Android Permissions Security
Android (Google)OfficialCreated by Google LLCDistributed by Android (Google)
- Skill
- Guidelines
- Security
- Apache-2.0
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides a systematic approach to identifying and fixing security gaps in Android applications. It covers the secure configuration of AndroidManifest.xml, the implementation of robust IPC (Inter-Process Communication) boundaries, and the correct handling of runtime permissions. It emphasizes moving away from insecure practices like spoofable intent-based identity checks toward cryptographically secure UID verification using Binder. The guide also details how to properly define custom permissions, manage granular URI grants, and implement safe, non-blocking runtime permission request flows.
What it does
- Audits AndroidManifest.xml for weak custom permission protection levels.
- Provides patterns for cryptographically verifying caller identity via Binder.
- Guides the implementation of granular URI permission management for ContentProviders.
- Defines secure practices for protecting exported Services, Receivers, and Providers.
- Outlines a 3-state runtime permission request flow to prevent infinite loops.
- Recommends zero-permission alternatives like the Photo Picker for media access.
When to use it
- During security audits of Android application codebases.
- When configuring custom permissions for inter-app communication.
- When securing AIDL-based bound services against Confused Deputy attacks.
- When refactoring legacy code that relies on spoofable intent extras for identity.
- When implementing or updating runtime permission request logic.
Advantages
- Prevents common IPC vulnerabilities like package name spoofing.
- Enforces the principle of least privilege through granular URI grants.
- Reduces user friction by implementing standard, non-looping permission flows.
- Eliminates Confused Deputy risks by using proper Binder permission enforcement.
- Provides clear, actionable code snippets for modern Android security APIs.
Usage examples
- “How do I securely verify that a caller is an authorized partner app?”
- The agent provides a CallerVerifier implementation that uses Binder.getCallingUid() and PackageManager.hasSigningCertificate() to cryptographically verify the caller's signature.
- “My app is vulnerable to intent spoofing. How do I fix it?”
- The agent instructs you to remove all string-based package checks and replace them with Binder-based UID authentication to ensure the caller's identity is genuine.
- “How should I handle runtime permissions without creating an infinite loop?”
- The agent provides a 3-state flow pattern: checking grant status, showing rationale if needed, and launching the request, with a fallback to Settings for permanent denials.
- “How do I restrict access to my ContentProvider to only specific partner apps?”
- The agent guides you to define a custom permission with signature|knownSigner protection level and apply it to the provider, ensuring only apps with matching certificate digests can access it.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/android/android-permissions-security/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip android-permissions-security.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by Google LLC
Guidelines for auditing permission vulnerabilities, enforcing least privilege, securing IPC boundaries, and handling runtime permissions across the Android ecosystem.
Glossary
Runtime Permission: Dangerous permission (e.g., Camera, Location) that must be granted by the user at runtime on Android 6.0+ (API 23+).
Custom Permission: A permission defined by an app (
<permission>) to restrict access to its exported components.Protection Level: Attribute defining how the OS grants the permission (
normal,dangerous,signature,knownSigner).knownSigner: Protection flag (API 31+) granting signature-level access to partner apps matching trusted certificate digests.
SigningInfo: Object (API 28+) providing signing history and multiple signer certificates for an application.
Binder Calling Identity: Reliable UID representing the calling process obtained using
Binder.getCallingUid().URI Permission: Temporary, granular access granted to a content URI using
grantUriPermissionsand intent flags.
Prerequisites
Add
androidx.core:core-ktxandandroidx.activity:activity-ktx(orandroidx.fragment:fragment-ktx) dependencies to the app-levelbuild.gradlefile forContextCompatandActivityResultContracts.For
knownSignerpartner permissions (android:knownCerts), ensure the projectcompileSdkandtargetSdkare at least 31 (Android 12).For broadcast identity sharing (
BroadcastOptions.setShareIdentityEnabled), ensurecompileSdkandtargetSdkare at least 34 (Android 14).
