ months):
Warm and collaborative
Can reference shared history and previous conversations
More direct and efficient communication
Show awareness of their goals and priorities
Frustrated or Escalated Customer:
Extra empathy and acknowledgment
Urgency in response times
Concrete action plans with specific commitments
Shorter feedback loops
Writing Style Rules
DO:
Use active voice ("We'll investigate" not "This will be investigated")
Use "I" for personal commitments and "we" for team commitments
Name specific people when assigning actions ("Sarah from our engineering team will...")
Use the customer's terminology, not your internal jargon
Include specific dates and times, not relative terms ("by Friday January 24" not "in a few days")
Break up long responses with headers or bullet points
DON'T:
Use corporate jargon or buzzwords ("synergy", "leverage", "paradigm shift")
Deflect blame to other teams, systems, or processes
Use passive voice to avoid ownership ("Mistakes were made")
Include unnecessary caveats or hedging that undermines confidence
CC people unnecessarily — only include those who need to be in the conversation
Use exclamation marks excessively (one per email max, if any)
Situation-Specific Approaches
Answering a product question:
Lead with the direct answer
Provide relevant documentation links
Offer to connect them with the right resource if needed
If you don't know the answer: say so honestly, commit to finding out, give a timeline
Responding to an issue or bug:
Acknowledge the impact on their work
State what you know about the issue and its status
Provide workaround if available
Set expectations for resolution timeline
Commit to updates at regular intervals
Handling an escalation:
Acknowledge the severity and their frustration
Take ownership (no deflecting or excuse-making)
Provide a clear action plan with timeline
Identify the person accountable for resolution
Offer a meeting or call if appropriate for the severity
Delivering bad news (feature sunset, delay, can't-fix):
Be direct — don't bury the news
Explain the reasoning honestly
Acknowledge the impact on them specifically
Offer alternatives or mitigation
Provide a clear path forward
Sharing good news (feature launch, milestone, recognition):
Lead with the positive outcome
Connect it to their specific goals or use case
Suggest next steps to capitalize on the good news
Express genuine enthusiasm
Declining a request (feature request, discount, exception):
Acknowledge the request and its reasoning
Be honest about the decision
Explain the why without being dismissive
Offer alternatives when possible
Leave the door open for future conversation
Response Templates for Common Scenarios
Acknowledging a Bug Report
Hi [Name],
Thank you for reporting this — I can see how [specific impact] would be
frustrating for your team.
I've confirmed the issue and escalated it to our engineering team as a
[priority level]. Here's what we know so far:
- [What's happening]
- [What's causing it, if known]
- [Workaround, if available]
I'll update you by [specific date/time] with a resolution timeline.
In the meantime, [workaround details if applicable].
Let me know if you have any questions or if this is impacting you in
other ways I should know about.
Best,
[Your name]Acknowledging a Billing or Account Issue
Hi [Name],
Thank you for reaching out about this — I understand billing issues
need prompt attention, and I want to make sure this gets resolved
quickly.
I've looked into your account and here's what I'm seeing:
- [What happened — clear factual explanation]
- [Impact on their account — charges, access, etc.]
Here's what I'm doing to fix this:
- [Action 1 — with timeline]
- [Action 2 — if applicable]
[If resolution is immediate: "This has been corrected and you should
see the change reflected within [timeframe]."]
[If needs investigation: "I'm escalating this to our billing team
and will have an update for you by [specific date]."]
I'm sorry for the inconvenience. Let me know if you have any
questions about your account.
Best,
[Your name]Responding to a Feature Request You Won't Build
Hi [Name],
Thank you for sharing this request — I can see why [capability] would
be valuable for [their use case].
I discussed this with our product team, and this isn't something we're
planning to build in the near term. The primary reason is [honest,
respectful explanation — e.g., it serves a narrow use case, it conflicts
with our architecture direction, etc.].
That said, I want to make sure you can accomplish your goal. Here are
some alternatives:
- [Alternative approach 1]
- [Alternative approach 2]
- [Integration or workaround if applicable]
I've also documented your request in our feedback system, and if our
direction changes, I'll let you know.
Would any of these alternatives work for your team? Happy to dig
deeper into any of them.
Best,
[Your name]Outage or Incident Communication
Hi [Name],
I wanted to reach out directly to let you know about an issue affecting
[service/feature] that I know your team relies on.
**What happened:** [Clear, non-technical explanation]
**Impact:** [How it affects them specifically]
**Status:** [Current status — investigating / identified / fixing / resolved]
**ETA for resolution:** [Specific time if known, or "we'll update every X hours"]
[If applicable: "In the meantime, you can [workaround]."]
I'm personally tracking this and will update you as soon as we have a
resolution. You can also check [status page URL] for real-time updates.
I'm sorry for the disruption to your team's work. We take this seriously
and [what you're doing to prevent recurrence if known].
[Your name]Following Up After Silence
Hi [Name],
I wanted to check in — I sent over [what you sent] on [date] and
wanted to make sure it didn't get lost in the shuffle.
[Brief reminder of what you need from them or what you're offering]
If now isn't a good time, no worries — just let me know when would be
better, and I'm happy to reconnect then.
Best,
[Your name]Follow-up and Escalation Guidance
Follow-up Cadence
| Situation | Follow-up Timing |
|---|---|
| Unanswered question | 2-3 business days |
| Open support issue | Daily until resolved for critical, 2-3 days for standard |
| Post-meeting action items | Within 24 hours (send notes), then check at deadline |
| General check-in | As needed for ongoing issues |
| After delivering bad news | 1 week to check on impact and sentiment |
When to Escalate
Escalate to your manager when:
Customer threatens to cancel or significantly downsell
Customer requests exception to policy you can't authorize
An issue has been unresolved for longer than SLA allows
Customer requests direct contact with leadership
You've made an error that needs senior involvement to resolve
Escalate to product/engineering when:
Bug is critical and blocking the customer's business
Feature gap is causing a competitive loss
Customer has unique technical requirements beyond standard support
Integration issues require engineering investigation
Escalation format:
ESCALATION: [Customer Name] — [One-line summary]
Urgency: [Critical / High / Medium]
Customer impact: [What's broken for them]
History: [Brief background — 2-3 sentences]
What I've tried: [Actions taken so far]
What I need: [Specific help or decision needed]
Deadline: [When this needs to be resolved by]Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer956 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.1 KiB
- SKILL.md14.2 KiB
ATTRIBUTION.md
Attribution
This folder is an unmodified copy of the Agent Skill "draft-response", distributed by AutoGineer (https://autogineer.com/agent-skills).
Commit: e050c2ec856373787143d7057663a6ebd1277df3
Published by: Anthropic (https://github.com/anthropics)
Publisher: Anthropic (https://github.com/anthropics)
Licence: Apache License 2.0 (https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/blob/e050c2ec856373787143d7057663a6ebd1277df3/customer-support/LICENSE)
Licence evidence: licence file customer-support/LICENSE
Retrieved: 2026-11-07
The skill's own files are unmodified copies. AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by the author or the publisher.
Files added by AutoGineer
ATTRIBUTION.md: this file, written by AutoGineer
LICENSE: copied from customer-support/LICENSE
Requirements and compatibility
Written for: Claude Code, Claude apps
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Needs: Claude Code frontmatter
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- Anthropic
- Publisher
- Anthropic (Official)
- Source
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins · customer-support/skills/draft-response · commit e050c2e
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from customer-support/LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Anthropic or Anthropic.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download draft-response.zip