Planetscale Change Gates And Approval Contract
PlanetScaleOfficialPublished by PlanetScale
- Skill
- Guidelines
- Security
- MIT
- No issues found
AutoGineer summary
Written by AutoGineer from the skill’s own files, not by the author
This skill provides a structured governance framework for managing mutations within PlanetScale environments. It categorizes operations into five classes based on risk, ranging from read-only actions to high-impact production changes. The framework mandates specific approval requirements, pre-execution checklists, and post-execution reporting to ensure that all modifications to databases, network settings, and repository configurations are intentional, documented, and verified.
What it does
- Defines five risk-based operation classes for database and infrastructure changes.
- Mandates explicit approval requirements including change IDs and target confirmation.
- Requires a detailed pre-execution checklist for high-impact changes.
- Enforces post-execution reporting to document outcomes and rollback states.
- Provides standardized refusal language for ambiguous or overly broad production requests.
- Outlines strict prohibitions for autonomous actions on critical production resources.
When to use it
- When establishing safety protocols for AI agents interacting with PlanetScale.
- When defining governance for database schema migrations and configuration updates.
- When implementing a review process for infrastructure-as-code or database changes.
- When ensuring that production-impacting actions require human oversight and rollback plans.
Advantages
- Reduces the risk of accidental or unauthorized production changes.
- Ensures clear accountability through mandatory approval and reporting steps.
- Standardizes the documentation of database and infrastructure modifications.
- Prevents ambiguous instructions from triggering unintended system states.
Usage examples
- “Apply all schema recommendations to the production database.”
- The agent refuses the broad request and instead generates a specific, named change plan including risk assessments and a rollback strategy for review.
- “Update the production database connection pooling settings.”
- The agent identifies this as a Class C action, pauses to present a pre-execution checklist, and requests explicit approval with a change ID before proceeding.
Install
Download the skill as a ZIP:
https://autogineer.com/agent-skills/planetscale/planetscale-change-gates-and-approval-contract/downloadUnzip it into the cross-client skills folder of your project:
mkdir -p .agents/skills && unzip planetscale-change-gates-and-approval-contract.zip -d .agents/skills
Documentation by PlanetScale
Change gates and approval contract
Purpose
Prevent accidental or autonomous changes that can affect availability, safety, security, data, or developer workflows.
Operation classes
Class A: read-only by default
Allowed without approval:
List databases, branches, keyspaces, webhooks, backups, roles, traffic budgets, schema recommendations, deploy requests, and Insights data.
Inspect repository code.
Read schema metadata.
Read non-sensitive database metadata.
Produce reports and proposed change sets.
Class B: state-creating proposals
Allowed by default; requires approval only when the operator has demanded strict no-mutation mode:
Creating a query-pattern report through an API POST, even if the result is read-only telemetry.
Triggering a webhook test event.
Creating temporary local branches or files.
Opening PRs or issues in external tools.
Creating database development branches.
Applying DDL or migrations to non-production development branches.
Opening deploy requests targeting a branch protected by a review workflow.
The last three are proposals inside an existing review system: nothing reaches production until a human merges or deploys. The gate belongs on the merge/deploy action (Class C/D), not on proposal creation. An agent that stops to ask permission to open a PR is misclassifying.
Class C: behavior-changing
Always requires explicit approval:
Enable safe migrations.
Disable safe migrations.
Change deploy request approval settings.
Create/update/delete Traffic Control budget or rule.
Move Traffic Control budget to enforce mode.
Create/update/delete webhook.
Enable raw query collection.
Enable/disable extensions or settings that require restart.
Create/update/delete role.
Reset passwords.
Change pg_strict settings.
Change connection pooling behavior.
Change IP restrictions, PrivateLink, PSC, or public access.
Change backup schedule or retention.
Create restore branch.
Create backup beyond automatic backups.
Change branch size or replica topology.
Edit repository files or dependencies.
Class D: production data/availability impacting
Requires explicit approval, named target confirmation, rollback plan, and ideally a second human review:
Production DDL.
Production DML.
Applying schema recommendation to production.
Queueing or applying Vitess deploy request to production.
Promoting or restoring branches.
Deleting branches, databases, roles, webhooks, backups, or traffic rules.
Enforcing Traffic Control on production.
Changing production network access.
Rotating production credentials.
Emergency backup during high load.
Class E: never autonomous
Never do without direct human operation or separately approved incident procedure:
Delete a production database.
Disable all production safety mechanisms.
Drop production tables or columns.
Remove IP restrictions or private-only posture.
Store or expose secrets in logs, issues, PRs, Slack, or reports.
Auto-merge code generated from database telemetry.
Auto-apply DDL generated by an LLM.
Approval requirements
A valid approval must include:
Change ID.
Target organization/database/branch.
Whether production is affected.
Permission to execute the exact action.
Invalid approvals:
“Do the best practices.”
“Fix everything.”
“Apply recommendations.”
“Go ahead” without named change IDs.
Autonomous execution exception
There is exactly one alternative to per-change approval: the risk-acknowledged
autonomous mode defined in ../planetscale-autonomous-execution-mode/SKILL.md. When the
operator explicitly acknowledges the risk, names a scope, and states whether
production is included, that acknowledgment substitutes for per-change approval
of Class B/C (and Class D when production is included) actions within the
named scope only.
Everything else in this skill still applies in autonomous mode:
Class E is never unlocked by any phrasing.
The pre-execution checklist must still be produced for every Class C/D step (shown as the execution plan, not as a stop-and-wait).
The post-execution report is still required.
Out-of-scope work still requires new approval or new acknowledgment.
Required pre-execution checklist
Before any Class C or D action, produce:
Exact command, API endpoint, dashboard action, SQL, or repository diff.
Target confirmation.
Expected effect.
Availability impact.
Data risk.
Security risk.
Rollback plan.
Validation plan.
Monitoring plan.
Then stop for approval.
Required post-execution report
If an approved change is later executed, report:
What changed.
When it changed.
Who approved.
Interface used.
Evidence of success.
Any warnings.
Rollback state.
Follow-up monitoring.
Required refusal behavior
If asked to apply broad or ambiguous production changes, refuse the broad action and produce a safer named change plan.
Use this sentence:
“I will not apply broad production changes from an ambiguous instruction. I can produce a named change set with risk and rollback details.”
Files
- ATTRIBUTION.mdAdded by AutoGineer920 B
- LICENSELicence file added by AutoGineer1.0 KiB
- SKILL.md5.2 KiB
Requirements and compatibility
Works with: Claude Code, Claude apps, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Kiro, OpenCode, Goose, Amp, Roo Code, JetBrains Junie, Factory Droid, Devin (ex-Windsurf), Mistral Vibe, OpenHands, Letta
“Works with” means the tool reads the open Agent Skills format; a skill written for one tool may use features others lack.
Security
No issues found by our static scan· No issues found
A static scan is not a guarantee. Skills are third-party content: review a skill before you let an agent use it.
Attribution and licence
- Published by
- PlanetScale
- Publisher
- PlanetScale (Official)
- Source
- planetscale/skills · planetscale-change-gates-and-approval-contract · commit 999045c
- Licence
- MIT License (redistribution allowed)
- LICENSE (added by AutoGineer from LICENSE)
- ATTRIBUTION.md (written by AutoGineer)
- Synced
AutoGineer is not affiliated with or endorsed by PlanetScale or PlanetScale.
Download ZIP
The ZIP holds the skill’s files, its licence files and an ATTRIBUTION.md. Download planetscale-change-gates-and-approval-contract.zip