1. Security audit and permission gap detection playbook
When auditing an Android project for permission and IPC security vulnerabilities, systematically inspect each area:
| Vulnerability Area | Search In / Pattern | Risk | Remediation Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weak Custom Permission Protection | AndroidManifest.xml with android:protectionLevel="normal", "dangerous", or "signatureOrSystem" | Unauthorized apps request or claim permission without restriction | Upgrade to signature or signature with knownSigner and android:knownCerts. |
| Overly Broad URI Permission Grants | <grant-uri-permission android:pathPrefix="/" /> or pathPrefix="" in <provider> | Leaks all provider data to third parties | Replace with explicit scoped subpath (e.g. android:pathPrefix="/shared/"). Retain android:grantUriPermissions="true". Remove any wildcard pathPrefix="/". |
| Missing ContentProvider Split Permissions | <provider> with only generic android:permission or missing android:readPermission and android:writePermission | Read-only callers execute write operations or write-only callers access read operations | Configure granular android:readPermission="...READ_DATA" and android:writePermission="...WRITE_DATA", AND declare the custom <permission> tags with android:protectionLevel="signature" (or signature with knownSigner) at the <manifest> root. |
| Spoofable Caller Identity Checks | intent.getStringExtra("calling_package"), intent.getStringExtra("sender"), callingPackage == "..." in Services | Malicious callers forge intent extras or strings | Remove string checks; authenticate caller UID cryptographically using Binder.getCallingUid() and pm.hasSigningCertificate(). |
| Bound Service Permission Bypass | checkCallingOrSelfPermission() or enforceCallingOrSelfPermission() in Binder AIDL stubs | Falls back to host app UID outside IPC or when identity is cleared, causing Confused Deputy bypass | Replace with enforceCallingPermission("...WRITE_DATA", ...) or checkCallingPermission("...WRITE_DATA"). |
| Missing Method-Level Checks in Bound Services | Bound Service AIDL methods mutating state without enforcing write permissions | Callers with read-only binding access invoke mutating write operations | Add enforceCallingPermission("...WRITE_DATA", "Caller lacks WRITE_DATA permission") inside mutating AIDL methods. |
| Flawed Runtime Permission Flow | Missing shouldShowRequestPermissionRationale(), missing permanent denial handling, or re-requesting in loops | Poor user experience, infinite loops, or inability to recover permissions | Implement 3-state flow: check grant -> check rationale dialog -> launch contract. On permanent denial, redirect to Settings.ACTION_APPLICATION_DETAILS_SETTINGS. |
| Simultaneous Location Requests | arrayOf(ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, ACCESS_BACKGROUND_LOCATION) in one request | Rejected by Android 11+ (API 30+) | Request foreground location (ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION) first. Request ACCESS_BACKGROUND_LOCATION only after foreground is granted in a separate user step. |
| Broad Storage Permissions for Media | Requesting READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE or READ_MEDIA_IMAGES for user image selection | Over-privilege, user privacy violation | Migrate to zero-permission Photo Picker (ActivityResultContracts.PickVisualMedia). |
| Cached Permission State | Storing permission status in var cachedLocationPermissionGranted = ... | Fails when permission is revoked or expires | Query ContextCompat.checkSelfPermission() dynamically at invocation time and wrap protected calls in try-catch blocks catching SecurityException. |
| Insecure Broadcasts | sendBroadcast(intent) without package target or receiver permission; receiver without sender authentication | Data interception or command spoofing | Set explicit package (intent.setPackage(...)), pass receiver permission, and enable BroadcastOptions.setShareIdentityEnabled(true) (API 34+) to verify sentFromPackage. |
2. Custom permissions and protection levels
When declaring custom permissions or partner certificates in the manifest, you
must follow the instructions in the <permission> element guide.
signature: Restricts access to apps signed with the same developer key.signature|knownSigner(API 31+): Restricts access to partner apps whose signing certificate digests match declared hashes inandroid:knownCerts.normalordangerous: Do not use for private inter-app IPC.signatureOrSystem: Deprecated (API 23). Upgrade deprecatedsignatureOrSystempermissions tosignature. Avoid in non-system apps.
Manifest snippets
Signature-level custom permission
Use signature permissions when restricting component access exclusively to
apps signed with the same developer certificate by declaring the <permission>
in the manifest and applying android:permission to the target component.
<permission
android:name="com.example.snippets.permission.ACCESS_SECURE_API"
android:protectionLevel="signature" /><br />
KnownSigner partner permission (API 31+)
Use signature|knownSigner permissions when granting access to specific
external partner apps by declaring the <permission> in the manifest with
android:knownCerts referencing a resource array of trusted SHA-256
certificate digests.
