Claude Md Improver

AnthropicOfficialPublished by Anthropic

Skill
Review and audit
Software development
Apache-2.0
No issues found

From the author

Audit and improve CLAUDE.md files in repositories. Use when user asks to check, audit, update, improve, or fix CLAUDE.md files. Scans for all CLAUDE.md files, evaluates quality against templates, outputs quality report, then makes targeted updates. Also use when the user mentions "CLAUDE.md maintenance" or "project memory optimization".

— the description by Anthropic

AutoGineer summary

Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author

The CLAUDE.md Improver is a specialized utility designed to maintain the quality and relevance of project context files. It scans a repository for CLAUDE.md files, assesses them against a structured quality rubric covering architecture, commands, and patterns, and provides a detailed report. Following user approval, it applies targeted updates to ensure the documentation remains actionable, concise, and accurate for future AI interactions.

What it does

Discovers all CLAUDE.md files across a repository, including local and global overrides.
Evaluates files based on commands, architecture clarity, patterns, conciseness, and currency.
Generates a comprehensive quality report with scores and specific improvement recommendations.
Proposes targeted, minimal updates to fill gaps or correct stale information.
Applies approved changes directly to the codebase while preserving existing structure.

When to use it

When you want to audit the quality of your project's AI context documentation.
When you notice that Claude is struggling to understand project-specific commands or patterns.
During routine project maintenance to ensure CLAUDE.md files reflect current codebase states.
When onboarding a new team member or setting up a new repository for AI-assisted development.

Advantages

Ensures AI agents have accurate, up-to-date context for more effective assistance.
Standardizes documentation quality across different project modules or monorepos.
Reduces hallucination by providing clear, actionable commands and architecture maps.
Promotes a clean, concise documentation style that is easy for both humans and AI to read.

Usage examples

“Audit my CLAUDE.md file and suggest improvements.”: The agent scans the file, evaluates it against the quality rubric, and presents a report with a score and specific recommendations for missing sections.
“Perform CLAUDE.md maintenance on this repository.”: The agent identifies all relevant files, assesses their current state, and proposes targeted updates to fix stale commands or clarify architecture.

Install

Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/anthropics/claude-md-improver/download

Unzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:

mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip claude-md-improver.zip -d .agents/skills

Documentation by Anthropic

CLAUDE.md Improver

Audit, evaluate, and improve CLAUDE.md files across a codebase to ensure Claude Code has optimal project context.

This skill can write to CLAUDE.md files. After presenting a quality report and getting user approval, it updates CLAUDE.md files with targeted improvements.

Workflow

Phase 1: Discovery

Find all CLAUDE.md files in the repository:

find . -name "CLAUDE.md" -o -name ".claude.md" -o -name ".claude.local.md" 2>/dev/null | head -50

File Types & Locations:

Type	Location	Purpose
Project root	`./CLAUDE.md`	Primary project context (checked into git, shared with team)
Local overrides	`./.claude.local.md`	Personal/local settings (gitignored, not shared)
Global defaults	`~/.claude/CLAUDE.md`	User-wide defaults across all projects
Package-specific	`./packages/*/CLAUDE.md`	Module-level context in monorepos
Subdirectory	Any nested location	Feature/domain-specific context

Note: Claude auto-discovers CLAUDE.md files in parent directories, making monorepo setups work automatically.

Phase 2: Quality Assessment

For each CLAUDE.md file, evaluate against quality criteria. See references/quality-criteria.md for detailed rubrics.

Quick Assessment Checklist:

Criterion	Weight	Check
Commands/workflows documented	High	Are build/test/deploy commands present?
Architecture clarity	High	Can Claude understand the codebase structure?
Non-obvious patterns	Medium	Are gotchas and quirks documented?
Conciseness	Medium	No verbose explanations or obvious info?
Currency	High	Does it reflect current codebase state?
Actionability	High	Are instructions executable, not vague?

Quality Scores:

A (90-100): Comprehensive, current, actionable
B (70-89): Good coverage, minor gaps
C (50-69): Basic info, missing key sections
D (30-49): Sparse or outdated
F (0-29): Missing or severely outdated

Phase 3: Quality Report Output

ALWAYS output the quality report BEFORE making any updates.

Format:

## CLAUDE.md Quality Report

### Summary
- Files found: X
- Average score: X/100
- Files needing update: X

### File-by-File Assessment

#### 1. ./CLAUDE.md (Project Root)
**Score: XX/100 (Grade: X)**

| Criterion | Score | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Commands/workflows | X/20 | ... |
| Architecture clarity | X/20 | ... |
| Non-obvious patterns | X/15 | ... |
| Conciseness | X/15 | ... |
| Currency | X/15 | ... |
| Actionability | X/15 | ... |

**Issues:**
- [List specific problems]

**Recommended additions:**
- [List what should be added]

#### 2. ./packages/api/CLAUDE.md (Package-specific)
...

Phase 4: Targeted Updates

After outputting the quality report, ask user for confirmation before updating.