<resources xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools">
<!-- SHA-256 fingerprints of trusted partner certificates (lowercase, no colons) -->
<string-array name="trusted_partner_certs" tools:ignore="Typos">
<item>103938ee4537e59e8ee792f654504fb8346fc6b346d0bbc4415fc339fcfc8ec1</item>
</string-array>
</resources><br />
<permission
android:name="com.example.snippets.permission.PARTNER_API"
android:protectionLevel="signature|knownSigner"
android:knownCerts="@array/trusted_partner_certs" /><br />
3. Exported component protection and URI permissions
Private components : Always set
android:exported="false".Exported components : Require permissions (
android:permission,android:readPermission,android:writePermission).Granular URI Grants : Retain
android:grantUriPermissions="true"for secure sharing, but scope grants to specific sub-paths. Never use wildcardpathPrefix="/".Custom Permission Declarations : When splitting read and write permissions on a provider, you MUST declare the
<permission>tags withandroid:protectionLevel="signature"(orsignature|knownSigner) at the<manifest>root level.Remediating Existing Wildcard Grants : You MUST find and remove any existing
<grant-uri-permission android:pathPrefix="/" />orpathPrefix=""and replace it with an explicit scoped subpath (e.g.android:pathPrefix="/shared/").Granular
UriPermissionManagement : Instead of broad manifest grants, use runtimeandroid.content.UriPermissiontokens for least-privilege per-URI sharing:Grant temporary access :
context.grantUriPermission(targetPackage, uri, Intent.FLAG_GRANT_READ_URI_PERMISSION)or attachIntent.FLAG_GRANT_READ_URI_PERMISSIONto outgoing intents.Persist and release access : The receiving app calls
contentResolver.takePersistableUriPermission(uri, modeFlags)for durable access across reboots, andcontentResolver.releasePersistableUriPermission(uri, modeFlags)when durable access is no longer needed.Audit active grants : Inspect
contentResolver.persistedUriPermissions(List<UriPermission>) to verify granted URIs (uriPermission.uri,uriPermission.isReadPermission(),uriPermission.isWritePermission()).Revoke temporary access : Call
context.revokeUriPermission(targetPackage, uri, modeFlags)(API 26+), falling back tocontext.revokeUriPermission(uri, modeFlags)on API 25 and lower so access fails closed as soon as operations conclude.
Manifest snippet: Complete secure ContentProvider declaration
Declare the split read and write permissions at the <manifest> root:
<permission
android:name="com.example.snippets.permission.READ_DATA"
android:protectionLevel="signature" />
<permission
android:name="com.example.snippets.permission.WRITE_DATA"
android:protectionLevel="signature" /><br />
Then configure the provider with those permissions and a scoped URI grant:
<provider
android:name=".permissions.SecureDataProvider"
android:authorities="com.example.snippets.partnerprovider"
android:exported="true"
android:readPermission="com.example.snippets.permission.READ_DATA"
android:writePermission="com.example.snippets.permission.WRITE_DATA"
android:grantUriPermissions="true">
<grant-uri-permission android:pathPrefix="/shared/" />
</provider><br />
Runtime granular UriPermission management snippet
object UriPermissionManager {
/** Grants temporary read access to a specific URI for a partner package. */
fun grantScopedUriAccess(context: Context, targetPackage: String, uri: Uri) {
context.grantUriPermission(
targetPackage,
uri,
Intent.FLAG_GRANT_READ_URI_PERMISSION
)
}
/** Audits active persisted URI permissions held by the application. */
fun getActivePersistedPermissions(context: Context): List<UriPermission> {
return context.contentResolver.persistedUriPermissions
}
/** Revokes temporary URI access for a specific partner package when data transfer completes. */
fun revokeScopedUriAccess(context: Context, targetPackage: String, uri: Uri) {
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.O) {
context.revokeUriPermission(
targetPackage,
uri,
Intent.FLAG_GRANT_READ_URI_PERMISSION or Intent.FLAG_GRANT_WRITE_URI_PERMISSION
)
} else {
context.revokeUriPermission(
uri,
Intent.FLAG_GRANT_READ_URI_PERMISSION or Intent.FLAG_GRANT_WRITE_URI_PERMISSION
)
}
}
}<br />
4. Cryptographic caller identity verification
Never trust caller package names provided in Intents or string arguments
(getCallingPackage(), intent.getStringExtra("calling_package"),
intent.getStringExtra("sender"), intent.getStringExtra("package")). Intent
extras and string package names are forged by malicious applications.
Critical vulnerability: Package name spoofing using intent extras
// VULNERABLE PATTERN: DO NOT DO THIS
val callingPackage = intent?.getStringExtra("calling_package")
if (callingPackage != null && SignatureUtils.verifyPartnerPackage(this, callingPackage)) {
// A malicious app passes "com.example.partner" in the extra.
// The signature check verifies the installed partner on disk, but the CALLER was malicious!
}<br />
Secure pattern: Authenticate calling UID cryptographically
Completely remove all
intent.getStringExtra("calling_package"),intent.getStringExtra("sender"), andcallingPackage == "..."checks.Obtain caller identity using
Binder.getCallingUid()inside an active Binder IPC transaction (such as an AIDLStubmethod orContentProvidermethod).Verify caller certificate using
PackageManager.hasSigningCertificate()(API 28+) orPackageManager.getPackagesForUid().
Complete CallerVerifier implementation
Apply this to the service that currently performs the spoofable check.
Placement : declare
CallerVerifierin the same file as the service you are fixing (for example insideSecureDataService.kt). Do not move the verification into a new file and leave the original service untouched.Active Binder IPC context :
Binder.getCallingUid()only returns the remote caller's UID during an active Binder transaction (never insideService.onStartCommand()orService.onBind(), where it returnsProcess.myUid()). RejectcallingUid == Process.myUid()so calls outside an active IPC transaction or afterBinder.clearCallingIdentity()fail closed instead of bypassing verification.Nullability :
packageInfo.signaturesisArray<Signature>?. Copy the?: return falseguard exactly as written below. IteratingpackageInfo.signaturesdirectly fails to compile with "Non-nullable value required to call an 'iterator()' method in a for-loop."
object CallerVerifier {
private const val TRUSTED_PARTNER_SHA256 =
"A1B2C3D4E5F60708090A0B0C0D0E0F1011121314151617181920212223242526"
fun isCallerAuthorized(context: Context): Boolean {
val callingUid = Binder.getCallingUid()
if (callingUid == android.os.Process.myUid()) return false
val pm = context.packageManager
// Modern API 28+ check by UID:
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.P) {
val certBytes = hexStringToByteArray(TRUSTED_PARTNER_SHA256)
return pm.hasSigningCertificate(callingUid, certBytes, PackageManager.CERT_INPUT_SHA256)
}
// Fallback for legacy APIs:
val callingPackages = pm.getPackagesForUid(callingUid) ?: return false
for (pkg in callingPackages) {
if (verifyPackageSignature(pm, pkg)) {
return true
}
}
return false
}
@Suppress("DEPRECATION")
private fun verifyPackageSignature(pm: PackageManager, packageName: String): Boolean {
return try {
val packageInfo = pm.getPackageInfo(packageName, PackageManager.GET_SIGNATURES)
val signatures = packageInfo.signatures ?: return false
for (sig in signatures) {
val digest = java.security.MessageDigest.getInstance("SHA-256").digest(sig.toByteArray())
val hex = digest.joinToString("") { "%02X".format(it) }
if (hex.equals(TRUSTED_PARTNER_SHA256, ignoreCase = true)) return true
}
false
} catch (e: PackageManager.NameNotFoundException) {
false
}
}
private fun hexStringToByteArray(s: String): ByteArray {
val len = s.length
val data = ByteArray(len / 2)
for (i in 0 until len step 2) {
data[i / 2] = ((Character.digit(s[i], 16) shl 4) + Character.digit(s[i + 1], 16)).toByte()
}
return data
}
}<br />
5. Method-level Binder enforcement in bound services (SecureBoundService.kt)
In bound services exposing AIDL Binder stubs, protect state-modifying methods
using enforceCallingPermission().