Update Guidelines (Critical):

Propose targeted additions only - Focus on genuinely useful info:
- Commands or workflows discovered during analysis
- Gotchas or non-obvious patterns found in code
- Package relationships that weren't clear
- Testing approaches that work
- Configuration quirks
Keep it minimal - Avoid:
- Restating what's obvious from the code
- Generic best practices already covered
- One-off fixes unlikely to recur
- Verbose explanations when a one-liner suffices
Show diffs - For each change, show:
- Which CLAUDE.md file to update
- The specific addition (as a diff or quoted block)
- Brief explanation of why this helps future sessions

Diff Format:

### Update: ./CLAUDE.md

**Why:** Build command was missing, causing confusion about how to run the project.

```diff
+ ## Quick Start
+
+ ```bash
+ npm install
+ npm run dev  # Start development server on port 3000
+ ```


### Phase 5: Apply Updates

After user approval, apply changes using the Edit tool. Preserve existing content structure.

## Templates

See [references/templates.md](references/templates.md) for CLAUDE.md templates by project type.

## Common Issues to Flag

1. **Stale commands**: Build commands that no longer work
2. **Missing dependencies**: Required tools not mentioned
3. **Outdated architecture**: File structure that's changed
4. **Missing environment setup**: Required env vars or config
5. **Broken test commands**: Test scripts that have changed
6. **Undocumented gotchas**: Non-obvious patterns not captured

## User Tips to Share

When presenting recommendations, remind users:

- **`#` key shortcut**: During a Claude session, press `#` to have Claude auto-incorporate learnings into CLAUDE.md
- **Keep it concise**: CLAUDE.md should be human-readable; dense is better than verbose
- **Actionable commands**: All documented commands should be copy-paste ready
- **Use `.claude.local.md`**: For personal preferences not shared with team (add to `.gitignore`)
- **Global defaults**: Put user-wide preferences in `~/.claude/CLAUDE.md`

## What Makes a Great CLAUDE.md

**Key principles:**
- Concise and human-readable
- Actionable commands that can be copy-pasted
- Project-specific patterns, not generic advice
- Non-obvious gotchas and warnings

**Recommended sections** (use only what's relevant):
- Commands (build, test, dev, lint)
- Architecture (directory structure)
- Key Files (entry points, config)
- Code Style (project conventions)
- Environment (required vars, setup)
- Testing (commands, patterns)
- Gotchas (quirks, common mistakes)
- Workflow (when to do what)

Files

ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer1014 B
LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.1 KiB
SKILL.md5.9 KiB
references/quality-criteria.md2.6 KiB
references/templates.md3.6 KiB
references/update-guidelines.md3.1 KiB

references/quality-criteria.md

CLAUDE.md Quality Criteria

Scoring Rubric

1. Commands/Workflows (20 points)

20 points: All essential commands documented with context

Build, test, lint, deploy commands present
Development workflow clear
Common operations documented

15 points: Most commands present, some missing context

10 points: Basic commands only, no workflow

5 points: Few commands, many missing

0 points: No commands documented

2. Architecture Clarity (20 points)

20 points: Clear codebase map

Key directories explained
Module relationships documented
Entry points identified
Data flow described where relevant

15 points: Good structure overview, minor gaps

10 points: Basic directory listing only

5 points: Vague or incomplete

0 points: No architecture info

3. Non-Obvious Patterns (15 points)

15 points: Gotchas and quirks captured

Known issues documented
Workarounds explained
Edge cases noted
"Why we do it this way" for unusual patterns

10 points: Some patterns documented

5 points: Minimal pattern documentation

0 points: No patterns or gotchas

4. Conciseness (15 points)

15 points: Dense, valuable content

No filler or obvious info
Each line adds value
No redundancy with code comments

10 points: Mostly concise, some padding

5 points: Verbose in places

0 points: Mostly filler or restates obvious code

5. Currency (15 points)

15 points: Reflects current codebase

Commands work as documented
File references accurate
Tech stack current

10 points: Mostly current, minor staleness

5 points: Several outdated references

0 points: Severely outdated

6. Actionability (15 points)

15 points: Instructions are executable

Commands can be copy-pasted
Steps are concrete
Paths are real

10 points: Mostly actionable

5 points: Some vague instructions

0 points: Vague or theoretical

Assessment Process

Read the CLAUDE.md file completely
Cross-reference with actual codebase:
- Run documented commands (mentally or actually)
- Check if referenced files exist
- Verify architecture descriptions
Score each criterion
Calculate total and assign grade
List specific issues found
Propose concrete improvements

Red Flags

Commands that would fail (wrong paths, missing deps)
References to deleted files/folders
Outdated tech versions
Copy-paste from templates without customization
Generic advice not specific to the project
"TODO" items never completed
Duplicate info across multiple CLAUDE.md files

Requirements and compatibility

Written for: Claude Code, Claude apps

Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta

“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.

Needs: Names Claude Code tools, Needs Node.js

Security

No issues found by our static scan· No issues found

A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.

Attribution and licence

Published by

Anthropic

Publisher

Anthropic (Official)

Source

anthropics/claude-plugins-official · plugins/claude-md-management/skills/claude-md-improver · commit 0412be7

Licence

Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)

LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from plugins/claude-md-management/LICENSE)
ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)

Synced

2026-11-09

AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Anthropic or Anthropic.

Download ZIP

The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download claude-md-improver.zip