Critical security rule: Never use CallingOrSelfPermission in services
NEVER use
checkCallingOrSelfPermission()orenforceCallingOrSelfPermission().Why: During an active Binder transaction, this method checks the caller's permission. However, if the method is invoked locally (outside of an active IPC) or if the IPC calling identity is dropped, it falls back to checking the host app's permissions. Because the host app holds the permission, this fallback grants access and bypasses the security boundary, causing a Confused Deputy vulnerability.
MUST USE:
enforceCallingPermission("com.example.snippets.permission.WRITE_DATA", "Caller lacks WRITE_DATA permission")orcheckCallingPermission("com.example.snippets.permission.WRITE_DATA").
Complete SecureBoundService implementation
class SecureBoundService : Service() {
private val binder = object : IMyService.Stub() {
override fun getData(): String {
// Read-only operation guarded by manifest-level permission
return "Confidential Data"
}
override fun modifyData(newData: String) {
// MUST use enforceCallingPermission or checkCallingPermission.
// NEVER use checkCallingOrSelfPermission or enforceCallingOrSelfPermission.
[email protected](
"com.example.snippets.permission.WRITE_DATA",
"Caller lacks WRITE_DATA permission"
)
updateInternalState(newData)
Log.d("SecureBoundService", "Data modified to: $newData with proper WRITE_DATA permission check")
}
}
override fun onBind(intent: Intent?): IBinder = binder
private fun updateInternalState(data: String) {
// Internal state update logic
}
}<br />
6. Safe runtime permission workflow (RuntimePermissionsActivity.kt)
When implementing runtime permission requests or handling permission denial states, you must follow the instructions in the Request runtime permissions guide and Permissions overview. Implement a 3-state flow without caching states or creating infinite retry loops:
Check Granted State :
ContextCompat.checkSelfPermission(this, permission) == PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED.Check Rationale : When
shouldShowRequestPermissionRationale(permission)returnstrue, show a rationale dialog and launch the permission request only from its Continue button.Launch Contract :
ActivityResultContracts.RequestPermission().Handle Permanent Denial : In the callback, if permission was denied and
!shouldShowRequestPermissionRationale(permission), guide the user toSettings.ACTION_APPLICATION_DETAILS_SETTINGS.
Complete RuntimePermissionsActivity.kt implementation
class RuntimePermissionsActivity : ComponentActivity() {
private val cameraLauncher =
registerForActivityResult(ActivityResultContracts.RequestPermission()) { isGranted ->
if (isGranted) {
startCameraPreview()
} else {
if (!shouldShowRequestPermissionRationale(Manifest.permission.CAMERA)) {
// User selected 'Don't ask again' or permanently denied.
// Direct user to Application Details Settings.
val intent = Intent(Settings.ACTION_APPLICATION_DETAILS_SETTINGS).apply {
data = Uri.fromParts("package", packageName, null)
}
startActivity(intent)
} else {
showSnackbar("Camera permission is required to preview camera feed.")
}
}
}
fun requestCameraPermissionSafely() {
val permission = Manifest.permission.CAMERA
when {
ContextCompat.checkSelfPermission(this, permission) == PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED -> {
startCameraPreview()
}
shouldShowRequestPermissionRationale(permission) -> {
showRationaleDialog(permission)
}
else -> {
cameraLauncher.launch(permission)
}
}
}
private fun showRationaleDialog(permission: String) {
AlertDialog.Builder(this)
.setTitle("Camera permission required")
.setMessage("Camera permission is needed to preview the camera feed.")
.setPositiveButton("Continue") { _, _ ->
cameraLauncher.launch(permission)
}
.setNegativeButton("Cancel", null)
.show()
}
private fun startCameraPreview() {
Log.d("RuntimePermissionsActivity", "Camera preview started")
}
private fun showSnackbar(msg: String) {
Log.i("RuntimePermissionsActivity", msg)
}
}<br />
7. Zero-permission alternatives and sequential flows
When implementing photo or media selection, you must follow the instructions in the Photo Picker API guide to avoid requesting broad storage permissions.
Photo Picker : Prefer
ActivityResultContracts.PickVisualMedia()over requesting wide storage permissions (READ_MEDIA_IMAGES,READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE).Sequential Location Flow : Request
ACCESS_FINE_LOCATIONandACCESS_COARSE_LOCATIONfirst. Never requestACCESS_BACKGROUND_LOCATIONsimultaneously. Only request background location in a separate step after foreground is granted.
Photo picker implementation
private val photoPickerLauncher =
registerForActivityResult(ActivityResultContracts.PickVisualMedia()) { uri ->
if (uri != null) {
handleImageUri(uri)
}
}
fun selectPhoto() {
photoPickerLauncher.launch(
PickVisualMediaRequest(ActivityResultContracts.PickVisualMedia.ImageOnly)
)
}<br />
Sequential location request implementation
private val foregroundLocationLauncher =
registerForActivityResult(ActivityResultContracts.RequestMultiplePermissions()) { permissions ->
val fineGranted = permissions[Manifest.permission.ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION] ?: false
val coarseGranted = permissions[Manifest.permission.ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION] ?: false
if (fineGranted || coarseGranted) {
startForegroundLocationUpdates()
}
}
fun requestForegroundLocation() {
foregroundLocationLauncher.launch(
arrayOf(
Manifest.permission.ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION,
Manifest.permission.ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION
)
)
}
// Background location requested only AFTER foreground is granted and user explicitly opts in:
private val backgroundLocationLauncher =
registerForActivityResult(ActivityResultContracts.RequestPermission()) { isGranted ->
if (isGranted) {
startBackgroundTracking()
}
}<br />
8. Stateless checks and error boundaries
Never cache permission states in in-memory variables (e.g.
cachedLocationPermissionGranted). CheckContextCompat.checkSelfPermission()dynamically before each operation.Wrap API calls in try-catch : Catch
SecurityExceptionaround permission-protected framework calls (e.g., location queries) to handle one-time permission revocation gracefully.
fun performLocationAccess() {
val fine = ContextCompat.checkSelfPermission(this, Manifest.permission.ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION)
val coarse = ContextCompat.checkSelfPermission(this, Manifest.permission.ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION)
if (fine != PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED && coarse != PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED) {
requestForegroundLocation()
return
}
val provider = if (fine == PackageManager.PERMISSION_GRANTED) {
LocationManager.GPS_PROVIDER
} else {
LocationManager.NETWORK_PROVIDER
}
try {
val location = locationManager.getLastKnownLocation(provider)
processLocation(location)
} catch (e: SecurityException) {
Log.e("LocationAccess", "Permission revoked at runtime", e)
}
}<br />
9. Secure broadcasts (API 34+ share identity)
Use explicit intents, required receiver permissions, or Android 14+ broadcast options:
// Sender: Enforce permission and share identity
val intent = Intent("com.example.snippets.permission.ACTION_SECRET_UPDATE").apply {
setPackage("com.example.partner") // Explicit target
}
val isUdc = Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.UPSIDE_DOWN_CAKE
val options = if (isUdc) {
BroadcastOptions.makeBasic().apply {
setShareIdentityEnabled(true)
}.toBundle()
} else null
sendBroadcast(intent, "com.example.snippets.permission.RECEIVE_SECRET_UPDATE", options)<br />
// Receiver: Validate sender on Android 14+
class ProtectedReceiver : BroadcastReceiver() {
override fun onReceive(context: Context, intent: Intent) {
if (intent.action == "com.example.snippets.permission.ACTION_SECRET_UPDATE") {
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.UPSIDE_DOWN_CAKE) {
val sender = sentFromPackage
if (sender != "com.example.trusted_sender") {
return // Reject unauthorized sender
}
}
processUpdate(intent)
}
}
private fun processUpdate(intent: Intent) {}
}<br />
Legacy compatibility (Pre-API 34) : On API 33 and lower, never authenticate
a broadcast sender using PendingIntent.getCreatorPackage() or
PendingIntent.getCreatorUid(), because any app that acquires a trusted app's
PendingIntent can attach and send it (see Sender of Pending Intents).
Instead, restrict the <receiver> with a signature or signature|knownSigner
(API 31+) permission in the manifest; if minSdkVersion is lower than 31, use a
bound Service or ContentProvider and verify Binder.getCallingUid().
Quality checklist
DO
MUST declare
<permission android:name="..." android:protectionLevel="signature" />(orsignature|knownSigner) at the<manifest>root for custom permissions and ContentProvider split permissions.MUST explicitly set
android:exported="false"for all private components to remove the need for custom permission management.MUST authenticate callers cryptographically using
Binder.getCallingUid()and certificate hashes (PackageManager.hasSigningCertificateorgetPackagesForUid) rather than checking spoofable intent extras.MUST check
shouldShowRequestPermissionRationale()before runtime prompts and during denial handling.MUST direct user to
Settings.ACTION_APPLICATION_DETAILS_SETTINGSwhen permission is permanently denied.MUST enforce method-level checks with
enforceCallingPermission()orcheckCallingPermission()on modifying AIDL methods.MUST scope ContentProvider URI permissions to explicit sub-paths (e.g.
android:pathPrefix="/shared/") while retainingandroid:grantUriPermissions="true".MUST catch
SecurityExceptionaround protected API calls.MUST request foreground and background location permissions sequentially, never simultaneously.
NEVER
NEVER extract or verify package names from Intent extras (
intent.getStringExtra("calling_package"),intent.getStringExtra("sender"),intent.getStringExtra("package")). Always authenticate usingBinder.getCallingUid()and certificates.NEVER authenticate a broadcast or IPC sender using
PendingIntent.getCreatorPackage()orPendingIntent.getCreatorUid().NEVER remediate caller spoofing by merely adding manifest permissions while keeping spoofable intent extra checks.
NEVER use
checkCallingOrSelfPermission()orenforceCallingOrSelfPermission()to guard external caller methods. Always useenforceCallingPermission()orcheckCallingPermission().NEVER use deprecated
signatureOrSystem.NEVER declare or retain
<grant-uri-permission android:pathPrefix="/" />orpathPrefix="". Always replace with a scoped sub-path.NEVER create infinite permission request loops on denial.
NEVER request foreground and background location permissions in the same request.
NEVER cache permission grant states in in-memory fields.
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer999 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer11.1 KiB
- SKILL.md29.2 KiB
- references/android/guide/topics/manifest/permission-element.md6.7 KiB
- references/android/guide/topics/permissions/overview.md10.4 KiB
- references/android/privacy-and-security/risks/sender-of-pending-intents.md3.7 KiB
- references/android/training/permissions/requesting.md37.9 KiB
references/android/guide/topics/permissions/overview.md
App permissions help support user privacy by protecting access to the following:
Restricted data, such as system state and users' contact information
Restricted actions, such as connecting to a paired device and recording audio
This page provides an overview to how Android permissions work, including a high-level workflow for using permissions, descriptions of different types of permissions, and some best practices for using permissions in your app. Other pages explain how to minimize your app's requests for permissions, declare permissions, request runtime permissions, and restrict how other apps can interact with your app's components.
To view a complete list of Android app permissions, visit the permissions API reference page.
To view some sample apps that demonstrate the permissions workflow, visit the Android permissions samples repository on GitHub.
Workflow for using permissions
If your app offers functionality that might require access to restricted data or restricted actions, determine whether you can get the information or perform the actions without needing to declare permissions. You can fulfill many use cases in your app, such as taking photos, pausing media playback, and displaying relevant ads, without needing to declare any permissions.
If you decide that your app must access restricted data or perform restricted actions to fulfill a use case, declare the appropriate permissions. Some permissions, known as install-time permissions, are automatically granted when your app is installed. Other permissions, known as runtime permissions, require your app to go a step further and request the permission at runtime.
Figure 1 illustrates the workflow for using app permissions: Image: untitled Figure 1. High-level workflow for using permissions on Android.
Types of permissions
Android categorizes permissions into different types, including install-time permissions, runtime permissions, and special permissions. Each permission's type indicates the scope of restricted data that your app can access, and the scope of restricted actions that your app can perform, when the system grants your app that permission. The protection level for each permission is based on its type and is shown on the permissions API reference page.
Install-time permissions
Image: The left image shows a list of an app's install-time permissions. The right image shows a pop-up dialog that contains 2 options: allow and deny. Figure 2. The list of an app's install-time permissions, which appears in an app store.
Install-time permissions give your app limited access to restricted data or let your app perform restricted actions that minimally affect the system or other apps. When you declare install-time permissions in your app, an app store presents an install-time permission notice to the user when they view an app's details page, as shown in figure 2. The system automatically grants your app the permissions when the user installs your app.
Android includes several sub-types of install-time permissions, including normal permissions and signature permissions.
Normal permissions
These permissions allow access to data and actions that extend beyond your app's sandbox but present very little risk to the user's privacy and the operation of other apps.
The system assigns the normal protection level to normal permissions.
Signature permissions
The system grants a signature permission to an app only when the app is signed by the same certificate as the app or the OS that defines the permission.
Applications that implement privileged services, such as autofill or VPN services, also make use of signature permissions. These apps require service-binding signature permissions so that only the system can bind to the services.
[!NOTE] Note: Some signature permissions aren't for use by third-party apps.
The system assigns the signature protection level to signature permissions.
Runtime permissions
Image: A pop-up dialog that contains 2 options: allow and deny. Figure 3. The system permission prompt that appears when your app requests a runtime permission.
Runtime permissions, also known as dangerous permissions, give your app additional access to restricted data or let your app perform restricted actions that more substantially affect the system and other apps. Therefore, you need to request runtime permissions in your app before you can access the restricted data or perform restricted actions. Don't assume that these permissions have been previously granted---check them and, if needed, request them before each access.
When your app requests a runtime permission, the system presents a runtime permission prompt, as shown in figure 3.
Many runtime permissions access private user data, a special type of restricted data that includes potentially sensitive information. Examples of private user data include location and contact information.
The microphone and camera provide access to particularly sensitive information. Therefore, the system helps you explain why your app accesses this information.
The system assigns the dangerous protection level to runtime permissions.
Special permissions
Special permissions correspond to particular app operations. Only the platform and OEMs can define special permissions. Additionally, the platform and OEMs usually define special permissions when they want to protect access to particularly powerful actions, such as drawing over other apps.
The Special app access page in system settings contains a set of user-toggleable operations. Many of these operations are implemented as special permissions.
Learn more about how to request special permissions.
The system assigns the appop protection level to special permissions.
Permission groups
Permissions can belong to permission groups. Permission groups consist of a set of logically related permissions. For example, permissions to send and receive SMS messages might belong to the same group, as they both relate to the application's interaction with SMS.
Permission groups help the system minimize the number of system dialogs that are presented to the user when an app requests closely related permissions. When a user is presented with a prompt to grant permissions for an application, permissions belonging to the same group are presented in the same interface. However, permissions can change groups without notice, so don't assume that a particular permission is grouped with any other permission.
Best practices
App permissions build on system security features and help Android support the following goals related to user privacy:
Control: The user has control over the data that they share with apps.
Transparency: The user understands what data an app uses and why the app accesses this data.
Data minimization: An app accesses and uses only the data that's required for a specific task or action that the user invokes.
This section presents a set of core best practices for using permissions effectively in your app. For more details on how you can work with permissions on Android, visit the app permissions best practices page.
Request a minimal number of permissions
When the user requests a particular action in your app, your app should request only the permissions that it needs to complete that action. Depending on how you are using the permissions, there might be an alternative way to fulfill your app's use case without relying on access to sensitive information.
Associate runtime permissions with specific actions
Request permissions as late into the flow of your app's use cases as possible. For example, if your app lets users send audio messages to others, wait until the user has navigated to the messaging screen and has pressed the Send audio message button. After the user presses the button, your app can then request access to the microphone.
Consider your app's dependencies
When you include a library, you also inherit its permission requirements. Be aware of the permissions that each dependency requires and what those permissions are used for.
Be transparent
When you make a permissions request, be clear about what you're accessing, why, and what functionalities are affected if permissions are denied, so users can make informed decisions.
Make system accesses explicit
When you access sensitive data or hardware, such as the camera or microphone, provide a continuous indication in your app if the system doesn't already provide these indicators. This reminder helps users understand exactly when your app accesses restricted data or performs restricted actions.
Permissions in system components
Permissions aren't only for requesting system functionality. Your app's system components can restrict which other apps can interact with your app, as described on the page about how to restrict interactions with other apps.
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Created by
- Google LLC
- Publisher
- Android (Google) (Official)
- Distributed by
- Android (Google)
- Source
- android/skills · security/android-permissions-security · commit bf68e2d
- Licence
- Apache License 2.0 (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE.txt)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by Google LLC or Android (Google).
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download android-permissions-security.zip